User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:09:41 PM EDT
[#1]
Yup I got canceled too, but they didn't charge me yet so I kinda figured it was coming
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:15:46 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Tigwelder1971:
Same. Now where to source Okay mags from here on out?.... Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Tigwelder1971:
Originally Posted By Alaskanforfreedom:
Lesson learned just say no to Bitchtach. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:17:49 PM EDT
[#3]
Bitch glitch.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:19:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: PA-Minuteman]
[#4]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SecretSquirell:
44mag.com |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:24:45 PM EDT
[#5]
Gun Mag Warehouse sells Okay mags.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:25:09 PM EDT
[#6]
You guys should check the last page of the Mk18 thread. Krdt just found some interesting info on
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/18/2019 10:27:56 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PA-Minuteman:
44mag.com went/are going out of business Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PA-Minuteman:
Originally Posted By SecretSquirell:
44mag.com 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/19/2019 11:43:03 AM EDT
[#8]
Freaking Shark Arms. Taking all my money.
Two Colt SOCOM profile barrels and two KAC 600m USMC back up sights are on the way. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/19/2019 9:04:09 PM EDT
[#9]
Warcomp FH is finally on the way. Hope it's worth the coin
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/20/2019 12:56:23 AM EDT
[#10]
|
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 3/20/2019 1:25:36 AM EDT
[#11]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/20/2019 1:29:32 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MarthaStewart:
Just going to leave this here... https://www.brownells.com/rifle-parts/receiver-parts/receivers/upper-receivers/ar-15-m4a1-socom-block-ii-5-56-stripped-upper-receiver-prod110296.aspx?avs%7cManufacturer_1=DANIEL%2bDEFENSE |
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 3/20/2019 8:19:27 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Conner378:
That would be worth it without the upper reciever markings and having to cut the barrel down. Outside of my better judgement, however, I did spend $300 on a Surefire 4 prong on eBay. Getting it pinned and welded now.. I don't want to have to go through the SBR process. |
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 3/20/2019 10:22:18 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver:
FN now making ambi safeties. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6917_jpg-884043.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6920_jpg-884044.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6921_jpg-884047.JPG CD |
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 3/20/2019 7:58:07 PM EDT
[#15]
SBR form 1 came back for the CQBR. SOPMOD family is coming along. Still liking the vortex razor on the block ii.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/21/2019 12:11:38 AM EDT
[#16]
^^^^^^^
Nice Stable |
|
|
|
CO, USA
|
Posted: 3/22/2019 2:26:21 AM EDT
[#17]
Just got an in stock alert from DD on the RIS II, went to look and still shows out of stock
|
|
|
AR, USA
|
Posted: 3/22/2019 9:51:33 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 762hunter2]
[#18]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By simplefolk:
^^^^^^^ Nice Stable Every gun kinda has its role. I like CQBR for a handy suppressed home defense gun. I like the block 1 for when I need to carry a rifle all day. And the block ii just does everything great, albeit heavy. Now I need a MK12 mod 1 and a MK18 mod 0. But first I need a Surefire suppressor, the block 1 barrel cut to 14.5, and Surefire muzzle devices for all. It never ends 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/22/2019 12:48:15 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By 762hunter2: Thanks man. Every gun kinda has its role. I like CQBR for a handy suppressed home defense gun. I like the block 1 for when I need to carry a rifle all day. And the block ii just does everything great, albeit heavy. Now I need a MK12 mod 1 and a MK18 mod 0. But first I need a Surefire suppressor, the block 1 barrel cut to 14.5, and Surefire muzzle devices for all. It never ends We need to get on it! |
|
|
|
PA, USA
|
Posted: 3/22/2019 7:03:41 PM EDT
[#20]
Outside of the older m95X lights I don't know my Surefire models all too well. Anyone know the exact model of this one? Some m600 scout thing?
|
|
|
WA, USA
|
Posted: 3/22/2019 7:11:30 PM EDT
[#21]
Got it out and put a few mags through it. Ran really smooth and I couldn't be happier. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/22/2019 10:27:27 PM EDT
[#22]
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 7:47:18 AM EDT
[#23]
|
|
|
|
TX, USA
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 8:12:09 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Akin:
Freaking Shark Arms. Taking all my money. Two Colt SOCOM profile barrels and two KAC 600m USMC back up sights are on the way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 9:47:21 AM EDT
[Last Edit: AmericanCheese]
[#25]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver:
Inspection day........... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6988_jpg-887142.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6989_jpg-887143.JPG CD 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 11:45:06 AM EDT
[Last Edit: TGWLDR]
[#26]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By SaurusX:
I recall a few years back that the USMC marked sights were all considered to be stolen. Was that all bullshit fake news? 
