Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 6
Next Page
8/19/2011 1:49:02 PM EDT
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?
8/19/2011 1:56:12 PM EDT
[#1]
Spend enough time reading this forum and you'll realize stealing other people's food is not a survival strategy.  Its a quick way to lose the survival game.

I know I would do everything in my power to provide for myself and my family, short of compromising my humanity and moral fortitude.

8/19/2011 2:03:31 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?



How long do you think it would be before you got shot stealing?



8/19/2011 2:04:50 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?



How long you you think it would be before you got shot stealing?





This is why its not a survival strategy.  Its the opposite.

8/19/2011 2:14:27 PM EDT
[#4]
Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting it is something smart to do. I'm also not talking about taking something from someones home or anything like that. I'm talking something like going to a grocery store in need of antibiotics or more cans of food or something.
8/19/2011 2:19:02 PM EDT
[#5]
As has been said before...Stealing is a good way to end up dead sooner.



Most folks on here plan for folks to try to steal.

Most folks on here plan and prepare so that they do not need to steal.




8/19/2011 2:20:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting it is something smart to do. I'm also not talking about taking something from someones home or anything like that. I'm talking something like going to a grocery store in need of antibiotics or more cans of food or something.



In that case your proposed plan is a strategy, ––obviously.

That said, how long can you continue your strategy w/out something really bad happening to you or someone else?

BTW, how old are you?



8/19/2011 2:22:42 PM EDT
[#7]
Looting and theft is not part of my survival plan. Just because SHTF doesn't mean that I have to sacrifice my morals to survive. Many people in the past have survived in harsh conditions while maintaining high morals.
8/19/2011 2:29:41 PM EDT
[#8]
I dont see that happening for me, maybe Im kidding myself idk. Im only about 30min from the Gulf of Mexico to the west and inland hunting to the east. While the local resources may not support everyone long term, most of the population here are clueless anyways.

If the local gov can keep the fishingshrimping boats running there would be food for everyone in the short term, probably decimating some of the fish populations in the process. We also have some crab, fish and clam farms. Someone out here farms ostiches. Really depends on how organized the local gov is to keep the food chain running.

Saw a tv show about surviving a nuclear bomb, they advised stealing a car if you had to in order to evacuate the fallout area. Guess it will really depend on the situation. My family are christians, becoming highwaymen is not in our future. We wont be taking anything by force.
8/19/2011 2:41:42 PM EDT
[#9]
I'm not sure how long I would last in that situation. Probably not long because I'm not prepared at all. I don't have any plan what-so-ever.

I was just curious as to how some people view the situation. It's apparent that yall are against it 100% and that's fine. I just got to thinking about that kind of thing after reading about looting after hurricanes.

I'm not the kind of person to go looting anything either, so again I'm not suggesting it's a strategy of mine or anything like that.

I'm 18 for another month.
8/19/2011 2:50:07 PM EDT
[#10]
IMO, it's far better to plan ahead and get what you need while you can.

I'm not saying I wouldn't steal if I was watching my children wither away, but there's a good chance that I may end up dead while doing it.

Get everything you need now, so you don't have to rob or steal, because if there's a TEOTWAWKI, I'm killing everyone I find on my property,

it's not even an option for me, if my location is compromised, the threat needs to be eliminated.

Stealing is an absolute last option, and a horrible one at that.
8/19/2011 2:51:26 PM EDT
[#11]
What are some things you think you'd need in a shit hit the fan type senario?
8/19/2011 2:54:30 PM EDT
[#12]
Welcome to the SF



The whole point of what we do here can best be summed up in the Boy Scout motto "Be Prepared."



TomJefferson, who is on Staff at this site and has a son about your age, has said


Prepare for the most likely first and the least likely last.  It is impressive how that when you get prepared for the most likely that then the least likely things take care of themselves.










8/19/2011 2:55:36 PM EDT
[#13]
Quoted:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting it is something smart to do. I'm also not talking about taking something from someones home or anything like that. I'm talking something like going to a grocery store in need of antibiotics or more cans of food or something.


