Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/29/2005 9:08:11 PM EDT
It's available here in Word format.

Defense Walk Wisconsin

If someone could save it as an Adobe Acrobat file, and maybe as HTML and email it to me that would be great.

Please distribute it far and wide.

[email protected]

Now in PDF!!
https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/andrijasevic/Defense%20Walk/Defense_Walk_Wisconsin.pdf?uniq=-wtgfef
3/30/2005 5:45:16 AM EDT
[#1]
Adrian,
Emailed to you as a PDF file. Let me know if it works.
Cheers,
Dave
3/30/2005 6:50:15 AM EDT
[#2]
Adrian,

Beautiful work.

THANK YOU!
3/30/2005 10:01:21 AM EDT
[#3]
This is very good work. A job well done. Please keep us up to date, with what is going on.

3/30/2005 5:08:26 PM EDT
[#4]
Nice work! I'm only available on sundays due to work.Gface
3/31/2005 4:23:15 PM EDT
[#5]
Emailed the html file to you and put it on my clubs web site
Lone Oak Gun Club
3/31/2005 4:52:51 PM EDT
[#6]
Got the file. Looks good, thank you.
3/31/2005 10:27:32 PM EDT
[#7]
Good news - I have gotten dozens of responses from people who want to come to the rally and carry. I have gotten responses from several people who will come in from Minnesota, and some who will come in from Illinois (so long as we help them when their time comes )

I have gotten a few positive responses back from the big WI gun groups, and am waiting to hear from the others, so the ball should get rolling with them soon. Looking good, keep spreading the good word.
4/3/2005 4:34:58 AM EDT
[#8]

Shootings Fuel a Drive to Ease Gun Laws
By KATE ZERNIKE
New York Times
April 3, 2005

Paul Bucher, the district attorney for the Wisconsin county where a man opened fire in a church service last month, killing seven people and himself, has one answer to the deadly mass shootings around the country in recent weeks: more guns.

"The problems aren't the guns, it's the guns in the wrong hands," said Mr. Bucher, a Republican who recently announced his candidacy for Wisconsin attorney general. "We need to put more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Whether having that would have changed what happened is all speculation, but it would level the playing field. If the person you're fighting has a gun and all you have is your fists, you lose."



This is from  an artical posted in GD, Bucher's comments almost make me think maybe we shoudl try and get him involved in this......
4/4/2005 5:14:22 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Shootings Fuel a Drive to Ease Gun Laws
By KATE ZERNIKE
New York Times
April 3, 2005

Paul Bucher, the district attorney for the Wisconsin county where a man opened fire in a church service last month, killing seven people and himself, has one answer to the deadly mass shootings around the country in recent weeks: more guns.

"The problems aren't the guns, it's the guns in the wrong hands," said Mr. Bucher, a Republican who recently announced his candidacy for Wisconsin attorney general. "We need to put more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Whether having that would have changed what happened is all speculation, but it would level the playing field. If the person you're fighting has a gun and all you have is your fists, you lose."



This is from  an artical posted in GD, Bucher's comments almost make me think maybe we shoudl try and get him involved in this......



Holy shiznit!  Bucher is such a press hound I thought for SURE he would be a foaming liberal on the gun issue.  I can't believe he said that on the record.....he is a very high profile guy.  WOW!
4/4/2005 5:26:33 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

Shootings Fuel a Drive to Ease Gun Laws
By KATE ZERNIKE
New York Times
April 3, 2005

Paul Bucher, the district attorney for the Wisconsin county where a man opened fire in a church service last month, killing seven people and himself, has one answer to the deadly mass shootings around the country in recent weeks: more guns.

"The problems aren't the guns, it's the guns in the wrong hands," said Mr. Bucher, a Republican who recently announced his candidacy for Wisconsin attorney general. "We need to put more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Whether having that would have changed what happened is all speculation, but it would level the playing field. If the person you're fighting has a gun and all you have is your fists, you lose."



This is from  an artical posted in GD, Bucher's comments almost make me think maybe we shoudl try and get him involved in this......