Eta: They are now available commercially as contract overruns and are no longer made by KAC. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 6:57:01 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By conservakid:
Outside of the older m95X lights I don't know my Surefire models all too well. Anyone know the exact model of this one? Some m600 scout thing? https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7816/47444564171_374ec00892_k.jpg |
|
|
|
USA
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 9:39:06 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Combat_Diver:
Inspection day........... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6988_jpg-887142.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/32677/IMG_6989_jpg-887143.JPG CD |
|
|
CO, USA
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 10:07:38 PM EDT
[#29]
I scrolled through the thread as much as I could and didn’t come across any Block II’s with a B E Meyers MAWL. Anyone know of any pics with one, or did I just answer my own question.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 10:52:13 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By schaffer: Which magnifier is that? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 10:59:10 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By runguns:
I scrolled through the thread as much as I could and didn’t come across any Block II’s with a B E Meyers MAWL. Anyone know of any pics with one, or did I just answer my own question. |
|
|
|
VA, USA
|
Posted: 3/23/2019 11:05:12 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By themissinglink:
Looks like a SAMSON RAM Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By themissinglink:
Originally Posted By schaffer: Which magnifier is that? |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 1:36:25 AM EDT
[#33]
Greetings - can I get some guidance on cans from the hive? I've been running AAC and TBAC cans and need to get clone correct. I see from the front page that the following are accurate:
Flash Hider: KAC NT4 Surefire 4P Suppressors: KAC NT4 Surefire SOCOM RC Which setup are folks running and is one preferred over the other? Thanks Hive. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 2:05:56 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Combat_Diver]
[#34]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By simplefolk:
Greetings - can I get some guidance on cans from the hive? I've been running AAC and TBAC cans and need to get clone correct. I see from the front page that the following are accurate: Flash Hider: KAC NT4 Surefire 4P Suppressors: KAC NT4 Surefire SOCOM RC Which setup are folks running and is one preferred over the other? Thanks Hive. CD |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 6:02:56 PM EDT
[#35]
Gathering my parts up to be assembled soon, I have a NOS "F" marked FN upper receiver (and BCG) sitting here, and also a used "C" marked Colt.
Any reason not to use the FN? I'm using a Colt 13629 marked SOCOM barrel. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 6:04:43 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sputnik556:
Gathering my parts up to be assembled soon, I have a NOS "F" marked FN upper receiver (and BCG) sitting here, and also a used "C" marked Colt. Any reason not to use the FN? I'm using a Colt 13629 marked SOCOM barrel. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 6:14:50 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Sputnik556]
[#37]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Doesn't matter one bit. I would prob use the colt just to match barrel/receiver manufacturer Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Sputnik556:
Gathering my parts up to be assembled soon, I have a NOS "F" marked FN upper receiver (and BCG) sitting here, and also a used "C" marked Colt. Any reason not to use the FN? I'm using a Colt 13629 marked SOCOM barrel. I have most of the stuff for an FBI SWAT clone, and the FN upper wouldn't be correct for that. (Not that it will be 100% correct anyway.) If I use the FN on the Block II, that leaves the Colt for The FBI build. I could always buy another Colt upper, but that still leaves an FN upper sitting here. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 6:19:39 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sputnik556:
I'm in a bit a a parts pinch is the reason I asked. I have most of the stuff for an FBI SWAT clone, and the FN upper wouldn't be correct for that. (Not that it will be 100% correct anyway.) If I use the FN on the Block II, that leaves the Colt for The FBI build. I could always buy another Colt upper, but that still leaves an FN upper sitting here. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sputnik556:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Sputnik556:
Gathering my parts up to be assembled soon, I have a NOS "F" marked FN upper receiver (and BCG) sitting here, and also a used "C" marked Colt. Any reason not to use the FN? I'm using a Colt 13629 marked SOCOM barrel. I have most of the stuff for an FBI SWAT clone, and the FN upper wouldn't be correct for that. (Not that it will be 100% correct anyway.) If I use the FN on the Block II, that leaves the Colt for The FBI build. I could always buy another Colt upper, but that still leaves an FN upper sitting here. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 6:23:25 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Use the FN for this then. Many a FN upper are in use on block 2s (from being rebuilt by armorers with replacement FN uppers) Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Sputnik556:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Sputnik556:
