User Panel
Originally Posted By Subpar: I’m going off the information in this article by @goloud View Quote Yes sir. https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2022/04/30/mcx-virtus-piston/ |
|
Pete - The Firearm Blog
|
Well if anyone can figure out how someone who bought a 6.75” barrel before they made the F03 piston can snag one, let me know.
In the meantime it looks like the F01 should have been fine with my higher backpressure Hyperion. Next step will be clean/lube the gun really well and try a different brand of ammo to see if I can get it running. If none of that works I’ll try a different can and if all else fails ill throw the 9” barrel at the problem. Gun ran just fine unsuppressed with supers. Amazing how adding a can throws a wrench into the works. |
|
Originally Posted By Aimless: You're calling each other names at 8 on a sunday in a thread about ancient rome. smiley_freak.gif
|
Originally Posted By 74novaman: Well if anyone can figure out how someone who bought a 6.75” barrel before they made the F03 piston can snag one, let me know. In the meantime it looks like the F01 should have been fine with my higher backpressure Hyperion. Next step will be clean/lube the gun really well and try a different brand of ammo to see if I can get it running. If none of that works I’ll try a different can and if all else fails ill throw the 9” barrel at the problem. Gun ran just fine unsuppressed with supers. Amazing how adding a can throws a wrench into the works. View Quote Give customer service a call. They will get you sorted out. |
|
Pete - The Firearm Blog
|
Originally Posted By Aimless: You're calling each other names at 8 on a sunday in a thread about ancient rome. smiley_freak.gif
|
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
anyone know where a 9" 5.56 virtus barrel can be found or have a lead on one?
|
|
|
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: There used to be... View Quote virtus barrel? show me ( I should specify, commercial release. I am sure there is a bunch odd SMU requested things out there) there was once upon a time 9in early gen 1 "cabelas exlusive" 556 gun with a self regulating gas block. which would be the closest thing. I have a legacy upper with a 9.5in 556 barrel which took some custom valving for gas and a titanium piston to make it run like a sewing machine. |
|
|
Originally Posted By hamsandwich34: virtus barrel? show me ( I should specify, commercial release. I am sure there is a bunch odd SMU requested things out there) View Quote The commercial SKU was CALX-MCX-9B-556 and there was also an NSN associated with it. Pretty sure it was a Virtus exchange kit but I could be wrong. Edit: I found my SKU list. It was a legacy MCX exchange kit. I stand corrected |
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: The commercial SKU was CALX-MCX-9B-556 and there was also an NSN associated with it. Pretty sure it was a Virtus exchange kit but I could be wrong. View Quote Correct, that is a legacy barrel, not a virtus. And very very few of those went out if any as most were canceled and sent 11.5in barrels instead. @coregon can correct or confirm that. I had one of these on order the day that SKU became a thing in 2015 and never got it so I have to make my own lol |
|
|
Originally Posted By 74novaman: Well if anyone can figure out how someone who bought a 6.75” barrel before they made the F03 piston can snag one, let me know. In the meantime it looks like the F01 should have been fine with my higher backpressure Hyperion. Next step will be clean/lube the gun really well and try a different brand of ammo to see if I can get it running. If none of that works I’ll try a different can and if all else fails ill throw the 9” barrel at the problem. Gun ran just fine unsuppressed with supers. Amazing how adding a can throws a wrench into the works. View Quote Throwing a suppressor on it isn’t exactly a problem. Subsonic ammo is your problem. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Aimless: You're calling each other names at 8 on a sunday in a thread about ancient rome. smiley_freak.gif
|
|
Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: They told me the exact same thing when I called about a week ago. Guy knew what part I was talking about and had it up on his screen but he said "we can't sell it to you". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: Originally Posted By 74novaman: I did. They said “yep I see a part number but no way to sell or ship it”. They told me the exact same thing when I called about a week ago. Guy knew what part I was talking about and had it up on his screen but he said "we can't sell it to you". That’s the exact customer service that had me stay away from sight for a while… giving them another shot with the virtus… I had a sig 556xi and the charging handle flew off while shooting it.. tried to get one from sig they said they wouldn’t even sell me one, this was after 556xi was discontinued and parts dried up… finally found one used and sold it the next day… didn’t want a gun I couldn’t get parts for… sure hope that ain’t gonna be the mcx’s down fall also |
|
|
