Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/12/2017 7:55:33 PM EDT
My new 10/22 came with a weaver style base for scope mounting. Is this base any good, or should I look to the aftermarket for something better? I'm mounting a Leupold Mark AR 1.5-4. Use would be general plinking and and maybe some hunting.
3/12/2017 8:13:45 PM EDT
[#1]
I used it. Shoots great 
4/30/2017 10:30:03 PM EDT
[#2]
If you would like a 1 piece mount/ring system, check out the DNZ mounts. I have 2 on 10/22's and they are top notch.
6/2/2017 7:05:53 PM EDT
[#3]
I got a 1913 rail section that screws onto the top of the receiver from LaRue Tactical.
6/2/2017 7:28:51 PM EDT
[#4]
The weaver rail that came with mine was junk. It wouldn't stay tight and my scope wouldn't stay zeroed. I bought a Tactical Solutions rail and it works great.
6/2/2017 9:21:39 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Quoted:
I got a 1913 rail section that screws onto the top of the receiver from LaRue Tactical.
View Quote
I had ordered one, then waited about 6 weeks for it and canceled. I installed the rail that came with it. Haven't had a chance to shoot it yet and see how it holds up.
6/2/2017 9:57:03 PM EDT
[#6]
Amazon Product
  • Picatinny rail extension is a great product,high quality metal,good solid construction,many applications,easy installation and fast delivery.
  • Fits dovetail 11mm rail.
  • Can be to convert 11mm to 20mm.

Amazon Product
  • 0.5 inch H x 2.5 inch L.
  • Most Versatile for Use as QD Riser
  • Immediate Conversion of Any Non-QD Mount Accessories to QD Deployment

I purchased a conversion rail and some quick release mounts for my UTG Bugbuster scope. Works for me.
6/2/2017 10:45:25 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:
The weaver rail that came with mine was junk. It wouldn't stay tight and my scope wouldn't stay zeroed. I bought a Tactical Solutions rail and it works great.
View Quote
Mine was also junk.  So were the inexpensive but name-brand rings I bought.

Get good rings and a good base.  Install them properly.
6/3/2017 7:26:29 PM EDT
[#8]
EGW is what I used on my 10/22 Sporter and it has performed flawlessly.
6/7/2017 6:09:47 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote History
Quoted:
If you would like a 1 piece mount/ring system, check out the DNZ mounts. I have 2 on 10/22's and they are top notch.
View Quote
 THIS . Guys here pointed them out to me. One piece mount. I got the game reaper. Honestly you will really like these. There not that bad on price $60 maybe. One piece mount.I put this on a Ruger Target with a Leupold VX 2 3x9x40 .Wardawg
6/7/2017 10:08:59 PM EDT
[#10]
I have a Scope base from Power Custom that attaches to both the receiver and the barrel.
6/15/2017 8:24:13 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
I had ordered one, then waited about 6 weeks for it and canceled. I installed the rail that came with it. Haven't had a chance to shoot it yet and see how it holds up.
View Quote
I ordered mine and 2 days later it showed up.
6/15/2017 9:17:01 PM EDT
[#12]
You want this one.

6/16/2017 2:28:52 PM EDT
[#13]
With how faster .22lr drop you want a scope base with some cant, otherwise you're going to run out of elevation in your scope. Another factor is the 10/22 is known for have barrel "droop", the barrel tends to shoot low because of how it's mounted. You should ensure the screws for the V-block are only tighten to 10in/lbs to elevate this slightly. I would suggest getting a 20-25MOA base, it will let you maximize your scope.

I use one from DIP, Inc and it works outstandingly and I frequently shoot my 10/22 to 300yds

https://www.diproductsinc.com/Detail.aspx?PROD=1137176&CAT=8805
6/16/2017 2:32:25 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
No, no you don't. I had it. With a 25yds zero, it only left me with 2.2mils of elevation in my scope. You want some with at least 20moa cant
6/16/2017 8:56:54 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:



No, no you don't. I had it. With a 25yds zero, it only left me with 2.2mils of elevation in my scope. You want some with at least 20moa cant
View Quote
I certainly do not have this problem with the Kidd scope base.
6/16/2017 9:38:01 PM EDT
[#16]
The Kidd base works just fine.  Implying otherwise displays a lack of valid information