[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Sorry Pack fans (Page 1 of 3)
Posted: 11/1/2009 4:07:25 PM EDT
Maybe next year  |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
**fighting urge to respond.... going through with a response anyways** Hey congrats, maybe this year you can add another Lombardi Trophy to your... aww... 0-4 in the big one.   hehe, that's the spirit. You're more than welcome to sign another hand-me-down player. I'm sure Bart Starr has an open schedule, drop him a line. 
For the record, I could care less if they win or not but it does make work easier bc everyone is in a better mood. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Whatever happens the rest of season doesn't matter.....we beat GB twice!!!!! BTW leading in completeions between th 20's doesn't win many games... Whats this WE stuff, mr. michiganer? I haven't see the lions play football for a few years now. That's MR. NoDak to you...Hell, I had Dave Brown as a student teacher in 9th grade...as far Michigan, I am a prisoner of the economy...It was nice to see Bret beat the pack instead of the Vikes...only wish we still had the Met, haven't played good ball since moving indoors. Having been to Lambeau, I am jealous. Hope you guys win out now that WE have our two wins...Beat the Bears!!!!! |
|
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are.
Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. |
|
Vikings are a better team with more experience (Pack has the youngest starting roster in the NFL, IIRC). I hate to say it, but the better team won. Congrats.
Favre had a Favre day against a Packers team that didn't even show up to play until the middle of the 3rd quarter. *shrug* You Vikes fans wait till it's the end of the season, he's tired, your opponents have Pederson nailed and Brett thinks he has to carry the team. He may lead the league all-time in TDs, but he also leads the league all-time in INTs. Take it from us, the glory is great while it lasts. The frustration with that last interception to kill your NFC title hopes is what keeps you warm in the post-season. So what's you future look like, boys? Ours includes a second-year QB that matches a hall-of-fame performer stat-for-stat with one less game, and he's doing it with out an O-line. Now I like to watch the guy who will possibly go down in history as the greatest QB of all time, but the Packer's made the right move for the team. Rodgers' most productive years are yet to come. As far as Farve playing for the purple? Unless you guys win the SB (and you might just have a chance if you don't screw it up), Favre's current run will be the same as Montana's at the end of his career - the one at Kansas City that no one remembers. Gloat after the Super Bowl. Until then, pray for pass protection and one good year with Favre. You deserve 1/16th the experience we've had over the years as a sympathy prize for your suffering in the last decade or two (or five). 
|
|
Quoted:
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. THANK YOU...nuff said!
|
|
Quoted:
Gloat after the Super Bowl. Until then, pray for pass protection and one good year with Favre. You deserve 1/16th the experience we've had over the years as a sympathy prize for your suffering in the last decade or two (or five). 
You know, this year IS probably the first time in... ... ...about as long as I can remember... that the Vikings are actually INTERESTING to watch! 
|
|
Quoted:
Vikings are a better team with more experience (Pack has the youngest starting roster in the NFL, IIRC). I hate to say it, but the better team won. Congrats. Favre had a Favre day against a Packers team that didn't even show up to play until the middle of the 3rd quarter. *shrug* You Vikes fans wait till it's the end of the season, he's tired, your opponents have Pederson nailed and Brett thinks he has to carry the team. He may lead the league all-time in TDs, but he also leads the league all-time in INTs. Take it from us, the glory is great while it lasts. The frustration with that last interception to kill your NFC title hopes is what keeps you warm in the post-season. So what's you future look like, boys? Ours includes a second-year QB that matches a hall-of-fame performer stat-for-stat with one less game, and he's doing it with out an O-line. Now I like to watch the guy who will possibly go down in history as the greatest QB of all time, but the Packer's made the right move for the team. Rodgers' most productive years are yet to come. As far as Farve playing for the purple? Unless you guys win the SB (and you might just have a chance if you don't screw it up), Favre's current run will be the same as Montana's at the end of his career - the one at Kansas City that no one remembers. Gloat after the Super Bowl. Until then, pray for pass protection and one good year with Favre. You deserve 1/16th the experience we've had over the years as a sympathy prize for your suffering in the last decade or two (or five). Yours looks like an injured starting QB. I want to see Rodgers play that well with a broken bone. He is good, but he wont be great if he gets injured. How many times did he get sacked in that Bengals game by the same person? He cant take much more of that this year. The rest of the season isnt easy except for Tampa and Detroit. He will be extremely lucky not to get injured this season. Oh and I wouldnt start comparing the stats of Rodgers and Farve quite yet. Rodgers is not even in the