Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
M16a4 (clone) picture thread (Page 72 of 147)
Page / 147
Link Posted: 6/16/2015 10:48:54 AM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MikeE23666:



There are some posted here in this thread somewhere.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MikeE23666:
Originally Posted By InternationalM:
Were m16A4's ever issued with Eotechs or aimpoints?



There are some posted here in this thread somewhere.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


I saw them too with eotech, was curious to see what model it was.......
Link Posted: 6/16/2015 4:35:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: MILSPEC556] [#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By InternationalM:
Were m16A4's ever issued with Eotechs or aimpoints?
View Quote

EOTech yes. I've never seen a service A4 with an Aimpoint tho, but wouldn't be surprised if somebody somewhere did.

ETA I think the one I'm thinking of had a 552 on it.
Link Posted: 6/16/2015 5:00:30 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:

EOTech yes. I've never seen a service A4 with an Aimpoint tho, but wouldn't be surprised if somebody somewhere did.

ETA I think the one I'm thinking of had a 552 on it.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By InternationalM:
Were m16A4's ever issued with Eotechs or aimpoints?

EOTech yes. I've never seen a service A4 with an Aimpoint tho, but wouldn't be surprised if somebody somewhere did.

ETA I think the one I'm thinking of had a 552 on it.


Prior to the M4 being adopted for all BCTs in the Army; you use to see Army A4s with M68s

Marines units for several years would buy eotechs prior to the RCO being universally fielded.
Link Posted: 6/16/2015 5:15:25 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JJREA] [#4]
Yeah, I'm thinking I've seen some pics of aimpoints and A4's on here.  For sure.  I think I just saw one in that thread that asked about rifles and carbine buttstock being OK.  

Nope, was an A2.


I think I've seen it before, but not sure I have a pic of one.
Link Posted: 6/16/2015 5:48:08 PM EDT
[#5]
I have a few pics of A4s with Aimpoints. Just gotta find'em.
Link Posted: 6/17/2015 12:08:11 AM EDT
[#6]
Link Posted: 6/17/2015 2:56:24 AM EDT
[#7]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Corporal_Chaos:


When I went through OSUT (Army), we all had A4's with M68's (after passing basic rifle marksmanship).
View Quote


This.



I really want to clone my basic training rifle, but finding a Comp M2 might be a bit hard.



Decisions, decisions...



 
Link Posted: 6/17/2015 3:23:41 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By allforgotten1:

This.

I really want to clone my basic training rifle, but finding a Comp M2 might be a bit hard.

Decisions, decisions...
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By allforgotten1:
Originally Posted By Corporal_Chaos:
When I went through OSUT (Army), we all had A4's with M68's (after passing basic rifle marksmanship).

This.

I really want to clone my basic training rifle, but finding a Comp M2 might be a bit hard.

Decisions, decisions...
 

I've seen a bunch in the EE. Do it!

You could always make a WTB ad as well for the comp M2
Link Posted: 6/18/2015 10:53:33 AM EDT
[#9]
ok I tried search and im a doomas.. what vertical grip is used with the KAC M5 RAS?
Link Posted: 6/18/2015 11:05:55 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By pigpen60:
ok I tried search and im a doomas.. what vertical grip is used with the KAC M5 RAS?
View Quote


The KAC Vertical Grip:

http://www.operationparts.com/kac-knights-armament-forward-pistol-grip-assembly/



But dear God, please don't pay $65 for one. You can find them on the EE for about $15 shipped. Most often they are sold with rail panels and other accessories. They are so prolific they are often thrown into the category of "A2 grips" as far as people have extras.

If I can find a spare I'll send you an IM.
Link Posted: 6/18/2015 11:47:24 AM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 6/19/2015 12:13:00 PM EDT
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By allforgotten1:

This.

I really want to clone my basic training rifle, but finding a Comp M2 might be a bit hard.

Decisions, decisions...
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By allforgotten1:
Originally Posted By Corporal_Chaos:
When I went through OSUT (Army), we all had A4's with M68's (after passing basic rifle marksmanship).

This.

I really want to clone my basic training rifle, but finding a Comp M2 might be a bit hard.

Decisions, decisions...
 


