Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/4/2008 3:38:42 PM EDT
...start a political party?

Would one need a business license, not-for-profit, for profit, LLC, what?

I'm just curious at this point...
6/4/2008 3:41:44 PM EDT
[#1]
Answer
6/4/2008 5:06:15 PM EDT
[#2]
You can build your own battleship and be the captain but it is very expensive and something only nation states do, it is much easier to take over the helm of a existing ship.

Everybody needs to file for PCO for their precinct before friday, so we can take the GOP from the communazis.



6/4/2008 5:19:09 PM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
You can build your own battleship and be the captain but it is very expensive and something only nation states do, it is much easier to take over the helm of a existing ship.

Everybody needs to file for PCO for their precinct before friday, so we can take the GOP from the communazis.



I want nothing to do with either mainstream party. You can defile yourself with the Republicans if you wish, but please do it in another thread.
6/4/2008 5:28:16 PM EDT
[#4]
SWEET... My very first....
MILITIA!!!!!!!!
6/4/2008 5:33:41 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
SWEET... My very first....
MILITIA!!!!!!!!


I second that!!!!




6/4/2008 5:41:41 PM EDT
[#6]
It has been moved and seconded, those in favor signify by standing, those opposed same sign/
6/4/2008 5:43:17 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
I want nothing to do with either mainstream party. You can defile yourself with the Republicans if you wish, but please do it in another thread.


What is your objection to the Constitution party ?
6/4/2008 6:00:09 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
You can build your own battleship and be the captain but it is very expensive and something only nation states do, it is much easier to take over the helm of a existing ship.

Everybody needs to file for PCO for their precinct before friday, so we can take the GOP from the communazis.


I can find nothing to disagree with in this post.

6/4/2008 6:13:17 PM EDT
[#9]
height=8
Quoted:

I want nothing to do with either mainstream party.

+1
6/4/2008 6:16:31 PM EDT
[#10]
www.revolutionmarch.com/home.aspx?rnd=277220027
6/4/2008 9:46:04 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I want nothing to do with either mainstream party. You can defile yourself with the Republicans if you wish, but please do it in another thread.


What is your objection to the Constitution party ?



Source, Wikipedia

The Constitution Party advocates a platform that purports to reflect the Founding Fathers' original intent of the U.S. Constitution, principles found in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, and morals taken from the Bible.[2].


I suspect we both know the CP will not adhere to "the original intent" of the Founders...in at least one, crucial, respect. However, forum rules prohibit discussion of this.


Fiscal policy
The Constitution Party supports reducing the role of the United States federal government through cutting bureaucratic regulation, reducing spending, and replacing the income tax with a tariff-based revenue system supplemented by excise taxes. Its leaders are among the strongest advocates of abolishing most forms of federal taxation, especially the income tax; they view most current regular federal expenditures, such as those for health care, education, and welfare, as unconstitutional under Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution and the Tenth Amendment.


The Constitution, by lacking basic understanding/applications of health care, education, and even the most primitive forms of environmental protections, demonstrates that it was written in the 18th century; it needs to be updated to modern levels of knowledge or abolished. A Party that tries to make reality conform to the USC --rather than the other way around--is likewise antiquated.


Foreign policy
Additionally, the party favors a noninterventionist foreign policy. It advocates reduction and eventual elimination of the role the United States plays in multinational and international organizations such as the United Nations, and favors withdrawal of the United States from most current treaties, such as NAFTA, GATT, and the World Trade Organization. The party takes mercantilist positions in supporting protectionist policies on international trade.

The party also believes in exercising a tariff system to counteract the U.S.' increasingly negative balance of trade.[17] The tariff system would levy additional import costs, the amount of which would vary proportionally with how much less the exporting country's production costs are compared to that of U.S. companies. This system would presumably give U.S. companies a better chance at competing with countries, like Mexico and China, which have lower labor costs.


Overall, a good foreign policy--however, why do we have to "compete" with other countries? This unstated assumption is wrong; our farmers need not compete with other farmers...we grow our own food; we make our own products. Any surplus we have could be bartered/sold on the international market to obtain whatever goods we need, but cannot produce ourselves.


Immigration policy
The party opposes illegal immigration and also seeks a more restrictive policy on legal immigration. They demand that the federal government restore immigration policies based on the practice that potential immigrants will be disqualified from admission to the U.S. if, on the grounds of health, criminality, morals, or financial dependence, they would impose an improper burden on the United States, any state, or any citizen of the United States.

