Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 2/26/2015 10:17:26 PM EDT
Just picked up my first Gen 3 unit, a PVS14. Got a deal on it since it was a 2011 vintage L3 tube with a couple blems. Just tried it out and it's pretty sweet. You can see a couple dark spots in the tube around the edges, but I don't think it's too bad at all. Came with a data sheet. How's it look??

Happy to join the green eye club!





Link Posted: 2/26/2015 11:25:17 PM EDT
[#1]


Quoted:



Just picked up my first Gen 3 unit, a PVS14. Got a deal on it since it was a 2011 vintage L3 tube with a couple blems. Just tried it out and it's pretty sweet. You can see a couple dark spots in the tube around the edges, but I don't think it's too bad at all. Came with a data sheet. How's it look??





Happy to join the green eye club!





http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y316/righttobeararms8/Gun%20Pics/PVS14%20A_zpszepic3r4.jpg





http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y316/righttobeararms8/Gun%20Pics/PVS14%20B_zpsot34h2pd.jpg





http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y316/righttobeararms8/Gun%20Pics/PVS14%20C_zpsnb08ppx4.jpg
View Quote





 
S/N 22.6 is a little low - At the bottom of the "Good" range... Below 21 is "poor"







Of concern was the data sheet that suggested an EBI of 5 was acceptable? 5 would be absolute crap ( Don't worry, your's was 0.5 )
And a high-light resolution of 12 lp/mm is also pretty disgusting. ( Again, yours was 51, quite acceptable )

L3 standards are slipping... No, that's more like a landslide.







It's relatively OK other than that - Slightly below average but within the acceptable range -







Regards


David


 
Link Posted: 2/26/2015 11:31:54 PM EDT
[#2]
Truth is, if it looks good to your eyes then it looks good to your eyes.  Numbers on a sheet don't mean much,  what you see during different night environments is what matters.  The SN isn't top of the class, but then again it does pass the minimum spec.  Even the minimum spec looks darn good.  If you paid a fair price for a few year old option, then you did good.
Link Posted: 2/26/2015 11:48:22 PM EDT
[#3]
Fair enough. I'm very new to this game so wouldn't know a stellar unit from this one honestly. As a starting unit I'm pretty happy. Just curious, what do you think a fair price would be on this one? Thanks for the input too.
Link Posted: 2/26/2015 11:54:45 PM EDT
[#4]
I don't get the fascination with data sheets. I'm in music for a living and my instrument did not come with a data sheet, that's what my ears are for.
Link Posted: 2/27/2015 12:29:51 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

  S/N 22.6 is a little low - At the bottom of the "Good" range... Below 21 is "poor"


Of concern was the data sheet that suggested an EBI of 5 was acceptable? 5 would be absolute crap ( Don't worry, your's was 0.5 )And a high-light resolution of 12 lp/mm is also pretty disgusting. ( Again, yours was 51, quite acceptable )
L3 standards are slipping... No, that's more like a landslide.


It's relatively OK other than that - Slightly below average but within the acceptable range -


Regards
David
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Just picked up my first Gen 3 unit, a PVS14. Got a deal on it since it was a 2011 vintage L3 tube with a couple blems. Just tried it out and it's pretty sweet. You can see a couple dark spots in the tube around the edges, but I don't think it's too bad at all. Came with a data sheet. How's it look??

Happy to join the green eye club!

http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y316/righttobeararms8/Gun%20Pics/PVS14%20A_zpszepic3r4.jpg

http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y316/righttobeararms8/Gun%20Pics/PVS14%20B_zpsot34h2pd.jpg

http://i1025.photobucket.com/albums/y316/righttobeararms8/Gun%20Pics/PVS14%20C_zpsnb08ppx4.jpg

  S/N 22.6 is a little low - At the bottom of the "Good" range... Below 21 is "poor"


Of concern was the data sheet that suggested an EBI of 5 was acceptable? 5 would be absolute crap ( Don't worry, your's was 0.5 )And a high-light resolution of 12 lp/mm is also pretty disgusting. ( Again, yours was 51, quite acceptable )
L3 standards are slipping... No, that's more like a landslide.


It's relatively OK other than that - Slightly below average but within the acceptable range -


Regards
David
 


Don't fault L3 - they obviously had customers willing to purchase these tubes with such a low bar set for minimum specs, and who knows what L3 was selling them for. If that minimum is on the spec sheet, the buyers must have known.
Link Posted: 2/27/2015 2:48:33 AM EDT
[#6]
Not the best tube made but will get the job done. Solid performer but not a star athlete.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top