He couldn't participate, it would be way too politically risky for him.  However, I would say Waukesha County would be a great place for a defense walk!
4/4/2005 5:27:04 PM EDT
[#11]
Oh yeah.....I'm IN!
4/5/2005 4:08:48 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Shootings Fuel a Drive to Ease Gun Laws
By KATE ZERNIKE
New York Times
April 3, 2005

Paul Bucher, the district attorney for the Wisconsin county where a man opened fire in a church service last month, killing seven people and himself, has one answer to the deadly mass shootings around the country in recent weeks: more guns.

"The problems aren't the guns, it's the guns in the wrong hands," said Mr. Bucher, a Republican who recently announced his candidacy for Wisconsin attorney general. "We need to put more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens. Whether having that would have changed what happened is all speculation, but it would level the playing field. If the person you're fighting has a gun and all you have is your fists, you lose."



This is from  an artical posted in GD, Bucher's comments almost make me think maybe we shoudl try and get him involved in this......




He couldn't participate, it would be way too politically risky for him.  However, I would say Waukesha County would be a great place for a defense walk!



You think that would be politicly risky, hows about this.


I trhink yer right, waukesha might be the best place to hold a defense walk.

linky

Bucher says he favors concealed weapons
But election foes accuse him of changing stances
By DAVID DOEGE
[email protected]
Posted: April 4, 2005
Waukesha - Waukesha County District Attorney Paul Bucher said Monday that he supports a law that would allow residents to carry concealed weapons but refused to say whether mass shootings such as the one at a Brookfield hotel last month should propel support for legislation.

A New York Times story Sunday said recent killings such as the Terry Ratzmann shootings were spurring efforts nationally to ease gun laws and prominently quoted Bucher, who is running for attorney general, as saying, "We need to put more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens."

Bucher went on to say: "Whether having that would have changed what happened is all speculation, but it would level the playing field. If the person you're fighting has a gun and all you have is your fists, you lose."

Bucher said Monday that his remarks were taken out of context and that he "won't speculate" on whether a concealed-carry law would deter such incidents as the Brookfield Sheraton shootings, in which Ratzmann fatally shot seven people and wounded four others before killing himself during a church service in the hotel.

"It's the person behind the guns that matters," Bucher said Monday. "The people involved in these kinds of tragic situations have serious mental or emotional problems. I'm not going to tie that legislation to these types of terrible incidents."

Bucher said his remarks were intended to reiterate his support for the legislation.

"I didn't oppose this kind of legislation in the past, but nobody cared what Paul Bucher thought because I wasn't running for attorney general," Bucher said.

Accused of flip-flop
But Bucher's opponents in the attorney general's race accused him of changing positions, saying he publicly opposed the legislation in the past.

"No matter how he is trying to spin this now, this is a complete flip-flop from what he has said before," said Mike Murphy, campaign manager for state Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager, who opposes a concealed carry law. Lautenschlager, a Democrat, is seeking re-election.

Republican attorney general candidate J.B. Van Hollen, a former U.S. attorney, said he favors such legislation but questioned Bucher's stance.

"I was surprised at hearing recently that he was for concealed carry," Van Hollen said. "I think your personal and professional positions need to be one and the same.

"I was of the opinion that he was opposed to concealed carry."

Bucher insisted, "My position hasn't changed. I didn't oppose it."

His remarks in the past, he said, were based on the Wisconsin District Attorneys Association's opposition to the legislation. Bucher formerly was head of that group.

'Something seriously wrong'
Murphy said the Lautenschlager campaign was "appalled" by Bucher's remarks in the Times.

"This campaign believes that there is something seriously wrong with the assumption that we need more guns in churches," Murphy said.

The Times story Sunday looked at the effect mass shootings are having on the drive for legislation in states that would allow residents to carry concealed weapons if they are properly licensed.

It cited the Brookfield shootings as well as the murders of the family of a federal judge in Chicago, killings at courthouses in Atlanta and Tyler, Texas, and a deadly school shooting on the Red Lake Indian Reservation in Minnesota.

"In the states that have this provision, crime has gone down," Bucher said Monday.

Steps to protect officers
Bucher, a Republican, said the state Department of Justice should do the licensing and that the identities of license holders should be provided to the state Department of Transportation so it is available to law enforcement during traffic stops.