same league as Farve yet. Farve 17/28 for 244 yards, 4 TD Rodgers 26/41 for 287 yards, 3 TD Statistically Farve is better, more yards per completion, less attempts, and more TDs |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Vikings are a better team with more experience (Pack has the youngest starting roster in the NFL, IIRC). I hate to say it, but the better team won. Congrats. Favre had a Favre day against a Packers team that didn't even show up to play until the middle of the 3rd quarter. *shrug* You Vikes fans wait till it's the end of the season, he's tired, your opponents have Pederson nailed and Brett thinks he has to carry the team. He may lead the league all-time in TDs, but he also leads the league all-time in INTs. Take it from us, the glory is great while it lasts. The frustration with that last interception to kill your NFC title hopes is what keeps you warm in the post-season. So what's you future look like, boys? Ours includes a second-year QB that matches a hall-of-fame performer stat-for-stat with one less game, and he's doing it with out an O-line. Now I like to watch the guy who will possibly go down in history as the greatest QB of all time, but the Packer's made the right move for the team. Rodgers' most productive years are yet to come. As far as Farve playing for the purple? Unless you guys win the SB (and you might just have a chance if you don't screw it up), Favre's current run will be the same as Montana's at the end of his career - the one at Kansas City that no one remembers. Gloat after the Super Bowl. Until then, pray for pass protection and one good year with Favre. You deserve 1/16th the experience we've had over the years as a sympathy prize for your suffering in the last decade or two (or five). Yours looks like an injured starting QB. I want to see Rodgers play that well with a broken bone. He is good, but he wont be great if he gets injured. How many times did he get sacked in that Bengals game by the same person? He cant take much more of that this year. The rest of the season isnt easy except for Tampa and Detroit. He will be extremely lucky not to get injured this season. Oh and I wouldnt start comparing the stats of Rodgers and Farve quite yet. Rodgers is not even in the same league as Farve yet. Farve 17/28 for 244 yards, 4 TD Rodgers 26/41 for 287 yards, 3 TD Statistically Farve is better, more yards per completion, less attempts, and more TDs wtf? favre has one of the best offensive line in the league, was facing a weaker defense with no pass rush and benefits from one of the best RBs of all time. what a shitty comparison. the fact that rodgers put of comparable stats from his back with no run support, no offensive line, perhaps better WRs though against a better D is amazing. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Vikings are a better team with more experience (Pack has the youngest starting roster in the NFL, IIRC). I hate to say it, but the better team won. Congrats. Favre had a Favre day against a Packers team that didn't even show up to play until the middle of the 3rd quarter. *shrug* You Vikes fans wait till it's the end of the season, he's tired, your opponents have Pederson nailed and Brett thinks he has to carry the team. He may lead the league all-time in TDs, but he also leads the league all-time in INTs. Take it from us, the glory is great while it lasts. The frustration with that last interception to kill your NFC title hopes is what keeps you warm in the post-season. So what's you future look like, boys? Ours includes a second-year QB that matches a hall-of-fame performer stat-for-stat with one less game, and he's doing it with out an O-line. Now I like to watch the guy who will possibly go down in history as the greatest QB of all time, but the Packer's made the right move for the team. Rodgers' most productive years are yet to come. As far as Farve playing for the purple? Unless you guys win the SB (and you might just have a chance if you don't screw it up), Favre's current run will be the same as Montana's at the end of his career - the one at Kansas City that no one remembers. Gloat after the Super Bowl. Until then, pray for pass protection and one good year with Favre. You deserve 1/16th the experience we've had over the years as a sympathy prize for your suffering in the last decade or two (or five). Yours looks like an injured starting QB. I want to see Rodgers play that well with a broken bone. He is good, but he wont be great if he gets injured. How many times did he get sacked in that Bengals game by the same person? He cant take much more of that this year. The rest of the season isnt easy except for Tampa and Detroit. He will be extremely lucky not to get injured this season. Oh and I wouldnt start comparing the stats of Rodgers and Farve quite yet. Rodgers is not even in the same league as Farve yet. Farve 17/28 for 244 yards, 4 TD Rodgers 26/41 for 287 yards, 3 TD Statistically Farve is better, more yards per completion, less attempts, and more TDs wtf? favre has one of the best offensive line in the league, was facing a weaker defense with no pass rush and benefits from one of the best RBs of all time. what a shitty comparison. the fact that rodgers put of comparable stats from his back with no run support, no offensive line, perhaps better WRs though against a better D is amazing. I think it is a great comparison. You only think its shitty because you lost. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Vikings are a better team with more experience (Pack has the youngest starting roster in the NFL, IIRC). I hate to say it, but the better team won. Congrats. Favre had a Favre day against a Packers team that didn't even show up to play until the middle of the 3rd quarter. *shrug* You Vikes fans wait till it's the end of the season, he's tired, your opponents have Pederson nailed and Brett thinks he has to carry the team. He may lead the league all-time in TDs, but he also leads the league all-time in INTs. Take it from us, the glory is great while it lasts. The frustration with that last interception to kill your NFC title hopes is what keeps you warm in the post-season. So what's you future look like, boys? Ours includes a second-year QB that matches a hall-of-fame performer stat-for-stat with one less game, and he's doing it with out an O-line. Now I like to watch the guy who will possibly go down in history as the greatest QB of all time, but the Packer's made the right move for the team. Rodgers' most productive years are yet to come. As far as Farve playing for the purple? Unless you guys win the SB (and you might just have a chance if you don't screw it up), Favre's current run will be the same as Montana's at the end of his career - the one at Kansas City that no one remembers. Gloat after the Super Bowl. Until then, pray for pass protection and one good year with Favre. You deserve 1/16th the experience we've had over the years as a sympathy prize for your suffering in the last decade or two (or five). Yours looks like an injured starting QB. I want to see Rodgers play that well with a broken bone. He is good, but he wont be great if he gets injured. How many times did he get sacked in that Bengals game by the same person? He cant take much more of that this year. The rest of the season isnt easy except for Tampa and Detroit. He will be extremely lucky not to get injured this season. Oh and I wouldnt start comparing the stats of Rodgers and Farve quite yet. Rodgers is not even in the same league as Farve yet. Farve 17/28 for 244 yards, 4 TD Rodgers 26/41 for 287 yards, 3 TD Statistically Farve is better, more yards per completion, less attempts, and more TDs wtf? favre has one of the best offensive line in the league, was facing a weaker defense with no pass rush and benefits from one of the best RBs of all time. what a shitty comparison. the fact that rodgers put of comparable stats from his back with no run support, no offensive line, perhaps better WRs though against a better D is amazing. I think it is a great comparison. You only think its shitty because you lost. i had no problem with the packers losing. if ever there were a year for the vikes to win, this was it. but it's pretty meaningless to point to someone who had marginally better stats on a MUCH better team benefitting from a MUCH better supporting cast as someone being better than someone who has a group of pee wees playing o-line. im not saying favre is bad, far from. just that comparing their stats, apples to apples, is a straw man argument. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
quote] Farve 17/28 for 244 yards, 4 TD Rodgers 26/41 for 287 yards, 3 TD Statistically Farve is better, more yards per completion, less attempts, and more TDs wtf? favre has one of the best offensive line in the league, was facing a weaker defense with no pass rush and benefits from one of the best RBs of all time. what a shitty comparison. the fact that rodgers put of comparable stats from his back with no run support, no offensive line, perhaps better WRs though against a better D is amazing. I think it is a great comparison. You only think its shitty because you lost. i had no problem with the packers losing. if ever there were a year for the vikes to win, this was it. but it's pretty meaningless to point to someone who had marginally better stats on a MUCH better team benefitting from a MUCH better supporting cast as someone being better than someone who has a group of pee wees playing o-line. im not saying favre is bad, far from. just that comparing their stats, apples to apples, is a straw man argument. would you rather have it compared apples to oranges? |
|
Quoted:
Rogers is quite good. The defense lost that game. If you dig a little deeper you'd see that all his stats come in the 2nd half after the packers are already out of the game and the defense's have already stepped off there A-games. Look at all 3 of there losses, look at all tere games last year. Or maybe he'll look OK against the worst teams the league has to offer. He is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Accept it, you guys should be mad at thompson and mccarthy for not fielding the best possible players they could to win games, instead your mad at Favre because he didnt stay retired, he was gone from GB whether he would of changed his mind or not. I said it once I'll say it a million times and it'll prove itself time and time again, that loser ted thompson, is the worst thing that could ever happen to the packers and his ego, has destroyed your hopes of a winning season for yet another year. The terrible O-;ine this year, his fault. Getting rid of a winning quarterback, his fault. Giving ryan grant more money, his fault. Drafting hawk, his fault, not getting Randy Moss, his fault. You guys are so mad at Favre you cant even see, te real reason why you suck so much. |
|
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio.
