Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 28
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 4:31:06 PM EDT
[#1]
Visiting England for Tolkien Tour, Rings of Power Sneak Peek, & Showrunner Q&A!


Rings of Power Preview Event WINS Over Fans!!! LIVE with all the details and reactions #TORNTuesday


The tongues, they are a-wagging.
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 4:33:29 PM EDT
[#2]
Who cares LOTR is stupid.
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 4:34:12 PM EDT
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Who cares LOTR is stupid.
View Quote

You, enough to post and enjoy the thought of bashing people for liking what you don't.  
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 4:53:50 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Off to get EAC and my cds of the silmarillion so I can listen to it again.

View Quote
We can be friends.  I listen to these every couple of years.
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 7:02:08 PM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Who cares LOTR is stupid.
View Quote
Found the Orc.
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 7:57:51 PM EDT
[#6]
Amazon's Lord Of The Rings Gets ROASTED By Fans | Rings Of Power Art On Tolkien LOTR Book Covers
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 10:29:17 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We can be friends.  I listen to these every couple of years.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Off to get EAC and my cds of the silmarillion so I can listen to it again.

We can be friends.  I listen to these every couple of years.

Heh.



Mine came down to 421 meg after converting to mono MP3 using 110-150 kbs vbr.

The .wav archive folders come out to 8.77 gb.

EAC for the win!

Also, they didn't have the rights to the sil for the show. They had the rights to *the appendices of LOTR.*

I believe they may have since managed to get the rights for lotr and the hobbit and the sil. Obscene money talks.


ETA:

@Torf

https://archive.org/details/the-hobbit-bluefax

https://archive.org/details/tlotrunabridged

You will not be disappointed.
Link Posted: 5/11/2022 10:33:56 PM EDT
[#8]
Ryan:

Lord of the Rings Superfans RETURN! NEW Footage Shown After 100% None Influential Oxford Trip


... and surprisingly, even though its towards a rant, it's just ... well, the facts. You don't have to rage at this stuff. You just have to repeat what it is in public.
Link Posted: 5/12/2022 11:12:16 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Heh.



Mine came down to 421 meg after converting to mono MP3 using 110-150 kbs vbr.

The .wav archive folders come out to 8.77 gb.

EAC for the win!

Also, they didn't have the rights to the sil for the show. They had the rights to *the appendices of LOTR.*

I believe they may have since managed to get the rights for lotr and the hobbit and the sil. Obscene money talks.


ETA:

@Torf

https://archive.org/details/the-hobbit-bluefax

https://archive.org/details/tlotrunabridged

You will not be disappointed.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

Off to get EAC and my cds of the silmarillion so I can listen to it again.

We can be friends.  I listen to these every couple of years.

Heh.



Mine came down to 421 meg after converting to mono MP3 using 110-150 kbs vbr.

The .wav archive folders come out to 8.77 gb.

EAC for the win!

Also, they didn't have the rights to the sil for the show. They had the rights to *the appendices of LOTR.*

I believe they may have since managed to get the rights for lotr and the hobbit and the sil. Obscene money talks.


ETA:

@Torf

https://archive.org/details/the-hobbit-bluefax

https://archive.org/details/tlotrunabridged

You will not be disappointed.
Wonderful!  Thank you.  I have the Audible versions as well as the old CD versions of The Hobbit and The Silmarillion.

Going to have to fire these new versions up.

And yes, EAC is awesome.

@FlashMan-7k
Link Posted: 5/12/2022 3:40:15 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The ironic part is, IIRC, the onering.net, which is a disaster now ... went after jackson for his failings re: the LOTR movies.

Looks like these institutions are doing what institutions do: get old and decide they are about protecting their existence instead of doing what they were founded to do.

... something about lost your first love ...

ETA: wild how fans now don't seem to understand how you lose your credibility when you get onto the dole.  You're going from doing it because you like it, to doing it because you get paid to, either in currency or favors.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Somewhat breaking:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mkBWYuXUEk

Amazon is hardcore trying to get fans to utterly sell out their souls. Throwing what looks like k-street level lobbying at them.

It's sickening.

Event last week in london thrown for "fans" where they got to pre-screen the show.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSUzCOxWQAInkUK.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSU2u3zXMAM0o-J.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSU3j6DWQAATklM.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSU39RNXwAMXrIt.jpg

https://www.teawithtolkien.com/blog/lotrrop-sneak-peek
The Journey Begins

Last week, I was invited to London by Prime Studios to join a handful of other Tolkien scholars and creatives for a sneak peek of their forthcoming series, “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power”.

For full disclosure, the costs of this trip were paid by Prime Studios and I was under the very clear impression that their top priority was to impress us at all costs. However, I’ve tried to keep a level head throughout the whole thing and my thoughts and opinions of this experience are all my own.


"... Sauron desired to be a god-king, and was held to be this by his servants."
-J.R.R Tolkien Letters 184


Go on than. Serve sauron because he looks pretty to you and gives you your hearts desire. Be his saurman puppets, because you think him inevitable. Use the power of your voice to pull others in with you under the growing clouds and darkness.

You say you're tolkien fans and you say you like the books. Yet you are falling for things the books warn against. Suckers much?

He gives you your hearts greatest desire after his hatred of you was exposed. That's a clue. It's emotional manipulation.

Would you be grima?

https://c.tenor.com/qRXLEt2PRDYAAAAC/gandalf-keep.gif

But they get paid so much cool swag to flap their tongues!

Reminds me of ozzieman and his Game of Thrones videos.  After each new episode he’d put out a hilarious recap of it often making fun of how bad the show had gotten compared to what it use to be.  And then suddenly his videos stopped being funny, he never made fun of the show anymore, and instead he basically became a GoT hypeman.  People were confused and didn’t know what happened.

And then it came out he had been bought off by HBO and suddenly it all made sense.

https://i.gifer.com/QOlv.gif

The ironic part is, IIRC, the onering.net, which is a disaster now ... went after jackson for his failings re: the LOTR movies.

Looks like these institutions are doing what institutions do: get old and decide they are about protecting their existence instead of doing what they were founded to do.

... something about lost your first love ...

ETA: wild how fans now don't seem to understand how you lose your credibility when you get onto the dole.  You're going from doing it because you like it, to doing it because you get paid to, either in currency or favors.

What amazes me is how little it takes for them to sell out.  Like if someone offers you enough money where you can comfortably retire before you even turn 40, okay, I get that.  But a plane ticket, a nice dinner, a hotel room, and maybe a few thousand (or less) in cash/merchandise is all it takes for you to publicly abandoned your integrity and lose the respect of the people that have supported you for years?
Link Posted: 5/12/2022 9:34:38 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

What amazes me is how little it takes for them to sell out.  Like if someone offers you enough money where you can comfortably retire before you even turn 40, okay, I get that.  But a plane ticket, a nice dinner, a hotel room, and maybe a few thousand (or less) in cash/merchandise is all it takes for you to publicly abandoned your integrity and lose the respect of the people that have supported you for years?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Somewhat breaking:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mkBWYuXUEk

Amazon is hardcore trying to get fans to utterly sell out their souls. Throwing what looks like k-street level lobbying at them.

It's sickening.

Event last week in london thrown for "fans" where they got to pre-screen the show.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSUzCOxWQAInkUK.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSU2u3zXMAM0o-J.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSU3j6DWQAATklM.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSU39RNXwAMXrIt.jpg

https://www.teawithtolkien.com/blog/lotrrop-sneak-peek
The Journey Begins

Last week, I was invited to London by Prime Studios to join a handful of other Tolkien scholars and creatives for a sneak peek of their forthcoming series, “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power”.

For full disclosure, the costs of this trip were paid by Prime Studios and I was under the very clear impression that their top priority was to impress us at all costs. However, I’ve tried to keep a level head throughout the whole thing and my thoughts and opinions of this experience are all my own.


"... Sauron desired to be a god-king, and was held to be this by his servants."
-J.R.R Tolkien Letters 184


Go on than. Serve sauron because he looks pretty to you and gives you your hearts desire. Be his saurman puppets, because you think him inevitable. Use the power of your voice to pull others in with you under the growing clouds and darkness.

You say you're tolkien fans and you say you like the books. Yet you are falling for things the books warn against. Suckers much?

He gives you your hearts greatest desire after his hatred of you was exposed. That's a clue. It's emotional manipulation.

Would you be grima?

https://c.tenor.com/qRXLEt2PRDYAAAAC/gandalf-keep.gif

But they get paid so much cool swag to flap their tongues!

Reminds me of ozzieman and his Game of Thrones videos.  After each new episode he’d put out a hilarious recap of it often making fun of how bad the show had gotten compared to what it use to be.  And then suddenly his videos stopped being funny, he never made fun of the show anymore, and instead he basically became a GoT hypeman.  People were confused and didn’t know what happened.

And then it came out he had been bought off by HBO and suddenly it all made sense.

https://i.gifer.com/QOlv.gif

The ironic part is, IIRC, the onering.net, which is a disaster now ... went after jackson for his failings re: the LOTR movies.

Looks like these institutions are doing what institutions do: get old and decide they are about protecting their existence instead of doing what they were founded to do.

... something about lost your first love ...

ETA: wild how fans now don't seem to understand how you lose your credibility when you get onto the dole.  You're going from doing it because you like it, to doing it because you get paid to, either in currency or favors.

What amazes me is how little it takes for them to sell out.  Like if someone offers you enough money where you can comfortably retire before you even turn 40, okay, I get that.  But a plane ticket, a nice dinner, a hotel room, and maybe a few thousand (or less) in cash/merchandise is all it takes for you to publicly abandoned your integrity and lose the respect of the people that have supported you for years?
When you're living in the moment for the moment in a culture where your reputation  - your good name - means a lot less than it used to in society, I guess people's reputations are cheaper to buy out, and use for your purposes.
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 10:58:42 AM EDT
[#12]
Amazon FEARS LOTR: Rings of Power FLOP! Superfan SELLOUTS and First Episode DETAILS
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 11:26:17 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Gonna fail and they will question why.
View Quote


Nah, they'll blame the failure on racism and old white men.
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 11:48:00 AM EDT
[#14]
So where are the elves or trolls wearing the kippah? Where are the Asian elves? This isn't about races, but one race feeling perpetual butthurt. As an author, nothing makes me more offended than film makers deliberately trainwrecking an author's work. Someone has a butthurt over how the author wrote his story, then get off your ass, write your own and try to sell it. Don't steal the title and trash the story. Like him or not, Lucas did his own work, did it his way, and made a fortune. More power to him. I respect that even if it has flaws. I read just about all the books and what Disney did with their movies so turned me off I have no interest in them. I think most readers feel the same way once they read the books. For those too illiterate to read, it doesn't matter.
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 1:12:45 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Nah, they'll blame the failure on racism and old white men.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Gonna fail and they will question why.


Nah, they'll blame the failure on racism and old white men.

They already did that over the trailer failure.
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 4:02:07 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

What amazes me is how little it takes for them to sell out.  Like if someone offers you enough money where you can comfortably retire before you even turn 40, okay, I get that.  But a plane ticket, a nice dinner, a hotel room, and maybe a few thousand (or less) in cash/merchandise is all it takes for you to publicly abandoned your integrity and lose the respect of the people that have supported you for years?
View Quote
I read somewhere that it is fear of losing the early access.  If there's ten popular Tolkien youtube channels, no one wants to be the guy who can't talk about all the new footage.  Then all the viewers leave.  At least, that's the fear.
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 4:42:46 PM EDT
[#17]
Diversity is Death, Tolerance is Suicide!!
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 4:44:33 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Nah, they'll blame the failure on racism and old white men.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Gonna fail and they will question why.


Nah, they'll blame the failure on racism and old white men.

So, whose getting "f"ed in the "a" now?
Link Posted: 5/15/2022 5:26:29 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I don't get Hollywood "writing rooms."  All the great fantasy novels are created by one, maybe two authors.  You have lots of great authors still living like Feist, Sanderson, etc.  Why not hire one of them to do scripts?
View Quote


prose authors are very often terrible at teleplays, because the media are fundamentally different.  a book is a story told with words.  a teleplay is a story told with pictures.  a novel tells.  a movie shows.  many excellent novelists can't make the transition, and their movies tend to be boring talk-fests.  

aside form that, good writing is difficult, and far more difficult to deliver on a schedule.  at the end of the day, you can make a shit production from a good script, but you can't do the inverse.  there's a tendency to throw resources at the problem rather than allowing more time for it.
Link Posted: 5/16/2022 1:21:31 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They could have made the show about the East and the blue wizards if they were capable of writing anything.

The show runners only wrote Star Trek Discovery before this.
View Quote


The people involved in this wrote for ST:D? Yeah this is going to be dreck. ??
Link Posted: 5/16/2022 3:14:17 AM EDT
[#21]
I've got all 3 Hobbit series and all 3 LOR series.

Not giving Amazon a dime on their garbage interpretation
Link Posted: 5/16/2022 4:38:29 AM EDT
[#22]
Are they going to get Stacey Abrams to be the leader of Middle Earth?
Link Posted: 5/27/2022 4:01:13 AM EDT
[#23]
Fisk incoming. Also WOT. You have been warned.
https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss1lck
Hearthseeker  @Hearthseeker

19th May 2022 from TwitLonger
[Rant] Social Commentators Dividing the Tolkien Community

Imagine this. You're a pretty solid Tolkien fan for the most part. You've read LotR, The Hobbit, maybe even dabbled in The Lost Road and Other Writings or the Silmarillion. You've participated in a Tolkien Reading Day. A few years ago you subscribed to Men of the West or The Broken Sword and see their content every now and then. You for sure have the extended editions of the Peter Jackson Films, even the Hobbit despite its flaws.
View Quote
"You for sure have the jackson movies" If you say so, but I'm not buying that. Destroyed the character of frodo (whiner in the movies, not in the books), made the ents stupid, and criminally turned gimli ... GIMLI ... into comic relief.

That was too much. HInt: just because new stuff is more blatantly destructive and bad, doesn't make stuff that was destructive in the past something it wasn't.

Anyways, moving on.

Then one day, you see an article about Lord of the Rings on Prime. You look at the posters and you think "Huh, interesting that they've gone with such a diverse cast. Maybe there will be some lore reason for it."
View Quote

And what of the people who looked at it and realized: wow, these people are obsessed with race, to the point that they're real live racists and are only putting these people in the production for outright racist reasons, even if they have to mess with what people like?

Oh yes, I forgot, we're your orcs. We don't exist. We are doomed to be evil because we don't think like you.

So you pull up Youtube to find out what people think. There they are, the thumbnails and titles that scream for your attention. Tolkien Legacy DESTROYED by Amazon. LOTR on Prime DOOMED to FAIL. NO HOPE FOR THE FANS! What an exciting time to be alive.

You think: You know what? Maybe they are right. I don't recall if Tolkien mentioned short haired elves, black dwarves, or even beardless ones for that matter. Why mess with a formula that works? Isn't Middle-earth supposed to be based on northern Europe? This is getting a tad ridiculous. Except, you might be surprised what Tolkien actually wrote or actually intended. And if you look beyond surface level, there's a malicious undercurrent to these videos.
View Quote

"If you look below the surface level." No wait, let me guess, you were stupid or arrogant enough to believe it when your english teachers taught you that you could understand what someone was saying that has absolutely nothing to do with their writing or other words. You're good enough to put words in their mouths and read their minds. A long way of saying, you dehumanize them by treating what they say and mean as a plaything to serve your biases. Your real conscious ones.