Purchase a PRO & change the mount.
Link Posted: 6/19/2015 2:54:40 PM EDT
[#13]
thanks for replies, thanks ankratz.
Link Posted: 6/21/2015 11:29:48 PM EDT
[#14]
Link Posted: 6/22/2015 12:29:45 PM EDT
[#15]
Very nice!
Link Posted: 6/26/2015 2:55:51 PM EDT
[#16]
Took mine out the other day.

Link Posted: 6/26/2015 3:50:11 PM EDT
[#17]
I'm planning to run a red dot on mine. Originally I was inspired to run a 512, but all I have at the moment is a 553.

I pieced together an NOS M68 gen1 mount that I will put my aimpoint PRO in. Works for me.

I dig an A4 with a red dot.
Link Posted: 6/26/2015 8:17:11 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By thecolter383:
Took mine out the other day.

https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3704/18948554459_e52fe098e0_h.jpg
View Quote



Terrific pic.
Link Posted: 6/27/2015 1:00:28 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ankratz:


The KAC Vertical Grip:

http://www.operationparts.com/kac-knights-armament-forward-pistol-grip-assembly/

http://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-xock0/products/1678/images/904/97098-2__39175.1404845304.1280.1280.jpg?c=2

But dear God, please don't pay $65 for one. You can find them on the EE for about $15 shipped. Most often they are sold with rail panels and other accessories. They are so prolific they are often thrown into the category of "A2 grips" as far as people have extras.

If I can find a spare I'll send you an IM.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ankratz:
Originally Posted By pigpen60:
ok I tried search and im a doomas.. what vertical grip is used with the KAC M5 RAS?


The KAC Vertical Grip:

http://www.operationparts.com/kac-knights-armament-forward-pistol-grip-assembly/

http://cdn3.bigcommerce.com/s-xock0/products/1678/images/904/97098-2__39175.1404845304.1280.1280.jpg?c=2

But dear God, please don't pay $65 for one. You can find them on the EE for about $15 shipped. Most often they are sold with rail panels and other accessories. They are so prolific they are often thrown into the category of "A2 grips" as far as people have extras.

If I can find a spare I'll send you an IM.


I just finished selling about 60 of these on Ebay for 10-15$
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 1:43:54 PM EDT
[#20]
I took the ACOG off my A4 clone.... Kinda tempted to keep it off for good. Maybe move the ACOG to another rifle for fun.





Also I did switch out the BCG in my SBR and A4 clone. The BCM carrier made my SBR much more reliable and the Premium Palmetto BCG is now in my A4 clone and has not had any issues.
Link Posted: 6/29/2015 2:38:44 PM EDT
[#21]
JeredMD,
gorgeous set of firearms there.




I am with you, periodically, I just take the Acog off. And put the big ole handle back on.

I love it for a while. Then put Acog back on. Then off. On. Off. On. Off.




So it goes. It's cool to have options to give 'em different looks, aint it?
Link Posted: 7/1/2015 9:37:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Lancelot] [#22]
Link Posted: 7/1/2015 9:48:22 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/f5165edfa19bcf273643df7b3770f5690bca06dd/r=x404&c=534x401/http/cdn.tegna-tv.com/-mm-/ed43d23f836e8638496a3d04092d466af92fa7c1/c=0-0-5107-3840/local/-/media/2015/07/01/GGM/MilitaryTimes/635713546719675685-Rifle-competition-Woolfolk-.JPG

Gunnery Sgt. Amber Woods aims her rifle on June 30 during the 54th Inter-service Rifle Match held at Quantico, Va. The Marine Corps’ Weapons Training Battalion hosted the event from June 24 to July 1.(Photo: Daniel Woolfolk/Staff)



 
View Quote

Looks like they modified the KAC M-5 RAS to work around the float tube.  I've one that looks just like it.

Dan
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 12:22:49 AM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:

EOTech yes. I've never seen a service A4 with an Aimpoint tho, but wouldn't be surprised if somebody somewhere did.

ETA I think the one I'm thinking of had a 552 on it.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By InternationalM:
Were m16A4's ever issued with Eotechs or aimpoints?

EOTech yes. I've never seen a service A4 with an Aimpoint tho, but wouldn't be surprised if somebody somewhere did.

