[ARCHIVED THREAD] - FREE GARAGE! (Page 1 of 4)
Posted: 11/14/2013 12:37:54 PM EDT
No, I don't have a Garage that is free. But our fellow HTF member Garage has been banned.
 
|
|
From http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1554893__I_m_From_The_Government_And_I_m_Here_To_Inspect_Your_Guns_.html&page=3
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Sure... Safe is upstairs, combo is taped to the door..... I gotta run but feel free to check whatever you need." BOOM What are u trying to say.. Glocks can be dangerous ?? That's how I read it... ETA: beat by a few mins.LOL |
|
Quoted:
From http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1554893__I_m_From_The_Government_And_I_m_Here_To_Inspect_Your_Guns_.html&page=3 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Sure... Safe is upstairs, combo is taped to the door..... I gotta run but feel free to check whatever you need." BOOM What are u trying to say.. Glocks can be dangerous ?? That's how I read it... ETA: beat by a few mins.LOL Don't think that was it... something he said further up page 3 has been "removed"... |
|
Quoted:
Don't think that was it... something he said further up page 3 has been "removed"... Quoted:
Quoted:
From http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1554893__I_m_From_The_Government_And_I_m_Here_To_Inspect_Your_Guns_.html&page=3 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Sure... Safe is upstairs, combo is taped to the door..... I gotta run but feel free to check whatever you need." BOOM What are u trying to say.. Glocks can be dangerous ?? That's how I read it... ETA: beat by a few mins.LOL Don't think that was it... something he said further up page 3 has been "removed"... I searched through the whole thread and what he said in that quote is no where to be found. I'm thinking that is what was removed. |
|
Quoted:
Has he actually been BANNED. I can still send an IM or email to him thru the forum... When you are banned, doesn't your profile go away as well? Never really paid attention, just asking. "banned" afaik is a "permanent lock". The account is still there, they can still try to log in, but they get kicked out. If you look at a banned member's profile (say... Dave_A), it'll still be there, and show you the last time they tried to log in. |
|
Quoted:
"banned" afaik is a "permanent lock". The account is still there, they can still try to log in, but they get kicked out. If you look at a banned member's profile (say... Dave_A), it'll still be there, and show you the last time they tried to log in. Quoted:
Quoted:
Has he actually been BANNED. I can still send an IM or email to him thru the forum... When you are banned, doesn't your profile go away as well? Never really paid attention, just asking. "banned" afaik is a "permanent lock". The account is still there, they can still try to log in, but they get kicked out. If you look at a banned member's profile (say... Dave_A), it'll still be there, and show you the last time they tried to log in. OK 
|
|
Quoted:
I am going to guess this wasn't his first issue with a CoC violation. It takes a bit to get banned. There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. All it takes is you stepping on someone's sacred cow, and that's it. Whether it be an LEO that can't take any criticism of LEOs, a legal beagle who vehemently supports RIAA, or your average overzelous authority figure. |
|
Quoted:
There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. Quoted:
Quoted:
I am going to guess this wasn't his first issue with a CoC violation. It takes a bit to get banned. There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. Was it for the same thing or something different? |
|
Quoted: Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? Quoted: Quoted: 2nd post about killing public officials  Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? |
|
Quoted:
Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? Quoted:
Quoted:
2nd post about killing public officials Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? CoC 4 is probably the most important of all the rules, because it is the one that can result in calls from various agencies (which the owners of the site REALLY don't want) and it is the one that can harm the site's reputation the most. 4) Posting comments or links in support of illegal activities including, but not limited to, threats against the life of any person, doing harm to a state or federal official, or advocating the overthrow of the government. For many of the types of posts that advocate the killing of a government or law enforcement official, the first strike is what results in a permanent lock. Garage had that first strike earlier this year. He was locked, and he was then unlocked afer promising to abide by the rules and NOT to post something like that again. He then decided to post something like that again. 