If you have done your part in making adequate preparations, then by the time you "Need" to steal something, the store shelves will be long gone and the store will have already been burned down to rubble.

Again, it's not a plan, it's an act of desperation.
8/19/2011 3:08:59 PM EDT
[#14]
This is the sort of discussion guaranteed to create animus and hard feelings.  There is no way to navigate the concept without it.





There are guys/gals on this forum who's first plan is to take anything that isn't bolted down with red loctite on the threads.  Whether they have their own preps or no.





There are guys/gals on this forum who insist that people will do ANYTHING to survive, and who have made peace with the fact that they will go predatory at some point in the course of any long term event.





There are guys/gals on this forum who'd starve to death next door to an empty house with a cupboard full of viable food because it isn't theirs and somebody, some day might come to claim it.





There are also any number of folks who wander in and out of any or all of these categories.





Any one of the prime categories are rife with very, very passionate proponents who will get downright feisty over being contradicted or told in even the most gentle terms that they might not be entirely correct.





So, here's the way I see it breaking down.





Looters: shot on sight. Period.





Sneak thieves: Short term event, turned in to the authorities if authorities are in control.  Beaten and tossed out into the muck if no authority present.  Long term, shot on sight.





In long term events with significant loss of life, at some point, looting/thieving becomes scavenging.  The point at which this happens is somewhat murky, and differs from individual to individual, and from what part of the acquisition of goods you're on.





Of course, the group who'll starve to death next to abandoned plenty on the off chance that somebody, some day will come to claim it, maybe, will not recognize nor condone this.  I've heard from some on this very forum that, even if the former residents are on the lawn reduced to bones, it's still not fair game because relatives might some day show up with a rightful claim.  True enough.  Anything's possible, and any sort of scavenging entails the risk of injury or culpability.





It all comes down to a matter of determining what type of event you're trying to live through and what sort of circumstances the items exist in.





I'd never steal from other survivors, nor from a functioning business.  Over the long haul, however, once it became clear to me (depending on current events) that specific properties have been abandoned due to permanent flight or death, I'd start considering them fair game.





And, of course, anybody who comes after me with ill intent forfeits all of his shit arbitrarily





You have to learn to observe and extrapolate possible outcomes.  With some people, that comes with time.  Others never do get it.



ETA:  Oh, yeah, I forgot to add the guys who's plan is to kill anybody who comes near them

8/19/2011 3:20:27 PM EDT
[#15]
^ Thats the kind of response I was looking for. Thank you.

I didn't mean to create this tension or anything. Was just curious at what point it does become scavenging for someone here.
8/19/2011 3:43:00 PM EDT
[#16]
Rarely mentioned but I believe people will come together much quicker to rebuild a society simply because there's so many dependant on medications.

I can see a neighborhood protecting a local drug store & pharmicist in exchange for protection from Gang type looting and the promise to rebuild when times return to normal.

Be smart have 6+ months of supplies & meds tucked away and be prepared to help.

During the Northridge Quake I found a firehouse that had running water. The firemen let me fill up 6 trash can size barrels of water. I passed out 5 of them to my neighbors with horses and kept 1 for our own ponies (4).

From that 1 act over the course of 7 days we had people drop off hay, water and a vet stopped by (free). 7 days without water & power, we met alot of good people during that time.

Surviving with kids, elderly and animals is whats survivings all about
8/19/2011 3:49:23 PM EDT
[#17]
I was discussing the movie The Road with a fellow worker. He got all lathered up when talking about the guy that stole all their stuff on the beach. His attitude was that the father had no cause to take everything he owned away from the man even his clothes when he caught up with him. I just answered that he was lucky the father let him live.
8/19/2011 4:15:18 PM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?
When Andrew happened the Guard was mobilized and when people raided the supermarkets they had free reign, there was no power and everything was going to rot, but when people started looting stealing fishfinders and Vespa scooters then the cops started shooting at looters. I had my first warm meal after about 3 weeks after Andrew and it tasted like ice cream

8/19/2011 4:15:35 PM EDT
[#19]
Something else to consider.  Whiel you are out scavenging through the ruins of walmart looking for what earlier folks missed, who is watching our shit to keep some ne from scavenging it?
8/19/2011 4:20:20 PM EDT
[#20]



Quoted:


Something else to consider.  Whiel you are out scavenging through the ruins of walmart looking for what earlier folks missed, who is watching our shit to keep some ne from scavenging it?


