User Panel
Quoted: So you either can't, or won't, verbalize exactly what about AJ's behavior regarding Sandy Hook you support his freedom to do. That's good, because he is getting the punishment he deserves. Happy you recognize it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: LOL, the audience I need knows. The audience I don't give a flip can guess I suppose. Its not that hard. So you either can't, or won't, verbalize exactly what about AJ's behavior regarding Sandy Hook you support his freedom to do. That's good, because he is getting the punishment he deserves. Happy you recognize it. AJ is an entertainer. He can be a clown. He has also hit a few hot button issues that have panned out. Sandy Hook and 9/11 were not those. Do we make him pay because he hurt your feelings? Apparently you think so. Those who got dinged over Nick Sandman and Kyle Rittenhouse got dinged for calling out an individual and specifically assassinating their individual characters. But you go ahead and write your narrative of what you think I believe. That whole time I laugh at you and your fake stance to support freedom. I got more to say but CoC. You have shown yourself for a while now here. I laugh at you, not with you. AJ is another one living rent free in your head. |
|
Quoted: Gotta love the conservatives that thought Saddam had nukes and that George Bush really had secret intelligence somewhere about the WMD program now lecturing about conspiracies and disinformation lol View Quote Attached File I'm betting there was a time here when you couldn't say that without an account lock. |
|
Quoted: Write your own little narrative, its cute. Nothing about what I have heard him say on Sandy Hook is worth making him pay 45 million dollars. I don't buy into what he said about Sandy Hook, sugar. But he was free to say it. I am not aware that he called any individual out by name. I am not aware that he told anybody to attack anybody else. Did he write about a book about it too? You seem to know more about him than I do. But the guy who wrote the speculation book has not been made to pay that I know of. AJ is an entertainer. He can be a clown. He has also hit a few hot button issues that have panned out. Sandy Hook and 9/11 were not those. Do we make him pay because he hurt your feelings? Apparently you think so. Those who got dinged over Nick Sandman and Kyle Rittenhouse got dinged for calling out an individual and specifically assassinating their individual characters. But you go ahead and write your narrative of what you think I believe. That whole time I laugh at you and your fake stance to support freedom. I got more to say but CoC. You have shown yourself for a while now here. I laugh at you, not with you. AJ is another one living rent free in your head. View Quote Luckily for you, being wrong is protected by the 1A. What AJ did is not. |
|
|
Quoted: Luckily for you, being wrong is protected by the 1A. What AJ did is not. View Quote I wish the federal government would outlaw you. Put you in jail or fine you 45 million for all these type posts you have made on internet forums. See how statist a thought that is? Probably not, doubt you can see it. |
|
Quoted: I will take a page out of your book. I wish the federal government would outlaw you. Put you in jail or fine you 45 million for all these type posts you have made on internet forums. See how statist a thought that is? Probably not, doubt you can see it. View Quote Let’s say I have a radio station where millions of people tune in. I decide to come up with a whackjob theory that the firemen at station XYZ (whichever one you work at) are running a child sex trafficking ring. Those millions of listeners believe me. I wouldn’t mention you by name, but my accusations result in a decade of harassment and intimidation at your place of work. Those followers find out where you live. They stalk you at your house. They make death threats against you and your family. Your life is ruined. This is the “freedom” you are advocating for. |
|
Quoted: Let's say I have a radio station where millions of people tune in. I decide to come up with a whackjob theory that the firemen at station XYZ (whichever one you work at) are running a child sex trafficking ring. Those millions of listeners believe me. I wouldn't mention you by name, but my accusations result in a decade of harassment and intimidation at your place of work. Those followers find out where you live. They stalk you at your house. They make death threats against you and your family. Your life is ruined. This is the "freedom" you are advocating for. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I will take a page out of your book. I wish the federal government would outlaw you. Put you in jail or fine you 45 million for all these type posts you have made on internet forums. See how statist a thought that is? Probably not, doubt you can see it. Let's say I have a radio station where millions of people tune in. I decide to come up with a whackjob theory that the firemen at station XYZ (whichever one you work at) are running a child sex trafficking ring. Those millions of listeners believe me. I wouldn't mention you by name, but my accusations result in a decade of harassment and intimidation at your place of work. Those followers find out where you live. They stalk you at your house. They make death threats against you and your family. Your life is ruined. This is the "freedom" you are advocating for. No worse than saying it about drone pilots I guess. |
|
Quoted: Sex trafficking ring? Goal posts moved. No worse than saying it about drone pilots I guess. View Quote Well Lug, believe what you want. You have the right to be wrong. And if you can’t understand what a simple analogy is, we are likely done. The first amendment doesn’t give you the right to say whatever you want, free from consequences. The torts referenced in the lawsuit are older than our nation. AJ fucked up, and now he is facing the consequences. Rightfully so. It can only be explained to you. It’s up to you to understand it. |
|
The only thing I really remember as far as the conspiracy part is the one dad laughing before going on camera.
