Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
9/14/2013 3:57:58 PM EDT
Have a buddy of mine whose nephew came after him with an axe, and then threatened him with injury as law  enforcement finally hauled him away.
My buddy avoided the axe and ended up unscathed but a bit shaken. He has a cc permit and used great restraint in doing everything right and did not need to draw down.

I went with him to file a restraining order and he will soon go to his nephews hearing about his actions and to "finalize" the order.
He said in the paperwork he has to fill out they indicate they want an "inventory " of his weapons. Any advice on this from anyone here?
I have not seen this paperwork yet, but he wnats me to look at it with him.
9/14/2013 4:04:37 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Have a buddy of mine whose nephew came after him with an axe, and then threatened him with injury as law  enforcement finally hauled him away.
My buddy avoided the axe and ended up unscathed but a bit shaken. He has a cc permit and used great restraint in doing everything right and did not need to draw down.

I went with him to file a restraining order and he will soon go to his nephews hearing about his actions and to "finalize" the order.
He said in the paperwork he has to fill out they indicate they want an "inventory " of his weapons. Any advice on this from anyone here?
I have not seen this paperwork yet, but he wnats me to look at it with him.
View Quote


Why would they want an inventory of "weapons" owned by the victim? Stupid, and  none of their damn business. Being required to disclose detailed lists of firearms could easily discourage people from filing restraining orders. If it were me, and they insisted on a detailed list of my firearms, fuck that shit, I'm walking out... no restraining order.

If it were me, I'd put down guns, knives, hammers, baseball bats, fireplace pokers, tire irons, golf clubs... you get the idea.
9/14/2013 5:31:17 PM EDT
[#2]
Go google some of the funny registration stuff the Canadians did when they tried to register everything
9/14/2013 5:48:40 PM EDT
[#3]
I located the form he may have mentioned and I think he maybe somewhat confused as he as the petitioner would be able to list any firearms the respondent (the nephew) would own if he knew of any. It appears that this question on the form would be more applicable in the case of a spouse filing against a spouse when he/she may know of currently owned firearms, unless I'm not looking at the form correctly
9/14/2013 6:01:42 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Quoted:
I located the form he may have mentioned and I think he maybe somewhat confused as he as the petitioner would be able to list any firearms the respondent (the nephew) would own if he knew of any. It appears that this question on the form would be more applicable in the case of a spouse filing against a spouse when he/she may know of currently owned firearms, unless I'm not looking at the form correctly
View Quote


I think you found the issue.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
9/15/2013 3:28:14 AM EDT
[#5]

Quote History
Quoted:


I located the form he may have mentioned and I think he maybe somewhat confused as he as the petitioner would be able to list any firearms the respondent (the nephew) would own if he knew of any. It appears that this question on the form would be more applicable in the case of a spouse filing against a spouse when he/she may know of currently owned firearms, unless I'm not looking at the form correctly
View Quote
Yep. When we had to get ro's against my brothers ex father in law yeas ago we didnt have to fill that out and more recently when I and my parents also put one on my cousins abusive husband we never filled that out either.

 
9/15/2013 6:43:40 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:

I think you found the issue.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
... he as the petitioner would be able to list any firearms the respondent (the nephew) would own if he knew of any.

I think you found the issue.


I'm glad he found a simple issue.
I'm also disappointed that the mistake seems plausible.