![Bravo Company BCM](/images/2016/banners/sticky/BCM_StickyBarAd_225x40.gif)
![Login](/images/2016/spacer.gif)
|
That was a really ghey name. They changed it for the better for sure
|
|
|
Little known fact:
The term “5.11” originated in the technical rock climbing world. The Yosemite Decimal System grades the relative difficulty of a particular climbing route. It encompasses walking (class 1-2), scrambling (class 3-4), and roped climbing. Class 5 is subdivided into parts, currently 5.0 to 5.15. Back in the day Royal Robbins was a hard ass climber with first ascents of numerous El Cap big wall routes and the direct NW Face of Half Dome among others. He also popularized “clean climbing” which eschewed the use of rock damaging pitons. At the time of Royal’s climbing heyday, 5.11 was a difficult benchmark. Only a few climbers possessed the ability and vision to ascend routes of that grade. And now you know... |
|
Quoted:
I didn't know that 5.11 was spun off from Royal Robbins. View Quote The 5.11 name in based on/inspired by the Yosemite Decimal System of grading route difficulty. ETA: Beat. I'll also add, I always thought that 5.10 was a related company, but it's not. They're owned by Addidas now. |
|
Quoted:
That was a really ghey name. They changed it for the better for sure View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I think it's an interesting story. You start out general and adapt to what you excel in and demand is highest in. TA Associates, a Boston private equity firm, bought a majority stake in 5.11 Tactical for $305 million in 2007. In 2012, 5.11 Tactical purchased Seattle-based custom outdoor apparel brand, Beyond Clothing LLC, for an undisclosed amount. Royal Robbins is still in business as a clothing line separate from 5.11 right now. https://www.royalrobbins.com/ |
|
Quoted:
He's a rock climber that started both 5.11, and the company that bears his name. The 5.11 name in based on/inspired by the Yosemite Decimal System of grading route difficulty. ETA: Beat. I'll also add, I always thought that 5.10 was a related company, but it's not. They're owned by Addidas now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I didn't know that 5.11 was spun off from Royal Robbins. The 5.11 name in based on/inspired by the Yosemite Decimal System of grading route difficulty. ETA: Beat. I'll also add, I always thought that 5.10 was a related company, but it's not. They're owned by Addidas now. ![]() So both of these guys ![]() And this guy ![]() Have way more in common than it may seem. Btw 5.11 pants suck for climbing. |
|
|
Don’t think I’ve ever owned any. Unless there is rain, snow or something else going on, I’m just wearing what I’m wearing. Jeans, carharts (for desert climbing) or whatever rando target pants my wife got for me.
I can say definitively that the 2-3 diff types of 5.11 pants I’ve worn climbing or on a SAR, have chafed the hell out of my junk area. |
|
|
Quoted:
That was a really ghey name. They changed it for the better for sure View Quote There are a number of Robbins routes out there that have mandatory free climbing sections that will put you in your place, even with modern climbing shoes and cams. The photography of the day just didn't show it … because when they were doing fist ascents, no human had ever been there, or above. |
|
Pretty sure that grab handle on the back pocket isn't a grab handle either.
|
|
prAna is great, but most pants with a gusseted crotch will do. Except 5.11. 5.11 pants defy physics. They have a lot of the features found in climbing pants, and yet they suck for climbing. I think it has to do with excess bulk in the waist to support heavy belts, and too many seams and stitching around the knees that just seem to cause binding when high stepping.
|
|
|
Quoted: BEAT like a rented mule ![]() So both of these guys https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/241310/24286444-F28E-4C25-A6DB-CEC0EF47CA0E_jpeg-966580.JPG And this guy https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/241310/1AFBB218-3034-40D5-8336-F53B70EDF8EE_jpeg-966582.JPG Have way more in common than it may seem. Btw 5.11 pants suck for climbing. View Quote ![]() I use them for work pants. |
|
Quoted:
Depending upon which story you believe, it's either to clip one's carabiners on to, or to keeper to prevent beer bottle[s] from escaping. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Same. I still have and use my Royal Robbins from 2000ish. I recently threw the khaki into a vat of o d Dylon to darken them up a little.??
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/89I1Kmx.jpg https://i.imgur.com/hyxgwRA.jpg Yup, there was once a time when 5.11 wasn't a thing. They were Royal Robbins and I still have brand new never worn pants from way back. ![]() Originally marketed for climbers and hikers, the FBI started buying them when they realized they're better thanthe USGI BDUs of the era. Then the LE market was born.. Yes, I use them for work. After all these years they're still comfy. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Well, if you still wear a 34" waist that would make you a fucking unicorn around this place. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/89I1Kmx.jpg https://i.imgur.com/hyxgwRA.jpg Yup, there was once a time when 5.11 wasn't a thing. They were Royal Robbins and I still have brand new never worn pants from way back. ![]() Originally marketed for climbers and hikers, the FBI started buying them when they realized they're better thanthe USGI BDUs of the era. Then the LE market was born.. Yes, I use them for work. After all these years they're still comfy. ![]() |
|
Fun fact. An Agent's wife worked for Royal Robbins. Somehow that was the hook that got them to be "range pants" at the academy in the mid 90's. Scores of fresh faced newly minted G Men were then the envy of all their task force brethren. And the rest is history.
|
|
If one is into climbing, 5.11 then...
