Posted: 7/3/2014 11:36:23 AM EDT
Going to a baseball game tonight. Anybody know about the legality of CCW at Fluor Field? TIA.  |
|
Yeah, it's still "posted", but what I saw is just a vague outline of a handgun in the circleslash. Not what I remember to be "legal" signage. I know concealed means concealed and all, but, what if, say, they're wanding random people at the gate and they picked you? Would you be asked to leave, or arrested? |
|
Quoted:
SLED doesn't make laws....  Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding. New ruling from SLED. SLED doesn't make laws.... Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html |
|
Quoted:
Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding. New ruling from SLED. SLED doesn't make laws.... Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html Where does the local PD and DA stand on the law(s). If they are loose on their interpretations, you might be good to go. If they are tight and/or politicians looking for election fodder, you could get screwed |
|
Quoted:
Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no longer "legal signage", all signs wether they are traditional looking or not are legally binding. New ruling from SLED. SLED doesn't make laws.... Yep. The consensus was SLED could get bent on their "ruling", but no one wanted to volunteer to be the first to test it. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_8_65/561658_SLED_claims_non_standard_prohibitive_CWP_signs_have_full_legal_weight.html I was misinformed, thanks for the clarification. Not a cwp instructor so it was second hand knowledge. |
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.