Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/18/2008 7:36:18 AM EDT
ATK's Wound Ballistics Workshops has new testing results on their website. First new HST comparison tests released since the San Diego/Portland/Piece County Police Dept tests from 2002/2003.


7 new test documents from several Police Depts.


www.le.atk.com/general/irl/woundballistics.aspx

2/18/2008 11:59:42 AM EDT
[#1]
Nice.  I love my HST's
2/18/2008 12:30:02 PM EDT
[#2]
Thanks for those links, I've been considering making the switch to HSTs and the information is very helpful.

Thanks again!
2/18/2008 12:38:10 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Nice.  I love my HST's


me too!
2/18/2008 3:42:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Damn thats some good shit!





Quoted:
ATK's Wound Ballistics Workshops has new testing results on their website. First new HST comparison tests released since the San Diego/Portland/Piece County Police Dept tests from 2002/2003.


7 new test documents from several Police Depts.


www.le.atk.com/general/irl/woundballistics.aspx

2/18/2008 3:52:30 PM EDT
[#5]
Thanks for finding that. I'll add it to the FAQ in the next couple of days.
2/18/2008 4:02:39 PM EDT
[#6]
Looking at the last test, from LA, and the data shooting through auto glass, the ONLY 9mm that comes close to the penetration performance I'd want is the Winchester. On the other hand, both 230 gr .45 loads are OK. All fall short of the 12" of penetration, but for this difficult case I think I'd be willing to accept 10" of penetration.

The Santa Clara data was similar.

As a side note, I don't care so much about weight retention as I do penetration. 100% weight retention with 7" of penetration isn't what I want . . . .

Currently I use .45 HSTs, and that seems to be a good choice, but I'm not sure 9mm HSTs are the ticket. At least not for LEO use. Home defense or CCW may not have the same probability of shooting through windshield glass . . .
2/18/2008 4:11:04 PM EDT
[#7]
.