That's the question, isn't it?  Or, rather, what is the difference between scavenging and stealing?  If you're going into somebody's obviously occupied residence, that's burglary.  If you're going into somebody's obviously occupied business, that's looting/burglary.  If you're going into an obviously abandoned dwelling/business, that's probably scavenging.  Again, depending on other mitigating factors.



Careful how wide a brush you wield to justify actions.



 
8/19/2011 4:29:10 PM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
I was discussing the movie The Road with a fellow worker. He got all lathered up when talking about the guy that stole all their stuff on the beach. His attitude was that the father had no cause to take everything he owned away from the man even his clothes when he caught up with him. I just answered that he was lucky the father let him live.


A coworker told me after watching that movie that he needed to buy guns and ammo. I just laughed and told him it wasn't worth it, why waste good money.

In the past I have tried to talk to him on several occasions about being responsible and prepared, but to no avail. Some people are just stuck on stupid, so I leave them there.

BT
8/19/2011 4:37:22 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:

Any one of the prime categories are rife with very, very passionate proponents who will get downright feisty over being contradicted or told in even the most gentle terms that they might not be entirely correct.



This guy knows his stuff. you gotta walk on egg shells on this site. you may not know it but you probably pissed off a few people just by making that first post.
8/19/2011 4:41:56 PM EDT
[#23]
Is it considered looting, stealing or scavenging if a Govt rep or city official decides on taking your goods or property for the welfare of the community?

I don't mind helping out if I am able, and I'd like to think I will be in a position to do so, but it's by my choice when, where and how much.

BT



8/19/2011 4:46:32 PM EDT
[#24]



Quoted:


Is it considered looting, stealing or scavenging if a Govt rep or city official decides on taking your goods or property for the welfare of the community?



I don't mind helping out if I am able, and I'd like to think I will be in a position to do so, but it's by my choice when, where and how much.



BT


It is either called "eminent domain" or "abuse of authority" depending on who's on top at the far end.





 
8/19/2011 5:04:06 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
Is it considered looting, stealing or scavenging if a Govt rep or city official decides on taking your goods or property for the welfare of the community?

I don't mind helping out if I am able, and I'd like to think I will be in a position to do so, but it's by my choice when, where and how much.

BT





sounds to me like normal everyday gov.
8/19/2011 5:05:50 PM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
Spend enough time reading this forum and you'll realize stealing other people's food is not a survival strategy.  Its a quick way to lose the survival game.

I know I would do everything in my power to provide for myself and my family, short of compromising my humanity and moral fortitude.



1st post and all that.

Well said!
8/19/2011 5:06:21 PM EDT
[#27]
I would steal to survive.  Everyone on this forum would.  At some point everything gets stripped away but the bare animal when you are starving to death. Morals are a luxury the starving cannot afford.
And that's just the plain truth regardless of whatever else you hear.
8/19/2011 5:06:45 PM EDT
[#28]
I'll do what I have to do, to an extent. I have to be able to live with myself. I also have to be alive to worry about it. It's a tough choice.
8/19/2011 5:07:51 PM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not suggesting it is something smart to do. I'm also not talking about taking something from someones home or anything like that. I'm talking something like going to a grocery store in need of antibiotics or more cans of food or something.


Yeah. Cause that stuff isn't owned by people.......
8/19/2011 5:10:34 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
I'm not sure how long I would last in that situation. Probably not long because I'm not prepared at all. I don't have any plan what-so-ever.

I was just curious as to how some people view the situation. It's apparent that yall are against it 100% and that's fine. I just got to thinking about that kind of thing after reading about looting after hurricanes.

I'm not the kind of person to go looting anything either, so again I'm not suggesting it's a strategy of mine or anything like that.

I'm 18 for another month.