Now I understand people grieve differently but at the same time if that's the guy that's suing him he wasn't exactly sitting at home crying and some mean dude beat the door down and accused him of stuff. |
|
Quoted: Well Lug, believe what you want. You have the right to be wrong. And if you can't understand what a simple analogy is, we are likely done. The first amendment doesn't give you the right to say whatever you want, free from consequences. The torts referenced in the lawsuit are older than our nation. AJ fucked up, and now he is facing the consequences. Rightfully so. It can only be explained to you. It's up to you to understand it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Sex trafficking ring? Goal posts moved. No worse than saying it about drone pilots I guess. Well Lug, believe what you want. You have the right to be wrong. And if you can't understand what a simple analogy is, we are likely done. The first amendment doesn't give you the right to say whatever you want, free from consequences. The torts referenced in the lawsuit are older than our nation. AJ fucked up, and now he is facing the consequences. Rightfully so. It can only be explained to you. It's up to you to understand it. At the end of the day I know what team you play for. Oh enjoy your dental plan. Well until certain laws are passed by a statist group who decide you are not favored. |
|
Quoted: LoL . We can back and forth all day "you're wrong" "no you're wrong" At the end of the day I know what team you play for. Oh enjoy your dental plan. Well until certain laws are passed by a statist group who decide you are not favored. View Quote What team do I play for? The one that understands the law, and right vs. wrong? |
|
|
View Quote So you “know what team I play for”, but won’t say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. |
|
Quoted: So you “know what team I play for”, but won’t say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: So you "know what team I play for", but won't say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: So you "know what team I play for", but won't say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. You serious Clark? |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: So you “know what team I play for”, but won’t say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: So you “know what team I play for”, but won’t say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. Attached File |
|
Quoted: Well, that's not what Alex Jones said. He literally just stood there in multiple videos chanting "9/11 was an inside job," and I'm curious if Mr. Dover agrees with that. ETA: Do you think 9/11 was an inside job? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The only thing more entertaining than Alex Jones are the "aLeX jOnEs WaS rIgHt!!11!!" people that actually take his circus act seriously. Most of those folks are almost certainly unfamiliar with the early Jones before, about half way through the Obama years, he realized there was less money in the hardcore tinfoil "9/11 WuZ aN iNsIdE jOb!!11!!!" crew and started hitching his act to the "1776 wIlL CoMmEnCe AgAiN!!11!!" "patriot" movement. For example, here's Jones in 2008 harassing Michelle Malkin, who was busy bringing the border crisis to light through the Bush years, raving about her wanting to put "us" in FEMA camps: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMgllS413Q The Skull and Bones, Buildabears, and the military-industrial complex was behind 9/11 in 2004: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jznltrb4JT4 And some ranting/chanting about the CFR and 9/11 being an inside job in 2006: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbdOa83nSNs A real patriot! Wonder when the last time Jones got so worked up about Skull and Bones... Maybe they're just not cool enough to hate anymore. That said, Jones should be allowed to be as as he wants (especially to grift the gullible out of their money, which I fully support!) within the bounds of slander and libel. Apparently he really sucks at hiring attorneys. So you think bilderberg group, council for foreign relations, the world economic forum, trilateral commission are all made up? You think skull and bones isn't real? Lmfao ok bro. Did they help pull off 9/11? Nah, but they did cover up the involvement of the Saudi royal family and Paki ISI for 20 years. Literally the people that hid that from the public belong to those NGOs and social clubs. And they did it to start wars on false pretenses to build their wealth and to protect their power and investments. Well, that's not what Alex Jones said. He literally just stood there in multiple videos chanting "9/11 was an inside job," and I'm curious if Mr. Dover agrees with that. ETA: Do you think 9/11 was an inside job? No I don't. I think the government knew about and could've stopped it but didn't, maybe not intentionally but due to incompetence |
|
Quoted: So you “know what team I play for”, but won’t say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: So you “know what team I play for”, but won’t say it? Come on. When you are forced to resort to irrelevant ad hominems and memes, instead of actual points, recognize you lost the debate. At least you have recognized that people have stopped "debating" you. |
|
Quoted:
View Quote That is wonderful but he severely screwed up his career and life with saying Sandy Hook didn't happen. |
|