So, its been about a year of this now, and Amazon just can't help themselves but stepping into controversy after controversy with their Lord of the Rings series. It's almost inevitable. Their first attempts at marketing this were mishandled at best, egregious at the worst. Bezos saying he wanted his own Game of Thrones. Miscommunication over exactly why Tom Shippey was released from his advising role on the series. Not a good look by any means.

Thankfully, someone at Amazon decided it would be a good idea to welcome members of the Tolkien community in for a viewing in Oxford of all places. That is a stroke of genius if there ever was one.
View Quote

There's no way they were ever going to inspire any trust by giving people special treatement and NOT allowing them to tell people what they were shown. Per even your own words, people don't trust amazon. With good reasons. You do not engender trust or gain more trust by MORE secrecy. If the content is good. You show it, to gain trust.

But of course, if it were all kittens and butterflies--I wouldn't be writing this. Here come the thumbnails and titles again: AMAZON "Superfans" SELLOUTS? PAID SHILLS for Amazon? Hang on everyone, this is going to be a rough ride.

Now you're watching the Tolkien community get ripped apart by culture provocateurs and reactionaries. Traitors! Shills! Sellouts! Grima Wormtongue quotes! Didn't these people learn that Sauron was a deceiver who brought gifts? How will these "Influencers" Ever speak a word against Amazon ever again?

Except, hold on. You recognize these names. Prancing Pony Podcast. Nerd of the Rings? Maggie Park? Tolkien Professor? Fellowship of the Fans? Don? How could they all betray the Tolkien fandom?
View Quote

Writer, you are ignorant, and likely innocent of how these things work. Yes, even real fans can be made into shills. Because humans can be subverted and manipulated. The people doing the subverting don't even have to believe they are or are trying to do it in order TO do it.

If you aren't innocent or ignorant about these things, and you're saying this, than that doesn't leave you good options.

You are, by the way, showing your bias and conclusions beforehand. If commentators talk about how people are being subverted and turned into shills, they have to be provacateurs and reactionaries. They cannot possibly be anything else and especially can't be honestly trying to keep what they genuinely like from being treated as disrespectfully as ... well, see above comment about english teachers and putting words in peoples mouths.

You have automatically classed them as lower kinds of people. Removing them from any honest interactions where you try and keep your biases from warping and mutilating their words.

Instead of the exciting bit of news that Amazon held a press-reel for long-time content creators that are beloved by the Tolkien community--we get strung along with this grand narrative that Amazon just planted secret agents in the Tolkien fandom. Were they bribed with a wine and dine? Were they given gifts that were too lucrative?
View Quote

Again, with the ignorance. "Too lucrative." All amazon has to do to subvert people is give them personal acknowledgement related to the ROP project. They want it. Badly. Because amazon is working on a source they like. Or have built themselves around.

So what's actually here to discredit? They had to sign an NDA? That just means there's a timestamp on when they can release information directly related to the plot or significant elements of the show. NDA doesn't mean "Non-disparaging Agreement" There was still plenty of skepticism from the people who attended. Was it the fact they were brought to a wine and dine and given gifts? Honestly, if that's the most damning evidence against their credibility, that's quite a broad mark to hit. Most of the pictures seemed to be images of nick-knacks and branded content such as a carry out bag.
View Quote


It's the fact that they even went. We cannot know their thoughts, desires, or emotions related to it. So we treat them as humans and persons. Which means they are as easily subverted as anyone else. You don't know, so you can't (and shouldn't) trust them.

The more they either like .... or build themselves around ...  the tolkien content, and whatever is based off it, the *easier* they will be to be subverted by exactly what amazon did. Amazon is a big stupid bureaucratic beast at the group level, but like any big stupid bureaucratic beast, individuals in it serving it will know how to use what it has to get what they want. Which, in this case, is *good* pr from those who say they are, or really are fans of tolkien's works.

As a former gaming journalist myself, I'm familiar with guidelines on what can be considered a breach ethics. Being flown out to conferences, room and boarding, Q&A sessions, sponsorships, gift giving, catering and drinks, and NDAs are par the course for anyone in the industry. I can't even think of a comic convention where I wasn't showered with merchandise by a door greeter for simply attending. None of those concessions, so long as they are within reason, are generally considered unethical so long as their is full open disclosure.
View Quote

You really don't get it, do you.

It's not about the wrong or right of it. They went to an event that was, by it's design (intended or not) going to make them look well on amazon's content and work. If the event had not been expected to do that, amazon never would have done it. Unless you want to think that amazon WANTS their content to fail.

All of them have publicly disclosed their involvement in the event. And a few of them have made statements acknowledging the potential for them to be biased and wanting to wait until the show releases to give their final opinion. Thus negating any real gain for the short term exclusivity they received. Even then: The majority of these people aren't journalists under strict contractual adherences. The most Amazon seems to be capable of gaining from this is a thin veneer of appeasing the Tolkien fandom.

And what seems to be the consensus? "Yeah it was pretty good. Not convinced yet, but it seems alright."

Wow, how much do you have to bribe someone for that level of worship. /s

The only obligation they might have is an unwritten social rule to be honest. One could argue that they harm the Tolkien community by saying positive things about the show--as though they're socially contracted to provide nothing but utter disillusionment or contempt.

But I'll do you one better: Can't you make the same claim against their accusers? Why should Nerdrotic or any commentator be any less complicit of injecting narrative bias? Don't they have JUST AS MUCH of a stake in maintaining a negative perception of the show in order to make their financial gains?
View Quote

Yes, they do have a stake in that.

And they know it. And so do you. The difference is, they know if they lie or decieve people, they will lose viewers. Meaning they will lose money.

Amazon can afford to lie and deceive. It's a big dumb evil bureaucracy that had to be sued to pay it's delivery drivers in the UK and that has warehouse workers peeing in bottles to meet efficiency goals; with a worldwide base in multiple different things. Amazon can *afford* to piss all over the entire tolkien fanbase. It could run them up a serious bill on the red ink side of the ledger, but it wouldn't kill them or meaningfully change the lifestyle of nearly anyone in the upper levels working there.

The channels on YT can take a real meaningful beating from their viewers that would ruin them. And they know it.

These guys have built themselves around being real fans of these things. Them being outed as not real fans would hurt and possibly ruin them. People only trust their judgement so far as they think they are fans of what the viewers are also fans of.

Perhaps you have heard of a concept called "disparity of power" ...?

Their content is raw emotional attachment to a set of ideologies. That's what Nerdrotic, JustSomeGuy, and Disparu want you to feel.
View Quote

You're an arrogant dehumanizing of others evil person for doing this.

You really did buy the crap so many bad english teachers teach about deconstruction, didn't you?

Stop feeding the bad wolves in you and start trying to strangle them. This putting your words and thoughts in people's mouths and heads to fit your irrational biases crap is filthy and you should ... gasp ... be ashamed of it. You don't have to do this evil crap.

They make their living off of creating this narrative of a woke regime trying to attack the things you love. They don't want you to listen to these people you've grown to admire and trust for years: The people who went to this event have to somehow be complicit in aiding the antagonist. Anyone giving positive feedback to LotR on Prime is now woke and an enemy to Tolkien's legacy if you follow their arguments.

Its all nonsense.

Let me cap off this section with two quotes.

George The Giant Slayer: "These(The invitees) were lovers of the Legendarium, but somehow they set that all aside and embrace the Rings of Power"

NerdoftheRings(After attending the event): "At the end of the day, the showrunners can have all the passion and knowledge in the world, but fail in the execution. I hope they don't because it would be much for fun to cover a good show than a bad one, but if it falls short, I'll be right here as we do a post-mortem together."

Which sounds more sold to a narrative?
View Quote

Given the meanings of the words and text you just posted?

NEITHER. You have to add your irrational personal bias to get more from this bit of text from them you've posted.

In case any of you still believes that Nerdrotic and the others mentioned are the ones with the more grounded and sensible understanding of Tolkien's world. Here are some refutations to statements they've made about Tolkien's writings.

In Nerdrotic's video titled, "Amazon's Lord of the Rings Epic FAIL! The Vandalization of Tolkien and Fan ATTACKS have Begun"

Nerdrotic: "Galadriel did not take any part in the wars of the first age or any of the battles of the 2nd age"

Tolkien: "She was called Nerwen 'man-maiden' because of her strength and stature, and her courage." "She(Galadriel) fought fiercely against Feanor in defence of her mother's kin."
"Galadriel, the only woman of the Noldor to stand that day tall and valiant among the contending princes"
"Galadriel was then of Amazon disposition and bound up her hair as a crown when taking part in athletic feats"
View Quote

You must think us imbeciles to fall for this.

Clearly, the word fight can only mean physical combat. Or flinging magic attacks in the middle of combat. Nope, can't mean anything else.  If it's there in the text - I meanin in the meaning of the text itself, not your personal desires crammed into the text by the disgusting dehumanizing means of deconstruction and subversion - just pull the quote where tolkein says Galadriel fought in the wars as a combatant. Which is what the subhuman to you nerdrotic was pointing out.

In the video titled: The Rings of Power: Tolkien in Name Only by JustSomeGuy

JustSomeGuy: "I've read the Silmarillion every year since 2003, I don't recall Galadriel being described as angry or brash"

Tolkien:
"But now she burned with desire to follow Fanor with her anger to whatever lands he might come, and to thwart him in all ways that she could."
The History of Middle-earth XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth, Chapter XI "The Shibboleth of Fanor"
View Quote

You don't have to be angry or brash to burn with desire to do something, even to burn with desire to thwart someone in all the ways you can.

Are you so far lost to ignoring what the things people say mean that you don't even know what the words angry ... or...  brash mean?

JustSomeGuy: "What Army, she(Galadriel) was never part of any army during the second age"

Tolkien: "Galadriel chose Eregion because she knew of the Dwarves of Khazad-dm (Moria). ... she perceived from the beginning that Middle-earth could not be saved from "the residue of evil" that Morgoth had left behind him save by a union of all the peoples who were in their way and in their measure opposed to him. She looked upon the Dwarves also with the EYE OF A COMMANDER, seeing in them the finest warriors to pit against the Orcs"
View Quote

So if you're not in a military army, you can't be a commander.

Ok than.

JustSomeGuy: "Middle-Earth is basically north-west Europe, mostly England."

Tolkien: "Not Nordic, please! A word I personally dislike; it is associated, though of French origin, with racialist theories. Geographically Northern is usually better. But examination will show that even this is inapplicable (geographically or spiritually) to 'Middle-earth'...This is not a purely 'Nordic' area in any sense. If Hobbiton and Rivendell are taken (as intended) to be at about the latitude of Oxford, then Minas Tirith, 600 miles south, is at about the latitude of Florence. The Mouths of Anduin and the ancient city of Pelargir are at about the latitude of ancient Troy."
"The progress of the tale ends in what is far more like the re-establishment of an effective Holy Roman Empire with its seat in Rome than anything that would be devised by a 'Nordic'. (Letter 294, dated 8 February 1967)"
View Quote

You just quoted tolkein saying his work is ... "basically north west europe, mostly england."

You proved his point for him.

JustSomeGuy: "The native people of those areas are all white. So all the races of Middle-earth would be white"

Tolkien: Haradrim: "They have black eyes, and long black hair, and gold rings in their ears... lots of beautiful gold. And some have red paint on their cheeks, and red cloaks and their flags are red, and the tips of their spears; and they have round shields, yellow and black with big spikes"
"His corslet of overlapping brazen plates was rent and hewn, his black plaits of hair braided with gold were drenched with blood. His brown hand still clutched the hilt of a broken sword."

The men of Rhun: "These Men were short and broad, long and strong in the arm; their skins were swart or sallow, and their hair was dark as were their eyes."

Hobbits: "Before the crossing of the mountains the Hobbits had already become divided into three somewhat different breeds: Harfoots, Stoors, and Fallohides. The Harfoots were borwner of skin, smaller, and shorter, and they were beardless and bootless"

Samwise is a brown Harfoot Hobbit: "In his lap lay Frodo's head, drowned deep in sleep; upon his white forehead lay one of Sam's brown hands"
View Quote

Haradrim:south of where tolken wrote about. In other words, SOUTH of the area JSG was talking about. Did you miss this, or are you playing shellgames and hoping nobody notices?

Rhun: Again. Not where he was talking about. It's to the stinking EAST OF MORDOR. JSG was NOT saying that everywhere in the entire fictional world was "white."

Samwise:So you're going to use sterotyping for no reason other than to serve your purposes. Browner of skin (harfoots) has to mean only what you want it to mean. Otherwise, you'd be wrong.

Even if these quotes don't somehow showcase that they have a clear bias.
View Quote

Call out bias when exhibiting a startling amount of it yourself.

They show that there's a strange racial/sexual undertone that seems ignorant of the actual world Tolkien made.
View Quote

No, it doesn't. If the words and genre people are using do not logically force this as a necessary conclusion, there's no tone there, under, over, or otherwise. It's just your thoughts being disrespectfully rammed down other's throats and being said to be theirs.

Tolkien's world IS diverse. It parallels a Europe that has Turkic and Mongol people ...
View Quote

...

Hard eyeroll.

Turkey is not in europe. The mongols didn't make their base in or live in europe. IIRC the tatars didn't even live in europe. You're aware that russia is NOT european?

By the way, people are well aware of the shellgame with the word diverse. It can either mean the older meaning of diverse, or it can mean the new meaning, which is roughly "conforms to the latest pet causes of the political left of the western world."

If you don't think it can mean that, ask yourself if you would say thomas clarence or sowell or larry elder would count in your view as contributing to the "racial diversity" of anything where there aren't "black" (however you define that) people.

... of the steppes with its Easterlings and men of Rhun. It has Mediterranean people groups with its Gondorians, of both Numenorean lineage and native peoples. It has brown and dark haired men of ancient tribes and cultures living in its furthest recesses. It has its Africa in the southern reaches of Gondor and Harad, it has its Persia and Syria with the lands to the east and south. to the There are elves that travelled south and became unlike their kin in appearance and culture, whose children are indistinguishable from the children of men (Who aren't just white.)

Tolkien's world IS empowering to women: Luthien contended with the will Morgoth and Sauron, who took the form of a werewolf and vampire and saving Beren. Eowyn who slew the Witch King. Galadriel who threw down the walls and pits of Dol Guldur in Mirkwood and slew any evil escaping from it, cleansing the land.

How can anyone claim otherwise?
View Quote
Tilt at windmills much?

You haven't really watched the videos of the people you're dehumanizing and trying to trash.

If you had, you'd know they wouldn't say that tolkien's fiction didn't have people who look that way (You people obsessed with how people physically look as if that means something more than they look that way ... you are a mess), or that there are not strong women in the setting either.