Originally Posted By Bigchillin83: That’s the exact customer service that had me stay away from sight for a while… giving them another shot with the virtus… I had a sig 556xi and the charging handle flew off while shooting it.. tried to get one from sig they said they wouldn’t even sell me one, this was after 556xi was discontinued and parts dried up… finally found one used and sold it the next day… didn’t want a gun I couldn’t get parts for… sure hope that ain’t gonna be the mcx’s down fall also View Quote I don't know what SIG's reasoning is. Maybe they are all going toward complete guns and exchange kits. Yes, that's a poor excuse for bad CS and it's bizzare that they would provide one to @goloud. Maybe it has something to do with being a member of the press. Who knows. At the end of the day, I don't really care to know the why. I'd just like to fix the cycling issues I'm having with this $3000+ rifle. I know SIG has them, there's an active SKU, and they are individually packaged. I'm happy to pay whatever premium they want. If anyone has a contact at SIG that can help, please give me a shout. |
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
@SMFdarkangel
It is definitely related to TFB since I was reviewing one of the new SIG cans at the time. That being said, DM me your address and I’ll send you mine. I’ll wait for an eventual replacement. Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: I don't know what SIG's reasoning is. Maybe they are all going toward complete guns and exchange kits. Yes, that's a poor excuse for bad CS and it's bizzare that they would provide one to @goloud. Maybe it has something to do with being a member of the press. Who knows. At the end of the day, I don't really care to know the why. I'd just like to fix the cycling issues I'm having with this $3000+ rifle. I know SIG has them, there's an active SKU, and they are individually packaged. I'm happy to pay whatever premium they want. If anyone has a contact at SIG that can help, please give me a shout. View Quote |
|
Pete - The Firearm Blog
|
So, evidentially my tags aren't working again
I have an email out to the CS Manager, but he is on PTO. He'll get back with me and let me know their reasoning. Don't blame CS for something like that - i'm sure it has to do with production, contracts, etc That said, I have 3x F03 at the house that I can send to a couple of you. @74novaman @SMFdarkangel |
|
On Time. On Target.
|
Originally Posted By goloud: @SMFdarkangel It is definitely related to TFB since I was reviewing one of the new SIG cans at the time. That being said, DM me your address and I’ll send you mine. I’ll wait for an eventual replacement. View Quote Originally Posted By coregon: So, evidentially my tags aren't working again I have an email out to the CS Manager, but he is on PTO. He'll get back with me and let me know their reasoning. Don't blame CS for something like that - i'm sure it has to do with production, contracts, etc That said, I have 3x F03 at the house that I can send to a couple of you. @74novaman @SMFdarkangel View Quote I wanted to publicly thank you both for the kind offers. @coregon I’ll send you an IM with my contact info shortly. The guy I spoke to in CS was very polite and was just doing his job. My frustration shouldn’t have been directed toward him. |
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
Originally Posted By coregon: So, evidentially my tags aren't working again I have an email out to the CS Manager, but he is on PTO. He'll get back with me and let me know their reasoning. Don't blame CS for something like that - i'm sure it has to do with production, contracts, etc That said, I have 3x F03 at the house that I can send to a couple of you. @74novaman @SMFdarkangel View Quote Thank you so much, I appreciate it! |
|
Originally Posted By Aimless: You're calling each other names at 8 on a sunday in a thread about ancient rome. smiley_freak.gif
|
@coregon
Stand up kinda fella!!! Sure wish there was a “like” button!!! |
|
|
I will say this about sig cs… I did just get a 11.5 le and it didn’t have the tapered mount in the box or on the device, I emailed sig about it and they shipped me one no questioneda asked, I was willing to buy it or atleast pay shipping and they wouldn’t accept payment… and my situation with the 556xi they told me they couldn’t sell it to me because they were keeping what they had for warranty repairs, and couldn’t sell to public…still was very frustrating at the time
|
|
|
Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: I wanted to publicly thank you both for the kind offers. @coregon I’ll send you an IM with my contact info shortly. The guy I spoke to in CS was very polite and was just doing his job. My frustration shouldn’t have been directed toward him. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: Originally Posted By goloud: @SMFdarkangel It is definitely related to TFB since I was reviewing one of the new SIG cans at the time. That being said, DM me your address and I’ll send you mine. I’ll wait for an eventual replacement. Originally Posted By coregon: So, evidentially my tags aren't working again I have an email out to the CS Manager, but he is on PTO. He'll get back with me and let me know their reasoning. Don't blame CS for something like that - i'm sure it has to do with production, contracts, etc That said, I have 3x F03 at the house that I can send to a couple of you. @74novaman @SMFdarkangel I wanted to publicly thank you both for the kind offers. @coregon I’ll send you an IM with my contact info shortly. The guy I spoke to in CS was very polite and was just doing his job. My frustration shouldn’t have been directed toward him. And I wasn't saying you were taking it out on CS/that specific CSR. Just making a general statement who made read this thread, our CS team is awesome and they do a ton. Many times, their hands are tied - and they dont always get effectively communicated to with reasoning why. |
|
On Time. On Target.
