User Panel
Originally Posted By Highlande2: My humble contribution to the thread. Just nevermind the fake peq 15 it was just for the pic I think I might look at the Dbal. Also still trying to decide a magnifier as well. Special thanks to KOBK. http://i1188.photobucket.com/albums/z408/highlande2/1019121036.jpg Winner. Which stock and or pistol grip? |
|
|
Originally Posted By Highlande2: My humble contribution to the thread. Just nevermind the fake peq 15 it was just for the pic I think I might look at the Dbal. Also still trying to decide a magnifier as well. Special thanks to KOBK. http://i1188.photobucket.com/albums/z408/highlande2/1019121036.jpg Which stock/color and or pistol grip? |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Lancelot:
Originally Posted By Highlande2:
My humble contribution to the thread. Just nevermind the fake peq 15 it was just for the pic I think I might look at the Dbal. Also still trying to decide a magnifier as well. Special thanks to KOBK. http://i1188.photobucket.com/albums/z408/highlande2/1019121036.jpg Which stock/color and or pistol grip? The stock is LMT FDE and the pistol grip is Cav Arms Coyote brown |
|
|
Originally Posted By Highlande2: My humble contribution to the thread. Just nevermind the fake peq 15 it was just for the pic I think I might look at the Dbal. Also still trying to decide a magnifier as well. Special thanks to KOBK. http://i1188.photobucket.com/albums/z408/highlande2/1019121036.jpg Looks good buddy! Shoot soon. |
|
|
Kosher to buy a black m3x and just paint it tan? :P
|
|
Native Texan
LaRuemimati There is no such thing as an unethical round against feral hogs. -BushmanLA |
Originally Posted By silhouette_: Kosher to buy a black m3x and just paint it tan? :P Painted > unpainted. |
|
|
Originally Posted By hatexoc:
Received my SU-233 today along with my larue aimpoint mount. T-1 will be here Tuesday along with a NT4 and KAC stock sling QD thingy. http://i1263.photobucket.com/albums/ii640/hatexoc/Mobile%20Uploads/IMG_2689.jpg Looks good! Lmk if you ever decide to sell the ta01 |
|
Native Texan
LaRuemimati There is no such thing as an unethical round against feral hogs. -BushmanLA |
Originally Posted By Will816:
Originally Posted By tdoggy1:
A Navy SEAL doesnt have to win an oscar Exactly Nobody is questioning the reputations and character of the SEALs - that aside, I would rather watch Sponge Bob Square Pants for 7 hours straight than sit through Act of Valor again...thats how bad it was. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
"People don't like the looks of the AK - it's an ugly gun. You can't picture John Wayne carrying an AK. Would he? Probably. He was a practical man."
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By Will816:
Originally Posted By tdoggy1:
A Navy SEAL doesnt have to win an oscar Exactly Nobody is questioning the reputations and character of the SEALs - that aside, I would rather watch Sponge Bob Square Pants for 7 hours straight than sit through Act of Valor again...thats how bad it was. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile That's rough. I've watched it 3 times, twice in theatres. Loved it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By ragincajun1919:
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By Will816:
Originally Posted By tdoggy1:
A Navy SEAL doesnt have to win an oscar Exactly Nobody is questioning the reputations and character of the SEALs - that aside, I would rather watch Sponge Bob Square Pants for 7 hours straight than sit through Act of Valor again...thats how bad it was. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile That's rough. I've watched it 3 times, twice in theatres. Loved it. Agreed. Only watched it once, but acting aside, it's a good flick. |
|
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
|
Originally Posted By Will816: How are you liking the CQT? I had one and sold it. I just couldn't bring myself to like it. Maybe I should have gave it more time.Originally Posted By wayfaerer320: Originally Posted By Will816: Originally Posted By tdoggy1: A Navy SEAL doesnt have to win an oscar Exactly Nobody is questioning the reputations and character of the SEALs - that aside, I would rather watch Sponge Bob Square Pants for 7 hours straight than sit through Act of Valor again...thats how bad it was. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I've watched it 3 times, loved it each time Pic thread: http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae213/Will816/20cafbc4.jpg |
|
“There are two kinds of people: sheep and sharks. Sharks are winners and they don't look back 'cause they don't have necks. Necks are for sheep.”
|
Originally Posted By DonnieBrasco:
Originally Posted By Will816:
How are you liking the CQT? I had one and sold it. I just couldn't bring myself to like it. Maybe I should have gave it more time.