What they ARE (rightly) bashing and condemning is people changing already established characters to look physically different for no good reason beyond racism and ignorant childish thinking that physical looks means more than ... a person looks that way ... and they are bashing the idiotic stupid childish bull-feces that the only way a woman can be strong is if she is physically strong and operates in combat like superman, which dehumanizes and denigrates women and pushes the rotted in the head idea that they aren't being strong by exhibiting their strength in classically feminine ways.
Link Posted: 5/27/2022 4:03:53 AM EDT
[#24]
tldr;
Link Posted: 5/27/2022 8:48:56 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Fisk incoming. Also WOT. You have been warned.
https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss1lck
"You for sure have the jackson movies" If you say so, but I'm not buying that. Destroyed the character of frodo (whiner in the movies, not in the books), made the ents stupid, and criminally turned gimli ... GIMLI ... into comic relief.

That was too much. HInt: just because new stuff is more blatantly destructive and bad, doesn't make stuff that was destructive in the past something it wasn't.

Anyways, moving on.


And what of the people who looked at it and realized: wow, these people are obsessed with race, to the point that they're real live racists and are only putting these people in the production for outright racist reasons, even if they have to mess with what people like?

Oh yes, I forgot, we're your orcs. We don't exist. We are doomed to be evil because we don't think like you.


"If you look below the surface level." No wait, let me guess, you were stupid or arrogant enough to believe it when your english teachers taught you that you could understand what someone was saying that has absolutely nothing to do with their writing or other words. You're good enough to put words in their mouths and read their minds. A long way of saying, you dehumanize them by treating what they say and mean as a plaything to serve your biases. Your real conscious ones.


There's no way they were ever going to inspire any trust by giving people special treatement and NOT allowing them to tell people what they were shown. Per even your own words, people don't trust amazon. With good reasons. You do not engender trust or gain more trust by MORE secrecy. If the content is good. You show it, to gain trust.


Writer, you are ignorant, and likely innocent of how these things work. Yes, even real fans can be made into shills. Because humans can be subverted and manipulated. The people doing the subverting don't even have to believe they are or are trying to do it in order TO do it.

If you aren't innocent or ignorant about these things, and you're saying this, than that doesn't leave you good options.

You are, by the way, showing your bias and conclusions beforehand. If commentators talk about how people are being subverted and turned into shills, they have to be provacateurs and reactionaries. They cannot possibly be anything else and especially can't be honestly trying to keep what they genuinely like from being treated as disrespectfully as ... well, see above comment about english teachers and putting words in peoples mouths.

You have automatically classed them as lower kinds of people. Removing them from any honest interactions where you try and keep your biases from warping and mutilating their words.


Again, with the ignorance. "Too lucrative." All amazon has to do to subvert people is give them personal acknowledgement related to the ROP project. They want it. Badly. Because amazon is working on a source they like. Or have built themselves around.



It's the fact that they even went. We cannot know their thoughts, desires, or emotions related to it. So we treat them as humans and persons. Which means they are as easily subverted as anyone else. You don't know, so you can't (and shouldn't) trust them.

The more they either like .... or build themselves around ...  the tolkien content, and whatever is based off it, the *easier* they will be to be subverted by exactly what amazon did. Amazon is a big stupid bureaucratic beast at the group level, but like any big stupid bureaucratic beast, individuals in it serving it will know how to use what it has to get what they want. Which, in this case, is *good* pr from those who say they are, or really are fans of tolkien's works.


You really don't get it, do you.

It's not about the wrong or right of it. They went to an event that was, by it's design (intended or not) going to make them look well on amazon's content and work. If the event had not been expected to do that, amazon never would have done it. Unless you want to think that amazon WANTS their content to fail.


Yes, they do have a stake in that.

And they know it. And so do you. The difference is, they know if they lie or decieve people, they will lose viewers. Meaning they will lose money.

Amazon can afford to lie and deceive. It's a big dumb evil bureaucracy that had to be sued to pay it's delivery drivers in the UK and that has warehouse workers peeing in bottles to meet efficiency goals; with a worldwide base in multiple different things. Amazon can *afford* to piss all over the entire tolkien fanbase. It could run them up a serious bill on the red ink side of the ledger, but it wouldn't kill them or meaningfully change the lifestyle of nearly anyone in the upper levels working there.

The channels on YT can take a real meaningful beating from their viewers that would ruin them. And they know it.

These guys have built themselves around being real fans of these things. Them being outed as not real fans would hurt and possibly ruin them. People only trust their judgement so far as they think they are fans of what the viewers are also fans of.

Perhaps you have heard of a concept called "disparity of power" ...?


You're an arrogant dehumanizing of others evil person for doing this.

You really did buy the crap so many bad english teachers teach about deconstruction, didn't you?

Stop feeding the bad wolves in you and start trying to strangle them. This putting your words and thoughts in people's mouths and heads to fit your irrational biases crap is filthy and you should ... gasp ... be ashamed of it. You don't have to do this evil crap.


Given the meanings of the words and text you just posted?

NEITHER. You have to add your irrational personal bias to get more from this bit of text from them you've posted.


You must think us imbeciles to fall for this.

Clearly, the word fight can only mean physical combat. Or flinging magic attacks in the middle of combat. Nope, can't mean anything else.  If it's there in the text - I meanin in the meaning of the text itself, not your personal desires crammed into the text by the disgusting dehumanizing means of deconstruction and subversion - just pull the quote where tolkein says Galadriel fought in the wars as a combatant. Which is what the subhuman to you nerdrotic was pointing out.


You don't have to be angry or brash to burn with desire to do something, even to burn with desire to thwart someone in all the ways you can.

Are you so far lost to ignoring what the things people say mean that you don't even know what the words angry ... or...  brash mean?


So if you're not in a military army, you can't be a commander.

Ok than.


You just quoted tolkein saying his work is ... "basically north west europe, mostly england."

You proved his point for him.


Haradrim:south of where tolken wrote about. In other words, SOUTH of the area JSG was talking about. Did you miss this, or are you playing shellgames and hoping nobody notices?

Rhun: Again. Not where he was talking about. It's to the stinking EAST OF MORDOR. JSG was NOT saying that everywhere in the entire fictional world was "white."

Samwise:So you're going to use sterotyping for no reason other than to serve your purposes. Browner of skin (harfoots) has to mean only what you want it to mean. Otherwise, you'd be wrong.


Call out bias when exhibiting a startling amount of it yourself.


No, it doesn't. If the words and genre people are using do not logically force this as a necessary conclusion, there's no tone there, under, over, or otherwise. It's just your thoughts being disrespectfully rammed down other's throats and being said to be theirs.


...

Hard eyeroll.

Turkey is not in europe. The mongols didn't make their base in or live in europe. IIRC the tatars didn't even live in europe. You're aware that russia is NOT european?

By the way, people are well aware of the shellgame with the word diverse. It can either mean the older meaning of diverse, or it can mean the new meaning, which is roughly "conforms to the latest pet causes of the political left of the western world."

If you don't think it can mean that, ask yourself if you would say thomas clarence or sowell or larry elder would count in your view as contributing to the "racial diversity" of anything where there aren't "black" (however you define that) people.

Tilt at windmills much?

You haven't really watched the videos of the people you're dehumanizing and trying to trash.

If you had, you'd know they wouldn't say that tolkien's fiction didn't have people who look that way (You people obsessed with how people physically look as if that means something more than they look that way ... you are a mess), or that there are not strong women in the setting either.

What they ARE (rightly) bashing and condemning is people changing already established characters to look physically different for no good reason beyond racism and ignorant childish thinking that physical looks means more than ... a person looks that way ... and they are bashing the idiotic stupid childish bull-feces that the only way a woman can be strong is if she is physically strong and operates in combat like superman, which dehumanizes and denigrates women and pushes the rotted in the head idea that they aren't being strong by exhibiting their strength in classically feminine ways.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Fisk incoming. Also WOT. You have been warned.
https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss1lck
Hearthseeker  @Hearthseeker

19th May 2022 from TwitLonger
[Rant] Social Commentators Dividing the Tolkien Community

Imagine this. You're a pretty solid Tolkien fan for the most part. You've read LotR, The Hobbit, maybe even dabbled in The Lost Road and Other Writings or the Silmarillion. You've participated in a Tolkien Reading Day. A few years ago you subscribed to Men of the West or The Broken Sword and see their content every now and then. You for sure have the extended editions of the Peter Jackson Films, even the Hobbit despite its flaws.
"You for sure have the jackson movies" If you say so, but I'm not buying that. Destroyed the character of frodo (whiner in the movies, not in the books), made the ents stupid, and criminally turned gimli ... GIMLI ... into comic relief.

That was too much. HInt: just because new stuff is more blatantly destructive and bad, doesn't make stuff that was destructive in the past something it wasn't.

Anyways, moving on.

Then one day, you see an article about Lord of the Rings on Prime. You look at the posters and you think "Huh, interesting that they've gone with such a diverse cast. Maybe there will be some lore reason for it."

And what of the people who looked at it and realized: wow, these people are obsessed with race, to the point that they're real live racists and are only putting these people in the production for outright racist reasons, even if they have to mess with what people like?

Oh yes, I forgot, we're your orcs. We don't exist. We are doomed to be evil because we don't think like you.

So you pull up Youtube to find out what people think. There they are, the thumbnails and titles that scream for your attention. Tolkien Legacy DESTROYED by Amazon. LOTR on Prime DOOMED to FAIL. NO HOPE FOR THE FANS! What an exciting time to be alive.

You think: You know what? Maybe they are right. I don't recall if Tolkien mentioned short haired elves, black dwarves, or even beardless ones for that matter. Why mess with a formula that works? Isn't Middle-earth supposed to be based on northern Europe? This is getting a tad ridiculous. Except, you might be surprised what Tolkien actually wrote or actually intended. And if you look beyond surface level, there's a malicious undercurrent to these videos.

"If you look below the surface level." No wait, let me guess, you were stupid or arrogant enough to believe it when your english teachers taught you that you could understand what someone was saying that has absolutely nothing to do with their writing or other words. You're good enough to put words in their mouths and read their minds. A long way of saying, you dehumanize them by treating what they say and mean as a plaything to serve your biases. Your real conscious ones.

So, its been about a year of this now, and Amazon just can't help themselves but stepping into controversy after controversy with their Lord of the Rings series. It's almost inevitable. Their first attempts at marketing this were mishandled at best, egregious at the worst. Bezos saying he wanted his own Game of Thrones. Miscommunication over exactly why Tom Shippey was released from his advising role on the series. Not a good look by any means.

Thankfully, someone at Amazon decided it would be a good idea to welcome members of the Tolkien community in for a viewing in Oxford of all places. That is a stroke of genius if there ever was one.

There's no way they were ever going to inspire any trust by giving people special treatement and NOT allowing them to tell people what they were shown. Per even your own words, people don't trust amazon. With good reasons. You do not engender trust or gain more trust by MORE secrecy. If the content is good. You show it, to gain trust.

But of course, if it were all kittens and butterflies--I wouldn't be writing this. Here come the thumbnails and titles again: AMAZON "Superfans" SELLOUTS? PAID SHILLS for Amazon? Hang on everyone, this is going to be a rough ride.

Now you're watching the Tolkien community get ripped apart by culture provocateurs and reactionaries. Traitors! Shills! Sellouts! Grima Wormtongue quotes! Didn't these people learn that Sauron was a deceiver who brought gifts? How will these "Influencers" Ever speak a word against Amazon ever again?

Except, hold on. You recognize these names. Prancing Pony Podcast. Nerd of the Rings? Maggie Park? Tolkien Professor? Fellowship of the Fans? Don? How could they all betray the Tolkien fandom?

Writer, you are ignorant, and likely innocent of how these things work. Yes, even real fans can be made into shills. Because humans can be subverted and manipulated. The people doing the subverting don't even have to believe they are or are trying to do it in order TO do it.

If you aren't innocent or ignorant about these things, and you're saying this, than that doesn't leave you good options.

You are, by the way, showing your bias and conclusions beforehand. If commentators talk about how people are being subverted and turned into shills, they have to be provacateurs and reactionaries. They cannot possibly be anything else and especially can't be honestly trying to keep what they genuinely like from being treated as disrespectfully as ... well, see above comment about english teachers and putting words in peoples mouths.

You have automatically classed them as lower kinds of people. Removing them from any honest interactions where you try and keep your biases from warping and mutilating their words.

Instead of the exciting bit of news that Amazon held a press-reel for long-time content creators that are beloved by the Tolkien community--we get strung along with this grand narrative that Amazon just planted secret agents in the Tolkien fandom. Were they bribed with a wine and dine? Were they given gifts that were too lucrative?

Again, with the ignorance. "Too lucrative." All amazon has to do to subvert people is give them personal acknowledgement related to the ROP project. They want it. Badly. Because amazon is working on a source they like. Or have built themselves around.

So what's actually here to discredit? They had to sign an NDA? That just means there's a timestamp on when they can release information directly related to the plot or significant elements of the show. NDA doesn't mean "Non-disparaging Agreement" There was still plenty of skepticism from the people who attended. Was it the fact they were brought to a wine and dine and given gifts? Honestly, if that's the most damning evidence against their credibility, that's quite a broad mark to hit. Most of the pictures seemed to be images of nick-knacks and branded content such as a carry out bag.


It's the fact that they even went. We cannot know their thoughts, desires, or emotions related to it. So we treat them as humans and persons. Which means they are as easily subverted as anyone else. You don't know, so you can't (and shouldn't) trust them.

The more they either like .... or build themselves around ...  the tolkien content, and whatever is based off it, the *easier* they will be to be subverted by exactly what amazon did. Amazon is a big stupid bureaucratic beast at the group level, but like any big stupid bureaucratic beast, individuals in it serving it will know how to use what it has to get what they want. Which, in this case, is *good* pr from those who say they are, or really are fans of tolkien's works.

As a former gaming journalist myself, I'm familiar with guidelines on what can be considered a breach ethics. Being flown out to conferences, room and boarding, Q&A sessions, sponsorships, gift giving, catering and drinks, and NDAs are par the course for anyone in the industry. I can't even think of a comic convention where I wasn't showered with merchandise by a door greeter for simply attending. None of those concessions, so long as they are within reason, are generally considered unethical so long as their is full open disclosure.

You really don't get it, do you.

It's not about the wrong or right of it. They went to an event that was, by it's design (intended or not) going to make them look well on amazon's content and work. If the event had not been expected to do that, amazon never would have done it. Unless you want to think that amazon WANTS their content to fail.

All of them have publicly disclosed their involvement in the event. And a few of them have made statements acknowledging the potential for them to be biased and wanting to wait until the show releases to give their final opinion. Thus negating any real gain for the short term exclusivity they received. Even then: The majority of these people aren't journalists under strict contractual adherences. The most Amazon seems to be capable of gaining from this is a thin veneer of appeasing the Tolkien fandom.

And what seems to be the consensus? "Yeah it was pretty good. Not convinced yet, but it seems alright."

Wow, how much do you have to bribe someone for that level of worship. /s

The only obligation they might have is an unwritten social rule to be honest. One could argue that they harm the Tolkien community by saying positive things about the show--as though they're socially contracted to provide nothing but utter disillusionment or contempt.

But I'll do you one better: Can't you make the same claim against their accusers? Why should Nerdrotic or any commentator be any less complicit of injecting narrative bias? Don't they have JUST AS MUCH of a stake in maintaining a negative perception of the show in order to make their financial gains?