ETA I think the one I'm thinking of had a 552 on it.


I have. 2009 in Balad AB, Iraq.
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 6:25:26 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AGR1279:

Looks like they modified the KAC M-5 RAS to work around the float tube.  I've one that looks just like it.

Dan
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AGR1279:
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/f5165edfa19bcf273643df7b3770f5690bca06dd/r=x404&c=534x401/http/cdn.tegna-tv.com/-mm-/ed43d23f836e8638496a3d04092d466af92fa7c1/c=0-0-5107-3840/local/-/media/2015/07/01/GGM/MilitaryTimes/635713546719675685-Rifle-competition-Woolfolk-.JPG

Gunnery Sgt. Amber Woods aims her rifle on June 30 during the 54th Inter-service Rifle Match held at Quantico, Va. The Marine Corps’ Weapons Training Battalion hosted the event from June 24 to July 1.(Photo: Daniel Woolfolk/Staff)



 

Looks like they modified the KAC M-5 RAS to work around the float tube.  I've one that looks just like it.

Dan



That RAS would be around 1lb right? Add that with the freefloat sleeve (made of steel?) and the front end of that A4 has some weight to it.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 9:26:33 AM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 9:41:33 PM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MikeE23666:



That RAS would be around 1lb right? Add that with the freefloat sleeve (made of steel?) and the front end of that A4 has some weight to it.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MikeE23666:
Originally Posted By AGR1279:
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/f5165edfa19bcf273643df7b3770f5690bca06dd/r=x404&c=534x401/http/cdn.tegna-tv.com/-mm-/ed43d23f836e8638496a3d04092d466af92fa7c1/c=0-0-5107-3840/local/-/media/2015/07/01/GGM/MilitaryTimes/635713546719675685-Rifle-competition-Woolfolk-.JPG

Gunnery Sgt. Amber Woods aims her rifle on June 30 during the 54th Inter-service Rifle Match held at Quantico, Va. The Marine Corps’ Weapons Training Battalion hosted the event from June 24 to July 1.(Photo: Daniel Woolfolk/Staff)



 

Looks like they modified the KAC M-5 RAS to work around the float tube.  I've one that looks just like it.

Dan



That RAS would be around 1lb right? Add that with the freefloat sleeve (made of steel?) and the front end of that A4 has some weight to it.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Yes.  You can't put much additional weight under the RAS as compared to the standard A2 style hand guards.

Dan
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 10:45:08 PM EDT
[#28]
I always wondered why some of them stick the PEQ on the side instead of on top - especially if they have the top rail clear.
I would think the rifle balances way better with PEQ on top.




I did the same on the pic below, but just for I am a damn copycat.






Hoorah
by SoloDallas, on Flickr
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 8:58:43 AM EDT
[Last Edit: R0N] [#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SoloDallas:
I always wondered why some of them stick the PEQ on the side instead of on top - especially if they have the top rail clear. I would think the rifle balances way better with PEQ on top.


I did the same on the pic below, but just for I am a damn copycat.


<a href="https://flic.kr/p/mZnUBK" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2806/13776449985_08696795b1_b.jpg</a>
Hoorah
by SoloDallas, on Flickr
View Quote



Mostly convenience, many don't like it blocking the bottom of their RCO view this combined with rudimentary training that doesn't explains the need to have the laser above the bore.
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 6:17:28 PM EDT
[#30]
Got my A4 clone forsale in the EE
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 6:28:12 PM EDT
[#31]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R0N:





Mostly convenience, many don't like it blocking the bottom of their RCO view this combined with rudimentary training that doesn't explains the need to have the laser above the bore.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By R0N:







Mostly convenience, many don't like it blocking the bottom of their RCO view this combined with rudimentary training that doesn't explains the need to have the laser above the bore.




 
Now THAT made sense.
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 9:22:29 PM EDT
[#32]
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 9:24:54 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xta1/v/t1.0-9/11140356_10152805581445194_7434634962714507031_n.jpg?oh=e289fbacd5d0960d474fb2aa9d404d17&oe=56200CA8

Lance Cpl. Alex Rowan, a combat engineer with 4th Marine Division, runs to take cover before the Anti-Personnel Obstacle Breaching System detonates during the SAPPER Leaders Course aboard Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, June 26, 2015. During the course, the Marines used assault and breaching techniques to clear a wire obstacle using line charges that utilized C4 explosives and their APOBS.
 
