Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
5/9/2005 7:09:09 AM EDT
I'm in the market to get my first Kimber and need advice regarding the pros and cons of Kimbers two extractor versions. I'm leaning towards a TLE/RL II with the external but am also interested in either the Warrior with internal or the Custom Tactical with external. Since I have no track record myself with Kimber all I can relate to is from my past experiences with Springfield Armory and AMT 1911's both with external extractors (never had any problems with either). The AMT was stock and the Springfield I built myself.

Is there any production problems in Kimbers history? I seen some threads that mentioned extractor problems. Is this a current or ongoing problem or were these isolated occurances? Thanks in advance for the input.

RC
5/9/2005 7:30:51 AM EDT
[#1]
Hot diggity!

I was getting ready to ask the same question, and was looking at the exact same 2 guns (Warrior and TLE/RL II).

I heard it's better to go for the internal extractor (such as on the warrior), and that some .gov LE agency just placed a big special order for 1911's based on the original government specifications, including the internal extractor (read it in some gun rag, but can't remember which rag, which .gov, and who they ordered the pistols from .... I'll look it up and add it here).

BUT ..... I've also heard a lot of people *pshaw* at the external extractor problems, saying they've never had such a problem.

I would also like to know what others have to say in answer to StingerHP.

Thanks, Sting, for asking the question for me!
5/9/2005 7:35:56 AM EDT
[#2]
I have (4) Kimbers - including a TLE RL II



(2) of my Kimbers have the external extractor

(2) of my Kimbers have the internal

ALL of them work fine.


(3) of my Kimbers are Series II

(1) of my Kimbers is a Series I


ALL of them work fine.

(2) of my Kimbers have aluminum frames

(2) of my Kimbers have steel frames

ALL of them work fine.



5/9/2005 11:52:15 AM EDT
[#3]
Sorry to say I personaly have seen enough of the external extractors having problems that I would not own one untill Kimber gets it's act together on it's MIM extractor Quality control.

I've shot three new Eclipse's that all had fail to extract problems. The Warrior I shot last week ran flawlessly, My Custom II with internal extractor has also gone well over 3000 rounds flawlessly.

My Custom II with internal extractor gets carried every day
5/9/2005 5:49:07 PM EDT
[#4]
There is nothing wrong with the external extractors at all. If anything they are better. Everyone may have an opinion,  I have yet to see a problem.
5/9/2005 5:59:54 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
My Custom II with internal extractor gets carried every day




+1 on that.  



I also have a Custom II with an external extractor and have yet to have any problems with it.
5/9/2005 6:33:33 PM EDT
[#6]
I've got an Eclipse Ultra II with external extractor problems. When I first got the gun I was having about 5 or 6 failure to extracts out of 100 rounds. Kimber sent me their latest version of the extractor and I installed it and haven't had any extraction problems since. I'm having now is problems with feeding because the rim of the cartridge is getting jammed into the bottom of the new extractor as it's entering the chamber. The gun is heading back to Kimber tomorrow.

Oh by the way, the gun is pretty accurate and I hope Kimber gets it straightened out.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/thesilveradokid/Picture014b.jpg
5/9/2005 6:33:35 PM EDT
[#7]
Thanks to those that have responded so far. There seems to be a general consensus that there is no problems either way except  for one respondent.

If there are problems I would like to hear about specific's (documented) or first hand experience with such issues.

I've become a Kimber owner today.  I purchased a "Warrior" over the TLE/RL II because the dealer only had the TLE/RL II in SS and I would have preferred the matte finish. It had nothing to do with the extractor either. In fact if I enjoy this pistol as much as you all do yours I'm sure I'll be adding another one and most likely will be the TLE unless Kimber comes up with something else new. Looking forward to going to the range and breaking it in.

RC

NOTE:I WAS TYPING THIS THREAD AS THE ABOVE THREAD WAS BEING ADDED ON, THAT'S THE KIND OF INFO I'M LOOKING FOR AND WHAT KIND OF ACTION WAS TAKEN TO CORRECT IT. THANKS
5/10/2005 1:49:27 PM EDT
[#8]
congrates on the Warrior, you've made many here jealous............. Including me
5/10/2005 3:00:53 PM EDT
[#9]
Congrats!

I have Custom II w/ internal extractor and have had no problems.