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By Will816:
Originally Posted By tdoggy1:
A Navy SEAL doesnt have to win an oscar Exactly Nobody is questioning the reputations and character of the SEALs - that aside, I would rather watch Sponge Bob Square Pants for 7 hours straight than sit through Act of Valor again...thats how bad it was. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile I've watched it 3 times, loved it each time Pic thread: http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/ae213/Will816/20cafbc4.jpg I like it a lot. It's a good option for something similar to the Elcan Specter but a lot cheaper. The methods and feel of shooting with it are actually extremely similar to the Elcan. They did unfortunately raise the price recently to something like $1100, and I don't think it's worth that, but the original pricing of around $600 was excellent for what you get out of it. I wouldn't mind a more complex reticle (I think they actually have an optional BDC reticle now) but other than that its great. It lives on a Colt Competition Rifle for the time being but will need to find a new home when I get a Mark 6 1-6x for that rifle. I think it's a robust do-it-all optic, don't think I'll ever get rid of it. |
|
|
Originally Posted By ragincajun1919:
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By Will816:
Originally Posted By tdoggy1:
A Navy SEAL doesnt have to win an oscar Exactly Nobody is questioning the reputations and character of the SEALs - that aside, I would rather watch Sponge Bob Square Pants for 7 hours straight than sit through Act of Valor again...thats how bad it was. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile That's rough. I've watched it 3 times, twice in theatres. Loved it. I as well loved it all 3 viewings. |
|
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast!"
|
|
Elcan released a limited amount of FDE optics with the commercial reticle this year. From what I understand FDE is very hard to get anodizing to match so that would account for the color variations.
|
|
Bloodsport2885: Because if your riflemen can't reach it, your marksman can. If your marksman can't reach it, your sniper can. If your sniper can't reach it, your arty/air can. If they can't reach it then fuck that target. He isn't even worried about you.
|
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
Can some of you who are really familiar with Elcan's help me out a little? I found a few in the FDE color, and they were new and shrink wrapped from Elcan, but... the finish looks a little uneven and they have the commercial reticle. Anyone know the story behind these? http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/524883_507366105959956_771435202_n.jpg http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/190347_507365872626646_647670837_n.jpg http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/711_507365625960004_1802613835_n.jpg Probably due in large part to the popularity of this thread, and the high premiums some members were paying for FDE coated SpectreDRs, someone finally realized that it might be worth coating a couple standard commercial models in the color. Raytheon still maintains that the 1996 vintage TA01NSN reticule is "SOCOM proprietary," though, and claims they cannot use it in commercial models, so it was released with the commercial reticule. FDE anodizing has always been problematic with consistency - and the "overruns" that many of us have are rumored to have been available because they were rejected for cosmetic issues. Several companies have tried and abandoned FDE anodizing, with only a few notable exceptions. One wonders how many "anodizing rejects" DD gets when making FDE RIS IIs, and whether or not they'd ever consider selling them as "seconds" to satisfy the huddled masses, longing for an FDE RIS II. Obviously as they don't have the "SOCOM reticule" and aren't contract overruns, they're not marked "SU-230/PVS." Honestly, I'm not sure if the effort has been successful or not, because a lot of the people paying premiums for the FDE ones were doing it because it was the "real McCoy." Also, the commercial reticule instead of the "SOCOM reticule" turns potential buyers like me off, who could care less about the markings, but wanted the FDE version for the cleaner, crisper, and more familiar (and non-machine gun) reticule. ~Augee |
|
|
At $1870, they aren't cheap, but they aren't selling for the prices I have seen some sell for.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
At $1870, they aren't cheap, but they aren't selling for the prices I have seen some sell for. At $1870 you've got the best price I've seen for the commercial fde optic. If I didn't just get a deal on a SOCOM su230 I would have bought one. |
|
Bloodsport2885: Because if your riflemen can't reach it, your marksman can. If your marksman can't reach it, your sniper can. If your sniper can't reach it, your arty/air can. If they can't reach it then fuck that target. He isn't even worried about you.