Yes, they do have a stake in that.

And they know it. And so do you. The difference is, they know if they lie or decieve people, they will lose viewers. Meaning they will lose money.

Amazon can afford to lie and deceive. It's a big dumb evil bureaucracy that had to be sued to pay it's delivery drivers in the UK and that has warehouse workers peeing in bottles to meet efficiency goals; with a worldwide base in multiple different things. Amazon can *afford* to piss all over the entire tolkien fanbase. It could run them up a serious bill on the red ink side of the ledger, but it wouldn't kill them or meaningfully change the lifestyle of nearly anyone in the upper levels working there.

The channels on YT can take a real meaningful beating from their viewers that would ruin them. And they know it.

These guys have built themselves around being real fans of these things. Them being outed as not real fans would hurt and possibly ruin them. People only trust their judgement so far as they think they are fans of what the viewers are also fans of.

Perhaps you have heard of a concept called "disparity of power" ...?

Their content is raw emotional attachment to a set of ideologies. That's what Nerdrotic, JustSomeGuy, and Disparu want you to feel.

You're an arrogant dehumanizing of others evil person for doing this.

You really did buy the crap so many bad english teachers teach about deconstruction, didn't you?

Stop feeding the bad wolves in you and start trying to strangle them. This putting your words and thoughts in people's mouths and heads to fit your irrational biases crap is filthy and you should ... gasp ... be ashamed of it. You don't have to do this evil crap.

They make their living off of creating this narrative of a woke regime trying to attack the things you love. They don't want you to listen to these people you've grown to admire and trust for years: The people who went to this event have to somehow be complicit in aiding the antagonist. Anyone giving positive feedback to LotR on Prime is now woke and an enemy to Tolkien's legacy if you follow their arguments.

Its all nonsense.

Let me cap off this section with two quotes.

George The Giant Slayer: "These(The invitees) were lovers of the Legendarium, but somehow they set that all aside and embrace the Rings of Power"

NerdoftheRings(After attending the event): "At the end of the day, the showrunners can have all the passion and knowledge in the world, but fail in the execution. I hope they don't because it would be much for fun to cover a good show than a bad one, but if it falls short, I'll be right here as we do a post-mortem together."

Which sounds more sold to a narrative?

Given the meanings of the words and text you just posted?

NEITHER. You have to add your irrational personal bias to get more from this bit of text from them you've posted.

In case any of you still believes that Nerdrotic and the others mentioned are the ones with the more grounded and sensible understanding of Tolkien's world. Here are some refutations to statements they've made about Tolkien's writings.

In Nerdrotic's video titled, "Amazon's Lord of the Rings Epic FAIL! The Vandalization of Tolkien and Fan ATTACKS have Begun"

Nerdrotic: "Galadriel did not take any part in the wars of the first age or any of the battles of the 2nd age"

Tolkien: "She was called Nerwen 'man-maiden' because of her strength and stature, and her courage." "She(Galadriel) fought fiercely against Feanor in defence of her mother's kin."
"Galadriel, the only woman of the Noldor to stand that day tall and valiant among the contending princes"
"Galadriel was then of Amazon disposition and bound up her hair as a crown when taking part in athletic feats"

You must think us imbeciles to fall for this.

Clearly, the word fight can only mean physical combat. Or flinging magic attacks in the middle of combat. Nope, can't mean anything else.  If it's there in the text - I meanin in the meaning of the text itself, not your personal desires crammed into the text by the disgusting dehumanizing means of deconstruction and subversion - just pull the quote where tolkein says Galadriel fought in the wars as a combatant. Which is what the subhuman to you nerdrotic was pointing out.

In the video titled: The Rings of Power: Tolkien in Name Only by JustSomeGuy

JustSomeGuy: "I've read the Silmarillion every year since 2003, I don't recall Galadriel being described as angry or brash"

Tolkien:
"But now she burned with desire to follow Fanor with her anger to whatever lands he might come, and to thwart him in all ways that she could."
The History of Middle-earth XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth, Chapter XI "The Shibboleth of Fanor"

You don't have to be angry or brash to burn with desire to do something, even to burn with desire to thwart someone in all the ways you can.

Are you so far lost to ignoring what the things people say mean that you don't even know what the words angry ... or...  brash mean?

JustSomeGuy: "What Army, she(Galadriel) was never part of any army during the second age"

Tolkien: "Galadriel chose Eregion because she knew of the Dwarves of Khazad-dm (Moria). ... she perceived from the beginning that Middle-earth could not be saved from "the residue of evil" that Morgoth had left behind him save by a union of all the peoples who were in their way and in their measure opposed to him. She looked upon the Dwarves also with the EYE OF A COMMANDER, seeing in them the finest warriors to pit against the Orcs"

So if you're not in a military army, you can't be a commander.

Ok than.

JustSomeGuy: "Middle-Earth is basically north-west Europe, mostly England."

Tolkien: "Not Nordic, please! A word I personally dislike; it is associated, though of French origin, with racialist theories. Geographically Northern is usually better. But examination will show that even this is inapplicable (geographically or spiritually) to 'Middle-earth'...This is not a purely 'Nordic' area in any sense. If Hobbiton and Rivendell are taken (as intended) to be at about the latitude of Oxford, then Minas Tirith, 600 miles south, is at about the latitude of Florence. The Mouths of Anduin and the ancient city of Pelargir are at about the latitude of ancient Troy."
"The progress of the tale ends in what is far more like the re-establishment of an effective Holy Roman Empire with its seat in Rome than anything that would be devised by a 'Nordic'. (Letter 294, dated 8 February 1967)"

You just quoted tolkein saying his work is ... "basically north west europe, mostly england."

You proved his point for him.

JustSomeGuy: "The native people of those areas are all white. So all the races of Middle-earth would be white"

Tolkien: Haradrim: "They have black eyes, and long black hair, and gold rings in their ears... lots of beautiful gold. And some have red paint on their cheeks, and red cloaks and their flags are red, and the tips of their spears; and they have round shields, yellow and black with big spikes"
"His corslet of overlapping brazen plates was rent and hewn, his black plaits of hair braided with gold were drenched with blood. His brown hand still clutched the hilt of a broken sword."

The men of Rhun: "These Men were short and broad, long and strong in the arm; their skins were swart or sallow, and their hair was dark as were their eyes."

Hobbits: "Before the crossing of the mountains the Hobbits had already become divided into three somewhat different breeds: Harfoots, Stoors, and Fallohides. The Harfoots were borwner of skin, smaller, and shorter, and they were beardless and bootless"

Samwise is a brown Harfoot Hobbit: "In his lap lay Frodo's head, drowned deep in sleep; upon his white forehead lay one of Sam's brown hands"

Haradrim:south of where tolken wrote about. In other words, SOUTH of the area JSG was talking about. Did you miss this, or are you playing shellgames and hoping nobody notices?

Rhun: Again. Not where he was talking about. It's to the stinking EAST OF MORDOR. JSG was NOT saying that everywhere in the entire fictional world was "white."

Samwise:So you're going to use sterotyping for no reason other than to serve your purposes. Browner of skin (harfoots) has to mean only what you want it to mean. Otherwise, you'd be wrong.

Even if these quotes don't somehow showcase that they have a clear bias.

Call out bias when exhibiting a startling amount of it yourself.

They show that there's a strange racial/sexual undertone that seems ignorant of the actual world Tolkien made.

No, it doesn't. If the words and genre people are using do not logically force this as a necessary conclusion, there's no tone there, under, over, or otherwise. It's just your thoughts being disrespectfully rammed down other's throats and being said to be theirs.

Tolkien's world IS diverse. It parallels a Europe that has Turkic and Mongol people ...

...

Hard eyeroll.

Turkey is not in europe. The mongols didn't make their base in or live in europe. IIRC the tatars didn't even live in europe. You're aware that russia is NOT european?

By the way, people are well aware of the shellgame with the word diverse. It can either mean the older meaning of diverse, or it can mean the new meaning, which is roughly "conforms to the latest pet causes of the political left of the western world."

If you don't think it can mean that, ask yourself if you would say thomas clarence or sowell or larry elder would count in your view as contributing to the "racial diversity" of anything where there aren't "black" (however you define that) people.

... of the steppes with its Easterlings and men of Rhun. It has Mediterranean people groups with its Gondorians, of both Numenorean lineage and native peoples. It has brown and dark haired men of ancient tribes and cultures living in its furthest recesses. It has its Africa in the southern reaches of Gondor and Harad, it has its Persia and Syria with the lands to the east and south. to the There are elves that travelled south and became unlike their kin in appearance and culture, whose children are indistinguishable from the children of men (Who aren't just white.)

Tolkien's world IS empowering to women: Luthien contended with the will Morgoth and Sauron, who took the form of a werewolf and vampire and saving Beren. Eowyn who slew the Witch King. Galadriel who threw down the walls and pits of Dol Guldur in Mirkwood and slew any evil escaping from it, cleansing the land.

How can anyone claim otherwise?
Tilt at windmills much?

You haven't really watched the videos of the people you're dehumanizing and trying to trash.

If you had, you'd know they wouldn't say that tolkien's fiction didn't have people who look that way (You people obsessed with how people physically look as if that means something more than they look that way ... you are a mess), or that there are not strong women in the setting either.

What they ARE (rightly) bashing and condemning is people changing already established characters to look physically different for no good reason beyond racism and ignorant childish thinking that physical looks means more than ... a person looks that way ... and they are bashing the idiotic stupid childish bull-feces that the only way a woman can be strong is if she is physically strong and operates in combat like superman, which dehumanizes and denigrates women and pushes the rotted in the head idea that they aren't being strong by exhibiting their strength in classically feminine ways.

That's a lot of words for that person to demonstrate they really don't get it.

It's their job to attract me, the consumer/customer, into liking their product so I want it, not berate me into accepting a substandard product because that's all they're capable of producing. That's their problem, not mine.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 12:08:19 AM EDT
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

That's a lot of words for that person to demonstrate they really don't get it.

It's their job to attract me, the consumer/customer, into liking their product so I want it, not berate me into accepting a substandard product because that's all they're capable of producing. That's their problem, not mine.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fisk incoming. Also WOT. You have been warned.
https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss1lck
Hearthseeker  @Hearthseeker

19th May 2022 from TwitLonger
[Rant] Social Commentators Dividing the Tolkien Community

Imagine this. You're a pretty solid Tolkien fan for the most part. You've read LotR, The Hobbit, maybe even dabbled in The Lost Road and Other Writings or the Silmarillion. You've participated in a Tolkien Reading Day. A few years ago you subscribed to Men of the West or The Broken Sword and see their content every now and then. You for sure have the extended editions of the Peter Jackson Films, even the Hobbit despite its flaws.
"You for sure have the jackson movies" If you say so, but I'm not buying that. Destroyed the character of frodo (whiner in the movies, not in the books), made the ents stupid, and criminally turned gimli ... GIMLI ... into comic relief.

That was too much. HInt: just because new stuff is more blatantly destructive and bad, doesn't make stuff that was destructive in the past something it wasn't.

Anyways, moving on.

Then one day, you see an article about Lord of the Rings on Prime. You look at the posters and you think "Huh, interesting that they've gone with such a diverse cast. Maybe there will be some lore reason for it."

And what of the people who looked at it and realized: wow, these people are obsessed with race, to the point that they're real live racists and are only putting these people in the production for outright racist reasons, even if they have to mess with what people like?

Oh yes, I forgot, we're your orcs. We don't exist. We are doomed to be evil because we don't think like you.

So you pull up Youtube to find out what people think. There they are, the thumbnails and titles that scream for your attention. Tolkien Legacy DESTROYED by Amazon. LOTR on Prime DOOMED to FAIL. NO HOPE FOR THE FANS! What an exciting time to be alive.

You think: You know what? Maybe they are right. I don't recall if Tolkien mentioned short haired elves, black dwarves, or even beardless ones for that matter. Why mess with a formula that works? Isn't Middle-earth supposed to be based on northern Europe? This is getting a tad ridiculous. Except, you might be surprised what Tolkien actually wrote or actually intended. And if you look beyond surface level, there's a malicious undercurrent to these videos.

"If you look below the surface level." No wait, let me guess, you were stupid or arrogant enough to believe it when your english teachers taught you that you could understand what someone was saying that has absolutely nothing to do with their writing or other words. You're good enough to put words in their mouths and read their minds. A long way of saying, you dehumanize them by treating what they say and mean as a plaything to serve your biases. Your real conscious ones.

So, its been about a year of this now, and Amazon just can't help themselves but stepping into controversy after controversy with their Lord of the Rings series. It's almost inevitable. Their first attempts at marketing this were mishandled at best, egregious at the worst. Bezos saying he wanted his own Game of Thrones. Miscommunication over exactly why Tom Shippey was released from his advising role on the series. Not a good look by any means.

Thankfully, someone at Amazon decided it would be a good idea to welcome members of the Tolkien community in for a viewing in Oxford of all places. That is a stroke of genius if there ever was one.

There's no way they were ever going to inspire any trust by giving people special treatement and NOT allowing them to tell people what they were shown. Per even your own words, people don't trust amazon. With good reasons. You do not engender trust or gain more trust by MORE secrecy. If the content is good. You show it, to gain trust.

But of course, if it were all kittens and butterflies--I wouldn't be writing this. Here come the thumbnails and titles again: AMAZON "Superfans" SELLOUTS? PAID SHILLS for Amazon? Hang on everyone, this is going to be a rough ride.

Now you're watching the Tolkien community get ripped apart by culture provocateurs and reactionaries. Traitors! Shills! Sellouts! Grima Wormtongue quotes! Didn't these people learn that Sauron was a deceiver who brought gifts? How will these "Influencers" Ever speak a word against Amazon ever again?

Except, hold on. You recognize these names. Prancing Pony Podcast. Nerd of the Rings? Maggie Park? Tolkien Professor? Fellowship of the Fans? Don? How could they all betray the Tolkien fandom?

Writer, you are ignorant, and likely innocent of how these things work. Yes, even real fans can be made into shills. Because humans can be subverted and manipulated. The people doing the subverting don't even have to believe they are or are trying to do it in order TO do it.

If you aren't innocent or ignorant about these things, and you're saying this, than that doesn't leave you good options.

You are, by the way, showing your bias and conclusions beforehand. If commentators talk about how people are being subverted and turned into shills, they have to be provacateurs and reactionaries. They cannot possibly be anything else and especially can't be honestly trying to keep what they genuinely like from being treated as disrespectfully as ... well, see above comment about english teachers and putting words in peoples mouths.

You have automatically classed them as lower kinds of people. Removing them from any honest interactions where you try and keep your biases from warping and mutilating their words.

Instead of the exciting bit of news that Amazon held a press-reel for long-time content creators that are beloved by the Tolkien community--we get strung along with this grand narrative that Amazon just planted secret agents in the Tolkien fandom. Were they bribed with a wine and dine? Were they given gifts that were too lucrative?

Again, with the ignorance. "Too lucrative." All amazon has to do to subvert people is give them personal acknowledgement related to the ROP project. They want it. Badly. Because amazon is working on a source they like. Or have built themselves around.

