Posted: 11/24/2015 10:38:55 PM EDT
| Hey HK boys, need your help. I'm looking at getting my first HK, narrowed it down to full size USP. Does the USP9 feel noticeably slimmer than USP40? I'm thinking about doing away with 45, like the slimmer 9/40 size guns. In the Glock lineup, the 9/40 models are identical, size wise. Don't mind going 40, have an old S&W 411, gearing up to start loading for 40sw this winter. Any help would be great. I'm Glocked out! I LOVE them, but love my Sig too! Trying to add some flavor to my pistol collection. Thanks Fellas' |
|
I shoot the 9 for practice ammo prices. The difference becomes important if you are shooting a lot.
The ballistic gap between 9 and 40 is almost entirely gone based on bullet quality, so higher capacity, and reduced costs to train are both drivers to me. -shooter |
|
Quoted:
What are you talking about? 
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p64/huanab/Firearms/20150808_095418_zpsczc6pmxi.jpg Quoted:
Quoted:
IIRC, they only made a Tactical in a 40 and 45. I would aim for one of those if possible. If not, I like them all. Outside of the tac, I like the LEM trigger. What are you talking about?
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p64/huanab/Firearms/20150808_095418_zpsczc6pmxi.jpg It's this a recent change? Very nice! |
|
Quoted:
It's this a recent change? Very nice! Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
IIRC, they only made a Tactical in a 40 and 45. I would aim for one of those if possible. If not, I like them all. Outside of the tac, I like the LEM trigger. What are you talking about?
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p64/huanab/Firearms/20150808_095418_zpsczc6pmxi.jpg It's this a recent change? Very nice! Yes sir. I just got mine this summer. The older ones were just a standard usp 9 with a threaded barrel sold as USP9SD and everyone just markets it as the usp9 tactical. These new ones actually have the match trigger, oring barrel and adjustable sights like the standard tactical 40/45. |