Additionally, they oppose the provision of welfare subsidies and other taxpayer-supported benefits to illegal immigrants, and reject the practice of bestowing U.S. citizenship on children born to illegal immigrant parents while in this country. They also reject any extension of amnesty to illegal immigrants. The Constitution Party calls for the use of U.S. troops to protect the states against an influx of illegal immigrants.


Good.


Social policy
The party opposes euthanasia and abortion.[18][19] The party supports a state's right to administer the death penalty to those convicted of "capital crimes"[20] which, it should be noted, are not necessarily limited to murder but usually equate to such in modern American society.

Our support of a State's option to impose the death penalty is limited to those who have been convicted of capital crimes. This is consistent with protecting "innocent" life because the death penalty would only be applied to those who have proven to be a threat to innocent life.

((I would also propose that justice persons, whether LEO, judges, or prosecutors who are shown to fabricate or withhold evidence in capital crimes be subject to the death penalty as well))

The party also opposes government recognition of same-sex unions, and believes state and local governments have the right to criminalize "offensive sexual behavior".[21] The party further opposes pornography, believing the government needs to take a stand against it.[22] Viewing gambling as destructive and contributing to crime, the party opposes legalized gambling as well as government's support of gambling organizations.[23] The party opposes federal anti-drug laws, in keeping with the spirit of Article 1 Section 8 and Amendment 10, while maintaining that the federal government may have a role in limiting the import of drugs.[24]

((The Federal gov't cannot be used to enforce non-Federal laws))

The party supports the right to bear arms and view the Second Amendment to the Constitution as securing broad rights to own guns. The party is opposed to the USA PATRIOT Act.

The party believes that charity is a private matter in which the government has no business being involved.[25] The party opposes federal restrictions on, or subsidization of, medical treatments.[26]

((Again, we get into the realities of 21st century technology))

The party supports English as the official language for all governmental business, opposes bilingual ballots, and insists that those who wish to take part in the electoral process and governance of the US be required to read and comprehend basic English as a precondition of citizenship.[27]


I would put far more restrictions on "precondition of citizenship"--again we run into Forum Rules. Suffice to say that merely the ability to speak English isn't good enough to allow someone those most important rights of citizenship--the vote, the right to agitate, and the right to bear arms.


Federalism
The party supports the repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment, which allows Congress to tax income, and the Seventeenth Amendment, which requires the direct (popular) election of Senators.[35] The party asserts the rights of states to secede without interference from the Federal Government.


The 50 states are also a product of the 18th century--and are no longer needed. I believe it'd be better to re-align the States in accordance with the realities of local/regional needs. (ie, western WA -v- eastern WA, etc) The current 50 individual States serve no useful purpose to either the people who reside in them, or to the Union.

So, now having said that, it is *extremely* unlikely that any party that I devise would gain political power...and in truth, it's not for that lofty goal that I would organize one. (Although that would be a good thing, if it happened ) No, the purpose would be to awaken Americans to a better way of doing things than just looking at The Almighty Dollar, The Biggest F**ing House, and the Coolest Toys.

It seems to me that the Constitution Party is simply re-packaging the same kind of materialism that the Dems and Reps sell, but in a "let's return to our roots" form. Unless the entire perception of "America/the US" changes, we will continue on the path to destruction.
6/4/2008 9:51:07 PM EDT
[#12]
let's call the party arfcom and have strat run for prez!!!
6/4/2008 10:42:44 PM EDT
[#13]
Government devised by men will manifest the flaws of those men that designed it, Natural law has been proven effective by the experience of history and why a good part of the constitution was based on it, the major flaw of the constitution is it coppied too much from the British system and human designs.

You say you will not soil yourself trying to take the Republican party back and yet the alternative is to be ruled by evil men.

I know the system is broken at it's very foundation but then all law is when left the black letter interpretation.

Can't speak to the rest of the nation but here in Washington state we can and do have the ability to make the republican party a true conservative freedom protecting body.

I was a delegate to the state convention for Ron Paul, I know there is no political solution to the problems our country now faces but the political system can not be abandoned just because it appears useless, it is not useless, there are many good policy and political strategists in the system and that are needed to keep the peace once won by the militia, for America is unique in the world for having created peace through war where nations like France only got worse after their revolution.