So what's actually here to discredit? They had to sign an NDA? That just means there's a timestamp on when they can release information directly related to the plot or significant elements of the show. NDA doesn't mean "Non-disparaging Agreement" There was still plenty of skepticism from the people who attended. Was it the fact they were brought to a wine and dine and given gifts? Honestly, if that's the most damning evidence against their credibility, that's quite a broad mark to hit. Most of the pictures seemed to be images of nick-knacks and branded content such as a carry out bag.


It's the fact that they even went. We cannot know their thoughts, desires, or emotions related to it. So we treat them as humans and persons. Which means they are as easily subverted as anyone else. You don't know, so you can't (and shouldn't) trust them.

The more they either like .... or build themselves around ...  the tolkien content, and whatever is based off it, the *easier* they will be to be subverted by exactly what amazon did. Amazon is a big stupid bureaucratic beast at the group level, but like any big stupid bureaucratic beast, individuals in it serving it will know how to use what it has to get what they want. Which, in this case, is *good* pr from those who say they are, or really are fans of tolkien's works.

As a former gaming journalist myself, I'm familiar with guidelines on what can be considered a breach ethics. Being flown out to conferences, room and boarding, Q&A sessions, sponsorships, gift giving, catering and drinks, and NDAs are par the course for anyone in the industry. I can't even think of a comic convention where I wasn't showered with merchandise by a door greeter for simply attending. None of those concessions, so long as they are within reason, are generally considered unethical so long as their is full open disclosure.

You really don't get it, do you.

It's not about the wrong or right of it. They went to an event that was, by it's design (intended or not) going to make them look well on amazon's content and work. If the event had not been expected to do that, amazon never would have done it. Unless you want to think that amazon WANTS their content to fail.

All of them have publicly disclosed their involvement in the event. And a few of them have made statements acknowledging the potential for them to be biased and wanting to wait until the show releases to give their final opinion. Thus negating any real gain for the short term exclusivity they received. Even then: The majority of these people aren't journalists under strict contractual adherences. The most Amazon seems to be capable of gaining from this is a thin veneer of appeasing the Tolkien fandom.

And what seems to be the consensus? "Yeah it was pretty good. Not convinced yet, but it seems alright."

Wow, how much do you have to bribe someone for that level of worship. /s

The only obligation they might have is an unwritten social rule to be honest. One could argue that they harm the Tolkien community by saying positive things about the show--as though they're socially contracted to provide nothing but utter disillusionment or contempt.

But I'll do you one better: Can't you make the same claim against their accusers? Why should Nerdrotic or any commentator be any less complicit of injecting narrative bias? Don't they have JUST AS MUCH of a stake in maintaining a negative perception of the show in order to make their financial gains?

Yes, they do have a stake in that.

And they know it. And so do you. The difference is, they know if they lie or decieve people, they will lose viewers. Meaning they will lose money.

Amazon can afford to lie and deceive. It's a big dumb evil bureaucracy that had to be sued to pay it's delivery drivers in the UK and that has warehouse workers peeing in bottles to meet efficiency goals; with a worldwide base in multiple different things. Amazon can *afford* to piss all over the entire tolkien fanbase. It could run them up a serious bill on the red ink side of the ledger, but it wouldn't kill them or meaningfully change the lifestyle of nearly anyone in the upper levels working there.

The channels on YT can take a real meaningful beating from their viewers that would ruin them. And they know it.

These guys have built themselves around being real fans of these things. Them being outed as not real fans would hurt and possibly ruin them. People only trust their judgement so far as they think they are fans of what the viewers are also fans of.

Perhaps you have heard of a concept called "disparity of power" ...?

Their content is raw emotional attachment to a set of ideologies. That's what Nerdrotic, JustSomeGuy, and Disparu want you to feel.

You're an arrogant dehumanizing of others evil person for doing this.

You really did buy the crap so many bad english teachers teach about deconstruction, didn't you?

Stop feeding the bad wolves in you and start trying to strangle them. This putting your words and thoughts in people's mouths and heads to fit your irrational biases crap is filthy and you should ... gasp ... be ashamed of it. You don't have to do this evil crap.

They make their living off of creating this narrative of a woke regime trying to attack the things you love. They don't want you to listen to these people you've grown to admire and trust for years: The people who went to this event have to somehow be complicit in aiding the antagonist. Anyone giving positive feedback to LotR on Prime is now woke and an enemy to Tolkien's legacy if you follow their arguments.

Its all nonsense.

Let me cap off this section with two quotes.

George The Giant Slayer: "These(The invitees) were lovers of the Legendarium, but somehow they set that all aside and embrace the Rings of Power"

NerdoftheRings(After attending the event): "At the end of the day, the showrunners can have all the passion and knowledge in the world, but fail in the execution. I hope they don't because it would be much for fun to cover a good show than a bad one, but if it falls short, I'll be right here as we do a post-mortem together."

Which sounds more sold to a narrative?

Given the meanings of the words and text you just posted?

NEITHER. You have to add your irrational personal bias to get more from this bit of text from them you've posted.

In case any of you still believes that Nerdrotic and the others mentioned are the ones with the more grounded and sensible understanding of Tolkien's world. Here are some refutations to statements they've made about Tolkien's writings.

In Nerdrotic's video titled, "Amazon's Lord of the Rings Epic FAIL! The Vandalization of Tolkien and Fan ATTACKS have Begun"

Nerdrotic: "Galadriel did not take any part in the wars of the first age or any of the battles of the 2nd age"

Tolkien: "She was called Nerwen 'man-maiden' because of her strength and stature, and her courage." "She(Galadriel) fought fiercely against Feanor in defence of her mother's kin."
"Galadriel, the only woman of the Noldor to stand that day tall and valiant among the contending princes"
"Galadriel was then of Amazon disposition and bound up her hair as a crown when taking part in athletic feats"

You must think us imbeciles to fall for this.

Clearly, the word fight can only mean physical combat. Or flinging magic attacks in the middle of combat. Nope, can't mean anything else.  If it's there in the text - I meanin in the meaning of the text itself, not your personal desires crammed into the text by the disgusting dehumanizing means of deconstruction and subversion - just pull the quote where tolkein says Galadriel fought in the wars as a combatant. Which is what the subhuman to you nerdrotic was pointing out.

In the video titled: The Rings of Power: Tolkien in Name Only by JustSomeGuy

JustSomeGuy: "I've read the Silmarillion every year since 2003, I don't recall Galadriel being described as angry or brash"

Tolkien:
"But now she burned with desire to follow Fanor with her anger to whatever lands he might come, and to thwart him in all ways that she could."
The History of Middle-earth XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth, Chapter XI "The Shibboleth of Fanor"

You don't have to be angry or brash to burn with desire to do something, even to burn with desire to thwart someone in all the ways you can.

Are you so far lost to ignoring what the things people say mean that you don't even know what the words angry ... or...  brash mean?

JustSomeGuy: "What Army, she(Galadriel) was never part of any army during the second age"

Tolkien: "Galadriel chose Eregion because she knew of the Dwarves of Khazad-dm (Moria). ... she perceived from the beginning that Middle-earth could not be saved from "the residue of evil" that Morgoth had left behind him save by a union of all the peoples who were in their way and in their measure opposed to him. She looked upon the Dwarves also with the EYE OF A COMMANDER, seeing in them the finest warriors to pit against the Orcs"

So if you're not in a military army, you can't be a commander.

Ok than.

JustSomeGuy: "Middle-Earth is basically north-west Europe, mostly England."

Tolkien: "Not Nordic, please! A word I personally dislike; it is associated, though of French origin, with racialist theories. Geographically Northern is usually better. But examination will show that even this is inapplicable (geographically or spiritually) to 'Middle-earth'...This is not a purely 'Nordic' area in any sense. If Hobbiton and Rivendell are taken (as intended) to be at about the latitude of Oxford, then Minas Tirith, 600 miles south, is at about the latitude of Florence. The Mouths of Anduin and the ancient city of Pelargir are at about the latitude of ancient Troy."
"The progress of the tale ends in what is far more like the re-establishment of an effective Holy Roman Empire with its seat in Rome than anything that would be devised by a 'Nordic'. (Letter 294, dated 8 February 1967)"

You just quoted tolkein saying his work is ... "basically north west europe, mostly england."

You proved his point for him.

JustSomeGuy: "The native people of those areas are all white. So all the races of Middle-earth would be white"

Tolkien: Haradrim: "They have black eyes, and long black hair, and gold rings in their ears... lots of beautiful gold. And some have red paint on their cheeks, and red cloaks and their flags are red, and the tips of their spears; and they have round shields, yellow and black with big spikes"
"His corslet of overlapping brazen plates was rent and hewn, his black plaits of hair braided with gold were drenched with blood. His brown hand still clutched the hilt of a broken sword."

The men of Rhun: "These Men were short and broad, long and strong in the arm; their skins were swart or sallow, and their hair was dark as were their eyes."

Hobbits: "Before the crossing of the mountains the Hobbits had already become divided into three somewhat different breeds: Harfoots, Stoors, and Fallohides. The Harfoots were borwner of skin, smaller, and shorter, and they were beardless and bootless"

Samwise is a brown Harfoot Hobbit: "In his lap lay Frodo's head, drowned deep in sleep; upon his white forehead lay one of Sam's brown hands"

Haradrim:south of where tolken wrote about. In other words, SOUTH of the area JSG was talking about. Did you miss this, or are you playing shellgames and hoping nobody notices?

Rhun: Again. Not where he was talking about. It's to the stinking EAST OF MORDOR. JSG was NOT saying that everywhere in the entire fictional world was "white."

Samwise:So you're going to use sterotyping for no reason other than to serve your purposes. Browner of skin (harfoots) has to mean only what you want it to mean. Otherwise, you'd be wrong.

Even if these quotes don't somehow showcase that they have a clear bias.

Call out bias when exhibiting a startling amount of it yourself.

They show that there's a strange racial/sexual undertone that seems ignorant of the actual world Tolkien made.

No, it doesn't. If the words and genre people are using do not logically force this as a necessary conclusion, there's no tone there, under, over, or otherwise. It's just your thoughts being disrespectfully rammed down other's throats and being said to be theirs.

Tolkien's world IS diverse. It parallels a Europe that has Turkic and Mongol people ...

...

Hard eyeroll.

Turkey is not in europe. The mongols didn't make their base in or live in europe. IIRC the tatars didn't even live in europe. You're aware that russia is NOT european?

By the way, people are well aware of the shellgame with the word diverse. It can either mean the older meaning of diverse, or it can mean the new meaning, which is roughly "conforms to the latest pet causes of the political left of the western world."

If you don't think it can mean that, ask yourself if you would say thomas clarence or sowell or larry elder would count in your view as contributing to the "racial diversity" of anything where there aren't "black" (however you define that) people.

... of the steppes with its Easterlings and men of Rhun. It has Mediterranean people groups with its Gondorians, of both Numenorean lineage and native peoples. It has brown and dark haired men of ancient tribes and cultures living in its furthest recesses. It has its Africa in the southern reaches of Gondor and Harad, it has its Persia and Syria with the lands to the east and south. to the There are elves that travelled south and became unlike their kin in appearance and culture, whose children are indistinguishable from the children of men (Who aren't just white.)

Tolkien's world IS empowering to women: Luthien contended with the will Morgoth and Sauron, who took the form of a werewolf and vampire and saving Beren. Eowyn who slew the Witch King. Galadriel who threw down the walls and pits of Dol Guldur in Mirkwood and slew any evil escaping from it, cleansing the land.

How can anyone claim otherwise?
Tilt at windmills much?

You haven't really watched the videos of the people you're dehumanizing and trying to trash.

If you had, you'd know they wouldn't say that tolkien's fiction didn't have people who look that way (You people obsessed with how people physically look as if that means something more than they look that way ... you are a mess), or that there are not strong women in the setting either.

What they ARE (rightly) bashing and condemning is people changing already established characters to look physically different for no good reason beyond racism and ignorant childish thinking that physical looks means more than ... a person looks that way ... and they are bashing the idiotic stupid childish bull-feces that the only way a woman can be strong is if she is physically strong and operates in combat like superman, which dehumanizes and denigrates women and pushes the rotted in the head idea that they aren't being strong by exhibiting their strength in classically feminine ways.

That's a lot of words for that person to demonstrate they really don't get it.

It's their job to attract me, the consumer/customer, into liking their product so I want it, not berate me into accepting a substandard product because that's all they're capable of producing. That's their problem, not mine.

Eh, I knew it would be longer than most would bother to read.

Kudos to anyone who does.

People using phones to go on a forum and read/post are like guys using a .22 derringer for long range target shooting.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 12:32:49 AM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Eh, I knew it would be longer than most would bother to read.

Kudos to anyone who does.

People using phones to go on a forum and read/post are like guys using a .22 derringer for long range target shooting.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fisk incoming. Also WOT. You have been warned.
https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss1lck
Hearthseeker  @Hearthseeker

19th May 2022 from TwitLonger
[Rant] Social Commentators Dividing the Tolkien Community

Imagine this. You're a pretty solid Tolkien fan for the most part. You've read LotR, The Hobbit, maybe even dabbled in The Lost Road and Other Writings or the Silmarillion. You've participated in a Tolkien Reading Day. A few years ago you subscribed to Men of the West or The Broken Sword and see their content every now and then. You for sure have the extended editions of the Peter Jackson Films, even the Hobbit despite its flaws.
"You for sure have the jackson movies" If you say so, but I'm not buying that. Destroyed the character of frodo (whiner in the movies, not in the books), made the ents stupid, and criminally turned gimli ... GIMLI ... into comic relief.

That was too much. HInt: just because new stuff is more blatantly destructive and bad, doesn't make stuff that was destructive in the past something it wasn't.

Anyways, moving on.

Then one day, you see an article about Lord of the Rings on Prime. You look at the posters and you think "Huh, interesting that they've gone with such a diverse cast. Maybe there will be some lore reason for it."

And what of the people who looked at it and realized: wow, these people are obsessed with race, to the point that they're real live racists and are only putting these people in the production for outright racist reasons, even if they have to mess with what people like?

Oh yes, I forgot, we're your orcs. We don't exist. We are doomed to be evil because we don't think like you.

So you pull up Youtube to find out what people think. There they are, the thumbnails and titles that scream for your attention. Tolkien Legacy DESTROYED by Amazon. LOTR on Prime DOOMED to FAIL. NO HOPE FOR THE FANS! What an exciting time to be alive.

You think: You know what? Maybe they are right. I don't recall if Tolkien mentioned short haired elves, black dwarves, or even beardless ones for that matter. Why mess with a formula that works? Isn't Middle-earth supposed to be based on northern Europe? This is getting a tad ridiculous. Except, you might be surprised what Tolkien actually wrote or actually intended. And if you look beyond surface level, there's a malicious undercurrent to these videos.

"If you look below the surface level." No wait, let me guess, you were stupid or arrogant enough to believe it when your english teachers taught you that you could understand what someone was saying that has absolutely nothing to do with their writing or other words. You're good enough to put words in their mouths and read their minds. A long way of saying, you dehumanize them by treating what they say and mean as a plaything to serve your biases. Your real conscious ones.