|
Originally Posted By Bigchillin83: I will say this about sig cs… I did just get a 11.5 le and it didn’t have the tapered mount in the box or on the device, I emailed sig about it and they shipped me one no questioneda asked, I was willing to buy it or atleast pay shipping and they wouldn’t accept payment… and my situation with the 556xi they told me they couldn’t sell it to me because they were keeping what they had for warranty repairs, and couldn’t sell to public…still was very frustrating at the time View Quote Unfortunately, with end of life products, we have to protect extra parts for warranty work. Its a catch-22 - people get frustrated because they invested in a platform, but cant get replacement parts...we don't sell the parts for that EOL product because we have to protect the warranty for that very same customer. Frustrating, I know. |
|
On Time. On Target.
|
Sig’s new slogan should be “Designed with obsolescence in mind”
2 Sig 556 that I can’t get replacement parts ( had 4 end up dumping 2) 2 MCX Virtus rifles that I will likely not be able to get new replacement parts in 2 years ( had original MCX) Come on Sig at very list keep supporting your customers. |
|
|
Originally Posted By unrock: Sig’s new slogan should be “Designed with obsolescence in mind” 2 Sig 556 that I can’t get replacement parts ( had 4 end up dumping 2) 2 MCX Virtus rifles that I will likely not be able to get new replacement parts in 2 years ( had original MCX) Come on Sig at very list keep supporting your customers. View Quote What replacement parts do you feel you'll be unable to get for your MCX rifles? Hell, you can put a Spear lt barrel and bolt in a Legacy MCX now even. |
|
|
Bolt carrier parts , firing pin, gas system, hand guard…
I’m glad to see that barrel and bgc are backwards compatible. I think Sig is the most innovative company out there but it comes at customer’s expense. In some cases products are not well thought through, leading to numerous recall. Just about every product released has been recalled. Hell even automotive companies are mandated by law to have replacement parts available for 10 years after end of the production. |
|
|
Originally Posted By unrock: Hell even automotive companies are mandated by law to have replacement parts available for 10 years after end of the production. View Quote Which has nothing at all to do with why cars are more expensive than they used to be and car companies dont innovate, just crank out the same things year after year… I have zero desire to see any additional mandates by law on arms manufacturers, thanks. Wish I wasnt so busy the next few weeks so I could get back to the range with a clean gun and different ammo and report back with something useful to the thread. I used my MCX in a run and gun a few weeks ago and havent cleaned it in a bit. Wondering if I can get the Hyperion and GA playing nice on a gun that is actually cleaned and lubed. |
|
Originally Posted By Aimless: You're calling each other names at 8 on a sunday in a thread about ancient rome. smiley_freak.gif
|
Originally Posted By unrock: Bolt carrier parts , firing pin, gas system, hand guard… I’m glad to see that barrel and bgc are backwards compatible. I think Sig is the most innovative company out there but it comes at customer’s expense. In some cases products are not well thought through, leading to numerous recall. Just about every product released has been recalled. Hell even automotive companies are mandated by law to have replacement parts available for 10 years after end of the production. View Quote The only unqiue thing to the Virtus and legacy are the handguard. You can still obtain the Virtus handguard from SIG directly and there are at least two aftermarket sources for the Legacy as well as an aftermarket for the