Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/23/2007 7:16:22 PM EDT
I am ready to get a Beretta 9mm and would like to know of any differences between the M9 & the 92FS.haveOne dealer told me the 92FS has plastic internal fire control parts the the M9 has metal parts. He also said the M9 has looser tolerances?  

I did notice the 92FS has 3 dot sights and the M9 has a straight 8 sight picture.
Which sights do you all like better?

I have shot the 92 in the past and loved how it pointed and shot for me.I would appreciate any comments or input.
10/23/2007 7:18:32 PM EDT
[#1]
They are for the most part identical firearms with the exception of the roll marks.
92f will likely have 3 dot sights
M9 will have dot and post  see the picture in the thread I linked to
there are some other minor differences in the grip cuts on the M9A1 backstrap but I do not think the M9 and 92F are any different there.
Both have "plastic" parts the guide rod in particular.
the trigger is metal coated with a plastic like material.
Depending on the age of the 92F the dust covers are different one will have a flat dust cover one will have a slanted dust cover.

the 92F will have a paragraph of warning labels engraved on the side the M9 will not.

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=15&t=47990

you should type the following into Google it will show you a lot of post on this board as well as other gun boards   "m9 92f differences" <<-----google it
10/23/2007 8:01:09 PM EDT
[#2]
I am new to Beretta pistols. I did buy a M-9 last week. The warning card that came with my M-9 referred to the pistol as being a "replica". So I called Beretta about this. The customer service rep was very friendly. He answered all my questions.

He said the M-9 and 92F were the same pistol with the exceptions already mentioned above. He said parts between the two would interchange.

As for being a replica, he said the difference between the commercial M-9 and the military M-9 are the roll marks. He added the reason for this is that it would allow law enforcement officials to determine whether or not a M-9 used in a crime was stolen from the military.

I hope this helps. Perhaps, you might consider calling Beretta. I am sure they will answer your questions.