I can speak for all of us  when I say we are glad you're here so you can learn and grow.
8/19/2011 5:17:13 PM EDT
[#31]
Quoted:
This is the sort of discussion guaranteed to create animus and hard feelings.  There is no way to navigate the concept without it.

There are guys/gals on this forum who's first plan is to take anything that isn't bolted down with red loctite on the threads.  Whether they have their own preps or no.

There are guys/gals on this forum who insist that people will do ANYTHING to survive, and who have made peace with the fact that they will go predatory at some point in the course of any long term event.

There are guys/gals on this forum who'd starve to death next door to an empty house with a cupboard full of viable food because it isn't theirs and somebody, some day might come to claim it.

There are also any number of folks who wander in and out of any or all of these categories.

Any one of the prime categories are rife with very, very passionate proponents who will get downright feisty over being contradicted or told in even the most gentle terms that they might not be entirely correct.

So, here's the way I see it breaking down.

Looters: shot on sight. Period.

Sneak thieves: Short term event, turned in to the authorities if authorities are in control.  Beaten and tossed out into the muck if no authority present.  Long term, shot on sight.

In long term events with significant loss of life, at some point, looting/thieving becomes scavenging.  The point at which this happens is somewhat murky, and differs from individual to individual, and from what part of the acquisition of goods you're on.

Of course, the group who'll starve to death next to abandoned plenty on the off chance that somebody, some day will come to claim it, maybe, will not recognize nor condone this.  I've heard from some on this very forum that, even if the former residents are on the lawn reduced to bones, it's still not fair game because relatives might some day show up with a rightful claim.  True enough.  Anything's possible, and any sort of scavenging entails the risk of injury or culpability.

It all comes down to a matter of determining what type of event you're trying to live through and what sort of circumstances the items exist in.

I'd never steal from other survivors, nor from a functioning business.  Over the long haul, however, once it became clear to me (depending on current events) that specific properties have been abandoned due to permanent flight or death, I'd start considering them fair game.

And, of course, anybody who comes after me with ill intent forfeits all of his shit arbitrarily

You have to learn to observe and extrapolate possible outcomes.  With some people, that comes with time.  Others never do get it.

ETA:  Oh, yeah, I forgot to add the guys who's plan is to kill anybody who comes near them


Well said.

I wanted to add something important. You come to my home and ask for food, you may get turned away, but if I have plenty and you have kids, there is a possibility that you might get something and sent on your way.

Attempt to steal from me, you will more than likely die.
8/19/2011 5:23:21 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
Quoted:

Any one of the prime categories are rife with very, very passionate proponents who will get downright feisty over being contradicted or told in even the most gentle terms that they might not be entirely correct.



This guy knows his stuff. you gotta walk on egg shells on this site. you may not know it but you probably pissed off a few people just by making that first post.


notice my post count? No egg  shells here at all. Just know your shit and be prepared to back it up.
8/19/2011 5:26:21 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
I would steal to survive.  Everyone on this forum would.  At some point everything gets stripped away but the bare animal when you are starving to death. Morals are a luxury the starving cannot afford.
And that's just the plain truth regardless of whatever else you hear.


You speak for me? Your plain truth is only true for you.
8/19/2011 5:26:28 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Something else to consider.  Whiel you are out scavenging through the ruins of walmart looking for what earlier folks missed, who is watching our shit to keep some ne from scavenging it?

That's the question, isn't it?  Or, rather, what is the difference between scavenging and stealing?  If you're going into somebody's obviously occupied residence, that's burglary.  If you're going into somebody's obviously occupied business, that's looting/burglary.  If you're going into an obviously abandoned dwelling/business, that's probably scavenging.  Again, depending on other mitigating factors.

Careful how wide a brush you wield to justify actions.
 


I wasn't justifying anything.  Just pointing out a flaw in the whole why prep I got guns arguement.  One that does not get addressed as often as the because other folks have guns flaw.  I fully understand the difference between scavenging and looting morally and legally.
8/19/2011 5:27:43 PM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
Is it considered looting, stealing or scavenging if a Govt rep or city official decides on taking your goods or property for the welfare of the community?

I don't mind helping out if I am able, and I'd like to think I will be in a position to do so, but it's by my choice when, where and how much.