Quoted: No I don't. I think the government knew about and could've stopped it but didn't, maybe not intentionally but due to incompetence View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The only thing more entertaining than Alex Jones are the "aLeX jOnEs WaS rIgHt!!11!!" people that actually take his circus act seriously. Most of those folks are almost certainly unfamiliar with the early Jones before, about half way through the Obama years, he realized there was less money in the hardcore tinfoil "9/11 WuZ aN iNsIdE jOb!!11!!!" crew and started hitching his act to the "1776 wIlL CoMmEnCe AgAiN!!11!!" "patriot" movement. For example, here's Jones in 2008 harassing Michelle Malkin, who was busy bringing the border crisis to light through the Bush years, raving about her wanting to put "us" in FEMA camps: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQMgllS413Q The Skull and Bones, Buildabears, and the military-industrial complex was behind 9/11 in 2004: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jznltrb4JT4 And some ranting/chanting about the CFR and 9/11 being an inside job in 2006: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbdOa83nSNs A real patriot! Wonder when the last time Jones got so worked up about Skull and Bones... Maybe they're just not cool enough to hate anymore. That said, Jones should be allowed to be as as he wants (especially to grift the gullible out of their money, which I fully support!) within the bounds of slander and libel. Apparently he really sucks at hiring attorneys. So you think bilderberg group, council for foreign relations, the world economic forum, trilateral commission are all made up? You think skull and bones isn't real? Lmfao ok bro. Did they help pull off 9/11? Nah, but they did cover up the involvement of the Saudi royal family and Paki ISI for 20 years. Literally the people that hid that from the public belong to those NGOs and social clubs. And they did it to start wars on false pretenses to build their wealth and to protect their power and investments. Well, that's not what Alex Jones said. He literally just stood there in multiple videos chanting "9/11 was an inside job," and I'm curious if Mr. Dover agrees with that. ETA: Do you think 9/11 was an inside job? No I don't. I think the government knew about and could've stopped it but didn't, maybe not intentionally but due to incompetence Similar to Pearl Harbor. We were made aware, but it wasn't deliberate it was bureaucracy. |
|
Anyone else get a coc violation “911 truther” because of this post?
|
|
Quoted: The only thing I really remember as far as the conspiracy part is the one dad laughing before going on camera. Now I understand people grieve differently but at the same time if that's the guy that's suing him he wasn't exactly sitting at home crying and some mean dude beat the door down and accused him of stuff. View Quote That guy isn’t one of the plaintiffs. That was super weird though. I’d say that guy laughing it up and then getting into character for the camera made more people think it was a hoax than the 90 minutes that Jones covered it over 6 years. Alex Jones covered shit other people were saying because Steve Pieczenick told him that it was a made for TV wag the dog production. For whatever reason Jones has always been a sucker for whatever BS Pieczenick says. |
|
Quoted: I will take a page out of your book. I wish the federal government would outlaw you. Put you in jail or fine you 45 million for all these type posts you have made on internet forums. See how statist a thought that is? Probably not, doubt you can see it. View Quote The federal goverent has not "outlawed" Alex Jones, nor have they put him in jail or "fined" him. AJ lost a civil case brought against him by a fellow citizen(s). Your example would actually violate the First Amendment. This post is a great example of how utterly clueless you are regarding this issue. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Could you define "NeverTrump" for us? Like "racist" or "homophobic", it seems to be a term that gets thrown around a lot without much regard to situation so seems to have a bit of a nebulous meaning these days. I'd just like some clarification. Also, maybe you could share some more member tales from all your years spent lurking. In fact, I'd like to hear more on your thoughts on Bullet_Sponge's posting style since you're so familiar with them. (Also, a photographic memory would have remembered his underscore, especially given what a hot topic they are. That's how a photographic memory works. ) https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/519224/Screenshot__99_-2479821.png lol You keep using that word "never". I don't think that word means what you think it means. Attached File (I accidentally deleted my 2020 ballot pic I took. ) Oh and... Attached File |
|
Quoted: I'm not part of any "ilk". I like to read various topics in GD but its hard to when you and your pals with your superiority complex parachute in to correct everyone. You too can just not shit in threads but I doubt thats possible for someone like you. Your whole schtick, besides coming off as unhinged, is to ridicule those you think are not as smart as you. Nobody needs you to "correct" their thinking. The owners of this site control what can and cannot be discussed. Its not your job. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: I will take a page out of your book. I wish the federal government would outlaw you. Put you in jail or fine you 45 million for all these type posts you have made on internet forums. See how statist a thought that is? Probably not, doubt you can see it. View Quote You have must alluded to an interesting phenomenon playing out right here and now. Alex Jones is a polarizing figure, as he separates the freedom loving Americans from the big government regulation loving Statists. |
