Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/7/2008 4:23:36 PM EDT
Looking to buy 2 pistols. Pretty flexible on possibilities. (Don't hate on all the Taurus, unless you can suggest a better deal for a new gun)

Browning Buckmark & Taurus PT-92 (.22 & 9mm)

Taurus PT-92 & PT-1911 (9mm & .45)

Taurus PT-92 & Raging Bull .44 (9mm & 44 Mag)

Looking to buy pair for deal making, and jump start collection.
Already waiting to transfer up to me from late Grandpa are a Mark II and a .38 Speed Six.
10/7/2008 4:54:58 PM EDT
[#1]
my overall opinion: dump/skip the tauruses, opt for something else...there ARE other, better brands out there that offer comparble products w/ superior quality and CS imo

i would opt for the Browning Buckmark and a used Beretta 92 (about the same price as a PT92, but the original and better quality, mags, etc)

if you want a wheelgun, i'd look to a Ruger before any taurus...YMMV
10/7/2008 4:57:38 PM EDT
[#2]
get a beretta 92 from summitgunbroker for $369 instead of the taurus
10/7/2008 5:12:26 PM EDT
[#3]
Hmm, got me looking at the Super Redhawk. I thought they where much more expensive.

http://www.impactguns.com/store/736676055029.html

Even so, still unsure on Beretta VS Taurus. May even think of M&P or XD, want a long sight radius though.
10/7/2008 5:13:55 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

i would opt for the Browning Buckmark and a used Beretta 92 (about the same price as a PT92, but the original and better quality, mags, etc)





+1

The Beretta will be head & shoulders above the Taurus. There's lots of police trade-ins out there that can be affordable.
10/7/2008 5:18:01 PM EDT
[#5]
No Taurus bashing here, I owned a PT 1911 for over  2 years and it was a great entry level 1911 for me. If you're getting a MKII, don't spend money on a Buckmark too. That's an "either/or" situation, and both are good pistols. I know nothing about the PT 92, so no uninformed opinion will be offered, but S&W M&P's in 9 mm have treated me well. Getting ready to buy 2 guns is great fun, enjoy yourself.
10/7/2008 5:25:14 PM EDT
[#6]
So, would anyone disagree with these?

Ruger Super Redhawk .44 Mag (Not sure 7.5" or 9.5")

Springfield XD-9 Tactical 5"


10/7/2008 5:37:29 PM EDT
[#7]
Of the OP's selections, I'd go with the third one.
10/7/2008 6:04:18 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
So, would anyone disagree with these?

Ruger Super Redhawk .44 Mag (Not sure 7.5" or 9.5")

Springfield XD-9 Tactical 5"

ruger.com/Firearms/images/Products/169L.jpg
www.impactguns.com/store/media/springfield/spr_xd_5_black.jpg




Sounds good to me....
10/7/2008 6:29:38 PM EDT
[#9]
why such a long barrel???
10/7/2008 6:43:54 PM EDT
[#10]
Ruger in 9mm or .45acp your pick on model and Ruger MKII/III in .22lr.  Done.
10/7/2008 6:58:40 PM EDT
[#11]
I had a PT92. It jammed.

I sent back more Taurus products than any other brand when I worked at a major gunstore.

Used police trade in would be a good idea. And a .22.
10/7/2008 7:08:59 PM EDT
[#12]
The XD-9 is a quality item.  

Have you considered Ruger's Redhawk?  They tend to go for a bit less than the SRH.

10/7/2008 8:07:20 PM EDT
[#13]
Buckmark or Ruger MKIII and Ruger P95 or Sig P6.  I'm biased because this is basically what it came down to for me and I went Ruger/Sig.
10/7/2008 8:45:20 PM EDT
[#14]
CZ 75 with a kadet kit. You'd have 9mm and 22 on the same frame for familiarity.
10/8/2008 4:39:00 AM EDT
[#15]
I'd rather go Super Redhawk if I went Ruger, grip looks much more comfortable and controllable.
Although I am still tempted by good reviews to go Raging Bull / XD9.
10/8/2008 7:00:28 AM EDT
[#16]
go with the XD9/XD45  I prefer the 4" for all around use but my XD40 5" gives a bit more accuracy off the bench.


save your money and get a nice 629 6" for your revolver.

jmo