BT





Neither its called taxation with representation.
8/19/2011 5:30:36 PM EDT
[#36]
My household will not be doing any stealing or looting since Ithat sort of thing is totally wrong imho. Only thing we would consider is foraging from the surrounding public parks, ponds, creeks, etc. I personally don't see a problem with doing things like using a suppressor to harvest small game out of a local park or running trot lines in nearby creeks and ponds. I do think any foraging from local public areas would be high risk so would only do it descretely at night and only if things really got hairy. Anything 6months and less and we should not need to forage. Our game plan is to lay low and would be just fine with our food preps. My hope is that after 6 months, most of the un-prepared are no longer a threat. Our bol is our backup plan if things appear too dangerous in our neighborhood.

As for those that attempt to steal in a SHTF, I sure do not support that mentality and must say I would be prepared to defend my home/property with deadly force and assume most folks on this forum would feel the same way.
8/19/2011 5:38:30 PM EDT
[#37]
We're mostly on schedule here folks.  Still need to hear from the "not under any circumstances would I take anything that ever belonged to anyone" crowd.



@Oldrock.  I'm rather surprised you would consider poaching the king's–– I mean, public property!
8/19/2011 5:39:07 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?
When Andrew happened the Guard was mobilized and when people raided the supermarkets they had free reign, there was no power and everything was going to rot, but when people started looting stealing fishfinders and Vespa scooters then the cops started shooting at looters. I had my first warm meal after about 3 weeks after Andrew and it tasted like ice cream

Been there done that!They didnt hit shit when they shot!Animals were robbing people with no roofs on their houses!Shoot em and let the red ants eat em!

8/19/2011 5:46:22 PM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?



You have to ask, when you already know the answer. Seeking justification where it doesn't exist.
So, you rob a man to feed your kids, while his starve because of it. Welcome to darwinism, hope you enjoy it, all the while fearing the person bigger, badder than you.
I believe, that is how rats live.
8/19/2011 5:46:38 PM EDT
[#40]
Quoted:
This is the sort of discussion guaranteed to create animus and hard feelings.  There is no way to navigate the concept without it.

There are guys/gals on this forum who's first plan is to take anything that isn't bolted down with red loctite on the threads.  Whether they have their own preps or no.

There are guys/gals on this forum who insist that people will do ANYTHING to survive, and who have made peace with the fact that they will go predatory at some point in the course of any long term event.

There are guys/gals on this forum who'd starve to death next door to an empty house with a cupboard full of viable food because it isn't theirs and somebody, some day might come to claim it.

There are also any number of folks who wander in and out of any or all of these categories.

Any one of the prime categories are rife with very, very passionate proponents who will get downright feisty over being contradicted or told in even the most gentle terms that they might not be entirely correct.

So, here's the way I see it breaking down.

Looters: shot on sight. Period.

Sneak thieves: Short term event, turned in to the authorities if authorities are in control.  Beaten and tossed out into the muck if no authority present.  Long term, shot on sight.

In long term events with significant loss of life, at some point, looting/thieving becomes scavenging.  The point at which this happens is somewhat murky, and differs from individual to individual, and from what part of the acquisition of goods you're on.

Of course, the group who'll starve to death next to abandoned plenty on the off chance that somebody, some day will come to claim it, maybe, will not recognize nor condone this.  I've heard from some on this very forum that, even if the former residents are on the lawn reduced to bones, it's still not fair game because relatives might some day show up with a rightful claim.  True enough.  Anything's possible, and any sort of scavenging entails the risk of injury or culpability.

It all comes down to a matter of determining what type of event you're trying to live through and what sort of circumstances the items exist in.

I'd never steal from other survivors, nor from a functioning business.  Over the long haul, however, once it became clear to me (depending on current events) that specific properties have been abandoned due to permanent flight or death, I'd start considering them fair game.

And, of course, anybody who comes after me with ill intent forfeits all of his shit arbitrarily

You have to learn to observe and extrapolate possible outcomes.  With some people, that comes with time.  Others never do get it.