"I think we can resolve that issue so that police officers have it available to them during traffic stops, which for them is the most dangerous time," Bucher said.

Van Hollen agreed.

"In the states that have this, we do not hear the negative stories, the horror stories that opponents predict," said Van Hollen, a former district attorney who stepped down as U.S. attorney for the western district of Wisconsin in January to campaign for attorney general. The GOP primary is set for September 2006.

"I've had convicted criminals tell me that they would be much less inclined to commit an attack if they believe someone may be carrying a firearm," Van Hollen said. "I believe it would be a general deterrent."

Wisconsin lawmakers last year failed to override a veto by Gov. Jim Doyle of legislation that would have let Wisconsin residents carry concealed weapons.

Murphy said Lautenschlager has long opposed such legislation, as does "the overwhelming majority" of people in Wisconsin. Most law enforcement officials oppose the legislation and say that it would make police officers' jobs "more dangerous," Murphy said.

4/5/2005 5:58:47 AM EDT
[#13]
I have said multiple times that incrementalism is the way to approach this.  It sounds like you'd be very hard pressed to get charged in Waukesha county since the DA openly supports CCW.  

My suggestion is to go back to our original plan of starting in a friendly area, most likely Waukesha, and eventually move into Madison.
4/5/2005 6:50:36 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
I have said multiple times that incrementalism is the way to approach this.  It sounds like you'd be very hard pressed to get charged in Waukesha county since the DA openly supports CCW.  

My suggestion is to go back to our original plan of starting in a friendly area, most likely Waukesha, and eventually move into Madison.



Yup, loks like it is the right place to do the first one, Waukesha I mean.
4/5/2005 7:10:52 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
I have said multiple times that incrementalism is the way to approach this.  It sounds like you'd be very hard pressed to get charged in Waukesha county since the DA openly supports CCW.  

My suggestion is to go back to our original plan of starting in a friendly area, most likely Waukesha, and eventually move into Madison.



This is what I got back from WRPA attorneys...

"These folks have done their homework pretty well.  However, they are
naïve and appear to be presupposing that because the law appears to be
on their side, that government types who disagree will not act against
them.  This is a pure power issue which they must not discount.  If I
were to participate with them, as I am in sympathy with them, I would
walk unarmed.

A court case which they do not cite is one from the court of appeals
from Milwaukee.  In that case, a woman openly sitting on her porch with
her gun in her lap in plain view was charged and convicted by a jury of
CCW (they felt bad, but... The DA said we had to do this).  This was
upheld by the court of Appeals, Judge Schudson.  Yes, Hamden came later,
but the arrogance of the case is instructive.  In no way was any of this
case intellectually honest or a fair reading of the law.  They did this
because they could.  All in Milwaukee knew they were of the same mind.
They blame GUNS for all their problems there.

This attitude prevails in Madison.  To act as though it does not is very
risky, unless your goal is to be arrested so you can get standing to
challenge the statute as unconstitutional.  Do you wish to be arrested
so you can get your day in many courts in succession?   Will you win?
Even if you do, and your chances do seem pretty good, who will pay for
this?  These questions had better be answered before putting your head
in the noose.

If it was so clear and the WI Supreme Court WANTED to say so, they could
have, should have, declared CCW unconstitutional in Hamden. Conservative
justices do not make law and liberal justices hate guns, so the court
did not do what the liberal judges would have done if Hamden was a gay
marriage case.  They punted to the legislature, as they should have
done.  The legislature can't get it done just yet.  What if, by the time
your case gets to the WI Supreme Court, Gov. Jim Doyle (gun hater) has
appointed two more commie-lib justices.  Seems likely the Supreme court
blinks again, at least.  Then you are a convicted criminal and perhaps
your gun rights are gone.

If I am a UW student, full of piss and vinegar and with no assets, no
spouse, no children or other dependents, no home, no mortgage, no
professional licenses, or anything else I need to preserve in order to
enjoy a quiet existence in my old age, I am much more brave about
asserting my rights.  Let them carry the guns.