if this were a car racing analogy, offense: favre would be the guy in the tricked out car with the stronger engine, more fuel, better cornering, etc. rodgers would be the guy with the inferior car across the board. to make matters even worse, teh defenses they are facing: rodgersis driving a tough course whilst raining, favre is driving a challenging course, the pack defense isn't bad, but it's not as hard as rodger's. u can't compare the two finish times. they are facing different challenges (defenses) with vastly different weapons at their disposal. still, kudos to favre for still doing a good job. |
|
Quoted: If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. I'm not a Packer fan. This is the first time in 19 years I've been a Farve fan. I just love watching Farve, play for my Vikings, beating the Packers twice. If there is anything sweeter for a Viking fan growing up in Wisconsin, it'll only come this January. |
|
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. 
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. FMD for the win! Agreed: in my experience with the favre harem, they will focus on the one stat that turns out in favre's favor and praise it as the most important. Then again, all of the favre ppl who favor him to green bay that i know are also flaming liberals.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. FMD for the win! Agreed: in my experience with the favre harem, they will focus on the one stat that turns out in favre's favor and praise it as the most important. Then again, all of the favre ppl who favor him to green bay that i know are also flaming liberals.
I dont like the packers because I am a bears fan. But I like Farve as a QB and that is why I sided with him. Not just so he could stick it to the packers but so I could see him play more. |
| additional thoughts: as a note, im still not sure one cane really compare their season stats. it's no secret that the packers offense flows through rodgers, ergo, inflating his stats (though he has obviously been sacked far more times, which also acts as a downward pressure). at the same time, favre has often been second fiddle to adrian peterson, which hurts his stats, and at the same time radically benefits from AP opening up defenses for him. so it stands to figure that he'll have less chances, though better chances. this seems confirmed by the stats FMD posted which shows less attempts per game, but slightly better completion percentage and results per attempt. |
|
Quoted:
There's no doubt in my mind Rogers will be an excellent quarterback in the future, and that Farve is on his last legs. That's not the point of this thread. The point is, the Vikings beat the Packers twice this season.
There's always next year. don't hijack the thread
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. Apparently you cant read. Tell me how his stats are when the Packers are still in the game and not down by 3+ touchdowns in the 2nd half when he catches defenses after they start kicking it back, if you'd watch football you'd see that. How he played in the first half this past Sunday is how he plays every game against teams with winning records. If rodgers could play his 2nd half football for the entire game he might be an elite quarterback in the league, but that has happend yet against good or even mediocre teams. I might be wrong but has rodgers ever even brought back the pack from behind to win? As far as I'm concerned all he is concerned about is getting his stats up, and it has all of the fools fooled so far. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. Apparently you cant read. Tell me how his stats are when the Packers are still in the game and not down by 3+ touchdowns in the 2nd half when he catches defenses after they start kicking it back, if you'd watch football you'd see that. How he played in the first half this past Sunday is how he plays every game against teams with winning records. If rodgers could play his 2nd half football for the entire game he might be an elite quarterback in the league, but that has happend yet against good or even mediocre teams. I might be wrong but has rodgers ever even brought back the pack from behind to win? As far as I'm concerned all he is concerned about is getting his stats up, and it has all of the fools fooled so far. Sure we are fooled. 
