User Panel
I may be the only one that does like crosshairs. I never hear anyone else mention them. It's always chevron or horseshoe.
|
|
|
Quoted: They work better with night vision with dimmer tritium. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Once the tritium dims, they are great for daylight shooting but suck for low light, especially red. They work better with night vision with dimmer tritium. |
|
Quoted:
<a href="http://s748.photobucket.com/user/ragincajun1919/media/B8286169-FE77-480E-B2A0-B7829F0F39D8_zpsmculeyq1.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx125/ragincajun1919/B8286169-FE77-480E-B2A0-B7829F0F39D8_zpsmculeyq1.jpg</a> View Quote Yay CWAR! |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Once the tritium dims, they are great for daylight shooting but suck for low light, especially red. They work better with night vision with dimmer tritium. http://s20.postimg.org/wd3jhrnsd/DSCN1816.jpg |
|
Quoted:
I'm just here for the gangbang. I brought dickmod. <a href="http://s169.photobucket.com/user/MagiKBullet/media/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg</a> View Quote At least the general awesomeness and many good choices of that gun slightly offset the gross dickmods on the front. |
|
Quoted: http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx125/ragincajun1919/B8286169-FE77-480E-B2A0-B7829F0F39D8_zpsmculeyq1.jpg View Quote I wonder which one ragincajun likes the most?? All these pictures have me wondering... all of you guys have yours mounted in the same position more or less... the objective lens is almost always lined up directly with the CH. Is this because ya'll shoot NTCH? Every one of you? I'm not a NTCH guy but I'm not very far off so, Is there any particular reason not to mount a TA31 farther back to alleviate the short eye relief? I don't plan on using back up irons seeing as... well if my acog isn't working my gun is probably effed anyways, right? So I should have plenty of room to move mine back a couple picatinny slots. |
|
I shoot NTCH and that's how my 31 is positioned. I have my 33 a bit further forward.
|
|
Quoted:
I may be the only one that does like crosshairs. I never hear anyone else mention them. It's always chevron or horseshoe. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I may be the only one that does like crosshairs. I never hear anyone else mention them. It's always chevron or horseshoe. For the 31 and 33, the chevron and horseshoe are popular yeah. My plebeian NSN has crosshairs and I like it. Quoted:
I wonder which one ragincajun likes the most?? All these pictures have me wondering... all of you guys have yours mounted in the same position more or less... the objective lens is almost always lined up directly with the CH. Is this because ya'll shoot NTCH? Every one of you? I'm not a NTCH guy but I'm not very far off so, Is there any particular reason not to mount a TA31 farther back to alleviate the short eye relief? I don't plan on using back up irons seeing as... well if my acog isn't working my gun is probably effed anyways, right? So I should have plenty of room to move mine back a couple picatinny slots. For the 01/31, you have to shoot NTCH or mount the ACOG further back. The LaRue RCO mount will mount further back than the 4x DOS. The 33's eye relief is longer, but not that much longer. So, mounting in the same spot moves the shooter's head back. ACOGs are certainly hard to break... |
|
Quoted: For the 31 and 33, the chevron and horseshoe are popular yeah. My plebeian NSN has crosshairs and I like it. For the 01/31, you have to shoot NTCH or mount the ACOG further back. The LaRue RCO mount will mount further back than the 4x DOS. The 33's eye relief is longer, but not that much longer. So, mounting in the same spot moves the shooter's head back. ACOGs are certainly hard to break... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I may be the only one that does like crosshairs. I never hear anyone else mention them. It's always chevron or horseshoe. For the 31 and 33, the chevron and horseshoe are popular yeah. My plebeian NSN has crosshairs and I like it. Quoted: I wonder which one ragincajun likes the most?? All these pictures have me wondering... all of you guys have yours mounted in the same position more or less... the objective lens is almost always lined up directly with the CH. Is this because ya'll shoot NTCH? Every one of you? I'm not a NTCH guy but I'm not very far off so, Is there any particular reason not to mount a TA31 farther back to alleviate the short eye relief? I don't plan on using back up irons seeing as... well if my acog isn't working my gun is probably effed anyways, right? So I should have plenty of room to move mine back a couple picatinny slots. For the 01/31, you have to shoot NTCH or mount the ACOG further back. The LaRue RCO mount will mount further back than the 4x DOS. The 33's eye relief is longer, but not that much longer. So, mounting in the same spot moves the shooter's head back. ACOGs are certainly hard to break... Right but is there some specific reason you guys aren't mounting you 31's farther back other than that's where you like it? I wouldn't do this but could I theoretically mount mine as far back as it goes to allow more stock extension? I just never see anybody mount it any farther back than objective lens = charging handle. |
|
|
View Quote i can't afford the full monty CWAR makeover right now, but damned if i haven't started doing the earplug thingy. was an instant addition to the "why didn't i think of that?" file. |
|
Quoted: Why would you replace an EoTech with an ACOG? Get an MRO View Quote Because I have learned over the last year that 90% of the shooting I do these days is 200+ yards. The Eotech did fine out to 500, I could hit just about anything. Once I got out to 600 and 700 yards I was only hitting about 50% of my shots and that wasn't good enough for me. I'll build another MRO rifle someday, but the Acog will come first. |
|
|
I hope Trijicon will build a baby ACOG with the same magnification as the low setting on a VCOG. Their attempts at an Aimpoint competitor have too many issues for my tastes.