So, its been about a year of this now, and Amazon just can't help themselves but stepping into controversy after controversy with their Lord of the Rings series. It's almost inevitable. Their first attempts at marketing this were mishandled at best, egregious at the worst. Bezos saying he wanted his own Game of Thrones. Miscommunication over exactly why Tom Shippey was released from his advising role on the series. Not a good look by any means.

Thankfully, someone at Amazon decided it would be a good idea to welcome members of the Tolkien community in for a viewing in Oxford of all places. That is a stroke of genius if there ever was one.

There's no way they were ever going to inspire any trust by giving people special treatement and NOT allowing them to tell people what they were shown. Per even your own words, people don't trust amazon. With good reasons. You do not engender trust or gain more trust by MORE secrecy. If the content is good. You show it, to gain trust.

But of course, if it were all kittens and butterflies--I wouldn't be writing this. Here come the thumbnails and titles again: AMAZON "Superfans" SELLOUTS? PAID SHILLS for Amazon? Hang on everyone, this is going to be a rough ride.

Now you're watching the Tolkien community get ripped apart by culture provocateurs and reactionaries. Traitors! Shills! Sellouts! Grima Wormtongue quotes! Didn't these people learn that Sauron was a deceiver who brought gifts? How will these "Influencers" Ever speak a word against Amazon ever again?

Except, hold on. You recognize these names. Prancing Pony Podcast. Nerd of the Rings? Maggie Park? Tolkien Professor? Fellowship of the Fans? Don? How could they all betray the Tolkien fandom?

Writer, you are ignorant, and likely innocent of how these things work. Yes, even real fans can be made into shills. Because humans can be subverted and manipulated. The people doing the subverting don't even have to believe they are or are trying to do it in order TO do it.

If you aren't innocent or ignorant about these things, and you're saying this, than that doesn't leave you good options.

You are, by the way, showing your bias and conclusions beforehand. If commentators talk about how people are being subverted and turned into shills, they have to be provacateurs and reactionaries. They cannot possibly be anything else and especially can't be honestly trying to keep what they genuinely like from being treated as disrespectfully as ... well, see above comment about english teachers and putting words in peoples mouths.

You have automatically classed them as lower kinds of people. Removing them from any honest interactions where you try and keep your biases from warping and mutilating their words.

Instead of the exciting bit of news that Amazon held a press-reel for long-time content creators that are beloved by the Tolkien community--we get strung along with this grand narrative that Amazon just planted secret agents in the Tolkien fandom. Were they bribed with a wine and dine? Were they given gifts that were too lucrative?

Again, with the ignorance. "Too lucrative." All amazon has to do to subvert people is give them personal acknowledgement related to the ROP project. They want it. Badly. Because amazon is working on a source they like. Or have built themselves around.

So what's actually here to discredit? They had to sign an NDA? That just means there's a timestamp on when they can release information directly related to the plot or significant elements of the show. NDA doesn't mean "Non-disparaging Agreement" There was still plenty of skepticism from the people who attended. Was it the fact they were brought to a wine and dine and given gifts? Honestly, if that's the most damning evidence against their credibility, that's quite a broad mark to hit. Most of the pictures seemed to be images of nick-knacks and branded content such as a carry out bag.


It's the fact that they even went. We cannot know their thoughts, desires, or emotions related to it. So we treat them as humans and persons. Which means they are as easily subverted as anyone else. You don't know, so you can't (and shouldn't) trust them.

The more they either like .... or build themselves around ...  the tolkien content, and whatever is based off it, the *easier* they will be to be subverted by exactly what amazon did. Amazon is a big stupid bureaucratic beast at the group level, but like any big stupid bureaucratic beast, individuals in it serving it will know how to use what it has to get what they want. Which, in this case, is *good* pr from those who say they are, or really are fans of tolkien's works.

As a former gaming journalist myself, I'm familiar with guidelines on what can be considered a breach ethics. Being flown out to conferences, room and boarding, Q&A sessions, sponsorships, gift giving, catering and drinks, and NDAs are par the course for anyone in the industry. I can't even think of a comic convention where I wasn't showered with merchandise by a door greeter for simply attending. None of those concessions, so long as they are within reason, are generally considered unethical so long as their is full open disclosure.

You really don't get it, do you.

It's not about the wrong or right of it. They went to an event that was, by it's design (intended or not) going to make them look well on amazon's content and work. If the event had not been expected to do that, amazon never would have done it. Unless you want to think that amazon WANTS their content to fail.

All of them have publicly disclosed their involvement in the event. And a few of them have made statements acknowledging the potential for them to be biased and wanting to wait until the show releases to give their final opinion. Thus negating any real gain for the short term exclusivity they received. Even then: The majority of these people aren't journalists under strict contractual adherences. The most Amazon seems to be capable of gaining from this is a thin veneer of appeasing the Tolkien fandom.

And what seems to be the consensus? "Yeah it was pretty good. Not convinced yet, but it seems alright."

Wow, how much do you have to bribe someone for that level of worship. /s

The only obligation they might have is an unwritten social rule to be honest. One could argue that they harm the Tolkien community by saying positive things about the show--as though they're socially contracted to provide nothing but utter disillusionment or contempt.

But I'll do you one better: Can't you make the same claim against their accusers? Why should Nerdrotic or any commentator be any less complicit of injecting narrative bias? Don't they have JUST AS MUCH of a stake in maintaining a negative perception of the show in order to make their financial gains?

Yes, they do have a stake in that.

And they know it. And so do you. The difference is, they know if they lie or decieve people, they will lose viewers. Meaning they will lose money.

Amazon can afford to lie and deceive. It's a big dumb evil bureaucracy that had to be sued to pay it's delivery drivers in the UK and that has warehouse workers peeing in bottles to meet efficiency goals; with a worldwide base in multiple different things. Amazon can *afford* to piss all over the entire tolkien fanbase. It could run them up a serious bill on the red ink side of the ledger, but it wouldn't kill them or meaningfully change the lifestyle of nearly anyone in the upper levels working there.

The channels on YT can take a real meaningful beating from their viewers that would ruin them. And they know it.

These guys have built themselves around being real fans of these things. Them being outed as not real fans would hurt and possibly ruin them. People only trust their judgement so far as they think they are fans of what the viewers are also fans of.

Perhaps you have heard of a concept called "disparity of power" ...?

Their content is raw emotional attachment to a set of ideologies. That's what Nerdrotic, JustSomeGuy, and Disparu want you to feel.

You're an arrogant dehumanizing of others evil person for doing this.

You really did buy the crap so many bad english teachers teach about deconstruction, didn't you?

Stop feeding the bad wolves in you and start trying to strangle them. This putting your words and thoughts in people's mouths and heads to fit your irrational biases crap is filthy and you should ... gasp ... be ashamed of it. You don't have to do this evil crap.

They make their living off of creating this narrative of a woke regime trying to attack the things you love. They don't want you to listen to these people you've grown to admire and trust for years: The people who went to this event have to somehow be complicit in aiding the antagonist. Anyone giving positive feedback to LotR on Prime is now woke and an enemy to Tolkien's legacy if you follow their arguments.

Its all nonsense.

Let me cap off this section with two quotes.

George The Giant Slayer: "These(The invitees) were lovers of the Legendarium, but somehow they set that all aside and embrace the Rings of Power"

NerdoftheRings(After attending the event): "At the end of the day, the showrunners can have all the passion and knowledge in the world, but fail in the execution. I hope they don't because it would be much for fun to cover a good show than a bad one, but if it falls short, I'll be right here as we do a post-mortem together."

Which sounds more sold to a narrative?

Given the meanings of the words and text you just posted?

NEITHER. You have to add your irrational personal bias to get more from this bit of text from them you've posted.

In case any of you still believes that Nerdrotic and the others mentioned are the ones with the more grounded and sensible understanding of Tolkien's world. Here are some refutations to statements they've made about Tolkien's writings.

In Nerdrotic's video titled, "Amazon's Lord of the Rings Epic FAIL! The Vandalization of Tolkien and Fan ATTACKS have Begun"

Nerdrotic: "Galadriel did not take any part in the wars of the first age or any of the battles of the 2nd age"

Tolkien: "She was called Nerwen 'man-maiden' because of her strength and stature, and her courage." "She(Galadriel) fought fiercely against Feanor in defence of her mother's kin."
"Galadriel, the only woman of the Noldor to stand that day tall and valiant among the contending princes"
"Galadriel was then of Amazon disposition and bound up her hair as a crown when taking part in athletic feats"

You must think us imbeciles to fall for this.

Clearly, the word fight can only mean physical combat. Or flinging magic attacks in the middle of combat. Nope, can't mean anything else.  If it's there in the text - I meanin in the meaning of the text itself, not your personal desires crammed into the text by the disgusting dehumanizing means of deconstruction and subversion - just pull the quote where tolkein says Galadriel fought in the wars as a combatant. Which is what the subhuman to you nerdrotic was pointing out.

In the video titled: The Rings of Power: Tolkien in Name Only by JustSomeGuy

JustSomeGuy: "I've read the Silmarillion every year since 2003, I don't recall Galadriel being described as angry or brash"

Tolkien:
"But now she burned with desire to follow Fanor with her anger to whatever lands he might come, and to thwart him in all ways that she could."
The History of Middle-earth XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth, Chapter XI "The Shibboleth of Fanor"

You don't have to be angry or brash to burn with desire to do something, even to burn with desire to thwart someone in all the ways you can.

Are you so far lost to ignoring what the things people say mean that you don't even know what the words angry ... or...  brash mean?

JustSomeGuy: "What Army, she(Galadriel) was never part of any army during the second age"

Tolkien: "Galadriel chose Eregion because she knew of the Dwarves of Khazad-dm (Moria). ... she perceived from the beginning that Middle-earth could not be saved from "the residue of evil" that Morgoth had left behind him save by a union of all the peoples who were in their way and in their measure opposed to him. She looked upon the Dwarves also with the EYE OF A COMMANDER, seeing in them the finest warriors to pit against the Orcs"

So if you're not in a military army, you can't be a commander.

Ok than.

JustSomeGuy: "Middle-Earth is basically north-west Europe, mostly England."

Tolkien: "Not Nordic, please! A word I personally dislike; it is associated, though of French origin, with racialist theories. Geographically Northern is usually better. But examination will show that even this is inapplicable (geographically or spiritually) to 'Middle-earth'...This is not a purely 'Nordic' area in any sense. If Hobbiton and Rivendell are taken (as intended) to be at about the latitude of Oxford, then Minas Tirith, 600 miles south, is at about the latitude of Florence. The Mouths of Anduin and the ancient city of Pelargir are at about the latitude of ancient Troy."
"The progress of the tale ends in what is far more like the re-establishment of an effective Holy Roman Empire with its seat in Rome than anything that would be devised by a 'Nordic'. (Letter 294, dated 8 February 1967)"

You just quoted tolkein saying his work is ... "basically north west europe, mostly england."

You proved his point for him.

JustSomeGuy: "The native people of those areas are all white. So all the races of Middle-earth would be white"

Tolkien: Haradrim: "They have black eyes, and long black hair, and gold rings in their ears... lots of beautiful gold. And some have red paint on their cheeks, and red cloaks and their flags are red, and the tips of their spears; and they have round shields, yellow and black with big spikes"
"His corslet of overlapping brazen plates was rent and hewn, his black plaits of hair braided with gold were drenched with blood. His brown hand still clutched the hilt of a broken sword."

The men of Rhun: "These Men were short and broad, long and strong in the arm; their skins were swart or sallow, and their hair was dark as were their eyes."

Hobbits: "Before the crossing of the mountains the Hobbits had already become divided into three somewhat different breeds: Harfoots, Stoors, and Fallohides. The Harfoots were borwner of skin, smaller, and shorter, and they were beardless and bootless"

Samwise is a brown Harfoot Hobbit: "In his lap lay Frodo's head, drowned deep in sleep; upon his white forehead lay one of Sam's brown hands"

Haradrim:south of where tolken wrote about. In other words, SOUTH of the area JSG was talking about. Did you miss this, or are you playing shellgames and hoping nobody notices?

Rhun: Again. Not where he was talking about. It's to the stinking EAST OF MORDOR. JSG was NOT saying that everywhere in the entire fictional world was "white."

Samwise:So you're going to use sterotyping for no reason other than to serve your purposes. Browner of skin (harfoots) has to mean only what you want it to mean. Otherwise, you'd be wrong.

Even if these quotes don't somehow showcase that they have a clear bias.

Call out bias when exhibiting a startling amount of it yourself.

They show that there's a strange racial/sexual undertone that seems ignorant of the actual world Tolkien made.

No, it doesn't. If the words and genre people are using do not logically force this as a necessary conclusion, there's no tone there, under, over, or otherwise. It's just your thoughts being disrespectfully rammed down other's throats and being said to be theirs.

Tolkien's world IS diverse. It parallels a Europe that has Turkic and Mongol people ...

...

Hard eyeroll.

Turkey is not in europe. The mongols didn't make their base in or live in europe. IIRC the tatars didn't even live in europe. You're aware that russia is NOT european?

By the way, people are well aware of the shellgame with the word diverse. It can either mean the older meaning of diverse, or it can mean the new meaning, which is roughly "conforms to the latest pet causes of the political left of the western world."

If you don't think it can mean that, ask yourself if you would say thomas clarence or sowell or larry elder would count in your view as contributing to the "racial diversity" of anything where there aren't "black" (however you define that) people.

... of the steppes with its Easterlings and men of Rhun. It has Mediterranean people groups with its Gondorians, of both Numenorean lineage and native peoples. It has brown and dark haired men of ancient tribes and cultures living in its furthest recesses. It has its Africa in the southern reaches of Gondor and Harad, it has its Persia and Syria with the lands to the east and south. to the There are elves that travelled south and became unlike their kin in appearance and culture, whose children are indistinguishable from the children of men (Who aren't just white.)

Tolkien's world IS empowering to women: Luthien contended with the will Morgoth and Sauron, who took the form of a werewolf and vampire and saving Beren. Eowyn who slew the Witch King. Galadriel who threw down the walls and pits of Dol Guldur in Mirkwood and slew any evil escaping from it, cleansing the land.

How can anyone claim otherwise?
Tilt at windmills much?

You haven't really watched the videos of the people you're dehumanizing and trying to trash.

If you had, you'd know they wouldn't say that tolkien's fiction didn't have people who look that way (You people obsessed with how people physically look as if that means something more than they look that way ... you are a mess), or that there are not strong women in the setting either.

What they ARE (rightly) bashing and condemning is people changing already established characters to look physically different for no good reason beyond racism and ignorant childish thinking that physical looks means more than ... a person looks that way ... and they are bashing the idiotic stupid childish bull-feces that the only way a woman can be strong is if she is physically strong and operates in combat like superman, which dehumanizes and denigrates women and pushes the rotted in the head idea that they aren't being strong by exhibiting their strength in classically feminine ways.

That's a lot of words for that person to demonstrate they really don't get it.

It's their job to attract me, the consumer/customer, into liking their product so I want it, not berate me into accepting a substandard product because that's all they're capable of producing. That's their problem, not mine.

Eh, I knew it would be longer than most would bother to read.

Kudos to anyone who does.

People using phones to go on a forum and read/post are like guys using a .22 derringer for long range target shooting.

I wasn't critiquing your message, rather the person you were quoting.

