Quote History Quoted:
Get both.
View Quote
It is too bad we can't go back to the days when "getting both" was a realistic option. During the 1960s, we had all sorts of fighter/interceptor aircraft operational at the same time....the F-100, F-101, F-102, F-104, F-105, F-106, F-4, F-8, F-111, etc. And nearly all of those were developed within a few years of each other. These days, each of the services have to make due with just a couple of different fighter designs and as such, these aircraft have to be suitable to performing a wide variety of missions.
If things could be like they once were, we could have placed both the F-22 and F-23 into service. The YF-23 did possess better range and better supersonic cruise capability. And it also had better overall stealth characteristics. So it would have likely performed the interceptor and long range escort mission better than the Raptor. It could have also been superior for penetrating the most dense and capable air defense networks early in the fight and taking out the most heavily defended targets. It is a shame that the cost to develop military aircraft have become so astronomical that we can no longer afford to design and build specialty aircraft and instead have to develop "jack of all trades" designs that are masters of none. It would also be nice to have more variety in the fleet in case one particular fighter experienced some type of major problem that resulted in the type being grounded until a fix could be found.