ETA:  Oh, yeah, I forgot to add the guys who's plan is to kill anybody who comes near them


Very well said and thought out.  This is a great model of how to approach this topic that is logical and, when the time comes,  would allow one to stand tall in fornt of our maker with little worry of being sent straight to hell.
8/19/2011 6:04:09 PM EDT
[#41]
I think some people here are missing what I'm getting at here. I'm not talking about going next door, breaking in, and stealing from a neighbor while he is out hunting. I'm talking strictly about grocery stores and such when there is no order. No one to trade with.

I'm not seeking gratification on this. Personally I wouldn't even think about it unless there wasn't even a chance of order being restored.

And I appreciate those of you who are being constructive here and not just spreading the hate around.
8/19/2011 6:19:01 PM EDT
[#42]
Just as all of us once were here, you are new. There is a wealth of info on this site from a lot of really intelligent (and maybe certifiable) people on this site.
Check out this thread.

Welcome to the funnyfarm! Don't keep your tinfoil so tight you can make your own decisions about things. We aren't really uptight here, but we try to keep it "serious" with a little humor and good ribbing thrown in.
8/19/2011 6:20:25 PM EDT
[#43]
I prep hard to have food storage for 2 people for at least 2 years. Water included.
I prep even harder to have the firearms and ammo to defend my lifestyle.
8/19/2011 6:24:26 PM EDT
[#44]
Throughout my life I have been able to keep my morals thru good times and bad times. I would hope I could continue.
8/19/2011 6:26:44 PM EDT
[#45]



Quoted:


I think some people here are missing what I'm getting at here. I'm not talking about going next door, breaking in, and stealing from a neighbor while he is out hunting. I'm talking strictly about grocery stores and such when there is no order. No one to trade with.



I'm not seeking gratification on this. Personally I wouldn't even think about it unless there wasn't even a chance of order being restored.



And I appreciate those of you who are being constructive here and not just spreading the hate around.


I think the issue is the false separation we've been subjected to over the years.  You say you won't steal from your neighbor's house, but grocery stores are okay.  Why?  Because nobody lives there?  Because they're owned by teh ebil corporations?  Maybe the grocery store belongs to your neighbor.  But even if it's owned by some faceless corporation, it's still the means of livelihood of a mess of people.



Don't get me wrong, there's a couple of whole generations who consider theft from a corporation to be permissible because "it's not like I'm stealing from people!"  That's the retraining we've been subjected to by those with ulterior motives.



Speaking as a store owner (small though it is), I can tell you that robbing my snack counter or coolers will put me in a world of hurt, regardless of whether I was there at the time or not.  You might as well hit the house on your way home, for you've violated me and my property and made it harder for me to survive.  The last burglary took us 3+ years to recoup from.



The problem with your basic premise is that you've already decided that you aren't going to wait until the situation has passed that magical looting to scavenging threshold.  You've made the decision, based on what you've said in this post, that you're going to wait long enough to be able to tell yourself that you aren't a looter, but not so long that the looters with "less moral fiber" have cleaned the place out.



Go to Youtube and key up some of the flash mob videos, where they're cleaning out a convenience or liquor store.  Now, ask yourself as you watch if the last dozen or so kids through the door are any less criminals than the first as they're hauling stuff out without paying.  Now ask yourself if the loss of those last dozen handfuls of his stock hurt less or more than the first dozen handfuls, or just as much.



You can try to justify your actions by telling yourself that there isn't anybody to take your money, but that requires some moral gymnastics, and those are always a tip off.



If the grocery store is obviously abandoned (the only way you can even begin contemplating taking stuff on your own hook) it's probably already been cleaned out, either by the mobs or by the retreating owners to protect it from the mobs.





 
8/19/2011 7:48:14 PM EDT
[#46]
Quoted:
I think some people here are missing what I'm getting at here. I'm not talking about going next door, breaking in, and stealing from a neighbor while he is out hunting. I'm talking strictly about grocery stores and such when there is no order. No one to trade with.

I'm not seeking gratification on this. Personally I wouldn't even think about it unless there wasn't even a chance of order being restored.

And I appreciate those of you who are being constructive here and not just spreading the hate around.
 

