Originally Posted By RangerJoe11:
Reading Litz Volume 3 of Advancements, specifically the chapter on ladder testing.
From what I gather the “traditional” charge ladder test does NOT produce repeatable results, for finding flat spots/nodes in MV. Meaning you’re wasting time and resources, there is a better way.
Side bar….some of his data I think may suggest that isn’t necessarily true IMO but it’s Litz and he is 38462x smarter at this shit than I am. Specifically it appeared 1x rnd prevented the flat spot in 2/5 series as that rnd was just a bit faster/slower. In the other 3 series there was a flat spot/node in that charge range. With so many variables at play it’s hard to rule that out IMO - 1 rnd at a .1gr charge difference, where there is some repeatability in 3/5 of the series?
Anyway back on topic…based on his testing it is better to test charge weight in .5 gr (depending of .cal) increments and simply look at the SD, obviously lower is better.
Makes sense to me….however, one thing not addressed (perhaps because everyone but my dumbass knows already) is vertical dispersion, which I thought was the other purpose of ladder testing…my question is, does low SD directly correlate to low vertical dispersion?
My gut tells me yes, simply based on the higher charge, or faster velocity, generally the higher POI due to flatter trajectory. The smaller the SD the closer each rnds MV is to one another and the smaller the vertical dispersion due to MV. I’ve just never compared SD to vert dispersion or read anything about SD and vertical dispersion being correlated to one another or low SD = small vertical dispersion.
View Quote
First off, the "nodes" that people see in small sample tests do not exist over a statistically significant sample size. What does that mean? That means if you shoot a 1, 3, 5, or even 10 shot sample and record the ES/SD and Average velocity every 0.3gr up the useful powder charge scale for a given cartridge component combination, you will see what appear to be "flat spots" or "nodes". What happens when you shoot 35 shots at every 0.3gr is that you see a nearly-linear increase in MV vs. powder charge (unless the powder being used is WAY too slow burning for the cartridge).
If you were to take a nearly linear graph of average MV vs. powder charge, then apply a reasonable (+/- 20-25fps) error bar to that nearly-linear trend, what you would see is that your small sample data bounces around all over inside those error bars. The variance in the repetition of small sample tests produces trends that appear to show sinusoidal nodes, but what you're actually looking at is white noise.
Now MV spreads (ES or SD) vs. precision. At close range (300yd or less), you can run into instances where absolutely horrible MV spreads will still produce outstanding groups, and you can run into instances where super tight MV Spreads will produce dogshit dispersion. The two are not necessarily correlated from a raw dispersion point of view. HOWEVER, as distance increases, the vertical component will slowly but surely rear it's head from the pure physics of one bullet going slower/faster than the others will drop more/less. By 600-800 yards you will start to see it, and by 1000yd in low winds the vertical spread will dominate the dispersion pattern. Combine that with high winds or gusty/choppy winds and it will just look like a shotgun pattern.
If most of your shooting is inside of 400yd, ES/SD is not typically a problem for practical purposes, but it can definitely ruin your day beyond 400. Good ES is under 45-50fps. Good SD is under 12fps. I'm speaking on sample sizes of 20+ rounds. SD is not a viable metric for sample sizes under 20-25 rounds. ES is also extremely variable on 3,5, and 10 shot groups. Unfortunately there is no cheating statistics.