It's got nothing to do with who the mod or staff is, or any bullshit about favoritism or anything like that. It's got something to do with someone who has demonstrated a lack of interest in following one of our most important rules. We didn't ban him. He banned himself. |
|
Quoted:
Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? Quoted:
Quoted:
2nd post about killing public officials Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? Interdasting..... So purely for my own understanding.... If an individual was to say that Bradley Manning should have been tried and, if found guilty, executed for treason that would be OK. (I didn't search but I'd wager there a number of those exact types of comments around here) But if an individual was to say the exact same thing about any individual that holds public office that would not be OK?? |
|
Quoted:
There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. All it takes is you stepping on someone's sacred cow, and that's it. Whether it be an LEO that can't take any criticism of LEOs, a legal beagle who vehemently supports RIAA, or your average overzelous authority figure. Quoted:
Quoted:
I am going to guess this wasn't his first issue with a CoC violation. It takes a bit to get banned. There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. All it takes is you stepping on someone's sacred cow, and that's it. Whether it be an LEO that can't take any criticism of LEOs, a legal beagle who vehemently supports RIAA, or your average overzelous authority figure. Counting his other banned account technically it was 8 or 9 strikes. |
|
Quoted:
Yup. He sure did. Quoted:
Quoted:
So Spray and Pray got banned again.... Yup. He sure did. lol So it wasn't his second strike, it was something like his seventh strike ... with three previous locks, including advocating harm/death to others, and anti LEO stuff. Oh, and some racism too. Sounds like a swell guy.
|
|
Quoted:
lol So it wasn't his second strike, it was something like his seventh strike ... with three previous locks, including advocating harm/death to others, and anti LEO stuff. Oh, and some racism too. Sounds like a swell guy. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So Spray and Pray got banned again.... Yup. He sure did. lol So it wasn't his second strike, it was something like his seventh strike ... with three previous locks, including advocating harm/death to others, and anti LEO stuff. Oh, and some racism too. Sounds like a swell guy. Shhh... we are hear to mourn for "the man" keeping him down for a "Glock joke" |
|
Quoted:
lol So it wasn't his second strike, it was something like his seventh strike ... with three previous locks, including advocating harm/death to others, and anti LEO stuff. Oh, and some racism too. Sounds like a swell guy. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So Spray and Pray got banned again.... Yup. He sure did. lol So it wasn't his second strike, it was something like his seventh strike ... with three previous locks, including advocating harm/death to others, and anti LEO stuff. Oh, and some racism too. Sounds like a swell guy. "Spray and Pray" was before my time. I really can't say if they were one in the same. But I have had the opportunity to meet Garage in person on numerous occasions and can say first hand there are few people I would trust to have my back, but he is one of them. I've known him to go out of his way to lend a hand to a person in need (even people multiple states away). Don't judge a book by it's cover just because he shows a healthy ( or unhealthy whichever your point of view) skepticism for government officials. |
|
Quoted: That swell guy has had my back more times than I can count. Quoted: Quoted: Sounds like a swell guy. That swell guy has had my back more times than I can count. I don't expect people to rat out their buddies, but reading your posts in that context you were hardly being forthright and honest, you knew and thought we would not.
|
|
Quoted:
Ie you knew it was cop hating spray and pray getting banned again when you stared this. I don't expect people to rat out their buddies, but reading your posts in that context you were hardly being forthright and honest, you knew and thought we would not. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Sounds like a swell guy. That swell guy has had my back more times than I can count. I don't expect people to rat out their buddies, but reading your posts in that context you were hardly being forthright and honest, you knew and thought we would not. Birds of a feather have each other's backs. 
|
|
Quoted:
As is evidenced by the abundance of site staff in this thread. Odd. Quoted:
Quoted:
Birds of a feather have each other's backs. As is evidenced by the abundance of site staff in this thread. Odd. You are goddamned right about that. You impugned the integrity of my staff member with this post: Quoted:
Quoted:
Shhhhh, you can't say that stuff on a forum censored moderated by an LEO!  Some animals are more equal than others. NorCal_LEO is a man I would trust with my life, or the safety and well-being of my wife. Then you, knowing your shitbird friend was righteously banned post this thread to stir up the other members, hoping they would rally to his support. You also cast doubt on the integrity of the site itself and its administration. Birds of a feather indeed--on both sides of this.