|
|
Quoted:
At least the general awesomeness and many good choices of that gun slightly offset the gross dickmods on the front. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm just here for the gangbang. I brought dickmod. <a href="http://s169.photobucket.com/user/MagiKBullet/media/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg</a> At least the general awesomeness and many good choices of that gun slightly offset the gross dickmods on the front. thanks man |
|
Quoted: http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/tumblr_m52dy0RNXR1qhekpro3_250.gif thanks man View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm just here for the gangbang. I brought dickmod. <a href="http://s169.photobucket.com/user/MagiKBullet/media/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg</a> At least the general awesomeness and many good choices of that gun slightly offset the gross dickmods on the front. http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/tumblr_m52dy0RNXR1qhekpro3_250.gif thanks man Forgive my ignorance, but what on gods green earth is a "dickmod"? |
|
Quoted:
Forgive my ignorance, but what on gods green earth is a "dickmod"? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm just here for the gangbang. I brought dickmod. <a href="http://s169.photobucket.com/user/MagiKBullet/media/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg</a> At least the general awesomeness and many good choices of that gun slightly offset the gross dickmods on the front. http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/tumblr_m52dy0RNXR1qhekpro3_250.gif thanks man Forgive my ignorance, but what on gods green earth is a "dickmod"? keymod slots in the rail look like dick and balls. |
|
Quoted: keymod slots in the rail look like dick and balls. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'm just here for the gangbang. I brought dickmod. <a href="http://s169.photobucket.com/user/MagiKBullet/media/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/2015-09-10%2000.45.38.jpg</a> At least the general awesomeness and many good choices of that gun slightly offset the gross dickmods on the front. http://i169.photobucket.com/albums/u239/MagiKBullet/tumblr_m52dy0RNXR1qhekpro3_250.gif thanks man Forgive my ignorance, but what on gods green earth is a "dickmod"? keymod slots in the rail look like dick and balls. Hahaha |
|
Quoted:
The LaRue mount is too low. Currently, only the factory or the Bobro high mounts put it at the correct height. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
105, of course. The LaRue mount is too low. Currently, only the factory or the Bobro high mounts put it at the correct height. The Midwest Industries mount is higher also but I don't know if it's the height anyone considers "correct". I prefer the Larue height on my TA44, and the MI mount is noticeably higher. |
|
View Quote Are ta33's as durable as 31's? |
|
Quoted:
i can't afford the full monty CWAR makeover right now, but damned if i haven't started doing the earplug thingy. was an instant addition to the "why didn't i think of that?" file. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
i can't afford the full monty CWAR makeover right now, but damned if i haven't started doing the earplug thingy. was an instant addition to the "why didn't i think of that?" file. I had a similar idea back when I used to do reenacting (and had a tendency to forget my earplugs, which never stopped me from participating). I wasn't using the patchbox for anything and figured it would be a good place to put my earplugs so I'd never forget them again, since I kind of needed the rifle to do what I was doing. They're still in there well over a decade later. |
|
Quoted:
Are ta33's as durable as 31's? Why wouldn't they be? They're just different magnification levels, etc. It's the same basic optic. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah this. Close stuff, AImpoint T-1/2 General purpose gun- ACOG TA33 I have a Mark6 1-6 and like it a lot for hunting and ranges past 500m, but I am not nearly as fast with it even on 1x as with a TA33. TA33 is the bestest general purpose optic for AR. http://i.imgur.com/C4xrXtB.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What is the role of the rifle? Yeah this. Close stuff, AImpoint T-1/2 General purpose gun- ACOG TA33 I have a Mark6 1-6 and like it a lot for hunting and ranges past 500m, but I am not nearly as fast with it even on 1x as with a TA33. TA33 is the bestest general purpose optic for AR. http://i.imgur.com/C4xrXtB.jpg trufiest post. I have a PST 1-4x, but I'd take my TA33 at distance over that just because of how quick I can be with that ACOG. I have another AR lying around, it'll end up with a TA33 or TA11 on it eventually. |
|
Quoted: Why wouldn't they be? They're just different magnification levels, etc. It's the same basic optic. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Are ta33's as durable as 31's? Why wouldn't they be? They're just different magnification levels, etc. It's the same basic optic. I don't know... That's why I asked. The 31 seems much more robust to me but I have no idea. |
|
Quoted:
I don't know... That's why I asked. The 31 seems much more robust to me but I have no idea. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Are ta33's as durable as 31's? Why wouldn't they be? They're just different magnification levels, etc. It's the same basic optic. I don't know... That's why I asked. The 31 seems much more robust to me but I have no idea. I'd argue the TA33 has a weak point in the objective housing being threaded into the main body casting, where the TA01/31/11 all house the objective lens in that main casting. But it's theoretical because I've never heard of the front falling off anyone's TA33. |
|
After all of this I still can't decide. I think I really need to use them before I buy one.
