User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:05:42 AM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wake me up when you have proof there was no Elizabeth Carlisle employed at DOJ by Lynch, ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
LOL. This is too awesome. See, you're under the delusion that the emails are the only ones ever sent by Loretta Lynch or Elizabeth Carlisle. As if there are only 400 emails total in existence and that only one has the full email address for E. Carlisle. How delightfully naive! ACLJ did a FOIA request wanting emails between Loretta Lynch and others specifically regarding the Lynch-Clinton meetup. They had no idea about Carlisle email. The DOJ and FBI provided them, as the Freedom of Information Act requires, though Comey first tried to lie about it and tried to stall it. They inadvertantly included that one incriminating email from Carlisle because let's face it, the people working for the US federal govt aren't know for their reasoning skills. Afterwards somebody went through the emails and noticed the Elizabeth Carlise name popped up and the context of the email is ample proof that she it is a fake persona supposed working at the Justice Management Division of the DOJ (even though there is zero open source social media or professional networking footprint of her name). They weren't looking for Elizabeth Carlisle emails and yet they found this. Imagine what happens when the next FOIA request is for everything involving Elizabeth Carlisle. Me thinks subpoenas could be a comin'. 
Maybe this dumb deceitful cunt was as careless as others in leaving a paper trail and that the incriminating shit she wrote under her fake name could be used to further erode the power base of the Left/Deep State. Couldn't Lynch be bcc.'d and being addressed as part of the email? Without the body there is no context. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:07:40 AM EST
[#2]
Obama's EPA director did this too. Nothing happened to her.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:09:58 AM EST
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Obama's EPA director did this too. Nothing happened to her. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:11:59 AM EST
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
the entire Administration did it |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:12:42 AM EST
[#5]
Isn't it funny how the left circumvents all the records retention and FOIA laws that they created in the wake of Watergate?
I mean, we now see this so often it's an established pattern. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:12:52 AM EST
[#6]
think we'll ever get to see what FBHO used his Blackberry for? nope
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:23:20 AM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
One, the person who replied knew exactly who she really was. Because that's usually what happens with people responding to their bosses email, they know the name. Replier was head of communications working directly for Lynch. Her immediate boss. Further, Lynch would hardly be the first one to do this, the story is only interesting because at the same time these 400 released emails prove a conspiracy between DOJ/FBI/Media/Hillary/DNC, it also now found a whole new thread to pull on in the form of Elizabeth Carlisle emails. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 9:23:51 AM EST
[#8]
all of those scum need to be shot
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 10:34:41 AM EST
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. You are going to have to come up with a better line of shit. Then again, someone who goes to secret meetings with an ex-President whose wife is under investigation by her department and directs the FBI to not call the investigation an investigation would never try to be sneaky with her e-mail, right? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:06:46 AM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So if what you are saying is true and there is a perfectly innocent explanation for using a fake name on her e-mail, there should have been hundreds, thousands, maybe even 10's of thousands of emails to and from Elizabeth Carlisle in the e-mails that were turned over in the FOIA request. That does not seem to be the case. You are going to have to come up with a better line of shit. Then again, someone who goes to secret meetings with an ex-President whose wife is under investigation by her department and directs the FBI to not call the investigation an investigation would never try to be sneaky with her e-mail, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. You are going to have to come up with a better line of shit. Then again, someone who goes to secret meetings with an ex-President whose wife is under investigation by her department and directs the FBI to not call the investigation an investigation would never try to be sneaky with her e-mail, right? 1. Using a semi-anonymous email address for PERSEC reasons: Meh. 2. Not telling the FOIA office about the address so that FOIA requests aren't fully responsive: Bad. 3. Intentionally doing #1 and/or #2 to avoid FOIA requests (or Congressional oversight): Really bad. Make sense? Let me know when you see evidence of #3 - until then I'm sticking with Hanlon's Razor. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:14:45 AM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I addressed your point in my post. See red. Here let me break it down for you and the other guy with the appreciation for shitty knockoff-Giger artists: 1. Using a semi-anonymous email address for PERSEC reasons: Meh. 2. Not telling the FOIA office about the address so that FOIA requests aren't fully responsive: Bad. 3. Intentionally doing #1 and/or #2 to avoid FOIA requests (or Congressional oversight): Really bad. Make sense? Let me know when you see evidence of #3 - until then I'm sticking with Hanlon's Razor. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. You are going to have to come up with a better line of shit. Then again, someone who goes to secret meetings with an ex-President whose wife is under investigation by her department and directs the FBI to not call the investigation an investigation would never try to be sneaky with her e-mail, right? 1. Using a semi-anonymous email address for PERSEC reasons: Meh. 2. Not telling the FOIA office about the address so that FOIA requests aren't fully responsive: Bad. 3. Intentionally doing #1 and/or #2 to avoid FOIA requests (or Congressional oversight): Really bad. Make sense? Let me know when you see evidence of #3 - until then I'm sticking with Hanlon's Razor. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:25:53 AM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. And now you're defending Loretta Lynch. YAAF |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:37:16 AM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Death Certificate for Loretta Lynch's Grandmother, maiden name...Elizabeth Carlisle. https://i.redd.it/ttvfdrxjawdz.jpg Source: Reddit |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:38:04 AM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pay attention to certain posters in this thread. Notice how they downplay this and act like it's no big deal (which it could be but no one knows yet). Now find any Trump thread and watch them perform mental gymnastics to prove Trump, or his team, is at fault. It's funny how the benefit of the doubt always favors the left in their minds. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:50:35 AM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You've spent a year of your life crying about Trump's actions, how every thing he and his campaign have done is absolute proof of some grand Russian conspiracy. And now you're defending Loretta Lynch. YAAF Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. And now you're defending Loretta Lynch. YAAF This shit is comedy gold. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 11:57:52 AM EST
[#16]
And nothing will come of it....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:05:46 PM EST
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:15:06 PM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For somebody who pretends to have any tech knowledge at all, you'd know about things like proofpoint where you wouldn't need to do any of the absolute bullshit you're suggesting. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Using a pseudonym for email doesn't seem like that bad of an idea for Cabinet-level appointees. Could you imagine the spam / spear phishing attempts an email address like "[email protected]" would receive? Or the emails from some idiot GS-5 complaining about their supervisor? As long as the FOIA office is aware of it when it comes to processing FOIA requests (which is potentially the problem here) - then I don't see the big deal. YMMV. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:21:56 PM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Nice try PGA, but there isn't an Elizabeth Carlisle at the DoJ from what I can tell. Based on salary information, there is not an Elizabeth Carlisle in federal employment at all https://www.fedsdatacenter.com/federal-pay-rates/index.php?y=2016&n=carlisle&l=&a=&o= Please fabricate a new deflection and try again. Excellent Response! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:25:12 PM EST
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm still waiting for the link to your presentation about Dropbox hacking at Defcon... The fact that you think dropbox is secure does confirm that you work for the .gov, though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:29:45 PM EST
[#21]
It's funny that the #NeverTrumpers are defending Lynch in this thread.
Elizabeth is Loretta's middle name and Carlisle is her grandmother's name. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:31:36 PM EST
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Whatever you say, sweetie. The fact that you think dropbox is secure does confirm that you work for the .gov, though. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I'm still waiting for the link to your presentation about Dropbox hacking at Defcon... The fact that you think dropbox is secure does confirm that you work for the .gov, though. Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:33:13 PM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's funny that the #NeverTrumpers are defending Lynch in this thread. Elizabeth is Loretta's middle name and Carlisle is her grandmother's name. http://i.imgur.com/4kBPP2P.png https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGb1XVPXoAQQjJF.jpg http://i.imgur.com/o9RMNBk.png https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DGb1XVWXUAAyFLl.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:35:59 PM EST
[#24]
"It's funny that the #NeverTrumpers are defending Lynch in this thread. "
You haven't discovered their ideology and purpose... As well as their consistent attempts, trying to UNDERMINE REALITY ---yet???
