Posted: 3/11/2007 8:21:54 AM EDT
|
I just picked up a Ruger P95 for $200. It came with the neutered 10 rd mags but was in the box and looks like it's had less than a box of shells fired through it. I've never owned a P95 before but have had two P89s (which I liked but traded off). I still have some of the P89 15 rd mags and they fit well in the P95. It's been a while since I've dealt with Ruger semiautos and it may be a week or so before I shoot it. Is the P95 as good, better, or worse than the P89s? Thanks! |
|
FWIW, my P95 has had roughly 5,000 + rounds through it without a hiccup. It is more reliable than my P89 is. I like the P95 for a boat gun and range plinker, but not much else because it is too clunky (thick with sharp edges here and there) and bulky. But for $200, you got yourself a reliable 9mm anyway! For the money, they are good guns. |
That was 10 yards off hand. This was 13 yards off hand:  And this you can see the info on the target:  Rugers are damm fine weapons! As accurate as any and reliable! I posted these in another thread because BobCole would not stop saying Rugers were inaccurate junk. I challenged him(and others did too) to produce better groups at those ranges with his "better" handguns. He never did. |
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.