|
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
At $1870, they aren't cheap, but they aren't selling for the prices I have seen some sell for. I want one! |
|
|
Originally Posted By Will816:
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
At $1870, they aren't cheap, but they aren't selling for the prices I have seen some sell for. I want one! That's about what the black/gray model sells for - they're either getting more common these days, or more people have at least seen one before compared to when I first got one. Glad I got mine before the overruns got overrun. It'd be nice if I knew I could buy more if I ever won the lottery, though. ~Augee |
|
|
Originally Posted By Augee:
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
Can some of you who are really familiar with Elcan's help me out a little? I found a few in the FDE color, and they were new and shrink wrapped from Elcan, but... the finish looks a little uneven and they have the commercial reticle. Anyone know the story behind these? http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/524883_507366105959956_771435202_n.jpg http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/190347_507365872626646_647670837_n.jpg http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/711_507365625960004_1802613835_n.jpg Probably due in large part to the popularity of this thread, and the high premiums some members were paying for FDE coated SpectreDRs, someone finally realized that it might be worth coating a couple standard commercial models in the color. Raytheon still maintains that the 1996 vintage TA01NSN reticule is "SOCOM proprietary," though, and claims they cannot use it in commercial models, so it was released with the commercial reticule. FDE anodizing has always been problematic with consistency - and the "overruns" that many of us have are rumored to have been available because they were rejected for cosmetic issues. Several companies have tried and abandoned FDE anodizing, with only a few notable exceptions. One wonders how many "anodizing rejects" DD gets when making FDE RIS IIs, and whether or not they'd ever consider selling them as "seconds" to satisfy the huddled masses, longing for an FDE RIS II. Obviously as they don't have the "SOCOM reticule" and aren't contract overruns, they're not marked "SU-230/PVS." Honestly, I'm not sure if the effort has been successful or not, because a lot of the people paying premiums for the FDE ones were doing it because it was the "real McCoy." Also, the commercial reticule instead of the "SOCOM reticule" turns potential buyers like me off, who could care less about the markings, but wanted the FDE version for the cleaner, crisper, and more familiar (and non-machine gun) reticule. ~Augee I bought one of the limited run civilian FDE models and I couldn't be happier. The reticle and the lack of the SU-230 marking on the side was initially a turn off, but its still an Elcan Specter DR - the build quality is the same and the differences aren't significant enough to not want to buy one (for me anyway). Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
"People don't like the looks of the AK - it's an ugly gun. You can't picture John Wayne carrying an AK. Would he? Probably. He was a practical man."
|
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
Can some of you who are really familiar with Elcan's help me out a little? I found a few in the FDE color, and they were new and shrink wrapped from Elcan, but... the finish looks a little uneven and they have the commercial reticle. Anyone know the story behind these? http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/524883_507366105959956_771435202_n.jpg http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/190347_507365872626646_647670837_n.jpg http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/711_507365625960004_1802613835_n.jpg The Elcan in question is now mine! Thanks, I can't wait to get it! It may not be an SU-230 but for the price it's hard to beat. I'll give it a good look over and post more pics of the finish so others can see. |
|
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
I bought one of the limited run civilian FDE models and I couldn't be happier. The reticle and the lack of the SU-230 marking on the side was initially a turn off, but its still an Elcan Specter DR - the build quality is the same and the differences aren't significant enough to not want to buy one (for me anyway). Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Sorry, not meaning to imply that the limited run FDE ones are or should be a failure, like I said, I'm honestly not sure whether they're flying off the shelves, selling at the same rate as the black/gray ones, or rotting in dealer stocks. An almost $2,000 is almost always going to be a slow seller (though Ken at Kerif might not have thought so a year ago ). I'm nevertheless quite glad they offered it, if nothing else, it shows that Raytheon sees and hears the civilian market and is willing to be responsive if enough people seem to want something (take a close look, L3! Class I PEQ-15!). I was just offering reasons it might not be as successful as simply releasing more "SOF Overrruns." ~Augee |