Support them by showing up and lend credence to the slogan that the
benefit of concealed carry is that those who oppose you do not know who
to take on first."
4/5/2005 7:37:21 PM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:

This is what I got back from WRPA attorneys...



4/6/2005 4:17:37 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I have said multiple times that incrementalism is the way to approach this.  It sounds like you'd be very hard pressed to get charged in Waukesha county since the DA openly supports CCW.  

My suggestion is to go back to our original plan of starting in a friendly area, most likely Waukesha, and eventually move into Madison.



This is what I got back from WRPA attorneys...

"These folks have done their homework pretty well.  However, they are
naïve and appear to be presupposing that because the law appears to be
on their side, that government types who disagree will not act against
them.  This is a pure power issue which they must not discount.  If I
were to participate with them, as I am in sympathy with them, I would
walk unarmed.

A court case which they do not cite is one from the court of appeals
from Milwaukee.  In that case, a woman openly sitting on her porch with
her gun in her lap in plain view was charged and convicted by a jury of
CCW (they felt bad, but... The DA said we had to do this).  This was
upheld by the court of Appeals, Judge Schudson.
Yes, Hamden came later,
but the arrogance of the case is instructive.  In no way was any of this
case intellectually honest or a fair reading of the law.  They did this
because they could.  All in Milwaukee knew they were of the same mind.
They blame GUNS for all their problems there.

This attitude prevails in Madison. They act as though it does not is very
risky, unless your goal is to be arrested so you can get standing to
challenge the statute as unconstitutional.  Do you wish to be arrested
so you can get your day in many courts in succession?   Will you win?
Even if you do, and your chances do seem pretty good, who will pay for
this?  These questions had better be answered before putting your head
in the noose.

If it was so clear and the WI Supreme Court WANTED to say so, they could
have, should have, declared CCW unconstitutional in Hamden. Conservative
justices do not make law and liberal justices hate guns, so the court
did not do what the liberal judges would have done if Hamden was a gay
marriage case.  They punted to the legislature, as they should have
done.  The legislature can't get it done just yet.  What if, by the time
your case gets to the WI Supreme Court, Gov. Jim Doyle (gun hater) has
appointed two more commie-lib justices.  Seems likely the Supreme court
blinks again, at least.  Then you are a convicted criminal and perhaps
your gun rights are gone.

If I am a UW student, full of piss and vinegar and with no assets, no
spouse, no children or other dependents, no home, no mortgage, no
professional licenses, or anything else I need to preserve in order to
enjoy a quiet existence in my old age, I am much more brave about
asserting my rights.  Let them carry the guns.

Support them by showing up and lend credence to the slogan that the
benefit of concealed carry is that those who oppose you do not know who
to take on first."



Those fucks.

They can't even site the case right. the woman in question was not sitting on  her porch with a gun in plain view, the gun was in her purse. I know this case I've sited it before in arguments.  The State Supreme Court cited that case in the fucking Hamdan decision for God sake, how the hell could the WRPA lawyers NOT get it right??And even had that been the case how the hell would you get away with charging CCW when a weapon is in the open(some times this can stick, but it's car related, not house related). I can't see how a court would allow that to go through.

With ballsless lawyers like this representing the Pro- gun groups in this state it's no fucking wonder that we don't have CCW right now.
4/6/2005 5:34:58 AM EDT
[#18]
Good work going on.


government types who disagree will not act against
them. This is a pure power issue which they must not discount.



If I were a betting man I'd bet the antis are monitoring this forum.I can just visualize the backroom headcrunching that could be going on right now trying to scheme up charges.Allright I been in the woods too long but I feel strongly about this(CCW) issue and in my experience there are those in power who will do anything to stop or sabatoge a movement against thier agenda.

Just a trial balloon     here  but I think it's time to take it up a level,,,I've got 50 bucks to ante up to help fund an LLC or ?You guys on top of this issue could use some insulation.It could also recieve any cash contributions or legal aid contributions.At least there would be an entity to arrange permits.

