Come on SC. Please not another Graham.... (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 8/12/2026 7:31:54 AM EDT
| Wife's from SC so I have standing. Please don't put this chick in the senate! |
|
She did better than I expected. Will be interesting if Fry endorses. If he goes with Graham, it's probably over. If he goes with Norman, should be close. I think Sanford sits it out from here. The others don't move the needle that much. It seems like the machine is all in for Graham. Which is reason enough to vote for Norman, flawed as he is. |
|
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: God this state is full of morons.  Born and raised here, family's been here since the 1600s and just the amount of change in my lifetime is staggering. Seeing more signs around for that anti-gun, pro-trans kids moonbat woman who claims to be from Charleston too.  Charleston has been bent for some time now. Looks like it’s our turn to be lead around by the big cities. In our case looks like Lexington and Charleston. Attached File |
Imagine how brain washed people have to be to cast aside all manner of critical thought, rationality, reason and most of all, self preservation for the cause…. JP
|
Originally Posted By OneMoreAR: I voted for Fry in the primaries. Looks like I'll be voting for Norman next week. But we'll probably end n up with another Graham.  Edited to add. Just got my first attack ad postcard against Norman in today's mail. I got several anti -Fry attack ads before I voted for Fry in Lexington County. All these Graham opponent attack PACs come out of nowhere. That in itself should be fishy. Norman is our last hope to break the Graham Dynasty. |
|
Originally Posted By MarkBinSC: I can’t figure out why there is so much money flowing into the Graham campaign, as opposed to letting the primary play out and then spending the money against the Democrat. Who are these organizations and what is their agenda? The same one's (Out of State) that propped up Big Brother. This is among the cheapest Senate seats to buy. Texas total Senate spend will exceed $10B. The TX vote counts the same as the SC vote when the bills are voted on. And most of the money being spent now is outside PACs shitting on Norman ("He didn't pay back his Covid loan." Nobody did - that's the way they were structured!) Her answer in the debate about not knowing shit about Taiwan or China, but just focusing on domestic issues - fucking disqualifying. Lindsay's PACs spent more $$$ shitting on Lynch that these 2 will spend combined on this race. |
|
I've got a really bad feeling about this election, as much as I loathe the idea of that idiot Graham getting in (and she looked really, really stupid in that last appearance) at least she's not running on a platform of gun control- that's the only thing that moonbat dem has said. As has been the norm probably since I've been voting, it'll be voting against someone, not voting for anyone. If it comes to it I'll vote for Graham, I'll hate myself for it, but the alternative is an unknown idiot or an unknown idiot whose sole platform revolves around violating our rights. Looking online, the moonbat is originally from KY, grew up in Indianapolis, went to school in Ohio, which would explain a lot, then went to med school here and unfortunately didn't leave. 
|
|
No question about the general election neither of these people are anywhere close to how bad Dr. Trans kids could be Ill vote for Norman and then whomever wins from that...the problem with this state and other republican states is that we have like 8 candidates in the primary instead of one or two strong candidates...its always that way and thats weak |
|
Originally Posted By mc556: I swear when he died I didn’t see this BS coming. With Trump endorsing her she’s most likely going to win. Please dear lord not another Graham We spent years suffering through Lindsey Graham's "reaching across the aisle" BS. Now SC wants to put his sister in there. She has no qualifications whatsoever other than Trump endorsed her and her (newly adopted) last name. If she had run as Darline Nordone, there is no way she would be in this run-off election. She has already established she is a liar. I suspect she will not hesitate to sell out gun owners when the time comes. |
Our idea of a rough TDY was if the hotel did not have a swimming pool.
|
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: I've got a really bad feeling about this election, as much as I loathe the idea of that idiot Graham getting in (and she looked really, really stupid in that last appearance) at least she's not running on a platform of gun control- that's the only thing that moonbat dem has said. As has been the norm probably since I've been voting, it'll be voting against someone, not voting for anyone. If it comes to it I'll vote for Graham, I'll hate myself for it, but the alternative is an unknown idiot or an unknown idiot whose sole platform revolves around violating our rights. Looking online, the moonbat is originally from KY, grew up in Indianapolis, went to school in Ohio, which would explain a lot, then went to med school here and unfortunately didn't leave. |
|
Originally Posted By UrbancommandoX: Conflicted on what to do tomorrow. Vote for grahm because she has a better chance of beating trans gun control. Or vote norman. See how that pans out. Then hope the winner can beat trans gun control. Based on her debate performance, I would not necessarily say Graham has a better shot at winning than Norman. |
Our idea of a rough TDY was if the hotel did not have a swimming pool.