Just a lot of words and mental gymnastics to try and justify their cultural vandalism.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 12:41:32 AM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I wasn't critiquing your message, rather the person you were quoting.

Just a lot of words and mental gymnastics to try and justify their cultural vandalism.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fisk incoming. Also WOT. You have been warned.
https://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1ss1lck
Hearthseeker  @Hearthseeker

19th May 2022 from TwitLonger
[Rant] Social Commentators Dividing the Tolkien Community

Imagine this. You're a pretty solid Tolkien fan for the most part. You've read LotR, The Hobbit, maybe even dabbled in The Lost Road and Other Writings or the Silmarillion. You've participated in a Tolkien Reading Day. A few years ago you subscribed to Men of the West or The Broken Sword and see their content every now and then. You for sure have the extended editions of the Peter Jackson Films, even the Hobbit despite its flaws.
"You for sure have the jackson movies" If you say so, but I'm not buying that. Destroyed the character of frodo (whiner in the movies, not in the books), made the ents stupid, and criminally turned gimli ... GIMLI ... into comic relief.

That was too much. HInt: just because new stuff is more blatantly destructive and bad, doesn't make stuff that was destructive in the past something it wasn't.

Anyways, moving on.

Then one day, you see an article about Lord of the Rings on Prime. You look at the posters and you think "Huh, interesting that they've gone with such a diverse cast. Maybe there will be some lore reason for it."

And what of the people who looked at it and realized: wow, these people are obsessed with race, to the point that they're real live racists and are only putting these people in the production for outright racist reasons, even if they have to mess with what people like?

Oh yes, I forgot, we're your orcs. We don't exist. We are doomed to be evil because we don't think like you.

So you pull up Youtube to find out what people think. There they are, the thumbnails and titles that scream for your attention. Tolkien Legacy DESTROYED by Amazon. LOTR on Prime DOOMED to FAIL. NO HOPE FOR THE FANS! What an exciting time to be alive.

You think: You know what? Maybe they are right. I don't recall if Tolkien mentioned short haired elves, black dwarves, or even beardless ones for that matter. Why mess with a formula that works? Isn't Middle-earth supposed to be based on northern Europe? This is getting a tad ridiculous. Except, you might be surprised what Tolkien actually wrote or actually intended. And if you look beyond surface level, there's a malicious undercurrent to these videos.

"If you look below the surface level." No wait, let me guess, you were stupid or arrogant enough to believe it when your english teachers taught you that you could understand what someone was saying that has absolutely nothing to do with their writing or other words. You're good enough to put words in their mouths and read their minds. A long way of saying, you dehumanize them by treating what they say and mean as a plaything to serve your biases. Your real conscious ones.

So, its been about a year of this now, and Amazon just can't help themselves but stepping into controversy after controversy with their Lord of the Rings series. It's almost inevitable. Their first attempts at marketing this were mishandled at best, egregious at the worst. Bezos saying he wanted his own Game of Thrones. Miscommunication over exactly why Tom Shippey was released from his advising role on the series. Not a good look by any means.

Thankfully, someone at Amazon decided it would be a good idea to welcome members of the Tolkien community in for a viewing in Oxford of all places. That is a stroke of genius if there ever was one.

There's no way they were ever going to inspire any trust by giving people special treatement and NOT allowing them to tell people what they were shown. Per even your own words, people don't trust amazon. With good reasons. You do not engender trust or gain more trust by MORE secrecy. If the content is good. You show it, to gain trust.

But of course, if it were all kittens and butterflies--I wouldn't be writing this. Here come the thumbnails and titles again: AMAZON "Superfans" SELLOUTS? PAID SHILLS for Amazon? Hang on everyone, this is going to be a rough ride.

Now you're watching the Tolkien community get ripped apart by culture provocateurs and reactionaries. Traitors! Shills! Sellouts! Grima Wormtongue quotes! Didn't these people learn that Sauron was a deceiver who brought gifts? How will these "Influencers" Ever speak a word against Amazon ever again?

Except, hold on. You recognize these names. Prancing Pony Podcast. Nerd of the Rings? Maggie Park? Tolkien Professor? Fellowship of the Fans? Don? How could they all betray the Tolkien fandom?

Writer, you are ignorant, and likely innocent of how these things work. Yes, even real fans can be made into shills. Because humans can be subverted and manipulated. The people doing the subverting don't even have to believe they are or are trying to do it in order TO do it.

If you aren't innocent or ignorant about these things, and you're saying this, than that doesn't leave you good options.

You are, by the way, showing your bias and conclusions beforehand. If commentators talk about how people are being subverted and turned into shills, they have to be provacateurs and reactionaries. They cannot possibly be anything else and especially can't be honestly trying to keep what they genuinely like from being treated as disrespectfully as ... well, see above comment about english teachers and putting words in peoples mouths.

You have automatically classed them as lower kinds of people. Removing them from any honest interactions where you try and keep your biases from warping and mutilating their words.

Instead of the exciting bit of news that Amazon held a press-reel for long-time content creators that are beloved by the Tolkien community--we get strung along with this grand narrative that Amazon just planted secret agents in the Tolkien fandom. Were they bribed with a wine and dine? Were they given gifts that were too lucrative?

Again, with the ignorance. "Too lucrative." All amazon has to do to subvert people is give them personal acknowledgement related to the ROP project. They want it. Badly. Because amazon is working on a source they like. Or have built themselves around.

So what's actually here to discredit? They had to sign an NDA? That just means there's a timestamp on when they can release information directly related to the plot or significant elements of the show. NDA doesn't mean "Non-disparaging Agreement" There was still plenty of skepticism from the people who attended. Was it the fact they were brought to a wine and dine and given gifts? Honestly, if that's the most damning evidence against their credibility, that's quite a broad mark to hit. Most of the pictures seemed to be images of nick-knacks and branded content such as a carry out bag.


It's the fact that they even went. We cannot know their thoughts, desires, or emotions related to it. So we treat them as humans and persons. Which means they are as easily subverted as anyone else. You don't know, so you can't (and shouldn't) trust them.

The more they either like .... or build themselves around ...  the tolkien content, and whatever is based off it, the *easier* they will be to be subverted by exactly what amazon did. Amazon is a big stupid bureaucratic beast at the group level, but like any big stupid bureaucratic beast, individuals in it serving it will know how to use what it has to get what they want. Which, in this case, is *good* pr from those who say they are, or really are fans of tolkien's works.

As a former gaming journalist myself, I'm familiar with guidelines on what can be considered a breach ethics. Being flown out to conferences, room and boarding, Q&A sessions, sponsorships, gift giving, catering and drinks, and NDAs are par the course for anyone in the industry. I can't even think of a comic convention where I wasn't showered with merchandise by a door greeter for simply attending. None of those concessions, so long as they are within reason, are generally considered unethical so long as their is full open disclosure.

You really don't get it, do you.

It's not about the wrong or right of it. They went to an event that was, by it's design (intended or not) going to make them look well on amazon's content and work. If the event had not been expected to do that, amazon never would have done it. Unless you want to think that amazon WANTS their content to fail.

All of them have publicly disclosed their involvement in the event. And a few of them have made statements acknowledging the potential for them to be biased and wanting to wait until the show releases to give their final opinion. Thus negating any real gain for the short term exclusivity they received. Even then: The majority of these people aren't journalists under strict contractual adherences. The most Amazon seems to be capable of gaining from this is a thin veneer of appeasing the Tolkien fandom.

And what seems to be the consensus? "Yeah it was pretty good. Not convinced yet, but it seems alright."

Wow, how much do you have to bribe someone for that level of worship. /s

The only obligation they might have is an unwritten social rule to be honest. One could argue that they harm the Tolkien community by saying positive things about the show--as though they're socially contracted to provide nothing but utter disillusionment or contempt.

But I'll do you one better: Can't you make the same claim against their accusers? Why should Nerdrotic or any commentator be any less complicit of injecting narrative bias? Don't they have JUST AS MUCH of a stake in maintaining a negative perception of the show in order to make their financial gains?

Yes, they do have a stake in that.

And they know it. And so do you. The difference is, they know if they lie or decieve people, they will lose viewers. Meaning they will lose money.

Amazon can afford to lie and deceive. It's a big dumb evil bureaucracy that had to be sued to pay it's delivery drivers in the UK and that has warehouse workers peeing in bottles to meet efficiency goals; with a worldwide base in multiple different things. Amazon can *afford* to piss all over the entire tolkien fanbase. It could run them up a serious bill on the red ink side of the ledger, but it wouldn't kill them or meaningfully change the lifestyle of nearly anyone in the upper levels working there.

The channels on YT can take a real meaningful beating from their viewers that would ruin them. And they know it.

These guys have built themselves around being real fans of these things. Them being outed as not real fans would hurt and possibly ruin them. People only trust their judgement so far as they think they are fans of what the viewers are also fans of.

Perhaps you have heard of a concept called "disparity of power" ...?

Their content is raw emotional attachment to a set of ideologies. That's what Nerdrotic, JustSomeGuy, and Disparu want you to feel.

You're an arrogant dehumanizing of others evil person for doing this.

You really did buy the crap so many bad english teachers teach about deconstruction, didn't you?

Stop feeding the bad wolves in you and start trying to strangle them. This putting your words and thoughts in people's mouths and heads to fit your irrational biases crap is filthy and you should ... gasp ... be ashamed of it. You don't have to do this evil crap.

They make their living off of creating this narrative of a woke regime trying to attack the things you love. They don't want you to listen to these people you've grown to admire and trust for years: The people who went to this event have to somehow be complicit in aiding the antagonist. Anyone giving positive feedback to LotR on Prime is now woke and an enemy to Tolkien's legacy if you follow their arguments.

Its all nonsense.

Let me cap off this section with two quotes.

George The Giant Slayer: "These(The invitees) were lovers of the Legendarium, but somehow they set that all aside and embrace the Rings of Power"

NerdoftheRings(After attending the event): "At the end of the day, the showrunners can have all the passion and knowledge in the world, but fail in the execution. I hope they don't because it would be much for fun to cover a good show than a bad one, but if it falls short, I'll be right here as we do a post-mortem together."

Which sounds more sold to a narrative?

Given the meanings of the words and text you just posted?

NEITHER. You have to add your irrational personal bias to get more from this bit of text from them you've posted.

In case any of you still believes that Nerdrotic and the others mentioned are the ones with the more grounded and sensible understanding of Tolkien's world. Here are some refutations to statements they've made about Tolkien's writings.

In Nerdrotic's video titled, "Amazon's Lord of the Rings Epic FAIL! The Vandalization of Tolkien and Fan ATTACKS have Begun"

Nerdrotic: "Galadriel did not take any part in the wars of the first age or any of the battles of the 2nd age"

Tolkien: "She was called Nerwen 'man-maiden' because of her strength and stature, and her courage." "She(Galadriel) fought fiercely against Feanor in defence of her mother's kin."
"Galadriel, the only woman of the Noldor to stand that day tall and valiant among the contending princes"
"Galadriel was then of Amazon disposition and bound up her hair as a crown when taking part in athletic feats"

You must think us imbeciles to fall for this.

Clearly, the word fight can only mean physical combat. Or flinging magic attacks in the middle of combat. Nope, can't mean anything else.  If it's there in the text - I meanin in the meaning of the text itself, not your personal desires crammed into the text by the disgusting dehumanizing means of deconstruction and subversion - just pull the quote where tolkein says Galadriel fought in the wars as a combatant. Which is what the subhuman to you nerdrotic was pointing out.

In the video titled: The Rings of Power: Tolkien in Name Only by JustSomeGuy

JustSomeGuy: "I've read the Silmarillion every year since 2003, I don't recall Galadriel being described as angry or brash"

Tolkien:
"But now she burned with desire to follow Fanor with her anger to whatever lands he might come, and to thwart him in all ways that she could."
The History of Middle-earth XII: The Peoples of Middle-earth, Chapter XI "The Shibboleth of Fanor"

You don't have to be angry or brash to burn with desire to do something, even to burn with desire to thwart someone in all the ways you can.

Are you so far lost to ignoring what the things people say mean that you don't even know what the words angry ... or...  brash mean?

JustSomeGuy: "What Army, she(Galadriel) was never part of any army during the second age"

Tolkien: "Galadriel chose Eregion because she knew of the Dwarves of Khazad-dm (Moria). ... she perceived from the beginning that Middle-earth could not be saved from "the residue of evil" that Morgoth had left behind him save by a union of all the peoples who were in their way and in their measure opposed to him. She looked upon the Dwarves also with the EYE OF A COMMANDER, seeing in them the finest warriors to pit against the Orcs"

So if you're not in a military army, you can't be a commander.

Ok than.

JustSomeGuy: "Middle-Earth is basically north-west Europe, mostly England."

Tolkien: "Not Nordic, please! A word I personally dislike; it is associated, though of French origin, with racialist theories. Geographically Northern is usually better. But examination will show that even this is inapplicable (geographically or spiritually) to 'Middle-earth'...This is not a purely 'Nordic' area in any sense. If Hobbiton and Rivendell are taken (as intended) to be at about the latitude of Oxford, then Minas Tirith, 600 miles south, is at about the latitude of Florence. The Mouths of Anduin and the ancient city of Pelargir are at about the latitude of ancient Troy."
"The progress of the tale ends in what is far more like the re-establishment of an effective Holy Roman Empire with its seat in Rome than anything that would be devised by a 'Nordic'. (Letter 294, dated 8 February 1967)"

You just quoted tolkein saying his work is ... "basically north west europe, mostly england."

You proved his point for him.

JustSomeGuy: "The native people of those areas are all white. So all the races of Middle-earth would be white"

Tolkien: Haradrim: "They have black eyes, and long black hair, and gold rings in their ears... lots of beautiful gold. And some have red paint on their cheeks, and red cloaks and their flags are red, and the tips of their spears; and they have round shields, yellow and black with big spikes"
"His corslet of overlapping brazen plates was rent and hewn, his black plaits of hair braided with gold were drenched with blood. His brown hand still clutched the hilt of a broken sword."

The men of Rhun: "These Men were short and broad, long and strong in the arm; their skins were swart or sallow, and their hair was dark as were their eyes."

Hobbits: "Before the crossing of the mountains the Hobbits had already become divided into three somewhat different breeds: Harfoots, Stoors, and Fallohides. The Harfoots were borwner of skin, smaller, and shorter, and they were beardless and bootless"

Samwise is a brown Harfoot Hobbit: "In his lap lay Frodo's head, drowned deep in sleep; upon his white forehead lay one of Sam's brown hands"

Haradrim:south of where tolken wrote about. In other words, SOUTH of the area JSG was talking about. Did you miss this, or are you playing shellgames and hoping nobody notices?

Rhun: Again. Not where he was talking about. It's to the stinking EAST OF MORDOR. JSG was NOT saying that everywhere in the entire fictional world was "white."

Samwise:So you're going to use sterotyping for no reason other than to serve your purposes. Browner of skin (harfoots) has to mean only what you want it to mean. Otherwise, you'd be wrong.

Even if these quotes don't somehow showcase that they have a clear bias.

Call out bias when exhibiting a startling amount of it yourself.

They show that there's a strange racial/sexual undertone that seems ignorant of the actual world Tolkien made.

