Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/9/2016 7:16:04 PM EDT
After YEARS of dealing with slashes, starbursts and blobs its over. Vortex knocked it out of the park with this one. The spitfire ar is fantastic. Glass is clear. The reticle is awesome. After 4 micros, 2 comp m4s , comp m3 , MRO and various others I am at peace. Thank you. Thank you. I cant believe i didnt get a prism years ago. You rock vortex.
1/20/2017 10:53:36 PM EDT
[#1]
I'm right there with you.
I took delivery of one today and am very impressed.

I hope to get it out to the range very soon...

Nice work Vortex.
2/4/2017 4:49:26 AM EDT
[#2]
Amen!

I am digging this scope.
2/5/2017 11:45:01 AM EDT
[#3]
How about a Spitfire AR with ADM QD mount for $249.99?

https://www.americandefensemanufacturing.com/view/product/1248/
2/6/2017 11:54:45 AM EDT
[#4]
Awesome! We're glad you guys like the Spitfire!
3/20/2017 1:48:05 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Quoted:
Awesome! We're glad you guys like the Spitfire!
View Quote
Hey Vortex, those of us with uncorrected astigmatism thank you for bringing this to market.

Any idea if the Spitfire AR 1x will come with any different reticle options in the future, perhaps even a Gen II?

This would be my favorite carbine optic on the market if it weren't for the DRT reticle. I get that the primary focus was speed, but the 3 MOA center dot severely hinders accuracy beyond 50 yards. To a less important degree, I also feel like a single, large outer ring or horseshoe would actually increase speed vs. the two of varying thicknesses. In other words, I either wish it had an EOTech-like reticle with a single, large ring and a fine 1-1.5 MOA center dot, OR a variation of the Holosun Paralow ACSS reticle with a large outer ring and a chevron in the middle... Really, anything with a finer central aiming point and only one "speed / centering ring" (for lack of a better term) would make this a much more versatile optic with tons of utility. The illumination should be adequate enough to compensate for a smaller central aiming point as far as visibility is concerned, and the ability to engage 8-12" targets with some semblance of accuracy to 200 yards would more than make up for any perceived shortcomings of a smaller dot.
3/20/2017 2:24:00 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote History
Quoted:but the 3 MOA center dot severely hinders accuracy beyond 50 yards
View Quote
I have a doe dropped at 125yds that says you're wrong.
4/2/2017 6:10:33 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
And? I can do that with irons. Being able to place a round on a deer at an average hunting distance does not mean that accuracy isn't hindered at practical carbine ranges... Try hitting an 8" steel plate at 300 yards in a carbine course with a dot that appears 9" wide at that range and let me know if your opinion is still the same. My point was, some of the "fastest" reticles out there still include a reasonably fine central aiming point (anywhere from .25 - 2 MOA, with the average being about 1 MOA). Vortex's own V-Brite reticle uses a 1.5 MOA center dot that would be very well suited for this type of application.

It's still a great optic, I just wish there was more than one reticle choice.
4/2/2017 7:44:50 PM EDT
[#8]
I like the optic, but it seems to have some slight magnification or something that makes both-eyes-open kind of off.
4/3/2017 6:44:36 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Quoted:

And? I can do that with irons. Being able to place a round on a deer at an average hunting distance does not mean that accuracy isn't hindered at practical carbine ranges... Try hitting an 8" steel plate at 300 yards in a carbine course with a dot that appears 9" wide at that range and let me know if your opinion is still the same. My point was, some of the "fastest" reticles out there still include a reasonably fine central aiming point (anywhere from .25 - 2 MOA, with the average being about 1 MOA). Vortex's own V-Brite reticle uses a 1.5 MOA center dot that would be very well suited for this type of application.

It's still a great optic, I just wish there was more than one reticle choice.
View Quote
You made the comment that accuracy is hindered beyond 50 yards, I offered a rebuttal. There's no "and". I think your statement about the 8" plate at 300yds, while a good point, is moving the goal post from your previous assessment. I think there is a point where the 3MOA dot becomes difficult to use, but 50 yards, in my opinion is not that mark. Your second example of 300 yards, or even 250, might be that point.

I think we also need to get an idea of what kind of accuracy you expect from a red dot before moving up to a scope before we can really get into the accuracy requirements.