(U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Krista James/Released)
View Quote


Really been diggin these A4 training pics!
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 10:16:56 PM EDT
[#34]
Link Posted: 7/8/2015 8:54:14 AM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
A4 to kick the door.

https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/11391510_10152734075175194_3033073478670159330_n.jpg?oh=9886c4057aed60cec3c0f583c2e2caab&oe=56163387

Marines with 1st Battalion, 3rd Marine Regiment, the "Lava Dogs," stack up to breach a door with a donut charge during exercise Lava Viper aboard Pohakuloa Training Area, Hawaii, May 28, 2015.

(U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Ricky S. Gomez/Released)
View Quote


Most miserable training area ever, hated that place
Link Posted: 7/9/2015 1:52:18 AM EDT
[#36]
Any update on availability of the factory FN A4 rifles?  I've been trying to work through my LGS but they aren't able to find them anywhere yet.
Link Posted: 7/9/2015 9:51:09 AM EDT
[#37]
Finally finished her!

JD machine upper
JD machine EGA lower
Colt removable carry handle
BCM A2 stock kit
PSA lower parts kit
ALG trigger group
KAC RAS
PSA FN 1/7 govt profile 20" barrel assembly
PSA unmarked FA BCG











Link Posted: 7/9/2015 9:38:01 PM EDT
[#38]
I saw these patches (I have one in multicam as well) and had to have them. It was only on the rifle for this picture, though.

Link Posted: 7/10/2015 8:23:13 AM EDT
[#39]
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 8:23:32 AM EDT
[#40]
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 1:52:18 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RedRaider0311:
Finally finished her!

JD machine upper
JD machine EGA lower
Colt removable carry handle
BCM A2 stock kit
PSA lower parts kit
ALG trigger group
KAC RAS
PSA FN 1/7 govt profile 20" barrel assembly
PSA unmarked FA BCG

http://i.imgur.com/LsKY0UZl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/BdACvvUl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/lRcuGlrl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/34tq0DCl.jpg



View Quote

Looks damn good. You gonna eventually snag a TA31RCO-A4 for it?
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 3:57:13 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:

Looks damn good. You gonna eventually snag a TA31RCO-A4 for it?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By RedRaider0311:
Finally finished her!

JD machine upper
JD machine EGA lower
Colt removable carry handle
BCM A2 stock kit
PSA lower parts kit
ALG trigger group
KAC RAS
PSA FN 1/7 govt profile 20" barrel assembly
PSA unmarked FA BCG

http://i.imgur.com/LsKY0UZl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/BdACvvUl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/lRcuGlrl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/34tq0DCl.jpg




Looks damn good. You gonna eventually snag a TA31RCO-A4 for it?



Thanks y'all. I will down the road. I don't have time to save up for an RCO before I ship to OCS, and I'll get my fair share of RCO usage after that point, so maybe a few years from now.
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 3:58:18 PM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RedRaider0311:



Thanks y'all. I will down the road. I don't have time to save up for an RCO before I ship to OCS, and I'll get my fair share of RCO usage after that point, so maybe a few years from now.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By RedRaider0311:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By RedRaider0311:
Finally finished her!

JD machine upper
JD machine EGA lower
Colt removable carry handle
BCM A2 stock kit
PSA lower parts kit
ALG trigger group
KAC RAS
PSA FN 1/7 govt profile 20" barrel assembly
PSA unmarked FA BCG

http://i.imgur.com/LsKY0UZl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/BdACvvUl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/lRcuGlrl.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/34tq0DCl.jpg




Looks damn good. You gonna eventually snag a TA31RCO-A4 for it?



Thanks y'all. I will down the road. I don't have time to save up for an RCO before I ship to OCS, and I'll get my fair share of RCO usage after that point, so maybe a few years from now.


At TBS not so much at OCS
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 6:14:52 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lancelot:

Which pouch?
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
Originally Posted By 86HMMWV:
I saw these patches (I have one in multicam as well) and had to have them. It was only on the rifle for this picture, though.

