User Panel
Posted: 8/20/2014 8:31:36 AM EDT
|
|
|
|
"I'll fucking kill you"
"What's your name?" "Go fuck yourself" Luckily there was another officer there to unfuck Heavy 6. |
|
|
|
For those of us without speakers at work or whatever reason. I assume the gist is "Get out of here or I'll kill you?
|
|
|
|
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media?
|
|
In any case, it is high time for several games of Beat the Press.
|
|
Quoted:
For those of us without speakers at work or whatever reason. I assume the gist is "Get out of here or I'll kill you? View Quote Pointing his rifle at one guy with a camera after wildly pointing around at a bunch of folks "I'll fucking kill you. Get back." Not a conditional threat, just a threat to kill someone. I'm sure it will be defended. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. I disagree. The government should issue licenses to the press after they have received proper training. Then they should issue renewable 24 hour free speech passes after they pay their $20.00 administrative fee. Everyone without a pass must remain in the free speech zone. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. I didn't. Bloggers and other internet contributors are the new media. |
|
|
Quoted:
I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. Alternatively, people who hang out in riots and take pictures with their cell phones should not call themselves journalists. It's a blatant lie and if the person will lie about something that obvious, anything else he says must be considered bullshit until proven otherwise. Besides, I took pictures in D.C. I'm a fucking Washington Correspondent! Quoted:
Bloggers and other internet contributors are the new media. Ever since The Weekly World News went out of business. |
|
Who gives a fuck whether it's a journalist or not? When people try to distract from the real topic with trivialities, it smells of an agenda.
The "protesters" are fucking stupid. However, Officer Douchey Killemall should be removed from the force immediately. Am I in before someone defends his actions? [ETA] I can't wait to see how the transition is made from "not a journalist" to "officer acted appropriately", because I'm sure that's in the works. |
|
View Quote Thanks for saving this thread and oh yea I'm sure the cop is going to lose his job for that one. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. There's nothing in the first amendment about media corporations. Besides that, what is the problem, do you think we might end up with too much control over our government? |
|
|
|
Obvious troll is obvious.
DU is that way -------------------->
|
|
Quoted:
Alternatively, people who hang out in riots and take pictures with their cell phones should not call themselves journalists. It's a blatant lie and if the person will lie about something that obvious, anything else he says must be considered bullshit until proven otherwise. Besides, I took pictures in D.C. I'm a fucking Washington Correspondent! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. Alternatively, people who hang out in riots and take pictures with their cell phones should not call themselves journalists. It's a blatant lie and if the person will lie about something that obvious, anything else he says must be considered bullshit until proven otherwise. Besides, I took pictures in D.C. I'm a fucking Washington Correspondent! Are Breibart's staff journalists? Is a freelance news photographer? |
|
Quoted:
I disagree. The government should issue licenses to the press after they have received proper training. Then they should issue renewable 24 hour free speech passes after they pay their $20.00 administrative fee. Everyone without a pass must remain in the free speech zone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. I disagree. The government should issue licenses to the press after they have received proper training. Then they should issue renewable 24 hour free speech passes after they pay their $20.00 administrative fee. Everyone without a pass must remain in the free speech zone. Free speech is more dangerous than an assault rifle in the wrong hands, we need common sense speech control. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. No. He gets it. The point is anyone with a camera is press. |
|
Don't stop at unprofessional. Pretty illegal. |
|
|
Quoted:
Don't stop at unprofessional. Pretty illegal. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Don't stop at unprofessional. Pretty illegal. I meant whoever filmed it. Nearly every phone has a fucking HD camera. |
|
Quoted:
No. He gets it. The point is anyone with a camera is press. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. No. He gets it. The point is anyone with a camera is press. They possibly can be. Although that's my position about as much as only people that are employed by print newspapers are the press is yours. |
|
Quoted:
I meant whoever filmed it. Nearly every phone has a fucking HD camera. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Don't stop at unprofessional. Pretty illegal. I meant whoever filmed it. Nearly every phone has a fucking HD camera. Gotcha. When the video was on Fox News it looked much more clear. That may just be a low resolution upload. |
|
Quoted: I didn't. Bloggers and other internet contributors are the new media. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: So anyone with a cell phone streaming live video is now considered part of the media? I agree. The government should license and only allow first amendment rights to officially recognized journalists. I didn't. Bloggers and other internet contributors are the new media. |
|
|
Quoted:
Pointing his rifle at one guy with a camera after wildly pointing around at a bunch of folks "I'll fucking kill you. Get back." Not a conditional threat, just a threat to kill someone. I'm sure it will be defended. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
For those of us without speakers at work or whatever reason. I assume the gist is "Get out of here or I'll kill you? Pointing his rifle at one guy with a camera after wildly pointing around at a bunch of folks "I'll fucking kill you. Get back." Not a conditional threat, just a threat to kill someone. I'm sure it will be defended. I shall step up to the plate. If I was there, in any uniform or otherwise, I'd be threatening to kill everything that moved. |
|
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.