By all means keep crying about Favre and how he is not with the Packers blah blah blah Far to many people sucking Favres dick. ((((General comment. Not directed at you unless the shoe fits of course.))))) |
|
Quoted:
Apparently you cant read. ...and apparently you suck at reading stats.
Tell me how his stats are when the Packers are still in the game and not down by 3+ touchdowns in the 2nd half when he catches defenses after they start kicking it back, if you'd watch football you'd see that.
It's only happened once (this past Sunday). If you watched football, you'd already know that. For the record: Rodger's 1st Q TDs: 4 Rodgers 2nd Q TDs: 3 Rodgers 3rd Q TDs: 2 Rodgers 4th Q TDs: 5 But he can only throw a TD in the second half when they're down by 21 and the defenses are giving him the field, right? How he played in the first half this past Sunday is how he plays every game against teams with winning records.
ORLY? Packers at the half against winning teams were: - Up 10-2 with the Bears. - Tied with Cinci (21 all, Rodgers with 1 TD). - Down by 1 TD against the Vikes the first time (Rodgers had 1 TD). - Down by 10 on Sunday. If you're keeping score, you went 0-3 on that one. Maybe 0-2.5 if you count the Bears where Rodgers didn't have a TD in the first half. If rodgers could play his 2nd half football for the entire game he might be an elite quarterback in the league, but that has happend yet against good or even mediocre teams. I might be wrong but has rodgers ever even brought back the pack from behind to win?
Rodgers has 7 TDs in the first half and 7 in the second half this season. In the first game of the season he brought the Pack back to beat the Bears with a minute 11 in the 4th... ...but I wouldn't know any of this since I don't watch football. 
As far as I'm concerned all he is concerned about is getting his stats up, and it has all of the fools fooled so far.
"Fool" is a pretty bold word for someone who can't seem to get any of the stats right. Just sayin'. Look, the guy is not (and never will be) Brett Favre. I, for one, don't want him to be. That said, he's a damn good quarterback that will come in to his own as the team develops. Favre is gone, and we need to get over it. He aint comin' back. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. Apparently you cant read. Tell me how his stats are when the Packers are still in the game and not down by 3+ touchdowns in the 2nd half when he catches defenses after they start kicking it back, if you'd watch football you'd see that. How he played in the first half this past Sunday is how he plays every game against teams with winning records. If rodgers could play his 2nd half football for the entire game he might be an elite quarterback in the league, but that has happend yet against good or even mediocre teams. I might be wrong but has rodgers ever even brought back the pack from behind to win? As far as I'm concerned all he is concerned about is getting his stats up, and it has all of the fools fooled so far. OultlawZ79, Yup, the Vikes won. Good on you! However... Vikings fans seem to thrive on beating the Packers as if it was the Superbowl. Don't know why. Just like hearing, Ryan Grant sucks from Viking fans. I agree, he is not AP. But who is??? Ryan Grant is 9th in the league in yards, so saying he sucks is a bit out of touch. He IS NOT AP. Rodgers will be a good if not great QB given time. Objectivity gets lost at times and FMD has the facts to back it up. Win the Superbowl for all of our sakes, so then we can honestly say, "Great, the monkey is off your back." Else it is just another, "same ol', same 'ol year in Minneapolis", but at least Favre looks like a hero for now. |
|
This sums up the vikings
(viking's player runs ball into wrong end zone) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IBkQoXNvbA |
|
Quoted:
This sums up the vikings (viking's player runs ball into wrong end zone) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IBkQoXNvbA NICE!! Have fun with the old man for one year while it lasts....... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Rogers is quite good. The defense lost that game. If you dig a little deeper you'd see that all his stats come in the 2nd half after the packers are already out of the game and the defense's have already stepped off there A-games. Look at all 3 of there losses, look at all tere games last year. Or maybe he'll look OK against the worst teams the league has to offer. He is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Accept it, you guys should be mad at thompson and mccarthy for not fielding the best possible players they could to win games, instead your mad at Favre because he didnt stay retired, he was gone from GB whether he would of changed his mind or not. I said it once I'll say it a million times and it'll prove itself time and time again, that loser ted thompson, is the worst thing that could ever happen to the packers