|
|
Originally Posted By Augee:
Sorry, not meaning to imply that the limited run FDE ones are or should be a failure, like I said, I'm honestly not sure whether they're flying off the shelves, selling at the same rate as the black/gray ones, or rotting in dealer stocks. An almost $2,000 is almost always going to be a slow seller (though Ken at Kerif might not have thought so a year ago ). I'm nevertheless quite glad they offered it, if nothing else, it shows that Raytheon sees and hears the civilian market and is willing to be responsive if enough people seem to want something (take a close look, L3! Class I PEQ-15!). I was just offering reasons it might not be as successful as simply releasing more "SOF Overrruns." ~Augee I hear ya, brother. I'll give them a concession that they may have had to operate at capacity to produce the number of those suckers (and the PEQ-16) that the military wanted, so that may be a factor in not seeing a civilian product, and also is the fact that it may not be as simple as dropping Class I diodes into the existing circuits and housings, as is evident in the difference between the DBAL-D2 and and the PEQ-15A (DBAL-A2). But the fact remains: if Insight made a Class 1 product that looked and operated like a PEQ-15, they would likely fly off the shelves! |
|
|
Originally Posted By new-arguy:
At $1870, they aren't cheap, but they aren't selling for the prices I have seen some sell for. Still glad I paid $1600 for mine, I only wished I had used a different vendor, but that's water under the bridge now. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Augee:
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
I bought one of the limited run civilian FDE models and I couldn't be happier. The reticle and the lack of the SU-230 marking on the side was initially a turn off, but its still an Elcan Specter DR - the build quality is the same and the differences aren't significant enough to not want to buy one (for me anyway). Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Sorry, not meaning to imply that the limited run FDE ones are or should be a failure, like I said, I'm honestly not sure whether they're flying off the shelves, selling at the same rate as the black/gray ones, or rotting in dealer stocks. An almost $2,000 is almost always going to be a slow seller (though Ken at Kerif might not have thought so a year ago ). I'm nevertheless quite glad they offered it, if nothing else, it shows that Raytheon sees and hears the civilian market and is willing to be responsive if enough people seem to want something (take a close look, L3! Class I PEQ-15!). I was just offering reasons it might not be as successful as simply releasing more "SOF Overrruns." ~Augee I hear ya. For me it was the FDE color that pretty much sold me. And the fact that any SU-230s are all going to be second hand at this point if you want one. The fact that this one was in FDE and brand new is what made me jump on one when they recently came out. I wonder if others have felt similar? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
"People don't like the looks of the AK - it's an ugly gun. You can't picture John Wayne carrying an AK. Would he? Probably. He was a practical man."
|
Sorry I even bothered to post pictures of my build. Was posted in a moment of perceived camaraderie of folks with like appreciation.
My sensitivity towards name calling and rudeness of some members made me rethink that I should just have kept to myself like I have always done. For those with kind words, Thank you...and God Bless. |
|
|
Originally Posted By zemperfi1971: Still missing a couple of things (silencer etc.etc.)...but pretty happy with the build. I know the stock should be different but I really like the UBR gives the whole setup and stability. That and the heavy barrel does add weight but just means more exercise as if my Dragonskin set up is not heavy enough. Great varmint rig....lol...slight overkill...way to easy. http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0440.jpg http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0439.jpg ~ Deleted This is not GD. ~ |
|
|
Originally Posted By zemperfi1971:
Still missing a couple of things (silencer etc.etc.)...but pretty happy with the build. I know the stock should be different but I really like the UBR gives the whole setup and stability. That and the heavy barrel does add weight but just means more exercise. Great varmint rig....lol...slight overkill...way to easy. http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0440.jpg http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0439.jpg Where the heck did this guy come from? Nice stuff dude! |
|
|
Sex!
|
|
Native Texan
LaRuemimati There is no such thing as an unethical round against feral hogs. -BushmanLA |
I had an aimpoint on my fsp block 2, went to a 553, shot with it twice and sold it to go back to an aimpoint.