Society is like a wagon with four wheels, it needs a economic wheel, a political wheel, a justice wheel and a FORCE wheel the MILITIA.

A body has many members but not all the members the same function, we need all four wheels on the wagon.

"Gaurd with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... O sir, we should have fine times, indeed, if to punish tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people!" - Patrick Henry
6/5/2008 8:13:10 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
Government devised by men will manifest the flaws of those men that designed it, Natural law has been proven effective by the experience of history and why a good part of the constitution was based on it, the major flaw of the constitution is it coppied too much from the British system and human designs.

You say you will not soil yourself trying to take the Republican party back and yet the alternative is to be ruled by evil men.


False logic; also known as a "black and white fallacy." It is my position that the Republicans (as a party) *are* just as evil as the Democrats. Winning over a party which is, itself, dedicated to evil ends is not productive.


I know the system is broken at it's very foundation but then all law is when left the black letter interpretation.


All things made by Man is subject to corruption/evil; to minimize its effects we must do all we can to aknowledge this.  For starters, we might recognize what is "evil" and what is not, and proceed from there...rather than doing a nip-and-tuck approach. YMMV of course, and I wish you well in your endeavors; I will consider other options.


Can't speak to the rest of the nation but here in Washington state we can and do have the ability to make the republican party a true conservative freedom protecting body.

I was a delegate to the state convention for Ron Paul, I know there is no political solution to the problems our country now faces but the political system can not be abandoned just because it appears useless, it is not useless, there are many good policy and political strategists in the system and that are needed to keep the peace once won by the militia, for America is unique in the world for having created peace through war where nations like France only got worse after their revolution.


iirc, the title of this thread is "How do I go about making a political party." Doesn't sound like I've abandoned the political process...

France, and Europe in general, got worse because of the nature of their revolutions--which were proto-Marxist in nature and process.


Society is like a wagon with four wheels, it needs a economic wheel, a political wheel, a justice wheel and a FORCE wheel the MILITIA.

A body has many members but not all the members the same function, we need all four wheels on the wagon.


For the Militia to work, one has to promote the idea that "conflict is sometimes necessary, yet such conflict needs to be only for the survival and well-being of the nation."  I agree with this; however no party wishes to promote this idea, because it is not "politically correct" to do so.  

In addition, your description of society "as a wagon" is very apt; you described the wheels, now how about the wagon? When one ties society's elements together, whether to a wagon or with a cord, one is describing a fascist society.

Most people don't know what "fascism" means; the fasciis (symbol of fascism) is a bundle of sticks, surrounding an ax; the ax of course is militarism/militia-ism.  Today we have a neo-fascist society, but instead of an ax there is an olive branch (or is it hemlock?)


"Gaurd with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... O sir, we should have fine times, indeed, if to punish tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people!" - Patrick Henry


With all due respect, the time for an armed revolution was many decades ago. Even if such a thing were to be tried today, if it were to have any hope of succeeding it would require men (and women) who are willing to stand up for what is right, and risk losing all they have. This would be not only in the arena  of combat, but also in recruiting and education. We would need people who would dare to broach several "taboo" subjects, if we are to keep the idea of Liberty alive.

That's one of the reasons I'm looking at forming a "political party"--to attract those people who ARE willing to risk "their lives, fortunes, and honor", regardless of the presumed glories of battle.

Back on topic--

Since you have some experience with proper political parties, could you tell me something of their organization/structure? What form of structure do they have?

Sole Proprietorship

General Partnership

Limited Partnership

Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)

Corporation

Limited Liability Company (LLC)

Does the party follow national directives to-the-letter? How much leeway do they have in responding to local conditions? Who determines the party's "platform"? Are there corporate/executive officers?
6/5/2008 8:42:31 AM EDT
[#15]
Crap, I thought I was in the nudie bar thread...wtf happened?!

AHa, here it is So what does one do
6/5/2008 9:05:57 AM EDT
[#16]
A true political party is organized to serve the interests of the living souls comprising the body, a state is really we the people, confusion comes in when "we the people" is not seen as an individual soul but confused with a legal entity, artificial and fictitious abstract.

The parties as they are presently comprised are corporations = legal entities but not living breathing souls with a mind that can reason.

The only pure party would be formed according to natural law Lex non Scripta.
6/5/2008 9:51:29 AM EDT
[#17]
Tell me more about this battleship.

If only Paul Allen was an Arfcommer.