and his ego, has destroyed your hopes of a winning season for yet another year. The terrible O-;ine this year, his fault. Getting rid of a winning quarterback, his fault. Giving ryan grant more money, his fault. Drafting hawk, his fault, not getting Randy Moss, his fault. You guys are so mad at Favre you cant even see, te real reason why you suck so much. Alright, the part in red is just not true. He puts up a hundred yards in the first quarter, more often than not. Also, how many guys come into the league and rank with the top 5 rated qb's right off the bat? On a shitty team no less. Hell, look at the 49ers, the bears or even the vikings. When was the last time they had a true franchise qb? The second part however, I agree with completely. In my opinion, Mccarthy is a terrible coach. Just look at all the penalties, week in and week out. Play calling is crap and his clock management is laughable. Also, I have begun to refer to Ted Thompson as the Green Bay slacker. Ahman Green, really? Ryan Grant, all that money after a few good games? And why don't we EVER sign big free agents, instead of turd polishing? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. Apparently you cant read. Tell me how his stats are when the Packers are still in the game and not down by 3+ touchdowns in the 2nd half when he catches defenses after they start kicking it back, if you'd watch football you'd see that. How he played in the first half this past Sunday is how he plays every game against teams with winning records. If rodgers could play his 2nd half football for the entire game he might be an elite quarterback in the league, but that has happend yet against good or even mediocre teams. I might be wrong but has rodgers ever even brought back the pack from behind to win? As far as I'm concerned all he is concerned about is getting his stats up, and it has all of the fools fooled so far. Tell me the last time we were down 3 touchdowns, at any point in any game with Rodgers being QB, minus the Saints game last year. So were you a Vikings fan the last 3 years, when we won 5 of the last 6? Don't you feel kinda dirty using our old vengeful quarterback to finally win? Kinda like the rebound guy who the girl uses to get back at her ex, who will just be tossed to the side after the point is made? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
[Rodgers] is a mediocre quarterback at best, you Favre haters all are kidding yourselves, if you think he is a reasonable replacement. Quoted:
incomparable, at least not without some kind of ratio. Rodgers 2009 Stats: Games 7 Games Started 7 Completions 147 Attempts 225 Percentage 65.3 Total Yards Passing 1,989 Avg Yards Per Comp 8.8 Touchdowns 14 Interceptions 2 Sacks 31 QB Rating 110.4 Favre 2009 Stats: Games 8 Games Started 8 Completions 174 Attempts 256 Percentage 68.0 Total Yards Passing 1,925 Avg Yards Per Comp 7.5 Touchdowns 16 Interceptions 3 Sacks 18 QB Rating 106.0 The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they don't lie either. Cherry pick any game from this year that you want to remove for Favre and compare to Rodgers for an apples-to-apples basis. The only stat in Favre's favor will be sacks. Now compare the second-year start of Rodgers to Favre's second year with the Pack and see how they stack up. That should say something to the doubters. Sadly, it won't. Apparently you cant read. Tell me how his stats are when the Packers are still in the game and not down by 3+ touchdowns in the 2nd half when he catches defenses after they start kicking it back, if you'd watch football you'd see that. How he played in the first half this past Sunday is how he plays every game against teams with winning records. If rodgers could play his 2nd half football for the entire game he might be an elite quarterback in the league, but that has happend yet against good or even mediocre teams. I might be wrong but has rodgers ever even brought back the pack from behind to win? As far as I'm concerned all he is concerned about is getting his stats up, and it has all of the fools fooled so far. Tell me the last time we were down 3 touchdowns, at any point in any game with Rodgers being QB, minus the Saints game last year. So were you a Vikings fan the last 3 years, when we won 5 of the last 6? Don't you feel kinda dirty using our old vengeful quarterback to finally win? Kinda like the rebound guy who the girl uses to get back at her ex, who will just be tossed to the side after the point is made? lulz |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted:snip Tell me the last time we were down 3 touchdowns, at any point in any game with Rodgers being QB, minus the Saints game last year. So were you a Vikings fan the last 3 years, when we won 5 of the last 6? Don't you feel kinda dirty using our old vengeful quarterback to finally win? Kinda like the rebound guy who the girl uses to get back at her ex, who will just be tossed to the side after the point is made? All's fair in love and football. |
