User Panel
Quoted:
If I needed a thousand of them, then they wouldn’t be very good traps. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
Invest in large magnets or battery banks, wire, and steel matting.
|
|
Aw man.. we need charged supercaps in .223 cases now.. embed into head and shock these things.
Or just some homemade EMP devices. |
|
Imagine that horror and many others like it, manufactured by robots in factories, and upon birth integrated into the internet full time.
We are soo fucked. Prepare to bow before your robot overlord, Skynet. |
|
Quoted:
As bad ass as that sounds, let's remember our fucked up friends at Lamebook pulled the plug on their own AI after it developed a language outside of the programming developed for them. Found in the Forbes article, "Researchers at the Facebook AI Research Lab (FAIR) found that the chatbots had deviated from the script and were communicating in a new language developed without human input..." Found here Or how about the AI that destroyed the world's best "Go" player? That AI, developed by Google that ended up teaching itself better moves in order to beat it's human adversary. This is important to note as the moves had not been pre-programmed into the AI, the AI developed them on it's own. You really think the AI wouldn't be able to adapt and overcome some hammers and fence posts from Lowe's? Don't be naive. I am more Libertarian if anything, politically, but I do believe that oversight of two technology-driven fields of research may be needed. These fields, AI and genetic engineering, if left unchecked, could permanently alter the state of humanity forever. Imagine what they will be doing when the two fields cross paths... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Pretty sure a twelve gauge or 30.06 would send that mechanical horse straight to robot hell. Imagine the one they have now that is projectile proof. Or how about the AI that destroyed the world's best "Go" player? That AI, developed by Google that ended up teaching itself better moves in order to beat it's human adversary. This is important to note as the moves had not been pre-programmed into the AI, the AI developed them on it's own. You really think the AI wouldn't be able to adapt and overcome some hammers and fence posts from Lowe's? Don't be naive. I am more Libertarian if anything, politically, but I do believe that oversight of two technology-driven fields of research may be needed. These fields, AI and genetic engineering, if left unchecked, could permanently alter the state of humanity forever. Imagine what they will be doing when the two fields cross paths... |
|
Quoted:
Warfare is won with logistics, not body count. Those things have to be serviced, equipped, repaired, and controlled. And there's going to be a facility manned with people to do so. Stop pissing your pants. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I was thinking more along the lines of personal mini over watch drones equipped with a HD camera, thermal imaging, night vision, motion sensors that could scan/monitor a 10, 25, 50, 100 or even 1000 foot radius of your present location and alert you to any suspicious activity. Something that could follow you where ever you go, watch over your kids, your home, your vehicle etc... 24/7 View Quote Hexo+ Hands-on: The drone that follows you |
|
|
Not a problem, technology with known methods of action are more reliable than humans. They're very deterministic systems.
In other words, they have a routine, and are therefore easily exploitable. Capturing even one would further help exploiting them... |
|
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
How I know you did not read the OP's post.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Simple.. we build our own (non-AI) versions of similar fighting platforms. Perhaps a bit more crude, but similar mechanics. Or maybe even reprogram a captured AI unit.
Send the improvised or repurposed captured unit out against the AI and observe how the AI learns to defeat it - essentially the AI will teach us how to defeat itself. Rule #1 of new battlefield technology: Have a plan to defeat it incase your enemy gets its hands on your new weapon. |
|
Quoted:
Simple.. we build our own (non-AI) versions of similar fighting platforms. Perhaps a bit more crude, but similar mechanics. Or maybe even reprogram a captured AI unit. Send the improvised or repurposed captured unit out against the AI and observe how the AI learns to defeat it - essentially the AI will teach us how to defeat itself. Rule #1 of new battlefield technology: Have a plan to defeat it incase your enemy gets its hands on your new weapon. View Quote |
|
|
|
|
View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Google's a.i. just created it's own a.i. And it was better than any other a.i. man ever made. In 100 years there won t be anyone in charge except those damn robot dogs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
In the future, will blue collar assembly line robots' robot dogs be shot by robot police? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted: In the future, will blue collar assembly line robots' robot dogs be shot by robot police? View Quote Quoted:
In the future, do androids dream of electric sheep? View Quote I want you in my team. Some of these other guys are incapable of thinking about the future |
|
|
Quoted:
Excellent questions. I want you in my team. Some of these other guys are incapable of thinking about the future View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
I have a couple thousand of these. http://i1142.photobucket.com/albums/n619/Ordo6502/0409122316.jpg Just need to figure out shot placement to conserve ammo. View Quote Think about aimbots on your favorite FPS videogame. From the standpoint of processing power, they're insignificantly easy to implement. Once the programming is solved for a given problem, it (usually) becomes extremely easy to work into a new design. Look at how quickly new features like gimbal stabilization become integrated into simple consumer-grade drones. It is difficult to imagine exactly what will be developed in the future, but I suspect it will be more advanced than what we picture in our minds even now. The threat posed here is not insignificant in the long term. Few of the engineers developing these technologies are asking whether they should be doing what they're doing. They're only asking whether there's grant funding for it. And there is. |
|
Quoted:
Excellent questions. I want you in my team. Some of these other guys are incapable of thinking about the future View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: In the future, will blue collar assembly line robots' robot dogs be shot by robot police? Quoted:
In the future, do androids dream of electric sheep? I want you in my team. Some of these other guys are incapable of thinking about the future
|
|
Quoted:
A swift hit to a lithium battery pack (bonus if incendiary) should be enough to catastrophically disable early versions, until the designers learn to up-armor certain parts. In reality, the vast majority of robots of this nature have EXTREMELY limited fuel capacity without the additional weight from armor. Eventually, even that problem will likely be overcome. Think about aimbots on your favorite FPS videogame. From the standpoint of processing power, they're insignificantly easy to implement. Once the programming is solved for a given problem, it (usually) becomes extremely easy to work into a new design. Look at how quickly new features like gimbal stabilization become integrated into simple consumer-grade drones. It is difficult to imagine exactly what will be developed in the future, but I suspect it will be more advanced than what we picture in our minds even now. The threat posed here is not insignificant in the long term. Few of the engineers developing these technologies are asking whether they should be doing what they're doing. They're only asking whether there's grant funding for it. And there is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I have a couple thousand of these. http://i1142.photobucket.com/albums/n619/Ordo6502/0409122316.jpg Just need to figure out shot placement to conserve ammo. Think about aimbots on your favorite FPS videogame. From the standpoint of processing power, they're insignificantly easy to implement. Once the programming is solved for a given problem, it (usually) becomes extremely easy to work into a new design. Look at how quickly new features like gimbal stabilization become integrated into simple consumer-grade drones. It is difficult to imagine exactly what will be developed in the future, but I suspect it will be more advanced than what we picture in our minds even now. The threat posed here is not insignificant in the long term. Few of the engineers developing these technologies are asking whether they should be doing what they're doing. They're only asking whether there's grant funding for it. And there is. |
|
Meh, Im more worried about the hummingbird-sized smart drones that use facial recognition to pick you out of the crowd and blow your head in with a 3 gram shaped charge. I need a portable EMP device.
|
|
This could handle the problem.
Prototype Quadrotor with Machine Gun! |
|
Quoted:
Will just use a UAV with tow cable https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/459941/C487605B-C3D3-4976-AE16-8F9731C5CC16-380531.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Lots of legs there, best bone-up on our Bola tossing skills. |
|
Quoted:
Thank you for the endorsement. Can my g/f come also? She's already read ahead: www.amazon.com/dp/1582345929 View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.