|
Quoted: You have must alluded to an interesting phenomenon playing out right here and now. Alex Jones is a polarizing figure, as he separates the freedom loving Americans from the big government regulation loving Statists. View Quote You understand this is a civil suit, right? Right? The government, nor the first amendment, have not a thing to do with this. |
|
Quoted: You understand this is a civil suit, right? Right? The government, nor the first amendment, have not a thing to do with this. View Quote They don't understand. They will also be the ones cheering (rightfully so) if or when Kyle breaks in off in the MSM outlets if they ever go to court. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The term "rent free in your head". I see it said all the time here, i wonder if they know it doesnt really mean shit..lol. Is that supposed to be an insult? I don't see how it does as it wouldn't bother me...at all.. so kinda dumb I guess
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: QFT. Look carefully at the enemies and detractors Alex Jones has. You will soon realize that they are all the same type of people. Not morons? *Says the guy siding with a blue haired crazy bitch that would put him in a little cage for owning a gun after she attempted to bankrupt another guy for saying words 10 years ago. |
|
Quoted: *Says the guy siding with a blue haired crazy bitch that would put him in a little cage for owning a gun after she attempted to bankrupt another guy for saying words 10 years ago. View Quote I didn't know I needed to side with anyone to recognize that Alex Jones is and always was a fucking clown. |
|
Quoted: https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/nicholas-sandmann-937.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=744 So which is this guy? A freedom loving American or a big government regulation loving statist who violated CNN's first amenent rights? View Quote Curious to see if any of them will show up to defend CNN’s “freedom” to defame Sandmann. |
|
Quoted: I didn't know I needed to side with anyone to recognize that Alex Jones is and always was a fucking clown. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: *Says the guy siding with a blue haired crazy bitch that would put him in a little cage for owning a gun after she attempted to bankrupt another guy for saying words 10 years ago. I didn't know I needed to side with anyone to recognize that Alex Jones is and always was a fucking clown. I didn’t know jello could talk. |
|
Quoted: What team do I play for? The one that understands the law, and right vs. wrong? View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/nicholas-sandmann-937.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=744 So which is this guy? A freedom loving American or a big government regulation loving statist who violated CNN's first amenent rights? View Quote I have seen AJ call out no names. Just be clown shoes about the whole event. That hurt some feelz, including yours. I think it was classless but not 45 million classless. Try, if you can, to wrap your cluelessness around that. |
|
Quoted: https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/nicholas-sandmann-937.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=744 So which is this guy? A freedom loving American or a big government regulation loving statist who violated CNN's first amenent rights? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: You have must alluded to an interesting phenomenon playing out right here and now. Alex Jones is a polarizing figure, as he separates the freedom loving Americans from the big government regulation loving Statists. https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/nicholas-sandmann-937.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=744 So which is this guy? A freedom loving American or a big government regulation loving statist who violated CNN's first amenent rights? |
|
|
Quoted: Let me spoon feed you since you have trouble sounding it out. He was specifcially attacked and defamed. They lied about him specifically attributing things he did not do. They made him into a racist. I have seen AJ call out no names. Just be clown shoes about the whole event. That hurt some feelz, including yours. I think it was classless but not 45 million classless. Try, if you can, to wrap your cluelessness around that. View Quote Why are you hung up on the “No names”. It is no secret who the parents of the Sandy Hook victims are, and there aren’t that many of them. Your point is entirely irrelevant. |
|
Quoted: And still manages to be right more than 50% of the time 6 months later. Lol, Im no Jones fan but he's right more than the "legitimate" press that lies and defames entire classes of people in this country daily and faces zero consequences or repercussions. View Quote You know, the lawsuit in question. The only reason he's in the news now. He's a cross between Howard Stern and Springer. Maybe some Jim Bakker involved, gotta whip up the believers. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.