Oh --yes you have!!!! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:43:12 PM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"It's funny that the #NeverTrumpers are defending Lynch in this thread. " You haven't discovered their ideology and purpose... As well as their consistent attempts, trying to UNDERMINE REALITY ---yet???  
"DRUMPF IS GUILTY, OF WHAT, I DON'T KNOW." "HILLARY CLINTON DIDN'T COMMIT HER CRIMES ON PURPOSE, THERE'S NO SIGNED CONFESSION OR VIDEO TAPE SO LA-LA-LA-LA" |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:47:29 PM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hey man, carrying water for the democratic party all day has to be an exhausting job for those stupid motherfuckers
"DRUMPF IS GUILTY, OF WHAT, I DON'T KNOW." "HILLARY CLINTON DIDN'T COMMIT HER CRIMES ON PURPOSE, THERE'S NO SIGNED CONFESSION OR VIDEO TAPE SO LA-LA-LA-LA"
And Balistas' and Waterglasses' ability to tie things together so well, incl graphically...
. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:49:13 PM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Remember that gov't employees were using yahoo, gmail, and Hotmail IDs to get around the federal records retention act? http://www.securitycurrent.com/en/writers/mark-rasch/personal-email-or-government-property-hillary-clinton |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:51:30 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not trying to be the devils advocate but, this. Couldn't Lynch be bcc.'d and being addressed as part of the email? Without the body there is no context. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
LOL. This is too awesome. See, you're under the delusion that the emails are the only ones ever sent by Loretta Lynch or Elizabeth Carlisle. As if there are only 400 emails total in existence and that only one has the full email address for E. Carlisle. How delightfully naive! ACLJ did a FOIA request wanting emails between Loretta Lynch and others specifically regarding the Lynch-Clinton meetup. They had no idea about Carlisle email. The DOJ and FBI provided them, as the Freedom of Information Act requires, though Comey first tried to lie about it and tried to stall it. They inadvertantly included that one incriminating email from Carlisle because let's face it, the people working for the US federal govt aren't know for their reasoning skills. Afterwards somebody went through the emails and noticed the Elizabeth Carlise name popped up and the context of the email is ample proof that she it is a fake persona supposed working at the Justice Management Division of the DOJ (even though there is zero open source social media or professional networking footprint of her name). They weren't looking for Elizabeth Carlisle emails and yet they found this. Imagine what happens when the next FOIA request is for everything involving Elizabeth Carlisle. Me thinks subpoenas could be a comin'.
Maybe this dumb deceitful cunt was as careless as others in leaving a paper trail and that the incriminating shit she wrote under her fake name could be used to further erode the power base of the Left/Deep State. Couldn't Lynch be bcc.'d and being addressed as part of the email? Without the body there is no context. I'm half tempted to send them a serious inquiry even though it will probably go nowhere. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 12:56:23 PM EST
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Love your analyses!
And Weatherglasses' ability to tie things together so well, graphically...
. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Hey man, carrying water for the democratic party all day has to be an exhausting job for those stupid motherfuckers
"DRUMPF IS GUILTY, OF WHAT, I DON'T KNOW." "HILLARY CLINTON DIDN'T COMMIT HER CRIMES ON PURPOSE, THERE'S NO SIGNED CONFESSION OR VIDEO TAPE SO LA-LA-LA-LA"
And Weatherglasses' ability to tie things together so well, graphically...
. 
