Posted: 4/16/2017 5:19:45 PM EDT
|
Are there issues with the quality of current production RMR sights? I read about alleged issues in archived threads that RMRs vary in quality after some production changes. If there are issues, are they isolated to specific models? Are any models gtg?
ETA: I am thinking about getting a dual-illuminated with an amber dot. |
|
I can't comment on the dual illuminated models, but I bought an RM07 (adjustable 6.5 MOA model) in January and it just got back from Trijicon after dying within 1000 rounds on a glock 19. It doesn't seem like my experience is anywhere near common but I have a sample size of one.
In Trijicons defense, they did fix it without any fuss in about 3 weeks time. The issue I was having was that after a shot, the dot would slowly fade out to nothing over about 2 seconds. Racking the slide or firing another shot would usually bring the dot back. It started doing this after about 750 rounds, and by ~850-900 it was completely gone. Right now I'm operating under the assumption that my experience was a fluke, I've put about 500 rounds through it since I got the RMR back without a hitch. YMMV. |
|
Quoted:
I can't comment on the dual illuminated models, but I bought an RM07 (adjustable 6.5 MOA model) in January and it just got back from Trijicon after dying within 1000 rounds on a glock 19. It doesn't seem like my experience is anywhere near common but I have a sample size of one. |
|
Quoted:
Not exactly, this is a common problem and many have had it happen to them. |
|
Quoted:
... ETA: I am thinking about getting a dual-illuminated with an amber dot. That will literally wash out on everything. Their DI Green is ok and ADJ red also ok, amber is crap. A friend has an RMR08G that has been trouble free, but it is a huge 12.9moa. I have an RMR06 that they had to warranty replace with a new unit. 10mm G40 MOS was too much for it, kept adjusting hi/left with every shot till it walked off target at 10yds. They installed new adj torque thingies, same problem. Replaced it with new, now GTG |
|
This is unrelated to QC, but noteworthy nonetheless. I was super excited to get a new RM09 to run on a carbine. I liked it a lot until I actually started using it and realized that every bit of sand / water / whatever that touches the thing collects in the back where the emitter is and either distorts or completely blocks the dot. That, and the curvature of the lens means that crap likes to collect on the inside and so I was constantly blowing it out and fingering the debris out of the inside, which eventually started to scratch the lens and left smudges constantly that began to progressively obscure the view.
IMO, I wouldn't run one on an EDC handgun (knowing how much dust/lint/etc my IWB collects in short time) or a carbine that will ever leave the house and have any chance of contacting the elements. The overall shape and exposed emitter makes it highly susceptible to crap getting in the way of your dot and/or the actual sight picture. |
|
Quoted:
I always take internet searches on this kind of thing with a grain of salt as you can get a bit of a skewed perspective, as the vast majority of people who have no issues never say anything at all. Even though they tout the ruggedness of the RMRs, from what I have been told if you really put a lot of rounds through them its not a matter of "if" it will crap out on you, but "when." IMO they just aren't capable of withstanding the repeated abuse of the slide cycling during fire. |