Go play with both if you can and see which reticle you like, for me the circle got too much in the way but others swear by it . Hope that helps. |
|
|
Originally Posted By zemperfi1971:
Still missing a couple of things (silencer etc.etc.)...but pretty happy with the build. I know the stock should be different but I really like the UBR gives the whole setup some stability. That and the heavy barrel does add weight but just means more exercise. Great varmint rig....lol...slight overkill...way to easy. http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0440.jpg http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0439.jpg Is that a no-shit SU-232/PAS? How much'd that run you? ~Augee |
|
|
Originally Posted By The_Texan_Ninja: Here is my humble build as it sits, I just need to decide on an optic and a different light mount. Sorry for the crappy picture, the lighting sucks. I’ll have a better one tomorrow. http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k581/The_Texan_Ninja/photo-1766.jpg Specs: Colt LE6920 "M4 Carbine” (Base Gun) Colt SOCOM 14.5 in. barrel DD RIS II KAC NT4 flash hider ( pinning/spacer by ADCO ) LMT SOPMOD Gen. 1 BCM/VLTOR Gunfighter Mod. 4 CH Tango Down BG-16 KAC taupe front sight KAC 200m-600m micro MagPul AFG ( haters gonna hate ) CQD sling mount BFG VCAS padded sling w/ MASH hook and cover Surefire M600C w/ KX2C head I’m trying to figure out which optic and offset light mount to go with. I’ve narrowed it down to: Optic: a.) Aimpoint T-1/H-1 2MOA version b.) EoTech 553 Tan Light Mount: a.) Larue offset mount b.)Gear Sector offset mount Any suggestions? I know he optics are going to come down to personal choice, and I plan on at least looking through each one. I’m leaning towards the Aimpoint, but since I’ll be doing quite a bit of hog hunting with this, I’m not sure the single 2MOA dot will perform as well as the EoTech against moving targets. Get the IWC / HSP mount for the light. Specifically the Thorntail SBR mount. |
|
|
Originally Posted By zemperfi1971: Still missing a couple of things (silencer etc.etc.)...but pretty happy with the build. I know the stock should be different but I really like the UBR gives the whole setup some stability. That and the heavy barrel does add weight but just means more exercise. Great varmint rig....lol...slight overkill...way to easy. http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0440.jpg http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0439.jpg Holy shitballs. |
|
|
Originally Posted By zemperfi1971:
Still missing a couple of things (silencer etc.etc.)...but pretty happy with the build. I know the stock should be different but I really like the UBR gives the whole setup some stability. That and the heavy barrel does add weight but just means more exercise. Great varmint rig....lol...slight overkill...way to easy. http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0440.jpg http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0439.jpg %#@* me! He win's Is $350.00 a good price for a RIS II FSB ? |
|
|
Originally Posted By kbi:
Originally Posted By zemperfi1971:
Still missing a couple of things (silencer etc.etc.)...but pretty happy with the build. I know the stock should be different but I really like the UBR gives the whole setup some stability. That and the heavy barrel does add weight but just means more exercise. Great varmint rig....lol...slight overkill...way to easy. http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0440.jpg http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx126/Znzytivguy/IMG_0439.jpg %#@* me! He win's Is $350.00 a good price for a RIS II FSB ? If its new, then that's a pretty good deal. If its used, you can do better. I got my RIS II for $300 used. |
|
|
Originally Posted By The_Texan_Ninja:
Here is my humble build as it sits, I just need to decide on an optic and a different light mount. Sorry for the crappy picture, the lighting sucks. I’ll have a better one tomorrow. http://i1117.photobucket.com/albums/k581/The_Texan_Ninja/photo-1766.jpg Specs: Colt LE6920 “M4 Carbine” (Base Gun) Colt SOCOM 14.5 in. barrel DD RIS II KAC NT4 flash hider ( pinning/spacer by ADCO ) LMT SOPMOD Gen. 1 BCM/VLTOR Gunfighter Mod. 4 CH Tango Down BG-16 KAC taupe front sight KAC 200m-600m micro MagPul AFG ( haters gonna hate ) CQD sling mount BFG VCAS padded sling w/ MASH hook and cover Surefire M600C w/ KX2C head I’m trying to figure out which optic and offset light mount to go with. I’ve narrowed it down to: Optic: a.) Aimpoint T-1/H-1 2MOA version b.) EoTech 553 Tan Light Mount: a.) Larue offset mount b.)Gear Sector offset mount Any suggestions? I know he optics are going to come down to personal choice, and I plan on at least looking through each one. I’m leaning towards the Aimpoint, but since I’ll be doing quite a bit of hog hunting with this, I’m not sure the single 2MOA dot will perform as well as the EoTech against moving targets. What part if tx are you in? You're welcome to try my t1 2 moa. |
|
Native Texan
LaRuemimati There is no such thing as an unethical round against feral hogs. -BushmanLA |
Just a heads up if anyone is looking for a fde ris II fsp there is one in the EE for 315 nib. I would snag it if I didn't need an optic for my 1.5 =/
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_22/1048129_Fall_Clearance_Sale.html |
|
Native Texan
LaRuemimati There is no such thing as an unethical round against feral hogs. -BushmanLA |
I'm getting dang impatient waiting for DD to put out more M4A1 RIS II's in FDE for my custom build thru them.