No, it doesn't. If the words and genre people are using do not logically force this as a necessary conclusion, there's no tone there, under, over, or otherwise. It's just your thoughts being disrespectfully rammed down other's throats and being said to be theirs.

Tolkien's world IS diverse. It parallels a Europe that has Turkic and Mongol people ...

...

Hard eyeroll.

Turkey is not in europe. The mongols didn't make their base in or live in europe. IIRC the tatars didn't even live in europe. You're aware that russia is NOT european?

By the way, people are well aware of the shellgame with the word diverse. It can either mean the older meaning of diverse, or it can mean the new meaning, which is roughly "conforms to the latest pet causes of the political left of the western world."

If you don't think it can mean that, ask yourself if you would say thomas clarence or sowell or larry elder would count in your view as contributing to the "racial diversity" of anything where there aren't "black" (however you define that) people.

... of the steppes with its Easterlings and men of Rhun. It has Mediterranean people groups with its Gondorians, of both Numenorean lineage and native peoples. It has brown and dark haired men of ancient tribes and cultures living in its furthest recesses. It has its Africa in the southern reaches of Gondor and Harad, it has its Persia and Syria with the lands to the east and south. to the There are elves that travelled south and became unlike their kin in appearance and culture, whose children are indistinguishable from the children of men (Who aren't just white.)

Tolkien's world IS empowering to women: Luthien contended with the will Morgoth and Sauron, who took the form of a werewolf and vampire and saving Beren. Eowyn who slew the Witch King. Galadriel who threw down the walls and pits of Dol Guldur in Mirkwood and slew any evil escaping from it, cleansing the land.

How can anyone claim otherwise?
Tilt at windmills much?

You haven't really watched the videos of the people you're dehumanizing and trying to trash.

If you had, you'd know they wouldn't say that tolkien's fiction didn't have people who look that way (You people obsessed with how people physically look as if that means something more than they look that way ... you are a mess), or that there are not strong women in the setting either.

What they ARE (rightly) bashing and condemning is people changing already established characters to look physically different for no good reason beyond racism and ignorant childish thinking that physical looks means more than ... a person looks that way ... and they are bashing the idiotic stupid childish bull-feces that the only way a woman can be strong is if she is physically strong and operates in combat like superman, which dehumanizes and denigrates women and pushes the rotted in the head idea that they aren't being strong by exhibiting their strength in classically feminine ways.

That's a lot of words for that person to demonstrate they really don't get it.

It's their job to attract me, the consumer/customer, into liking their product so I want it, not berate me into accepting a substandard product because that's all they're capable of producing. That's their problem, not mine.

Eh, I knew it would be longer than most would bother to read.

Kudos to anyone who does.

People using phones to go on a forum and read/post are like guys using a .22 derringer for long range target shooting.

I wasn't critiquing your message, rather the person you were quoting.

Just a lot of words and mental gymnastics to try and justify their cultural vandalism.

I didn't think you were.

The dumb and disrespectful was so strong with the writer of that commentary I was fisking that I felt compelled to point out their errors and how they were being hateful and dehumanizing.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 12:45:12 AM EDT
[#29]
It’s all fantasy trash to begin with… who the fuck cares.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 12:45:55 AM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If we go by what the guy who actually created that world wrote then something like this:

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/258158/CED7DF16-207A-4A79-ACDC-C74736034DA4_jpe-2278347.JPG
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can someone show me exactly what a middle Earth elf looks like?

If we go by what the guy who actually created that world wrote then something like this:

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/258158/CED7DF16-207A-4A79-ACDC-C74736034DA4_jpe-2278347.JPG


So they went from looking like white fags to black fags… cool.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 12:54:49 AM EDT
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


So they went from looking like white fags to black fags… cool.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


So they went from looking like white fags to black fags… cool.

Quoted:
It’s all fantasy trash to begin with… who the fuck cares.

Quoted:


So they went from looking like white fags to black fags… cool.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 2:12:45 AM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It’s all fantasy trash to begin with… who the  cares.
View Quote

You.

Enough to talk about it and tell us we're having fun the wrong way.

After all, who could like a story that discusses the tragic elements of humanity, the feeling of what was lost after the fall of rome, that talked honestly about heroism, and adventures, and how those who go on and lvie through t hem find them to be hard and miserable and dark as they go through, and yet still benefit from them, and carry those things back home to their community in ways that help the community, and yet leave unseen scars that never fully heal. Also friendships forged in combat and hardship.

Such dumb things to discuss and find interesting. We are such 'tards for finding those topics compelling.  You know. Childish high fantasy crap.

ETA: Oh yeah and who could forget the moral midgetry of carrying an almost unfathomable burden in order to serve others. How pathetic and queer that is, amirite?

ETA2: and the author was just some stupid eggheaded wimp. So what if he went off to WW1 and fought in combat at some forgettable non-event called the battle of the somme. Just a dumb egghead.
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 3:12:24 AM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I’m not going to bother getting mad that made up beings are even more made up.
View Quote


This.  Don't get me wrong I don't think it's going to be any good and have no plans to watch it, and I'm sure it'll be full of woke nonsense, but the skin color of fantasy creatures seems like a poor target to hurl accusations at, even if they are described in the books.  Hell fantasy dwarves are often, dare I say usually, portrayed as dark skinned.  Yeah that's not so much true for elves, but is there any reason they couldn't be?
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 8:28:03 AM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Same shit with Wheel of Diversity. Take something cool and flat out ruin it.
View Quote


Yeah. Enjoyed the books but the diversity ruined the show. I made it through an episode.  
Link Posted: 5/28/2022 3:46:10 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Yeah. Enjoyed the books but the diversity ruined the show. I made it through an episode.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Same shit with Wheel of Diversity. Take something cool and flat out ruin it.


Yeah. Enjoyed the books but the diversity ruined the show. I made it through an episode.

At this point, I don't even call it diversity, because the only diversity it is is "physical looks" diversity.

Well, partly. Their "diversity" is  100% uniform to the point it can be checklisted.

Nowadays, I just call it what it is: Oh look. More disrespect. Because they hate.

The sad part is, nobody would care about how people looked or didn't in their flicks, if they could just have enough self control to stop weaponizing the way people look to show off their hatred of anyone they want to shove in a closet.
Link Posted: 6/3/2022 1:59:31 AM EDT
[#36]
https://archive.ph/doKmr

Empire’s The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power World-Exclusive Covers Revealed
by Ben Travis | Posted on01 06 2022
People:
J.D. Payne
Patrick McKay
J. A. Bayona
Morfydd Clark
Lenny Henry
Benjamin Walker
Robert Aramayo
Markella Kavenagh
Owain Arthur
Sophia Nomvete
Megan Richards

In the wake of the Lord Of The Rings movies, fantasy boomed on screens big and small – but no other fantastical world has had quite the majesty, the literary weight, or the cinematic scope of Middle-earth. J.R.R. Tolkien’s tales of Hobbits, Dark Lords, orcs, elves, goblins, and – of course – magical rings have resulted in some of the most expansive and exciting films of all time, changing the face of Hollywood and bringing the fantasy genre well and truly into the mainstream. Now, The Lord Of The Rings is about to change the game all over again with The Rings Of Power – a streaming series that takes the world you love and brings it back to the screen; just, not quite as you remember. Get ready: a whole new era of Middle-earth is about to unfold.

From 2 September, Amazon’s The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power will conjure up the Second Age of Middle-earth, an era thousands of years before the events of Peter Jackson’s movies – and the new issue of Empire takes a deep dive into the Prime Video series, exploring its epic scale, its many inhabitants, and its multi-year plan to tell a whole new tale in a beloved world. Inside, we speak to showrunners J.D. Payne and Patrick McKay, director J.A. Bayona, producer Ron Ames, and stars including Morfydd Clark, Lenny Henry, Robert Aramayo, Markella Kavenagh, and Benjamin Walker to get the hitherto untold inside story. Plus, the issue is packed with never-before-seen images of the sprawling ensemble cast and new locations. Your all-access return to Middle-earth starts here.

For this very special issue of Empire, we have three collectible covers (which may or may not have been forged in the fires of Mount Doom) to choose from – the first of which features Morfydd Clark’s combat-ready take on ethereal elf Galadriel.

Secondly, we have Dwarf Prince Durin IV (Owain Arthur) and Princess Disa (Sophia Nomvete), the rulers of Khazad-dûm.

And finally, we have the Harfoots – the precursors to the Hobbits, ready to take a hairy-footed step into a huge new story. Meet Megan Richards’ Poppy Proudfellow, Markella Kavenagh’s Elanor ‘Nori’ Brandyfoot, and Lenny Henry’s Sadoc Burrows.

Plus, we have our subscriber cover – featuring an exclusive piece of art by legendary concept artist John Howe, depicting a fearsome snow-troll.

It’s an epic new look at an epic new show – and there’s plenty more in the issue too, including a major look back at Batman Returns with director Tim Burton, the latest on Face/Off 2, the return of Avatar, and the hotly-anticipated Vol. 2 of Stranger Things Season 4. It’s an issue to rule them all – find it on newsstands from Thursday 9 June, or pre-order a copy online here.
Just so you know, whilst we may receive a commission or other compensation from the links on this website, we never allow this to influence product selections - read why you should trust us
View Quote



Masculine is the new feminine, I guess. May as well be a codpiece behind the chainmail.


Link Posted: 6/3/2022 9:37:43 PM EDT
[#37]
Galadriel airing out the rent receipt

Mama Shabooboo queen of the wee woke

Uncle Remus sings song of the shire
Link Posted: 6/3/2022 10:21:43 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Galadriel airing out the rent receipt

Mama Shabooboo queen of the wee woke

Uncle Remus sings song of the shire
View Quote

Link Posted: 6/12/2022 9:05:51 AM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
https://archive.org/details/tlotrunabridged
Fan made audiobook of the book, dramatized, I have been listening to it and so far it is very good.
View Quote
@FlashMan-7k

This post made the whole thread!
Link Posted: 6/12/2022 9:18:44 AM EDT
[#40]
No wonder there is such an issue with stolen jewelry in that story.
Link Posted: 6/12/2022 1:06:56 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
@FlashMan-7k

This post made the whole thread!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://archive.org/details/tlotrunabridged
Fan made audiobook of the book, dramatized, I have been listening to it and so far it is very good.
@FlashMan-7k

This post made the whole thread!

Ah. Someone AKSHUALLLLY listened to it.

Don't miss the hobbit one too.

If anything, it is done slightly better than the lotr one.
Link Posted: 6/12/2022 1:15:43 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
https://archive.ph/doKmr

Empire's The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power World-Exclusive Covers Revealed
by Ben Travis | Posted on01 06 2022
People:
J.D. Payne
Patrick McKay
J. A. Bayona
Morfydd Clark
Lenny Henry
Benjamin Walker
Robert Aramayo
Markella Kavenagh
Owain Arthur
Sophia Nomvete
Megan Richards

In the wake of the Lord Of The Rings movies, fantasy boomed on screens big and small  but no other fantastical world has had quite the majesty, the literary weight, or the cinematic scope of Middle-earth. J.R.R. Tolkien's tales of Hobbits, Dark Lords, orcs, elves, goblins, and  of course  magical rings have resulted in some of the most expansive and exciting films of all time, changing the face of Hollywood and bringing the fantasy genre well and truly into the mainstream. Now, The Lord Of The Rings is about to change the game all over again with The Rings Of Power  a streaming series that takes the world you love and brings it back to the screen; just, not quite as you remember. Get ready: a whole new era of Middle-earth is about to unfold.

From 2 September, Amazon's The Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power will conjure up the Second Age of Middle-earth, an era thousands of years before the events of Peter Jackson's movies  and the new issue of Empire takes a deep dive into the Prime Video series, exploring its epic scale, its many inhabitants, and its multi-year plan to tell a whole new tale in a beloved world. Inside, we speak to showrunners J.D. Payne and Patrick McKay, director J.A. Bayona, producer Ron Ames, and stars including Morfydd Clark, Lenny Henry, Robert Aramayo, Markella Kavenagh, and Benjamin Walker to get the hitherto untold inside story. Plus, the issue is packed with never-before-seen images of the sprawling ensemble cast and new locations. Your all-access return to Middle-earth starts here.

For this very special issue of Empire, we have three collectible covers (which may or may not have been forged in the fires of Mount Doom) to choose from  the first of which features Morfydd Clark's combat-ready take on ethereal elf Galadriel.

Secondly, we have Dwarf Prince Durin IV (Owain Arthur) and Princess Disa (Sophia Nomvete), the rulers of Khazad-dm.

And finally, we have the Harfoots  the precursors to the Hobbits, ready to take a hairy-footed step into a huge new story. Meet Megan Richards' Poppy Proudfellow, Markella Kavenagh's Elanor 'Nori' Brandyfoot, and Lenny Henry's Sadoc Burrows.

Plus, we have our subscriber cover  featuring an exclusive piece of art by legendary concept artist John Howe, depicting a fearsome snow-troll.

It's an epic new look at an epic new show  and there's plenty more in the issue too, including a major look back at Batman Returns with director Tim Burton, the latest on Face/Off 2, the return of Avatar, and the hotly-anticipated Vol. 2 of Stranger Things Season 4. It's an issue to rule them all  find it on newsstands from Thursday 9 June, or pre-order a copy online here.
Just so you know, whilst we may receive a commission or other compensation from the links on this website, we never allow this to influence product selections - read why you should trust us


https://archive.ph/doKmr/5eaf25de7fd2ea81bb08929ddc8b7e697dd8743f.jpg
Masculine is the new feminine, I guess. May as well be a codpiece behind the chainmail.
https://archive.ph/doKmr/7084836b77abef1bde5592a9a6f2cf36bb51ecf5.jpg

https://archive.ph/doKmr/1e3439b99091ad46c6f73178d20e95cbc5ec0c8e.jpg
Gonna be a steaming pile of shit
Link Posted: 6/12/2022 3:35:03 PM EDT
[#43]
Amazon's PR Disaster | LOTR: The Rings of Power Looks AWFUL
Link Posted: 6/12/2022 5:39:01 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Are they going to get Stacey Abrams to be the leader of Middle Earth?
View Quote


golfclap.gif
Link Posted: 6/24/2022 2:37:10 PM EDT
[#45]
Are Tolkien's Lord of the Rings Movies & Series using the WRONG WEAPONS?
Link Posted: 6/26/2022 9:49:33 PM EDT
[#46]


Link Posted: 6/27/2022 12:54:17 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV1BrawWQAMm3nU?format=png&name=small
View Quote
Orcs: "we're into conquest, murder, rape, torture and genocide.  But sex discrimination is a bridge too far."
Link Posted: 6/27/2022 3:00:02 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Orcs: "we're into conquest, murder, rape, torture and genocide.  But sex discrimination is a bridge too far."
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FV1BrawWQAMm3nU?format=png&name=small
Orcs: "we're into conquest, murder, rape, torture and genocide.  But sex discrimination is a bridge too far."

Link Posted: 7/3/2022 6:02:39 PM EDT
[#49]
Amazon SUBVERTS Lord of the Rings | Rings of Girl Power: A Rationalized DISASTER
Link Posted: 7/14/2022 4:04:23 PM EDT
[#50]
Page / 28
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top