+1 jealous on the Warrior
5/10/2005 3:33:58 PM EDT
[#10]
Thanks for the cudos all! . . . Heading to the Range tomorrow planning on putting around 200 rds through it maybe more if my girlfriend gets ahold of it . Range report to follow.

RC
5/11/2005 6:00:40 AM EDT
[#11]
Let me know how you like it. I will be ordering a few more Warriors and TLE/RL II  in matte next week.
And thanks for your business !
5/11/2005 3:29:58 PM EDT
[#12]
I would recommend a full size 1911. I think you'll find less problems overall with full size 1911's.
My Tactical Custom II has a external extractor and has never failed me yet.
5/12/2005 10:13:05 AM EDT
[#13]
I second the recommendation for a full size (5" barrel) 1911.  Or at the very least, no less than a 4" barrel.  They just seem to run better overall, as that's the barrel length the entire 1911 system was originally designed around.  From what I've seen, it's almost always the shorter ("Ultra" style 3" barrels) 1911 models having hiccups.  

For what it's worth, I have a new Kimber TLE RL II that I've put 300 rounds through.  NO failures to feed or extract.  Only issues have been slide lock failure (on last round) with the Kimber magazine.  Wilson mags and the Kimber mags with Wilson springs and followers work fine.  Other issue was the rear sight coming lose after the first 150 rounds.  Couldn't figure out why I my shots started drifting over so far all of a sudden...  Some Locktite took care of that.
5/16/2005 6:55:35 PM EDT
[#14]
fight4yourrights
Nice collection!
5/23/2005 8:37:51 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

fight4yourrights
Nice collection!



Thanks!  


I awaiting a Warrior now.
5/26/2005 3:43:25 PM EDT
[#16]
I have over 500 trouble free rounds thru my TLE/RL with external extractor.  I think the short guns have more problems than the full-size.  Insert gratuitous TLE/RL pic here

6/8/2005 12:25:54 AM EDT
[#17]
I have a PRO CDP I which I bought used , No problems whatsoever after 400 rnds. (internal ext)

JLS7

6/8/2005 3:59:17 PM EDT
[#18]
I got my Kimber Eclipse Ultra II external extractor back from Kimber a week or so ago. They replaced the barrel and adjusted the slide release. I've shot about 300 rounds through it with only one jam and I believe I might not of had the magazine in all the way. Anyway it wasn't a failure to extract or a failure to feed.  I need to get to Walmart and get a couple of boxes of Winchester white box ammo and run a couple 100 more through the gun. Unfortunately I don't think the new barrel is as accurate as the original barrel.
7/5/2005 7:03:41 PM EDT
[#19]
This was an informative thread.

In my opinion, the manufacturers need to step up and start using quality spring steel again.  That would solve the extractor "problems."
7/11/2005 4:13:35 PM EDT
[#20]
I always wondered why Kimber's external extractors are so short as opposed to every one elses. Why does everyone else choose to keep their external extractors so exposed while Kimber's look short? Are there any technical differences worth noting, or am I just nit picking?
7/11/2005 4:34:02 PM EDT
[#21]
I have not had a single problem with either of my kimbers I have a Tac Pro II and a CDP II both are 4 inch barrels and both have external extractors and both function flawlessy with about 1000 through one and about 500 through the other.
7/13/2005 1:29:08 PM EDT
[#22]
I have not had an fte with my stainless tle II in over 3000 rounds. Has never choked in an IDPA match (anywhere from 8 to 16 round scenarios fired quickly)...several "glock geeks" are unfortunately unable to say the same.  

I did have a FTC but it was traced down to a faulty magazine.
7/13/2005 6:07:54 PM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:
I always wondered why Kimber's external extractors are so short as opposed to every one elses. Why does everyone else choose to keep their external extractors so exposed while Kimber's look short? Are there any technical differences worth noting, or am I just nit picking?



Kimber deceided to use a coil [extractor] spring that runs parralell with slide and pushes against a plunger which cams against the extractor. A rather complex design that coupled with poor MIM quality control parts has caused Kimber a lot of grief IMHO.



7/14/2005 6:28:41 AM EDT
[#24]
+ 1 for the internal extractors, I have three Kimbers and they all have run flawlessly-I will be picking up another internal extracted Kimber today.

I agree with the earlier post regarding producing internal extractors out of  higher quality spring steel-but if you know how to operate and load a 1911 with an internal extractor you should never have any problems with the pistol as long as you do normal PMCS