this by far in my 10 years as a SC resident has been the Most times I have ever voted in one year. every ad on tv I saw or those wasteful ones that show up daily in the mail, always show Darline with either Lindsey or Donald... she has nothing else to run on. I voted this morning... 
|
| The thing about South Carolina is most people’s hearts are in the right place, but way to many are as dumb as a box of rocks. She gets a win just because of an endorsement. I bet 75% didn’t watch her talk even once |
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."
|
mc556 2005 12087 100% (79) USA SC, USA Today 9:25:13 PM EDT [#36] The thing about South Carolina is most people’s hearts are in the right place, but way to many are as dumb as a box of rocks. She gets a win just because of an endorsement. I bet 75% didn’t watch her talk even once This |
|
Originally Posted By mc556: The thing about South Carolina is most people’s hearts are in the right place, but way to many are as dumb as a box of rocks. She gets a win just because of an endorsement. I bet 75% didn’t watch her talk even once I am not a TDS guy, but he screwed SC on this deal. Graham is in over her head. Plus she seems to have no problem lying when convenient. I think we are welcoming in a Trojan horse. I sincerely hope I am wrong.
|
Our idea of a rough TDY was if the hotel did not have a swimming pool.
|
Originally Posted By Slufstuff: I am not a TDS guy, but he screwed SC on this deal. Graham is in over her head. Plus she seems to have no problem lying when convenient. I think we are welcoming in a Trojan horse. I sincerely hope I am wrong. Originally Posted By Slufstuff: Originally Posted By mc556: The thing about South Carolina is most people’s hearts are in the right place, but way to many are as dumb as a box of rocks. She gets a win just because of an endorsement. I bet 75% didn’t watch her talk even once I am not a TDS guy, but he screwed SC on this deal. Graham is in over her head. Plus she seems to have no problem lying when convenient. I think we are welcoming in a Trojan horse. I sincerely hope I am wrong. She is there to serve as Trumps yes girl then her reward is whatever when he’s gone. She snuck in with name recognition and quick timing. We are stuck with her for now and whatever damages she causes. What a shit show |
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."
|
Originally Posted By staringback05: Did my part for Norman, but they both sucked....neither were strong candidates Gotta beat Andrew's now They rarely are but she’s it’s completely unqualified in every way and doesn’t share values, no matter how she delegates. You can tell she’s not conservative and even worse emotionally driven I guarantee she would probably vote Democrat. Her entire life had not been related to Lindsay. |
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."
|
So far this year every single person I've voted for has lost. We have the worst options for senator, representative, and governor I can remember since I was old enough to vote. I hate every single person the Republicans have put on the ballot for my area. This is repugnant. |
|
Originally Posted By 57plymouth: So far this year every single person I've voted for has lost. We have the worst options for senator, representative, and governor I can remember since I was old enough to vote. I hate every single person the Republicans have put on the ballot for my area. This is repugnant. We could be friends and commiserate. Overall it's been a bad year for SC, and US, politics so far, and it's only getting worse. Increasingly "our" politicians have shown they don't care what their constituents say, they do whatever they want. |
|
Originally Posted By 57plymouth: So far this year every single person I've voted for has lost. We have the worst options for senator, representative, and governor I can remember since I was old enough to vote. I hate every single person the Republicans have put on the ballot for my area. This is repugnant. |
|
Originally Posted By Sanlanman: Agreed, And, that's why I may not even vote in the November election. Trust me, I feel your pain. But Annie Andrews would be an absolute disaster for SC. It gripes my gut to have to vote for Graham, but I will do so. Completely a lesser of two evils scenario. How we can end up with two pathetically unqualified US senate candidates is beyond me. |
Our idea of a rough TDY was if the hotel did not have a swimming pool.