Virtus. All the guts of the MCX are capable of being replaced with the most up do date model (Spear LT). They seem to be doing a rather shitty job at "planned obsolescence". It sucks about the 556 but willing to bet they'll still have parts to fix up your rifles but you'll need to send it in. Comparing the 556 to the MCX is rather humorous though, being the 556 was a catastrophe of sales and reception. Do believe it was posted here that the first year of MCX sales outpaced the 556 rifles life. Rather puts things into perspective. The MCX is here to stay, it's the most adopted/utilized modern rifle outside of the AR15 in the Western world. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Zerlak: The only unqiue thing to the Virtus and legacy are the handguard. You can still obtain the Virtus handguard from SIG directly and there are at least two aftermarket sources for the Legacy as well as an aftermarket for the Virtus. All the guts of the MCX are capable of being replaced with the most up do date model (Spear LT). They seem to be doing a rather shitty job at "planned obsolescence". It sucks about the 556 but willing to bet they'll still have parts to fix up your rifles but you'll need to send it in. Comparing the 556 to the MCX is rather humorous though, being the 556 was a catastrophe of sales and reception. Do believe it was posted here that the first year of MCX sales outpaced the 556 rifles life. Rather puts things into perspective. The MCX is here to stay, it's the most adopted/utilized modern rifle outside of the AR15 in the Western world. View Quote Look at the bolt carriers and bolts 1. Gen 1 1.1 Gen 1 post recall 2. Gen 2, new bolt and carrier 3. Gen 3 (Spear LT) new carrier, not sure if backwards compatible (firing pin/spring) The gas system does not seem to be backwards compatible. Not try to argue that MCX is a bad design but frankly getting tired of sig designing obsolescence in their product. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Zerlak: The only unqiue thing to the Virtus and legacy are the handguard. You can still obtain the Virtus handguard from SIG directly and there are at least two aftermarket sources for the Legacy as well as an aftermarket for the Virtus. All the guts of the MCX are capable of being replaced with the most up do date model (Spear LT). They seem to be doing a rather shitty job at "planned obsolescence". It sucks about the 556 but willing to bet they'll still have parts to fix up your rifles but you'll need to send it in. Comparing the 556 to the MCX is rather humorous though, being the 556 was a catastrophe of sales and reception. Do believe it was posted here that the first year of MCX sales outpaced the 556 rifles life. Rather puts things into perspective. The MCX is here to stay, it's the most adopted/utilized modern rifle outside of the AR15 in the Western world. View Quote The uppers are unique across all three generations. I have, however (and contrary to Sig’s stance), seen multiple people drop the LT handguard onto the Virtus upper with no issues, you just can’t use the two retention screws. I believe the LT upper will prove to be largely cross compatible with the Virtus upper. I suspect the transition from the Virtus to Spear LT is a more significant progression in terms of performance (mil spec triggers, handguard zero retention, fully ambidextrous, lighter) than the Gen 1 MCX to Virtus, but with far more parts cross compatibility. |
|
Well, well, well. How the turn tables...
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
If one were to truly unpack the MCX it does not really bring any new innovative designs another than picktany folding stock interface. It is largely a hybrid of ar15 and ar180 designs from the past. It is very cleverly incorporated together.
