User Panel
Posted: 5/26/2017 11:29:58 PM EDT
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a55299/justice-department-mortgage-company-veteran/
http://amp.oregonlive.com/v1/articles/20615230/feds_side_with_lender_in_vanco.amp So, yes, PHH foreclosed on a veteran while he was on his third tour in the Middle East. Happy Memorial Day Weekend. Luckily, there is something called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that is supposed to protect members of the military serving overseas from having done to them exactly what PHH did to Jacob McGreevey. He got legal help and took PHH to court. Then, something happened. The United States Department of Justice—Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, proprietor—has intervened on the side of a corrupt corporation and against a serviceman done dirt by that corrupt corporation. It already has filed a brief on behalf of PHH in the federal lawsuit against the CPFB. Certainly, it wouldn't have done PHH any good to be revealed as turning out a veteran while Ted Olson's back in Washington portraying the company as the poor victim of federal regulatory overreach. So the Justice Department—your Justice Department, in theory, anyway—intervenes in the Oregon case. This, by the way, is the same kind of thinking that got the FBI in Boston in bed with Whitey Bulger. If you want to know who the real owners of this government are, this is as good a window into them as any. Let's spend the next three days proclaiming our love for The Troops. |
|
Mortgage wasn't being paid and he didn't contest the foreclosure.
Don't see an issue myself. |
|
Well he's a vet, clearly they should just give him the house.
|
|
hhm? sounds like he was not overseas when it happened and did not exercise his rights?
|
|
I thought favoring veterans was now racist?
....I can't keep up. |
|
Fuck Correct The Record trolls. Where the fuck were you when Obama was office? Where was your daily thread then, Ole_slabside? Why don't you go to the liberal gun forums?
|
|
Mortgage Company broke the law.. DOJ the enforcement arm of the big banks sides with Mortgage Company.
Foreclosure Protections & the Military http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/free-books/foreclosure-book/chapter4-8.html When the longtime Marine became convinced his former lender had illegally foreclosed on his Vancouver home, he didn't hesitate. He looked up Sean Riddell, his former commanding officer now practicing law in Portland, and asked if he was ready to take on one of the biggest mortgage lenders in the country. The story shines a light on the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, an obscure and often overlooked federal law intended to protect members of the military from foreclosure and other collections efforts while they're on active duty McGreevey's fight raises questions about the Trump administration's Department of Justice and its sudden interest in the New Jersey-based lender. Twelve days before the agency sided with PHH in the Marine's case, it had filed an amicus brief supporting the lender in a lawsuit against the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The bureau had fined the lender more than $100 million for engaging in an insurance kickback scheme |
|
|
ole_slabside thread...
|
|
|
Quoted:
ole_slabside thread... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a55299/justice-department-mortgage-company-veteran/ http://amp.oregonlive.com/v1/articles/20615230/feds_side_with_lender_in_vanco.amp So, yes, PHH foreclosed on a veteran while he was on his third tour in the Middle East. Happy Memorial Day Weekend. Luckily, there is something called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that is supposed to protect members of the military serving overseas from having done to them exactly what PHH did to Jacob McGreevey. He got legal help and took PHH to court. Then, something happened. The United States Department of Justice—Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, proprietor—has intervened on the side of a corrupt corporation and against a serviceman done dirt by that corrupt corporation. It already has filed a brief on behalf of PHH in the federal lawsuit against the CPFB. Certainly, it wouldn't have done PHH any good to be revealed as turning out a veteran while Ted Olson's back in Washington portraying the company as the poor victim of federal regulatory overreach. So the Justice Department—your Justice Department, in theory, anyway—intervenes in the Oregon case. This, by the way, is the same kind of thinking that got the FBI in Boston in bed with Whitey Bulger. If you want to know who the real owners of this government are, this is as good a window into them as any. Let's spend the next three days proclaiming our love for The Troops. View Quote Pay your fucking bills! |
|
Quoted:
Right... but it does mean there are steps they must take under the law before foreclosing... they didnt take said step. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
The Marine waited too long to file an appeal and the court ruled that the statute of limitation was four years.