Chillin' out,
bulletcatchR


ETA,I don't remember if there was a discussion about organizing,I'm 'ass'uming this isn't a SAFER sponsored demonstration.TNX
4/6/2005 5:52:40 AM EDT
[#19]

If I were a betting man I'd bet the antis are monitoring this forum.
I've sent an IM to Adrian regarding this as well.  It may be time for the "inner circle" to take the planning off-line.  ...not that I even know who that may be, but we don't want to show all of our cards before the hand is played.
4/6/2005 5:58:26 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:

If I were a betting man I'd bet the antis are monitoring this forum.
I've sent an IM to Adrian regarding this as well.  It may be time for the "inner circle" to take the planning off-line.  ...not that I even know who that may be, but we don't want to show all of our cards before the hand is played.



You worry to much guys. Nothing you see here is "top secret" remember it's only a proposal.
4/6/2005 7:56:34 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:

If I were a betting man I'd bet the antis are monitoring this forum.
I've sent an IM to Adrian regarding this as well.  It may be time for the "inner circle" to take the planning off-line.  ...not that I even know who that may be, but we don't want to show all of our cards before the hand is played.



You worry to much guys. Nothing you see here is "top secret" remember it's only a proposal.



Alright, I have a couple of issues that need to be addressed.

1) I think we should keep this on the DL, but I dont think we need to pull it from the forum yet.

2) Unfortunately, Senator Zien's office already got a copy, but I've heard no reply. I've put off the mailings until we figure some more things out. Word of mouth and email seems to be getting it aroung pretty good.

3) These WI gun groups (WRPA) are afraid of what could happen in Madison. I think that gun friendly DA in Waukesha is a great opportunity. I spoke to one of the guys who was active in Ohio defense walks and he said we should find a DA who wont charge us, and talk to the Chief of Police, Sheriff and KNOW ahead of time that they wont arrest us. We need to meet with these people and hear this from them - and then we need to take that to the WI gun groups (or, have someone from one of those groups meet with them.)

4) I only have one more month that I can do these things, and my time will be very limited. I have exams in May, am graduating, am getting married, and I am moving out of state to take a job. My intent was to get this preliminary work done, and then hopefully the WCCA or WRPA would take this and use it as part of a larger PPA strategy. That looks like it may or may not happen. So, within a month, either they will need to adopt this as part of their strategy, or someone else is going to have to take over my place, and coordinate things between them, call DAs, police depts, etc. If you want to do this, or know someone who wants to - let me know.

Really, I'll be gone or busy from early May through mid June. Before then I can do this, after that I can consult, and hopefully come back to march, but I cant run things.
4/6/2005 10:28:44 PM EDT
[#22]
www.citybeat.com/2005-04-06/cover.shtml

Great article on Ohio CCW
4/9/2005 3:42:47 AM EDT
[#23]
It's all good Adrain.I honestly don't know what can realistically be done before you leave but believe me it's good to see 'youth' with your motivation.Perhaps the time would be best spent trying to organize and secure new leadership.

I certainly have time to help organize but can't volunteer to do any more due to health constraints.I also have the gut feeling this(PPA) will be going on for a few more years so it pays to  organize.

Back on the subject of  defense walk my opinion is the opposite.Pick the (legal)place most likely to get arrested,have plenty of witnesses and tape and let the litigators loose.I'm not talking about court debates I'm talking civil rights slap suits to everyone involved in the arrest and go from there.We could recruit the best attorneys to work on a percentage.Just my two cents but a PR event is just more of what we have gotten so far.


bulletcatchR
4/9/2005 11:17:24 AM EDT
[#24]
BulletCatchR,

"Perhaps the time would be best spent trying to organize and secure new leadership."

If indeed Adrian is not going to be available, I believe you have hit the nail on the head.  If he put the whole document together himself, then there is DEFINITELY a need for new leadership, because there is no way a longer term effort can be effectively managed "off-site".

On the other hand, if the document was a collaborative effort, then there is already talent at hand - maybe not a single leader, but group leadership is a possibility.

You all have a seed - now you need to make it germinate.

I don't live in WI, so I don't know the lay of the land, but IMHO, an open carry walk could do more harm than good, depending.



BB62

5/9/2005 12:42:45 PM EDT
[#25]
Here's a new thread on WI CCW, FYI.

http://www.glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=45c2d5522d94bde8f802fd43be841024&threadid=381985