1. Upper Bolt bolt carrier-it is simply AR15 carrier cut in half with Ar180 recoil system Bolt-origianl was just an Ar15 but later changed to tapered lug (KAC) Barrel-removable, just like LMT, SCAR, XCR, ACR many other designs Short stroke piston-again AR180, LWRCi, LMT, HK Handguard-unique but follow overall industry trend 2. Lower Mostly standard AR design with the exception of the pickitany interface One can pin AR lower to MCX upper, backwards compatibility AR15 ergonomic are almost impossible to improve All these features are very nicely re-engineered together into very robust platform. Not taking anything away from Sig. It took a lot of effort and money to make it happen. I do believe overall program is very successful. Thanks |
|
|
Originally Posted By unrock: Look at the bolt carriers and bolts 1. Gen 1 1.1 Gen 1 post recall 2. Gen 2, new bolt and carrier 3. Gen 3 (Spear LT) new carrier, not sure if backwards compatible (firing pin/spring) The gas system does not seem to be backwards compatible. Not try to argue that MCX is a bad design but frankly getting tired of sig designing obsolescence in their product. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By unrock: Originally Posted By Zerlak: The only unqiue thing to the Virtus and legacy are the handguard. You can still obtain the Virtus handguard from SIG directly and there are at least two aftermarket sources for the Legacy as well as an aftermarket for the Virtus. All the guts of the MCX are capable of being replaced with the most up do date model (Spear LT). They seem to be doing a rather shitty job at "planned obsolescence". It sucks about the 556 but willing to bet they'll still have parts to fix up your rifles but you'll need to send it in. Comparing the 556 to the MCX is rather humorous though, being the 556 was a catastrophe of sales and reception. Do believe it was posted here that the first year of MCX sales outpaced the 556 rifles life. Rather puts things into perspective. The MCX is here to stay, it's the most adopted/utilized modern rifle outside of the AR15 in the Western world. Look at the bolt carriers and bolts 1. Gen 1 1.1 Gen 1 post recall 2. Gen 2, new bolt and carrier 3. Gen 3 (Spear LT) new carrier, not sure if backwards compatible (firing pin/spring) The gas system does not seem to be backwards compatible. Not try to argue that MCX is a bad design but frankly getting tired of sig designing obsolescence in their product. I understand what you're saying and I know of the generational changes. Facts remain though, if a legacy mcx user shoots out their barrel, they can swap out to a Virtus barrel or soon enough the Spear LT and move on. To be "planned obsolescence", the rifle would be deadlined upon suffering the barrel crapping out and you wouldn't be able to source parts. I genuinely understand your frustration with the 556, as well as the gen 1 MPX owners but the MCX is an entirely different beast and is genuinely supported by SIG. |
|
|
Originally Posted By unrock: Look at the bolt carriers and bolts 1. Gen 1 1.1 Gen 1 post recall 2. Gen 2, new bolt and carrier 3. Gen 3 (Spear LT) new carrier, not sure if backwards compatible (firing pin/spring) The gas system does not seem to be backwards compatible. Not try to argue that MCX is a bad design but frankly getting tired of sig designing obsolescence in their product. View Quote Forward design isn't "planned obsolescence". They build a gun platform about a decade ago. They did as much testing as possible on it in house. Over time, refinements based on contract requirements, further testing, evolving market trends mean constant revision abs refinement. Everyone comparing the 556 to the MCX is understandable, but off base. On the second year or production, SIG had already sold more MCX than in 12 years of 556 production. The 556 was a hobby gun built to a price point for consumers. The MCX was developed in response to a JSOC contract. It's been adopted across USSOF (both SOCOM and JSOC) to replace the HK416, MP7, and MK18. It's been adopted in significant numbers by Allied SOF (UKSF, Ukraine SOF, etc...) and LE/CT units. The MCX is here, and while it will constantly evolve, it's not going to be dropped. If you want an AR standard of standardization, you need an AR. This is a new, constantly evolving, platform that has a long future already steady of it. It's pretty cool that it still maintains decent parts compatibility between generations; major sub assemblies are able to used. |
|
Please, call me Joe
Follow me on Instagram! http://instagram.com/tcba_joe/ |
MCX isnt even in my top 5 of guns I’m worried about getting parts for.
Vz61, T91 uppers, etc….now those I’m worried about. |
|
Originally Posted By Aimless: You're calling each other names at 8 on a sunday in a thread about ancient rome. smiley_freak.gif
|
I've got spare bolts, spare firing pins, spare recoil springs, and a spare barrel clamp. I think I'm good.
Also have some spare rifles, but, you know. |
|
|
Originally Posted By hamsandwich34: virtus barrel? show me ( I should specify, commercial release. I am sure there is a bunch odd SMU requested things out there) there was once upon a time 9in early gen 1 "cabelas exlusive" 556 gun with a self regulating gas block. which would be the closest thing. I have a legacy upper with a 9.5in 556 barrel which took some custom valving for gas and a titanium piston to make it run like a sewing machine. View Quote It was a thing. I'd like to get one of those instead of chopping a legacy barrel since it think that has a short enough gas system to run it. But I have no clue on reliablity at that point. https://www.midwestgunworks.com/page/mgwi/prod/calx-mcx-9b-556 |
|
|
Give Respect & Take Responsibility
|
Got a question for the experts in here. Will a Sig Match Duo MCX trigger work with the “G” marked carrier latch?