The Justice Department filed a brief that supported the four year ruling. The fact that the Marine had not paid his mortgage and didn't contest the foreclosure was completely glossed over in that story. And the $100 million fine? The courts ruled a $6 million fine but later some un-elected bureaucrat unilaterally raised the fine to $109 million. The Justice Department said that they can't do that and filed a brief in favor of the company. Your story is bad and you should feel bad. |
|
Quoted:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a55299/justice-department-mortgage-company-veteran/ http://amp.oregonlive.com/v1/articles/20615230/feds_side_with_lender_in_vanco.amp So, yes, PHH foreclosed on a veteran while he was on his third tour in the Middle East. Happy Memorial Day Weekend. Luckily, there is something called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that is supposed to protect members of the military serving overseas from having done to them exactly what PHH did to Jacob McGreevey. He got legal help and took PHH to court. Then, something happened. The United States Department of Justice—Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, proprietor—has intervened on the side of a corrupt corporation and against a serviceman done dirt by that corrupt corporation. It already has filed a brief on behalf of PHH in the federal lawsuit against the CPFB. Certainly, it wouldn't have done PHH any good to be revealed as turning out a veteran while Ted Olson's back in Washington portraying the company as the poor victim of federal regulatory overreach. So the Justice Department—your Justice Department, in theory, anyway—intervenes in the Oregon case. This, by the way, is the same kind of thinking that got the FBI in Boston in bed with Whitey Bulger. If you want to know who the real owners of this government are, this is as good a window into them as any. Let's spend the next three days proclaiming our love for The Troops. View Quote Are you using a VA loan? |
|
Sounds like a media paint job. The law protects for missed payments while deployed, not continued non payment of mortgage and then deciding to sue after statute of limitations runs out.
|
|
Quoted:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a55299/justice-department-mortgage-company-veteran/ http://amp.oregonlive.com/v1/articles/20615230/feds_side_with_lender_in_vanco.amp So, yes, PHH foreclosed on a veteran while he was on his third tour in the Middle East. Happy Memorial Day Weekend. Luckily, there is something called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that is supposed to protect members of the military serving overseas from having done to them exactly what PHH did to Jacob McGreevey. He got legal help and took PHH to court. Then, something happened. The United States Department of Justice—Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, proprietor—has intervened on the side of a corrupt corporation and against a serviceman done dirt by that corrupt corporation. It already has filed a brief on behalf of PHH in the federal lawsuit against the CPFB. Certainly, it wouldn't have done PHH any good to be revealed as turning out a veteran while Ted Olson's back in Washington portraying the company as the poor victim of federal regulatory overreach. So the Justice Department—your Justice Department, in theory, anyway—intervenes in the Oregon case. This, by the way, is the same kind of thinking that got the FBI in Boston in bed with Whitey Bulger. If you want to know who the real owners of this government are, this is as good a window into them as any. Let's spend the next three days proclaiming our love for The Troops. View Quote I don't care which side he backed as long as he did what the law required. Remember that statue of Lady Justice? Let me help you out: You'll notice that she's wearing a blindfold as she weighs matters in her scales. That's because she is supposed to be blinded to the persons appealing to the court and is only to decide based on the law. Even when it's a veteran. |
|
Quoted:
ole_slabside thread... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
ole_slabside thread... View Quote |
|
Wait, the foreclosure was finalized Sept 10, 2010, he did not contest it because he didn't know his rights, then "But by spring 2016, McGreevey was convinced he'd been wronged. He reached out to Riddell, who filed the lawsuit in federal court in Western Washington a month later. "
Didn't contest it at the time, files a lawsuit 5 1/2 years later. "The Relief Act has no statute of limitations. But most courts have elected to apply a time limit on filing a complaint based on the statute of limitations in the most closely analogous state law. This gray area gave the two companies the opening they needed, and they argued that, under Washington state law, McGreevey had four years from the date of the foreclosure to file his lawsuit" Statute of limitations ran out by 1 1/2 years, as the law was applied to all other cases. My guess? In 2010, the housing market had completely bottomed out, he probably had very little equity as far as book value goes, was horribly underwater at fair market value, and happy to get rid of it. Spring of 2016, home prices rebound, now he is upset that he lost his house. I wonder if he bought a house on the cheap sometime between 2011 and 2013, it would have saved him tons of money compared to the house he owned prior to 2010. |
|
|
|
Fuckin' lol.
