Posted: 5/30/2009 7:33:44 AM EDT
| My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. |
|
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. senoia? |
|
This might help if applicable...
§ 40-14-6. Warning signs required (a) Each county, municipality, college, and university using speed detection devices shall erect signs on every highway which comprises a part of the state highway system at that point on the highway which intersects the corporate limits of the municipality, the county boundary, or the boundary of the college or university campus. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area and shall warn approaching motorists that speed detection devices are being employed. No such devices shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection. (b) In addition to the signs required under subsection (a) of this Code section, each county, municipality, college, and university using speed detection devices shall erect speed limit warning signs on every highway which comprises a part of the state highway system at that point on the highway which intersects the corporate limits of the municipality, the county boundary, or the boundary of the college or university campus. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area, shall warn approaching motorists of changes in the speed limit, shall be visible plainly from every lane of traffic, shall be viewable in any traffic conditions, and shall not be placed in such a manner that the view of such sign is subject to being obstructed by any other vehicle on such highway. No such devices shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection. § 40-14-7. Visibility of vehicle from which device is operated No stationary speed detection device shall be employed by county, municipal, college, or university law enforcement officers where the vehicle from which the device is operated is obstructed from the view of approaching motorists or is otherwise not visible for a distance of at least 500 feet. |
|
Laser will go through glass, it will reduce its effective range, although it will not effect the accuracy. Shooting through the glass is not the best way, but it works.....13 mph and less will not show up on your MVR, therefore your insurance will not find out.
ETA: 500 feet really isn't all that far. When you're traveling 55 mph, 500 feet goes by really quick. |
| It is very difficult to beat a laser case in court. My advice is to plead not guilty, then on the day of court, talk to the solicitor and ask if it can be reduced to a non moving violation which will not place any points on the license, and not be reported to the insurance Co. and of course don't speed on that road. |
|
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. Jefferson? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. Jefferson? Bingo. |
|
Quoted:
It is very difficult to beat a laser case in court. My advice is to plead not guilty, then on the day of court, talk to the solicitor and ask if it can be reduced to a non moving violation which will not place any points on the license, and not be reported to the insurance Co. and of course don't speed on that road. This. We have just recently begun using LASER, but I have never seen any LASER ticket dismissed in court. |
|
K40 laser jammer, on a big vehicle put two on the front. On a smaller car only one is necessary. Punch thru on them is about 35 feet or so. If you havent seen the cop by the time you get that close you are dumb anyhow.
Me and an ex boss of mine used to piss Suwanee off constantly with his truck. |
|
Quoted:
K40 laser jammer, on a big vehicle put two on the front. On a smaller car only one is necessary. Punch thru on them is about 35 feet or so. If you havent seen the cop by the time you get that close you are dumb anyhow. Me and an ex boss of mine used to piss Suwanee off constantly with his truck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fwJCRDk2Ik |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
K40 laser jammer, on a big vehicle put two on the front. On a smaller car only one is necessary. Punch thru on them is about 35 feet or so. If you havent seen the cop by the time you get that close you are dumb anyhow. Me and an ex boss of mine used to piss Suwanee off constantly with his truck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fwJCRDk2Ik Look at the size of that front end? K40 reccomends 2 Diffusers on something that large with taht much reflective surface. AND that install was bullshit, they are NOT that simple to install. The diffusers themselves need to be level and K40 sends a level with the diffuser to make sure its level. Also they did not show the brain unit being installed or anything like that. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
K40 laser jammer, on a big vehicle put two on the front. On a smaller car only one is necessary. Punch thru on them is about 35 feet or so. If you havent seen the cop by the time you get that close you are dumb anyhow. Me and an ex boss of mine used to piss Suwanee off constantly with his truck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fwJCRDk2Ik Look at the size of that front end? K40 reccomends 2 Diffusers on something that large with taht much reflective surface. AND that install was bullshit, they are NOT that simple to install. The diffusers themselves need to be level and K40 sends a level with the diffuser to make sure its level. Also they did not show the brain unit being installed or anything like that. K40 Model LD5500 Plus