Gathering my parts up to be assembled soon, I have a NOS "F" marked FN upper receiver (and BCG) sitting here, and also a used "C" marked Colt. Any reason not to use the FN? I'm using a Colt 13629 marked SOCOM barrel. I have most of the stuff for an FBI SWAT clone, and the FN upper wouldn't be correct for that. (Not that it will be 100% correct anyway.) If I use the FN on the Block II, that leaves the Colt for The FBI build. I could always buy another Colt upper, but that still leaves an FN upper sitting here. I've been waiting on PSA's M4A1 lowers so that I could test fit and choose between the two, but I'm getting tired of waiting.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 6:27:58 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sputnik556:
Thanks for the info. I've been waiting on PSA's M4A1 lowers so that I could test fit and choose between the two, but I'm getting tired of waiting. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sputnik556:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Sputnik556:
Originally Posted By MILSPEC556:
Originally Posted By Sputnik556:
Gathering my parts up to be assembled soon, I have a NOS "F" marked FN upper receiver (and BCG) sitting here, and also a used "C" marked Colt. Any reason not to use the FN? I'm using a Colt 13629 marked SOCOM barrel. I have most of the stuff for an FBI SWAT clone, and the FN upper wouldn't be correct for that. (Not that it will be 100% correct anyway.) If I use the FN on the Block II, that leaves the Colt for The FBI build. I could always buy another Colt upper, but that still leaves an FN upper sitting here. I've been waiting on PSA's M4A1 lowers so that I could test fit and choose between the two, but I'm getting tired of waiting. 
They're both machined to the same specs so shouldn't be much of a difference. Not enough to worry about anyways. True MIL-SPEC vs true MIL-SPEC. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/24/2019 8:30:59 PM EDT
[#41]
My Block II is now all Colt. Swapped the Aero upper receiver out for a stamped C key hole forge upper.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/26/2019 12:46:31 AM EDT
[#42]
That CH though...and I would love to see a CQD rear sling mount.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/27/2019 2:27:22 AM EDT
[#43]
|
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 8:56:41 AM EDT
[#44]
Here is my *mostly* completed Block II:
I can post better picks (in the wild) tomorrow. Sorry for all the dog hair on my bath tub :-) Btw--Does anyone know the difference between the SU-230 and the SU-269? I'm a heathen and wanted an Elcan with a .mil reticle but also in black. Not a huge fan of the taupe one tbh and I got this SU-269 at a steal of a price. As far as I can tell there really is no difference between it and the SU-230 and I've even called Elcan to see what the difference is but they haven't gotten back to me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 9:59:54 AM EDT
[Last Edit: Sputnik556]
[#45]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TheBlackLabrador:
Here is my *mostly* completed Block II: https://imgur.com/9vYZnLV https://imgur.com/yXkjZaf I can post better picks (in the wild) tomorrow. Sorry for all the dog hair on my bath tub :-) Btw--Does anyone know the difference between the SU-230 and the SU-269? I'm a heathen and wanted an Elcan with a .mil reticle but also in black. Not a huge fan of the taupe one tbh and I got this SU-269 at a steal of a price. As far as I can tell there really is no difference between it and the SU-230 and I've even called Elcan to see what the difference is but they haven't gotten back to me. |
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 11:28:43 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Sputnik556:
Pics not working. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 2:48:37 PM EDT
[Last Edit: TGWLDR]
[#47]
Heads up....
NIP KAC USMC marked rear BUIS in stock at SAC. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 3:31:44 PM EDT
[Last Edit: brodband8]
[#48]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By TheBlackLabrador:
Here is my *mostly* completed Block II: https://imgur.com/9vYZnLV https://imgur.com/yXkjZaf I can post better picks (in the wild) tomorrow. Sorry for all the dog hair on my bath tub :-) Btw--Does anyone know the difference between the SU-230 and the SU-269? I'm a heathen and wanted an Elcan with a .mil reticle but also in black. Not a huge fan of the taupe one tbh and I got this SU-269 at a steal of a price. As far as I can tell there really is no difference between it and the SU-230 and I've even called Elcan to see what the difference is but they haven't gotten back to me. Markings are different. It's black. It's not the same optic. That's pretty much it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 3:35:03 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By Tigwelder1971:
Heads up.... NIP KAC USMC marked rear BUIS in stock at SAC. |
|
|
|
FL, USA
|
Posted: 3/29/2019 7:37:40 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By brodband8: Reticle is different. Markings are different. It's black. It's not the same optic. That's pretty much it. Either way, I got a good deal on it and it's close enough for me. I can't see too much of a difference in the reticles and at least it's not the civilian version. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File
Attached File