|
Quoted:
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. Really? For one, it's spelled DOUCHE. Another thing, you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I can't blame you but coming from someone that has met Favre personally I can honestly say that from my POV you just made yourself look stupid. And bitter... very, very bitter. Of course this last part is an assumption.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. Really? For one, it's spelled DOUCHE. Another thing, you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I can't blame you but coming from someone that has met Favre personally I can honestly say that from my POV you just made yourself look stupid. And bitter... very, very bitter. Of course this last part is an assumption. wow... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. Really? For one, it's spelled DOUCHE. Another thing, you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I can't blame you but coming from someone that has met Favre personally I can honestly say that from my POV you just made yourself look stupid. And bitter... very, very bitter. Of course this last part is an assumption. wow... Yes? A friend of my uncle used to bow hunt with him fairly regularly. About 5?(WAG on the years there) years ago they decided to hunt my uncles land. My uncle invited me along for a day. I didn't say much as I was only 15-16 at the time but he was very down to earth. Didn't talk about football at all. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. Really? For one, it's spelled DOUCHE. Another thing, you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I can't blame you but coming from someone that has met Favre personally I can honestly say that from my POV you just made yourself look stupid. And bitter... very, very bitter. Of course this last part is an assumption. Bitter? Not really. I am honestly not really much of a football fan. Ohhhh, sorry I spelled a word wrong. I also spelled Then wrong and whining wrong. Oh well. Ok you met him. So? Was he at a autograph session? If he was he is going to put his happy face on. So he didn't cry on national tv and then break his word later?? He had his own shower and dressed seperately from the rest of the team, among other things. That is not DOUCHEBAGGERY? (sp?) I guess it's ok for the all mighty Favre.... There are many things one could cite about Favre. I was hoping he was going to leave 2 years earlier.
That said. How can you be a Packer fan (insert your team here) and hope you lose so the other team can win. Just to prove some retarded point that is irrelevant anyway. How does this make me wrong? Take the rose colored Favre glasses off man. The spell check is to the right of the "Cancel" button and to the right of the "Preview" button. As a last note, sorry I made you so upset. It is only football. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If you call yourself a Packer fan and you root for Favre and wanted him to beat the Packers, tne you are not a Packer fan. Stop telling people you are. Farve is still and will always be a whinning cry baby douce bag. I would be happy to tell that to him to his face. I am still happy he is not a Packer. One man is not a team. Telling yourself, and others otherwise is stupid and makes yourself look stupid. Really? For one, it's spelled DOUCHE. Another thing, you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. I can't blame you but coming from someone that has met Favre personally I can honestly say that from my POV you just made yourself look stupid. And bitter... very, very bitter. Of course this last part is an assumption. Bitter? Not really. I am honestly not really much of a football fan. Ohhhh, sorry I spelled a word wrong. I also spelled Then wrong and whining wrong. Oh well. Ok you met him. So? Was he at a autograph session? If he was he is going to put his happy face on. I did not see your post above when I typed this. So he didn't cry on national tv and then break his word later?? He had his own shower and dressed seperately from the rest of the team, among other things. That is not DOUCHEBAGGERY? (sp?) I guess it's ok for the all mighty Favre.... There are many things one could cite about Favre. I was hoping he was going to leave 2 years earlier.
That said. How can you be a Packer fan (insert your team here) and hope you lose so the other team can win. Just to prove some retarded point that is irrelevant anyway. How does this make me wrong? Take the rose colored Favre glasses off man. The spell check is to the right of the "Cancel" button and to the right of the "Preview" button. As a last note, sorry I made you so upset. It is only football. I still stand by my comments. 99.9% of the people only see what he does on tv. If he is so down to earth why does he act like the world owes him something and he can do what he wants anytime? |