(Laser DefuserPlus, $299.95) K40 Model LD5500 Plus The K40 is unique by having its transceiver module mounted in the top of an extra-thick license plate frame. But since many cars have contoured front bumpers and not every vehicle is required to have a front license plate, the frame proved to be more of a liability than a feature, especially when we tried attaching it to one of our test cars, a 2006 Corvette. Fortunately, it can be removed from the license plate cover. So for the test we separated the two and mounted it in the location the front plate would normally occupy. Audio/visual alerts are provided by a piezo speaker and red LED. But there's no status light, so you'll never know whether the unit is working or not. A power switch is not provided, leaving no means of shutting it off. And the wiring, connectors and installation kit look like the product of a junior high school shop project. The DefuserPlus can be integrated with K40's remote detectors, using their power-on and audio/visual warnings, and this obviously was the design goal for this jammer. Used as a stand-alone model it's sadly lacking in features. This model was the oldest design tested, circa 1994, and its age showed. It failed entirely to jam any of the lasers save for an occasional momentary jam while the jammer was receiving a direct hit, but even then only for an instant and at very close range. We'd go on to describe the particulars of the K40's jamming performance but it died midway through the test. The single instance where the K40 managed to reduce target range on the Corvette was after we'd also applied a coating of Laser Veil to all of its lights. With the added protection, target range dropped to an average of 715 feet, a reduction of over 50 percent. But without Laser Veil, we might as well have saved ourselves the trouble of installing the jammer. The K40's early demise prevented a full comparison with the other units, but based on results from several previous tests we're confident that the DefuserPlus would be as inept at jamming lasers today as it was then. Bottom line: Useless against today's lasers Rating: no stars From Radar test dot com |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
K40 laser jammer, on a big vehicle put two on the front. On a smaller car only one is necessary. Punch thru on them is about 35 feet or so. If you havent seen the cop by the time you get that close you are dumb anyhow. Me and an ex boss of mine used to piss Suwanee off constantly with his truck. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fwJCRDk2Ik Look at the size of that front end? K40 reccomends 2 Diffusers on something that large with taht much reflective surface. AND that install was bullshit, they are NOT that simple to install. The diffusers themselves need to be level and K40 sends a level with the diffuser to make sure its level. Also they did not show the brain unit being installed or anything like that. K40 Model LD5500 Plus
(Laser DefuserPlus, $299.95) K40 Model LD5500 Plus The K40 is unique by having its transceiver module mounted in the top of an extra-thick license plate frame. But since many cars have contoured front bumpers and not every vehicle is required to have a front license plate, the frame proved to be more of a liability than a feature, especially when we tried attaching it to one of our test cars, a 2006 Corvette. Fortunately, it can be removed from the license plate cover. So for the test we separated the two and mounted it in the location the front plate would normally occupy. Audio/visual alerts are provided by a piezo speaker and red LED. But there's no status light, so you'll never know whether the unit is working or not. A power switch is not provided, leaving no means of shutting it off. And the wiring, connectors and installation kit look like the product of a junior high school shop project. The DefuserPlus can be integrated with K40's remote detectors, using their power-on and audio/visual warnings, and this obviously was the design goal for this jammer. Used as a stand-alone model it's sadly lacking in features. This model was the oldest design tested, circa 1994, and its age showed. It failed entirely to jam any of the lasers save for an occasional momentary jam while the jammer was receiving a direct hit, but even then only for an instant and at very close range. We'd go on to describe the particulars of the K40's jamming performance but it died midway through the test. The single instance where the K40 managed to reduce target range on the Corvette was after we'd also applied a coating of Laser Veil to all of its lights. With the added protection, target range dropped to an average of 715 feet, a reduction of over 50 percent. But without Laser Veil, we might as well have saved ourselves the trouble of installing the jammer. The K40's early demise prevented a full comparison with the other units, but based on results from several previous tests we're confident that the DefuserPlus would be as inept at jamming lasers today as it was then. Bottom line: Useless against today's lasers Rating: no stars From Radar test dot com Fuck me its 2009, ofcourse something from 94 is going to be outdated electronically. Imagine using a computer today that was made in 94. It MIGHT have an external 14.4 modem. I took one look at the picture of the unit they used and said " thats a two window unit thats no longer available and now obsolete. I will agree with them though that "A power switch is not provided, leaving no means of shutting it off. And the wiring, connectors and installation kit look like the product of a junior high school shop project" but if you wire it into a switched power source AND OR couple it with the detector then the detector has an audible tone when it powers on. The wiring harness does leave a lot to be desired and I wish that the wires were a stranded wire instead of a thin solid copper wire. I DO like the K40 and I have personal experience that it DOES in fact work and has pissed off a bunch of Suwanee cops. Whenever we would see them in their little speed trap by the shop we would drive by em and just fuck with em cause they couldnt get us on laser. We did get flagged down by one standing in the road and asked us why he coudlnt get us on laser. We told him and two days later he had his GF's car at the shop and we were doing an install on it. |
|
They are saying the K40 is 1994 technology and is ineffective against modern laser guns. NOT that they bought a 1994 model and tried it.
Bottom line. K40 is a waste of money today. 10 years ago it may not have been. But it is today. Go with a Blinder M25 or M45 setup. |
|
No, they said that the model tested was the oldest model the 1994 model.
