Posted: 4/22/2008 10:52:47 PM EDT
|
I am considering a snubnose .357 or .38 as a backup carry on my ankle. I am new to revolvers and am sure this has been asked 100 times, but I was wondering if I should go with a concealed hammer or not. What is the difference and benefits of a concealed hammer? |
| The concealed hammer prevents lint, etc. from entering the action plus gives a smooth, non-snag outline for concealed carry...especially in pockets or such. It also allows a slightly higher hold on the revolver which means less muzzle 'flip'. Some guys prefer the S&W M638 with the 'shrouded' hammer that leaves the tip of the hammer exposed, but I am not one of them, preferring instead the M642. |
|
On a concealed revolver, the single action feature is something you're very unlikely to ever need in a real "situation". Since SA isn't needed, the hammer spur serves no purpose, and can get you killed if it hangs up in your clothing. Revolver hammer spurs seem to have been almost deliberately designed to catch clothing with their "fish hook" like shape. Over the years, a lot of smart people have discovered that a smooth "hammerless" revolver is the perfect CCW revolver. |
|
Allright, sounds like concealed hammer/hammerless it is. Any recomendations? I was looking at the Taurus 650 www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/manufacturers_id/85/products_id/31868 |
|
Taurus makes some ok stuff, but what you should really look at first is the SW 642-2 airweight. I carry one in my front pocket everywhere I go. Action is good enough for me right outta the box, and it's accurate for a little gun. Handles +p ammo just fine. No rust or corrosion after about a year in a sweaty pocket. B789, if you are anywhere near SW WA, I'd be happy to let you try out my 642-2 before you make up your mind. |