Posted: 8/19/2008 9:16:40 AM EDT
|
Does any one here have any of these new wilson mags? What are your impressions of them? Anyone besides me thinking of picking some up? I have been using CMC power mags, but have been thinking of giving these a try. All I know about them is that it seems the Wilson Combat marketing department has been working overtime. I have seen their ads all over the place. They make them sound like the coolest thing since sliced bread. |
I don't know about "so different" but most "experts" (I do not claim to be one!) feel that the compromises made to put eight rounds in a mag designed to hold seven tend to lessen reliability. YMMV One opinion:
D&L Sports |
|
I've got a dozen 47Ds but I got a couple of the new Wilson mags when they came out to try. I think they're great but I don't see any pressing need to replace all my old Wilson mags. I think as long as I keep the old 47Ds clean and track when I replace the springs I think I'm fine with staying with them. If I was starting from scratch I'd definitely buy the new ETM mags but I'm fine with my old Wilsons. |
|
The new ETM mag bodies are a little longer. The entire mag is about the same length as a 47D, but the 47D has the fat base plate. The new ETM mags have a base plate, but they are not as fat at the bottom. I myself dont have any of them but no one I have sold one to has had any issues. Probably sold about 40 or 50 mags since they've come out. |
I'm one of those folks. Bought 5 of them before the Magpul Advanced Carbine Course. They passed the test with flying colors. They load well, function well, and stood up to all the being dropped on the ground and tossed around that the course entailed. I'm happy with them. |