"This model was the oldest design tested, circa 1994, and its age showed." That is copied and pasted directly out of your link, and article. It says the test car was a 2006 Corvette. That is 12 years of technology at a MINIMUM from the unit they tested to the testing equipment. Show me where it says that they are saying that it is antiquated technology. From what I am reading they used a 1994 unit, and the picture that they have IS of the OLD unit that has not had the upgrades that the newer units have. |
|
Quoted:
No, they said that the model tested was the oldest model the 1994 model. "This model was the oldest design tested, circa 1994, and its age showed." That is copied and pasted directly out of your link, and article. It says the test car was a 2006 Corvette. That is 12 years of technology at a MINIMUM from the unit they tested to the testing equipment. Show me where it says that they are saying that it is antiquated technology. From what I am reading they used a 1994 unit, and the picture that they have IS of the OLD unit that has not had the upgrades that the newer units have. Thing is adam I started looking around after you mentioned laser jamming and all I keep finding are bad reviews of the K40. I started out looking to buy one and now... not so much. |
|
Quoted:
This might help if applicable... § 40-14-6. Warning signs required (a) Each county, municipality, college, and university using speed detection devices shall erect signs on every highway which comprises a part of the state highway system at that point on the highway which intersects the corporate limits of the municipality, the county boundary, or the boundary of the college or university campus. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area and shall warn approaching motorists that speed detection devices are being employed. No such devices shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection. (b) In addition to the signs required under subsection (a) of this Code section, each county, municipality, college, and university using speed detection devices shall erect speed limit warning signs on every highway which comprises a part of the state highway system at that point on the highway which intersects the corporate limits of the municipality, the county boundary, or the boundary of the college or university campus. Such signs shall be at least 24 by 30 inches in area, shall warn approaching motorists of changes in the speed limit, shall be visible plainly from every lane of traffic, shall be viewable in any traffic conditions, and shall not be placed in such a manner that the view of such sign is subject to being obstructed by any other vehicle on such highway. No such devices shall be used within 500 feet of any such warning sign erected pursuant to this subsection. § 40-14-7. Visibility of vehicle from which device is operated No stationary speed detection device shall be employed by county, municipal, college, or university law enforcement officers where the vehicle from which the device is operated is obstructed from the view of approaching motorists or is otherwise not visible for a distance of at least 500 feet. Also, they can't run any speed detection device if it more than a seven percent downgrade. The OP said it was on a downgrade. A friend of mine's wife popped Suwanee on that. OP, go to the country road department/county dot/etc, get the drawing for that stretch of road. That's what she did and it shows the downgrade and they got their butts chapped. 
Also note in the section about the distance from a change in speed limit sign. § 40-14-9. Evidence obtained in certain areas inadmissible; use of device on hill
Evidence obtained by county or municipal law enforcement officers in using speed detection devices within 300 feet of a reduction of a speed limit inside an incorporated municipality or within 600 feet of a reduction of a speed limit outside an incorporated municipality or consolidated city-county government shall be inadmissible in the prosecution of a violation of any municipal ordinance, county ordinance, or state law regulating speed; nor shall such evidence be admissible in the prosecution of a violation as aforesaid when such violation has occurred within 30 days following a reduction of the speed limit in the area where the violation took place, except that this 30 day limitation shall not apply to a speeding violation within a highway work zone, as defined in Code Section 40-6-188. No speed detection device shall be employed by county, municipal, or campus law enforcement officers on any portion of any highway which has a grade in excess of 7 percent. |
|
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. Sounds like Doraville in every way. I beat them on a speeding ticket because they didn't have (and still don't have last time I checked) the signs indicating that speed detection devices are in use per the section that Mikey556 quoted.
Oops, wrong town. 
|
| I guess you are talking about Jefferson. The new Chief cleaned the place up alot! My guess would be youre wife got the ticket on Brockton road, sounds like it? A far as how the officer wrote the ticket, it sounds like he wrote it as a city ord. violation not state law. If that is the case it would not be turned into the state and no points on your wifes license. It was acually nice of him. I'm local to the area just give me an email if I can be of help. |
|
thanks mikey394.