|
|
Quoted: There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. All it takes is you stepping on someone's sacred cow, and that's it. Whether it be an LEO that can't take any criticism of LEOs, a legal beagle who vehemently supports RIAA, or your average overzelous authority figure. Quoted: Quoted: I am going to guess this wasn't his first issue with a CoC violation. It takes a bit to get banned. There was one prior, and it was very lame and very tame in comparison. I could understand a slap on the wrist for this one, but the "first strike" was BS. At most, this is 1.5 strikes. Which seems a bit heavy handed. All it takes is you stepping on someone's sacred cow, and that's it. Whether it be an LEO that can't take any criticism of LEOs, a legal beagle who vehemently supports RIAA, or your average overzelous authority figure. |
|
Quoted:
As is evidenced by the abundance of site staff in this thread. Odd. Quoted:
Quoted:
Birds of a feather have each other's backs. As is evidenced by the abundance of site staff in this thread. Odd. 
You got caught lying and trying to martyr your banned friend. Please tell me more about evil site staff and morals.
|
|
Quoted:
CoC 4 is probably the most important of all the rules, because it is the one that can result in calls from various agencies (which the owners of the site REALLY don't want) and it is the one that can harm the site's reputation the most. 4) Posting comments or links in support of illegal activities including, but not limited to, threats against the life of any person, doing harm to a state or federal official, or advocating the overthrow of the government. For many of the types of posts that advocate the killing of a government or law enforcement official, the first strike is what results in a permanent lock. Garage had that first strike earlier this year. He was locked, and he was then unlocked afer promising to abide by the rules and NOT to post something like that again. He then decided to post something like that again.
It's got nothing to do with who the mod or staff is, or any bullshit about favoritism or anything like that. It's got something to do with someone who has demonstrated a lack of interest in following one of our most important rules. We didn't ban him. He banned himself. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
2nd post about killing public officials Recommending prosecution to the fullest extent of the law is now against the CoC if the maximum sentence is capital punishment? CoC 4 is probably the most important of all the rules, because it is the one that can result in calls from various agencies (which the owners of the site REALLY don't want) and it is the one that can harm the site's reputation the most. 4) Posting comments or links in support of illegal activities including, but not limited to, threats against the life of any person, doing harm to a state or federal official, or advocating the overthrow of the government. For many of the types of posts that advocate the killing of a government or law enforcement official, the first strike is what results in a permanent lock. Garage had that first strike earlier this year. He was locked, and he was then unlocked afer promising to abide by the rules and NOT to post something like that again. He then decided to post something like that again.
It's got nothing to do with who the mod or staff is, or any bullshit about favoritism or anything like that. It's got something to do with someone who has demonstrated a lack of interest in following one of our most important rules. We didn't ban him. He banned himself. Just to be clear... what he said violated CoC4. Matter of interpretation, but I won't argue the point, not my place. But... in reading the thread where the violation occured, before I even finished the first page, I found these by others: "Come on in, but please use the window so I can deal with you like a criminal" "Welcome. Say hello to my .45." "Inspect this, you buttfucking piece of shit" "Oh, hai. Would you like to inspect the ammo first?" " BOOM " . . . . . ( headshot ). .. .. .. "Hold it right there! - You men from the bank? Daddy told me to shoot who's ever from the bank." "you can inspect em cockbreaths....one bullet at a time." "They should all (voters, politicians, all of 'em) be ashamed of themselves, and the asshole that introduced that bullshit ought to be tarred, feathered, and then run the fuck out of town on foot, for all the world's media to see." "I die on my feet like a Ranger Free " "That's why you've got a sniper or two on the neighbors roof duh Defending against tyranny takes a team effort" "Or you just make a run for it while the time delay fuse sets off the 100 gallons of gas in the basement" That's just page 1 (more on page 2... I quit reading there). I don't frequent GD, don't know any of those posters, don't have a beef against any of them. So my question is this... who else got banned, warned, locked? Perhaps the whole thread (headed for shitsville from the begining) should've been locked after the 1st few "threats". |