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc145/dieselpowrguy85/9EDBAA79-72D3-4EC6-A2D7-FAFFD2129685-6648-000006D413D25487_zpswwtyofev.jpg

Which pouch?
 

Specter
Link Posted: 7/12/2015 11:17:32 AM EDT
[#45]
Some interesting A4 observations from recent training (Army):

I was issued (along with the rest of my training unit) a Colt M16A4 for training. Finish on all the parts was factory new as far as I could tell, and I am 99.99% sure it was new out of the box and previously unissued - it had the round plastic handguards and carry handle, no M5 RAS or BUIS like most other "in the wild" A4s. Barrel dated 12/09, square UID label on the right side of the receiver. Roll mark was COLT DEFENSE. .

The later training units that arrived after us were issued rebuilt Colt M16A4s. As I observed, these were older A4s which were rebuilt by Anniston. Colt lowers were rollmarked COLTS MFG CO INC instead of the newer COLT DEFENSE. They had the rectangular UID sticker on the right side as well as the ANAD 09 - 12 stamping. Uppers I observed closely were FN replacements (F marked), but the barrels were Colt. These rifles were all equipped with the M5 RAS and Matech BUIS.

Also saw some M16A2s in use but did not get to handle any or otherwise look at them closely.
Link Posted: 7/13/2015 1:56:37 AM EDT
[#46]
I'm not seeing too many pics of painted rifles "in the wild".  For those that have BTDT, is this an accurate observation, or are we starting to see more and more painted rifles (A4s specifically) now?  I've looked through the last 20+ pages, but have only seen a handful of images with a good rattle can job going.  Every other rifle seems to be native black.
Link Posted: 7/13/2015 3:07:51 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SGL_Shooter:
Some interesting A4 observations from recent training (Army):

I was issued (along with the rest of my training unit) a Colt M16A4 for training. Finish on all the parts was factory new as far as I could tell, and I am 99.99% sure it was new out of the box and previously unissued - it had the round plastic handguards and carry handle, no M5 RAS or BUIS like most other "in the wild" A4s. Barrel dated 12/09, square UID label on the right side of the receiver. Roll mark was COLT DEFENSE. .

The later training units that arrived after us were issued rebuilt Colt M16A4s. As I observed, these were older A4s which were rebuilt by Anniston. Colt lowers were rollmarked COLTS MFG CO INC instead of the newer COLT DEFENSE. They had the rectangular UID sticker on the right side as well as the ANAD 09 - 12 stamping. Uppers I observed closely were FN replacements (F marked), but the barrels were Colt. These rifles were all equipped with the M5 RAS and Matech BUIS.

Also saw some M16A2s in use but did not get to handle any or otherwise look at them closely.
View Quote


Thank you for sharing this. I was under the impression from everything I've read that Colt never made an A4 destined for the U.S. Military. Not necessarily the US GOV, but Military... Do you suspect since these were ANAD rebuilds, they likely were M16A1 lowers?

Did Colt make M16A2's for the Military?

Thanks
Link Posted: 7/13/2015 9:39:58 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ankratz:


Thank you for sharing this. I was under the impression from everything I've read that Colt never made an A4 destined for the U.S. Military. Not necessarily the US GOV, but Military... Do you suspect since these were ANAD rebuilds, they likely were M16A1 lowers?

Did Colt make M16A2's for the Military?

Thanks
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ankratz:
Originally Posted By SGL_Shooter:
Some interesting A4 observations from recent training (Army):

I was issued (along with the rest of my training unit) a Colt M16A4 for training. Finish on all the parts was factory new as far as I could tell, and I am 99.99% sure it was new out of the box and previously unissued - it had the round plastic handguards and carry handle, no M5 RAS or BUIS like most other "in the wild" A4s. Barrel dated 12/09, square UID label on the right side of the receiver. Roll mark was COLT DEFENSE. .

The later training units that arrived after us were issued rebuilt Colt M16A4s. As I observed, these were older A4s which were rebuilt by Anniston. Colt lowers were rollmarked COLTS MFG CO INC instead of the newer COLT DEFENSE. They had the rectangular UID sticker on the right side as well as the ANAD 09 - 12 stamping. Uppers I observed closely were FN replacements (F marked), but the barrels were Colt. These rifles were all equipped with the M5 RAS and Matech BUIS.