I'm getting close to saying screw it, picking up a factory Noveske, and dressing it up in the FDE accessories I've had laying around for the Block II I've been waiting for. |
|
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
|
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
I'm getting dang impatient waiting for DD to put out more M4A1 RIS II's in FDE for my custom build thru them. I'm getting close to saying screw it, picking up a factory Noveske, and dressing it up in the FDE accessories I've had laying around for the Block II I've been waiting for. Yea Brownell's said earliest would be December. I couldn't handle the wait so I purchased a complete upper from another forum member. |
|
|
Originally Posted By thesocialistnetwork:
Originally Posted By AR-Ryan21:
I'm getting dang impatient waiting for DD to put out more M4A1 RIS II's in FDE for my custom build thru them. I'm getting close to saying screw it, picking up a factory Noveske, and dressing it up in the FDE accessories I've had laying around for the Block II I've been waiting for. Yea Brownell's said earliest would be December. I couldn't handle the wait so I purchased a complete upper from another forum member. Well that Brownells. I've been told by DD that parts for their custom builds take top priority, so I'd imagine some will be available thru them directly before Brownells. I put in a call to the guy I've been dealing with at DD earlier, and am waiting to hear back from him. If he says I can expect my rifle in the next couple weeks, I'll wait. If not, I'm gonna pick up a complete Noveske. |
|
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
|
Well, DD is telling me they should be able to start custom building me a rifle with a RIS II in FDE by late next week.
Or I can snag one of these tomorrow: Click I think I'll hold out for the DD, but I've got $2,500 burning a hole in my pocket, and a factory Noveske would also be a nice addition. |
|
"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."
|
Anyone have an Elcan MRDS mount they don't need? Hit me up if so!
|
|
Miserable douchebag list:
Cham1ber (cry baby) sbrooks75 (welch master) terral (ninny boy miser) |
Anyone tried one of the Micor flash suppressors yet?
I just picked one up, they look pretty similar to the KAC M4QD comp minus the helical ports that are supposedly matched to the barrel twist. Not sure I buy the whole "increasing accuracy" bit, but the Vortex helical tines seem to work pretty well for the flash suppression bit, and the Micors are little longer (say, about .2") than the M4QD, and should get a barrel up to 16" if permanently pinned, and are supposedly compatible with the NT4, though unfortunately I won't be able to test that theory for several many months. Might be a good option for another muzzle device for those that don't want to go SBR. ~Augee |
|
|
Originally Posted By Augee:
Anyone tried one of the Micor flash suppressors yet? I just picked one up, they look pretty similar to the KAC M4QD comp minus the helical ports that are supposedly matched to the barrel twist. Not sure I buy the whole "increasing accuracy" bit, but the Vortex helical tines seem to work pretty well for the flash suppression bit, and the Micors are little longer (say, about .2") than the M4QD, and should get a barrel up to 16" if permanently pinned, and are supposedly compatible with the NT4, though unfortunately I won't be able to test that theory for several many months. Might be a good option for another muzzle device for those that don't want to go SBR. ~Augee Yuck...not cloneish enough....j/k... On the PERM attach of the KAC M4QD, though, I think I can get away with the overall length with just 2.5 peel washers...(Which sure beats a $35 spacer plus shipping)...$35 may not seem a lot, but I have to multiply it by 3...... I can perm them at home with silver solder. (I dont want to fire up the drill press or welder,) |
|
-Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. ~ One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-One good shoot by a citizen can clear up more open cases than a week of detective work! |
Originally Posted By silhouette_:
Got my upper today from cmcflex. The lower is going to get hit with paint same with the upper. Idk if I will paint the rail though. Now I just need to get my 1.5 put together and get a few other items for both and voila. Just need kac taupe front buis, vfg or afg, m600 light and a few other misc things. http://i46.tinypic.com/2pyokfs.jpg Where in tx are you? It'd love to go shoot! |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.