thats a good bit of info to have. im amazed at how many breaks people get then turn around and act like they just got dealt a 20 year sentence and no i am not refering to the original poster. ive had my more than fair share and have been gracious and thankful. |
|
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. (1) Confirm that the Speed Detection Devices In Use signs are in place. (2) Confirm that the Laser certification and calibration are up to date. (3) Officers Laser certification valid (at the time the citation was issued) The officer most likely dropped the ticket down to less than 14 mph above the posted speed limit because your wife was cordial, so he cuts her a break by dropping it down, but he still get his stat. I have done this hundreds of times, adjusted the speed on the ticket. Also look on the citation and see if there are any notes in the remarks block where he indicates how far away she was at the time he checked her speed. Laser citations are very difficult to beat, I have only seen one beat in the last 7 yrs, and that was because the Laser Operator had an expired permit at the time the citation was issued. My best is advice if for you wife to ask to speak with the prosecutor and ask if there is anyway the ticket can be dismissed if she completes a defensive driving course, or 8 hrs community service, or something similar, that is if she is truly guilty. If not take your chances in court and see how it turns out. |
|
I guess you are talking about Jefferson. The new Chief cleaned the place up alot! My guess would be youre wife got the ticket on Brockton road, sounds like it? A far as how the officer wrote the ticket, it sounds like he wrote it as a city ord. violation not state law. If that is the case it would not be turned into the state and no points on your wifes license. It was acually nice of him. I'm local to the area just give me an email if I can be of help.
Yep. Brockton Rd. Sits behind the tree in the driveway. |
|
Quoted:
i know alot of motorcyclists that have used this guys stuff to get out of tickets. http://thegeorgiaspeedingticketkiller.com/thin_blue_line.php  That shit doesn't work, maybe a few years ago it might have worked, but not now because every gangbanger an illegal has one on their car. I've stopped a ton of vehicles with them on the window, and just about all of them got a ticket.
|
|
Quoted:
I guess you are talking about Jefferson. The new Chief cleaned the place up alot! My guess would be youre wife got the ticket on Brockton road, sounds like it? A far as how the officer wrote the ticket, it sounds like he wrote it as a city ord. violation not state law. If that is the case it would not be turned into the state and no points on your wifes license. It was acually nice of him. I'm local to the area just give me an email if I can be of help.
Yep. Brockton Rd. Sits behind the tree in the driveway. Like I said I am local. Just email me and we can get talk about what if anything can be done. They do recive alot of complaints about speeding vehicles on that road BTY. OR just transfer it to state court.....that's what I would do. Chances are it will be dropped by state court their known to dismiss anything that would require a trial. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
i know alot of motorcyclists that have used this guys stuff to get out of tickets. http://thegeorgiaspeedingticketkiller.com/thin_blue_line.php That shit doesn't work, maybe a few years ago it might have worked, but not now because every gangbanger an illegal has one on their car. I've stopped a ton of vehicles with them on the window, and just about all of them got a ticket.wasnt refering to the decal.meant to copy and paste this thegeorgiaspeedingticketkiller.com |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
i know alot of motorcyclists that have used this guys stuff to get out of tickets. http://thegeorgiaspeedingticketkiller.com/thin_blue_line.php That shit doesn't work, maybe a few years ago it might have worked, but not now because every gangbanger an illegal has one on their car. I've stopped a ton of vehicles with them on the window, and just about all of them got a ticket.wasnt refering to the decal.meant to copy and paste this thegeorgiaspeedingticketkiller.com Well crap.....i made a valid point though, so i'm good to go 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. senoia? HAHAHAHA WOW, that's the first place I thought too. I just moved out here and I've never seen a speed limit fluctuate the way it does on Rockaway Rd. I fully expect to get a ticket here anytime soon. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
My wife got a speeding ticket 2 days ago on a road I have told here not to ever speed on. As you reach the top of a slight incline on this road you enter the city limits where the speed changes to 35 and the road is now going down at a moderate grade. The cop parks in a driveway and is hidden quite well. The ticket says it was laser that he used and she was going 55. Every time I go by he is sitting in the car. I don't think laser can be used through glass as I think his angle would require if he is in the car. My wife says she was not going that fast and if you are doing 55 in that area it feels like you are going too fast. Also, he told my wife that he wrote the speeding ticket in a way the insurance company would not find out about. RED FLAG! That seems like BS to me. To me he is saying don't fight the ticket because it won't show up on your insurance anyway. Furthermore, a friend was issued a ticket by the same agency that ticketed my wife with a taillight out ticket. The taillight was not out and when he went to fight it they asked who was pleading not guilty and everyone that was had their tickets dropped, most for taillights out. I fully intend on having her fight it. Any advice? BTW, there is a rather popular singer/guitarist that has a song specifically about this particular agency. A rather blunt song at that. senoia? HAHAHAHA WOW, that's the first place I thought too. I just moved out here and I've never seen a speed limit fluctuate the way it does on Rockaway Rd. I fully expect to get a ticket here anytime soon. I was thinking of 16 just as you come into town that is fawked up. And they love to give tickets. |