|
|
Quoted:
I'd argue the TA33 has a weak point in the objective housing being threaded into the main body casting, View Quote Never, seen any problems related to the objective housing, I have had the rear lens unscrew on an older one using a LaRue Doctor mount on it, didn't break or anything just got loose. The new kind dont have the screw in rears though, which is nice. That being said Ive been on my older ones pretty hard and I have one about 8-9 years old thats holding up fine. |
|
this thread might make me spend sum money...
i've been debating the Leupold Leupold Mark 4 1.5-5x20mm MR/T M2, V the Acog. i already have an aimpoint, and a long range AR. i just need something in the medium long range |
|
I have a TA31F. Love it. It sits on a Dissipator as I write this.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Never, seen any problems related to the objective housing, I have had the rear lens unscrew on an older one using a LaRue Doctor mount on it, didn't break or anything just got loose. The new kind dont have the screw in rears though, which is nice. That being said Ive been on my older ones pretty hard and I have one about 8-9 years old thats holding up fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd argue the TA33 has a weak point in the objective housing being threaded into the main body casting, Never, seen any problems related to the objective housing, I have had the rear lens unscrew on an older one using a LaRue Doctor mount on it, didn't break or anything just got loose. The new kind dont have the screw in rears though, which is nice. That being said Ive been on my older ones pretty hard and I have one about 8-9 years old thats holding up fine. Good to know. |
|
Quoted: NOPE! I love the crosshairs on the TA01NSN. Never cared for stoooopid chevron or horseshoe. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I may be the only one that does like crosshairs. I never hear anyone else mention them. It's always chevron or horseshoe. NOPE! I love the crosshairs on the TA01NSN. Never cared for stoooopid chevron or horseshoe. I'll be going with the ACSS reticle for sure. At least I know that! Ha |
|
Quoted: TA45 with the triangle on the carbine, TA01 on the rifle http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af236/onehalfmvsquared/hobby/BCM16LWwACOG15_zps2cf32a71.jpg http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af236/onehalfmvsquared/hobby/BCM%2020%20FF%20ACOG_zpsdsjpjied.jpg View Quote Any reason you didn't get dual illuminated optic on the rifle? |
|
Quoted: Any reason you didn't get dual illuminated optic on the rifle? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: TA45 with the triangle on the carbine, TA01 on the rifle http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af236/onehalfmvsquared/hobby/BCM16LWwACOG15_zps2cf32a71.jpg http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af236/onehalfmvsquared/hobby/BCM%2020%20FF%20ACOG_zpsdsjpjied.jpg Any reason you didn't get dual illuminated optic on the rifle? |
|
Quoted: TA45 with the triangle on the carbine, TA01 on the rifle http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af236/onehalfmvsquared/hobby/BCM16LWwACOG15_zps2cf32a71.jpg http://i1011.photobucket.com/albums/af236/onehalfmvsquared/hobby/BCM%2020%20FF%20ACOG_zpsdsjpjied.jpg View Quote PS, I took both of these out to 300 yards yesterday on a steel torso silhouette using Guatemalan M193 ammo. I have done most (all?) of my shooting at less than 200 yards. The TA01 was very easy to use from prone, kneeling and standing. I could make headshots regularly from prone, and center of mass shots were boringly simple. But what surprised me was the TA45. I could also easily hit center of mass from prone if I took my time. The clarity of the optic, even with the low 1.5x power, was very helpful. Standing offhand I could hit the steel about 60% o the time. The 1.5x ACOG is certainly capable of being a 300+ yard optic |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
ACOGs are great until the tritium dims. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes they you pay to rebuild it if it's out of warranty. Trijicon got my 01 on Tuesday. Waiting to hear from them how much to rebuild. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.