By the time SHTF the grocery store and Walmart  will be rows of  empty shelves.  The looting seems to start as soon as the power goes off and the authorities are distracted.  That is in cases of localized emegencies when people know things will return to normal.

8/19/2011 8:18:11 PM EDT
[#47]
Morality should be like a rock and not negotiable.  Without it, we are like a sailor of old without a compass lost and our lives in peril, not to mention our souls.

A box of twinkies is a hell of a thing to risk your life and lose who you are over.  

You see, I will if I have to is a decision and decisions have a way of becoming plans.  They stand in your way and prevent you from answering the even more important question of what if there's no food to be had at all.  Its a bridge best not crossed at all.  

I will loot if I have to is admitting defeat and that you don't have the will power or ability to fend for yourself.  

Its not hard to understand a beggar has more respect than a thief.  

Any idiot can try to steal something.  It takes a man to say I won't steal.  

Many years ago, when I was not much older than you, I was married a young wife to take care of and so poor if I ate meat I shot it.  The idea of stealing never crossed my mind.  The idea of even asking for help while I could come up with an alternative never crossed my mind.

When you really think of it, its damn hard to come up with a when you have no alternative.  Man can live 30 days without food maybe longer.  That's a hell of a lot of time for alternatives.  

Years ago, this question would never come up.  I'm afraid NOLA Katrina has changed that as the media in their quest to prevent racial unrest justified thievery while in that same disaster all round them people shared what they had with their neighbors, made do without, stores opened their doors to people, and some even salvaged leaving notes with contact information and what they took offering compensation.

Its just best to say "no I won't" and leave it as the bridge not crossed.

Tj

 

8/20/2011 3:20:49 AM EDT
[#48]
Prep more now so that you wont need to worry about it. Have enough for at least a year or two growing seasons.
M
8/20/2011 5:37:55 AM EDT
[#49]
Quoted:
Morality should be like a rock and not negotiable.  Without it, we are like a sailor of old without a compass lost and our lives in peril, not to mention our souls.

A box of twinkies is a hell of a thing to risk your life and lose who you are over.  

You see, I will if I have to is a decision and decisions have a way of becoming plans.  They stand in your way and prevent you from answering the even more important question of what if there's no food to be had at all.  Its a bridge best not crossed at all.  

I will loot if I have to is admitting defeat and that you don't have the will power or ability to fend for yourself.  

Its not hard to understand a beggar has more respect than a thief.  

Any idiot can try to steal something.  It takes a man to say I won't steal.  

Many years ago, when I was not much older than you, I was married a young wife to take care of and so poor if I ate meat I shot it.  The idea of stealing never crossed my mind.  The idea of even asking for help while I could come up with an alternative never crossed my mind.

When you really think of it, its damn hard to come up with a when you have no alternative.  Man can live 30 days without food maybe longer.  That's a hell of a lot of time for alternatives.  

Years ago, this question would never come up.  I'm afraid NOLA Katrina has changed that as the media in their quest to prevent racial unrest justified thievery while in that same disaster all round them people shared what they had with their neighbors, made do without, stores opened their doors to people, and some even salvaged leaving notes with contact information and what they took offering compensation.

Its just best to say "no I won't" and leave it as the bridge not crossed.

Tj

 



Don't worry there are enough here that would put their souls in peril.
8/20/2011 5:58:14 AM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
I'm just curious about some of yalls views on stealing for survival. How soon after a SHTF scenario would you consider, for instance, stealing food?

Now I realize looting occurs almost immediately, however I'm not talking about getting that new big screen TV you have had your eye on for a few months. I'm talking about a situation where your thinking "Ok its going to be quite some time before things get back to normal, I'm going to need more food, gas, what have you, before then."

There are a couple of dilemmas when it comes to this. Too soon after a disaster and things might calm down quicker than you expected and you really are harming someones livelihood (although it might already be ruined by other people). Too late and there might not be anything left for you to use.

Where is the line between being a criminal and simply trying to survive, for you personally?


Why not take it one step further...How long before you would kill to provide for you and yours?
Previous Page
/ 6
Next Page