Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/13/2011 8:12:37 AM EDT
Ok all you HiPower owners, what type of hammer do you prefer on the Hipower?  Do you like the spur?  Or the various commander loop style?  
12/13/2011 2:15:41 PM EDT
[#1]
I voted round. But a good no bite spur hammer modification is just as good for my hands at least. Round looks more business like also. I have many of both and prefer round......
12/13/2011 2:49:53 PM EDT
[#2]
I like the Commander look myself. I am having a no-bite C&S hammer and sear installed at this time.

Craig
12/13/2011 3:27:14 PM EDT
[#3]
Round hammer doesn't jab my spare tire when carried IWB.
12/14/2011 5:52:06 PM EDT
[#4]
Practically speaking (no pun intended ), the round hammer is easier to secure when you're putting sear pin back in.  I like the look of the round as well.
12/15/2011 4:44:23 AM EDT
[#5]
Either one works fine for me, but I prefer the round hammer for aesthetic reasons.
12/15/2011 5:08:12 AM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Either one works fine for me, but I prefer the round hammer for aesthetic reasons.


+1 The loop hammer just says "Hi-Power!"
12/15/2011 5:14:49 PM EDT
[#7]
Commander.
12/15/2011 5:57:45 PM EDT
[#8]
To call the round hammer on a Hi Power a "Commander" hammer is an affront to the memory of John Browning and Deuidonne Saive. Call it round, rowel, lanyard or ring.............but it AIN'T a Commander.

If anything, the round hammer on a Colt Commander should be called a Hi Power hammer (since the HP and dozens of other handguns had similiar hammers decades before Colt figured out it was stylish)


End of rant
12/19/2011 12:32:05 PM EDT
[#9]
I prefer the look and feel of the loop hammer over the spur. I had a stainless loop hammer installed on the first BHP that I got back in 1978 (a 74C Which I foolishly sold) and it took a little bit of fitting to get it to work correctly.

I just installed one on my 73C that I now have and it dropped right in with no fitting at all. Here are some pics of my 73C:

Before:



After:

12/19/2011 3:35:02 PM EDT
[#10]

High Powers just do not look right to me with a spur hammer.





12/19/2011 7:13:43 PM EDT
[#11]
I much prefer the spur, as it does not bite me under recoil––-plus, it kinda sets the gun apart, because rounded hammers are on EVERYTHING these days.





12/24/2011 12:23:30 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
I much prefer the spur, as it does not bite me under recoil––-plus, it kinda sets the gun apart, because rounded hammers are on EVERYTHING these days.

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg213/scaled.php?server=213&filename=img4719w.jpg&res=medium


This right here.
12/25/2011 3:45:33 PM EDT
[#13]
I think the spur follows the lines of the gun better.  I don't care for the round hammer.
12/26/2011 6:12:58 PM EDT
[#14]
I have 3 spur and 1 Commander ring.

12/27/2011 7:12:56 PM EDT
[#15]
It's an incomplete poll.

I prefer the SFS system, which is sort of a spur, but a very bobbed spur.

It solves the mushy safety issue as well as the hammer bite issue and is very low snag when carrying cocked and locked.
1/4/2012 9:38:33 AM EDT
[#16]
All my 5 HB´s had the round, Commander, Hammer.

I exchanged it on # 5 ( a practical, in two tone finish, with cast frame ), my "carry" HP, with the spur one.

Ill ´never look back - no bite, no problems, and it is SO much easier to cock or decock ...

Hermann
1/4/2012 11:13:08 AM EDT
[#17]
HP's don't bite me but I like round better.
1/8/2012 12:17:50 PM EDT
[#18]
Spur. Nothing else comes close.