I am trying to complete a mutt of an MCX build and got the last part secured today. Ordered a MCX carrier assembly from here (4 more left in stock as of this post.) I noticed that’s the “Geissele” specific assembly but I already have the match duo in my lower. Will the duo work with that “G” carrier or do I need to swap it out? Will any mil spec AR trigger work with the “G” latch? |
|
|
Originally Posted By nate_the_great: It was a thing. I'd like to get one of those instead of chopping a legacy barrel since it think that has a short enough gas system to run it. But I have no clue on reliablity at that point. https://www.midwestgunworks.com/page/mgwi/prod/calx-mcx-9b-556 View Quote Have you ever seen a 9in virtus 556 barrel? the pic they have on the site looks like a legacy barrel to me. I have about 7-8k round through my 9in cut legacy barrel and it still goes like a champ |
|
|
Originally Posted By hamsandwich34: Have you ever seen a 9in virtus 556 barrel? the pic they have on the site looks like a legacy barrel to me. I have about 7-8k round through my 9in cut legacy barrel and it still goes like a champ View Quote Now that you mention it, it's a legacy judging by the piston adjustment valve did you have to make any changes to the gas port? have you been running it suppressed? |
|
|
Originally Posted By JSchell1309: Got a question for the experts in here. Will a Sig Match Duo MCX trigger work with the “G” marked carrier latch? I am trying to complete a mutt of an MCX build and got the last part secured today. Ordered a MCX carrier assembly from here (4 more left in stock as of this post.) I noticed that’s the “Geissele” specific assembly but I already have the match duo in my lower. Will the duo work with that “G” carrier or do I need to swap it out? Will any mil spec AR trigger work with the “G” latch? View Quote The G latch is for normal mil spec triggers and non-mcx G triggers. Hope this helps. |
|
|
Originally Posted By nate_the_great: Now that you mention it, it's a legacy judging by the piston adjustment valve did you have to make any changes to the gas port? have you been running it suppressed? View Quote Yes, the gas port was opened up and made a custom titanium piston for it to get it to run like it does now. its been 6ish years and through a few very high round count classes, usually wearing a surefire 556mini with no issues. It was done as project to see how short a 16in legacy barrel could be cut before causing issues due to dwell time (running both suppress and unsuppressed) 10.5 is what I would recommend for most. |
|
|
Originally Posted By SMFdarkangel: All the new 6.75" exchange kits and TACOPS ship with both. The F01 is intended for high pressure cans. F03 is for low backpressure cans. View Quote Not all, my 6.75" SBR came with both, although the F03 was not assembled properly and was missing the roll pin that holds the knob to the valve, but my spare 6.75" barrel only came with the F03. |
|
|
Originally Posted By coregon: Unfortunately, with end of life products, we have to protect extra parts for warranty work. Its a catch-22 - people get frustrated because they invested in a platform, but cant get replacement parts...we don't sell the parts for that EOL product because we have to protect the warranty for that very same customer. Frustrating, I know. View Quote It's terrible that guns that were produced in 2022 are already considered "end of life products" by a manufacturer. |
|
|
On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux.
|
Originally Posted By brazos609: It's terrible that guns that were produced in 2022 are already considered "end of life products" by a manufacturer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By brazos609: Originally Posted By coregon: Unfortunately, with end of life products, we have to protect extra parts for warranty work. Its a catch-22 - people get frustrated because they invested in a platform, but cant get replacement parts...we don't sell the parts for that EOL product because we have to protect the warranty for that very same customer. Frustrating, I know. It's terrible that guns that were produced in 2022 are already considered "end of life products" by a manufacturer. The 556Xi was not built in 2022. |
|
On Time. On Target.
|
Originally Posted By coregon: The 556Xi was not built in 2022. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By coregon: Originally Posted By brazos609: Originally Posted By coregon: Unfortunately, with end of life products, we have to protect extra parts for warranty work. Its a catch-22 - people get frustrated because they invested in a platform, but cant get replacement parts...we don't sell the parts for that EOL product because we have to protect the warranty for that very same customer. Frustrating, I know. It's terrible that guns that were produced in 2022 are already considered "end of life products" by a manufacturer. The 556Xi was not built in 2022. 556xi was discontinued like 7 years ago. Also, any product that gets discontinued will have a year where it was still being manufactured and is still end of life. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.