Quoted:
You don't have to believe it. It has been well chronicled though. They aren't traveling at 300+mph either. The P-47D had a sea level, balls to the wall top speed of about 330mph.
"You could see by the shattered trees and the torn branches where the P-47s had gone through. You'd have to see it to
believe it. Those crazy kids couldn't see what was hidden from above, so they went right into the forest to find out.
They cut a path right through the top of the woods."
(The Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Story, 1950)
Here's a MSPaint illustrating:
Only the very tops of trees could be trimmed via P47....this would leave the majority of the branches still obscuring troop movement(s).
Weedwacker via P47 is not an effective way to expose troops, because of the limited zone of trimmage, the *very* high risk of colliding with a thicker part of the tree trunk and/or branches, the relatively slow speed of the aircraft which would enable effective ground fire, and the fact that an aircraft would neither be able to see, nor shoot at, any troops thus exposed.
By the time the aircraft circled (or his wingman got into position––I hope to hell he didn't shoot with his Lead directly over the target) the troops would have dispersed.
So, what are we to make of this "well documented" story?
My theory is that it was an uncommon occurance (flying low, into the trees––probably by accident or "target fixation")....this was done by all aircraft types, but only the P47 survived with any numbers. The other aircraft types (P51 and P38, for example) were simply destroyed when the tree encounter happened.
So a few P47's survived....after a few months, or however long it took to have several survive and return, the pilots and/or crew chiefs (likely after a few rounds of rum) concocted a story about deliberately flying through trees to expose the enemy.
This may have even gotten some medals awarded....but I'm still calling BS. (The words in red in the quote probably describes
bomb damage, not aircraft-caused; why is it written thus? I wonder....maybe a propaganda piece about how great American planes and pilots were?)
I wonder if there's any A-10 pilots reading this....the A-10 is probably better designed at handling trees....is this "P47 -v- tree top" story
legit plausible,
a la Mythbusters?
Remember, I'm not talking about incidental contact with trees....I'm talking about deliberately, as a matter of established tactics (formal or informal) flying into the trees, with the expressed purpose of de-limbing the tops to expose troops below.