OP must assume everyone on this site is as stupid and easily had as he is. |
|
|
In cases involving the giant "evil" corporation versus the little guy, sometimes the little guy is wrong.
I thought that Elizabeth Warren was the only person who didn't understand that. |
|
Quoted:
Wait, the foreclosure was finalized Sept 10, 2010, he did not contest it because he didn't know his rights, then "But by spring 2016, McGreevey was convinced he'd been wronged. He reached out to Riddell, who filed the lawsuit in federal court in Western Washington a month later. " Didn't contest it at the time, files a lawsuit 5 1/2 years later. "The Relief Act has no statute of limitations. But most courts have elected to apply a time limit on filing a complaint based on the statute of limitations in the most closely analogous state law. This gray area gave the two companies the opening they needed, and they argued that, under Washington state law, McGreevey had four years from the date of the foreclosure to file his lawsuit" Statute of limitations ran out by 1 1/2 years, as the law was applied to all other cases. My guess? In 2010, the housing market had completely bottomed out, he probably had very little equity as far as book value goes, was horribly underwater at fair market value, and happy to get rid of it. Spring of 2016, home prices rebound, now he is upset that he lost his house. I wonder if he bought a house on the cheap sometime between 2011 and 2013, it would have saved him tons of money compared to the house he owned prior to 2010. View Quote |
|
The first article was written as propaganda. It did not intelligently lay out the legal position of either side, and no one could have an informed opinion on just reading the article.
Folks, don't get sucked in by obvious emotional appeals. This is worse than, "It's for the children!" |
|
So he got foreclosed while deployed but waited too long to bring the subsequent lawsuit?
|
|
Quoted:
Sounds like a media paint job. The law protects for missed payments while deployed, not continued non payment of mortgage and then deciding to sue after statute of limitations runs out. View Quote Bingo, yet another spin job and example of why people keep calling the major media Fake News |
|
O.P.
You LIE! About facts and your shit peddling doesn't work in this place. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Well he's a vet, clearly they should just give him the house. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I don't care which side he backed as long as he did what the law required. Remember that statue of Lady Justice? Let me help you out: http://www.allsculptures.com/prodimages/stu/WU75802A4.jpg You'll notice that she's wearing a blindfold as she weighs matters in her scales. That's because she is supposed to be blinded to the persons appealing to the court and is only to decide based on the law. Even when it's a veteran. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a55299/justice-department-mortgage-company-veteran/ http://amp.oregonlive.com/v1/articles/20615230/feds_side_with_lender_in_vanco.amp So, yes, PHH foreclosed on a veteran while he was on his third tour in the Middle East. Happy Memorial Day Weekend. Luckily, there is something called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act that is supposed to protect members of the military serving overseas from having done to them exactly what PHH did to Jacob McGreevey. He got legal help and took PHH to court. Then, something happened. The United States Department of Justice—Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, proprietor—has intervened on the side of a corrupt corporation and against a serviceman done dirt by that corrupt corporation. It already has filed a brief on behalf of PHH in the federal lawsuit against the CPFB. Certainly, it wouldn't have done PHH any good to be revealed as turning out a veteran while Ted Olson's back in Washington portraying the company as the poor victim of federal regulatory overreach. So the Justice Department—your Justice Department, in theory, anyway—intervenes in the Oregon case. This, by the way, is the same kind of thinking that got the FBI in Boston in bed with Whitey Bulger. If you want to know who the real owners of this government are, this is as good a window into them as any. Let's spend the next three days proclaiming our love for The Troops. I don't care which side he backed as long as he did what the law required. Remember that statue of Lady Justice? Let me help you out: http://www.allsculptures.com/prodimages/stu/WU75802A4.jpg You'll notice that she's wearing a blindfold as she weighs matters in her scales. That's because she is supposed to be blinded to the persons appealing to the court and is only to decide based on the law. Even when it's a veteran. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.