For serious use, I recommend the Tru-Spec 24-7 cotton canvas. Pockets in the right places, 4 internal M4 mag pouches, internal knee pouches, and in my experience last longer than 5.11's.... ymmv |
|
Quoted:
If one is into climbing, 5.11 then... For serious use, I recommend the Tru-Spec 24-7 cotton canvas. Pockets in the right places, 4 internal M4 mag pouches, internal knee pouches, and in my experience last longer than 5.11's.... ymmv View Quote ![]() |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm still wearing pants I bought back in the early 2000s. How much longer should I expect pants to last? ![]() View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If one is into climbing, 5.11 then... For serious use, I recommend the Tru-Spec 24-7 cotton canvas. Pockets in the right places, 4 internal M4 mag pouches, internal knee pouches, and in my experience last longer than 5.11's.... ymmv ![]() ![]() And yeah, I've got 5.11 pants that I wore 10-15 years ago that are still good to wear. My gut, though, not so much. |
|
Quoted:
I'm still wearing pants I bought back in the early 2000s. How much longer should I expect pants to last? ![]() View Quote The Tru-Specs take a year or more before they start showing any wear. If one just goes to the range and only stands, 5.11's would work fine. For serious hard core use, I choose Tru-Spec. |
|
I don't have any new ones left, but I bought some Royal Robbins Half Dome pants from Sierra Trading Post on closeout in 2006 for $9/pair that are still going strong. The only differences I've seen from the current standard 5.11 pants is the magazine pocket (or whatever the hell it was originally designed for) is on the right side rather than left, and there's a line of horizontal stitching on the left rear pocket so your wallet doesn't drop down so low.
|
|
Quoted:
I keep 10 pairs of tru-spec cotton canvas 24-7's on hand. 7 are used thru out the week. 2 to 3 hour range trips 5 days a week. Plus I wear them for yard work and clearing woods areas. Kneeling, prone, standing. 5.11's lasted about a year. Washing and constant kneeling wore out knee areas. The pant's bottom hems started threading after two months. The Tru-Specs take a year or more before they start showing any wear. If one just goes to the range and only stands, 5.11's would work fine. For serious hard core use, I choose Tru-Spec. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm still wearing pants I bought back in the early 2000s. How much longer should I expect pants to last? ![]() The Tru-Specs take a year or more before they start showing any wear. If one just goes to the range and only stands, 5.11's would work fine. For serious hard core use, I choose Tru-Spec. |
|
Quoted:
Well, if you still wear a 34" waist that would make you a fucking unicorn around this place. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/89I1Kmx.jpg https://i.imgur.com/hyxgwRA.jpg Yup, there was once a time when 5.11 wasn't a thing. They were Royal Robbins and I still have brand new never worn pants from way back. ![]() Originally marketed for climbers and hikers, the FBI started buying them when they realized they're better thanthe USGI BDUs of the era. Then the LE market was born.. Yes, I use them for work. After all these years they're still comfy. Kharn |
|
Quoted:
prAna is great, but most pants with a gusseted crotch will do. Except 5.11. 5.11 pants defy physics. They have a lot of the features found in climbing pants, and yet they suck for climbing. I think it has to do with excess bulk in the waist to support heavy belts, and too many seams and stitching around the knees that just seem to cause binding when high stepping. View Quote My biggest complaint is that they don't breathe for shit, but otherwise.....they are amazing pants for what I use them for. |
|
I used to have 5.11 climbing pants, that is how they started as already mentioned and I used them for ........ climbing.
|
|
Quoted:
I don't know about that. I've got some 5.11 pants that feel about as bind free and easy to move in than any pair of pants I've ever had, especially considering that they are cut tighter than some of my other options. My biggest complaint is that they don't breathe for shit, but otherwise.....they are amazing pants for what I use them for. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
prAna is great, but most pants with a gusseted crotch will do. Except 5.11. 5.11 pants defy physics. They have a lot of the features found in climbing pants, and yet they suck for climbing. I think it has to do with excess bulk in the waist to support heavy belts, and too many seams and stitching around the knees that just seem to cause binding when high stepping. My biggest complaint is that they don't breathe for shit, but otherwise.....they are amazing pants for what I use them for. Kharn |
|
|
I've got two pair of RR pants that are too big for me to wear now and a vest. I guess I've had them since 2000 or so.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.