Also saw some M16A2s in use but did not get to handle any or otherwise look at them closely.


Thank you for sharing this. I was under the impression from everything I've read that Colt never made an A4 destined for the U.S. Military. Not necessarily the US GOV, but Military... Do you suspect since these were ANAD rebuilds, they likely were M16A1 lowers?

Did Colt make M16A2's for the Military?

Thanks


Colt and FN both made M16A2s.  Not positive on the M16A3 (M16A2 with full auto instead of burst, only seen Seabees carry these).  Never got a M16A4 issue to me so don't know.

CD
Link Posted: 7/13/2015 10:05:07 AM EDT
[Last Edit: txtj79] [#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AGR1279:


Yes.  You can't put much additional weight under the RAS as compared to the standard A2 style hand guards.

Dan
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By AGR1279:
Originally Posted By MikeE23666:
Originally Posted By AGR1279:
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/f5165edfa19bcf273643df7b3770f5690bca06dd/r=x404&c=534x401/http/cdn.tegna-tv.com/-mm-/ed43d23f836e8638496a3d04092d466af92fa7c1/c=0-0-5107-3840/local/-/media/2015/07/01/GGM/MilitaryTimes/635713546719675685-Rifle-competition-Woolfolk-.JPG

Gunnery Sgt. Amber Woods aims her rifle on June 30 during the 54th Inter-service Rifle Match held at Quantico, Va. The Marine Corps’ Weapons Training Battalion hosted the event from June 24 to July 1.(Photo: Daniel Woolfolk/Staff)



 

Looks like they modified the KAC M-5 RAS to work around the float tube.  I've one that looks just like it.

Dan



That RAS would be around 1lb right? Add that with the freefloat sleeve (made of steel?) and the front end of that A4 has some weight to it.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile


Yes.  You can't put much additional weight under the RAS as compared to the standard A2 style hand guards.

Dan

Does anyone have anymore info about putting a freefloat sleeve under an M5 RAS? This is the first time I've seen it done and now I'm curious.
Link Posted: 7/13/2015 12:16:04 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ankratz:


Thank you for sharing this. I was under the impression from everything I've read that Colt never made an A4 destined for the U.S. Military. Not necessarily the US GOV, but Military... Do you suspect since these were ANAD rebuilds, they likely were M16A1 lowers?

Did Colt make M16A2's for the Military?

Thanks
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By ankratz:
Originally Posted By SGL_Shooter:
Some interesting A4 observations from recent training (Army):

I was issued (along with the rest of my training unit) a Colt M16A4 for training. Finish on all the parts was factory new as far as I could tell, and I am 99.99% sure it was new out of the box and previously unissued - it had the round plastic handguards and carry handle, no M5 RAS or BUIS like most other "in the wild" A4s. Barrel dated 12/09, square UID label on the right side of the receiver. Roll mark was COLT DEFENSE. .

The later training units that arrived after us were issued rebuilt Colt M16A4s. As I observed, these were older A4s which were rebuilt by Anniston. Colt lowers were rollmarked COLTS MFG CO INC instead of the newer COLT DEFENSE. They had the rectangular UID sticker on the right side as well as the ANAD 09 - 12 stamping. Uppers I observed closely were FN replacements (F marked), but the barrels were Colt. These rifles were all equipped with the M5 RAS and Matech BUIS.

Also saw some M16A2s in use but did not get to handle any or otherwise look at them closely.


Thank you for sharing this. I was under the impression from everything I've read that Colt never made an A4 destined for the U.S. Military. Not necessarily the US GOV, but Military... Do you suspect since these were ANAD rebuilds, they likely were M16A1 lowers?

Did Colt make M16A2's for the Military?

Thanks


They were original M16A4 lowers, stamped M16A4, just rebuilt with new uppers (at least that's the only replaced external part I could positively ID). I should have taken a pic. We had an ANAD rebuilt 240 as well.

As C_D already said, yes Colt made M16A2s for the military. The ones I saw I could make out the Colt rollmarks, I did not see any FN M16s, be it A2 or A4.
Page / 147
M16a4 (clone) picture thread (Page 72 of 147)
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top