You're impervious to their troll attempts, back during the shitshow of the closing days of the campaign, when the nevertriumph babies were chucking around the media talking points like the original thinkers that they are - you were in those threads like a honey badger raiding a hive
[juggernaut] "silly biiitch your weapons cannot harm me, don't you know who the fuck I amm?!"[/juggernaut] Waterglass is the 6:00 news show i'm the opinion stuff at 9:00
"aaaaand we're out of time, come by to the No-derp-zone, where there derp! stops here." |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:02:20 PM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Didn't Obama have an alias email account, too? From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-30 23:47 Subject: Re: Economic Staffing Decisions From:[email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2008-10-06 20:38 Subject: Diversity Link to source |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:05:51 PM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cool. I'll set up a dropbox account, upload a single picture and give you the account name. If you can "hack" it by whatever means and post the pic here I'll buy you a membership. I'm giving you permission to access the account so nothing illegal is going on... Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm still waiting for the link to your presentation about Dropbox hacking at Defcon... The fact that you think dropbox is secure does confirm that you work for the .gov, though. Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? If you think peoples pictures and documents are secure, I got news for you. Well, actually, I don't have news for you because I know what you are, but you know what I mean.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:11:34 PM EST
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Here are 2 emails. From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-30 23:47 Subject: Re: Economic Staffing Decisions From:[email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2008-10-06 20:38 Subject: Diversity Link to source Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Didn't Obama have an alias email account, too? From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-30 23:47 Subject: Re: Economic Staffing Decisions From:[email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2008-10-06 20:38 Subject: Diversity Link to source |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:21:31 PM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cool. I'll set up a dropbox account, upload a single picture and give you the account name. If you can "hack" it by whatever means and post the pic here I'll buy you a membership. I'm giving you permission to access the account so nothing illegal is going on... Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:26:54 PM EST
[#34]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:39:43 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pay attention to certain posters in this thread. Notice how they downplay this and act like it's no big deal (which it could be but no one knows yet). Now find any Trump thread and watch them perform mental gymnastics to prove Trump, or his team, is at fault. It's funny how the benefit of the doubt always favors the left in their minds. mention pizzagate and see what happens |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:42:36 PM EST
[#36]
Lynch and Holder need to be investigated hard.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:44:13 PM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Cool. I'll set up a dropbox account, upload a single picture and give you the account name. If you can "hack" it by whatever means and post the pic here I'll buy you a membership. I'm giving you permission to access the account so nothing illegal is going on... Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:48:43 PM EST
[#38]
I guess being a Democrat means never having to comply with a FOIA request.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 1:52:22 PM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Can we truly hopethis time something will happen They are above the law, though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 2:01:25 PM EST
[#40]
These Dems sure love their alias.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 2:27:27 PM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeah she's going to use alias email communicating with her subordinates, which are subject to Public Records, and she encourages them to address her "alias email" as "AG Lynch" and signs her replies "AG" 
"Hey guys please send me all your work emails that get archived to this super secret email, but please continue addressing them Attorney General Lynch and I will do the same when signing the reply, ooooookay?" |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 2:39:56 PM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If you even had a modicum of understanding of what brute forcing is you'd understand how incredibly daft you look right now. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Cool. I'll set up a dropbox account, upload a single picture and give you the account name. If you can "hack" it by whatever means and post the pic here I'll buy you a membership. I'm giving you permission to access the account so nothing illegal is going on... Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? Typical.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 2:46:25 PM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You do realize that DropBox was hacked last year and around 68 million accounts were compromised, right? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Cool. I'll set up a dropbox account, upload a single picture and give you the account name. If you can "hack" it by whatever means and post the pic here I'll buy you a membership. I'm giving you permission to access the account so nothing illegal is going on... Should be easy for someone with your l33t skillz, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 2:55:54 PM EST
[#44]
There was some internet research and it was determined that Chelsea Clinton was using am alias or 2 in email.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 3:34:31 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Whatever you say, sweetie. The fact that you think dropbox is secure does confirm that you work for the .gov, though. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I'm still waiting for the link to your presentation about Dropbox hacking at Defcon... The fact that you think dropbox is secure does confirm that you work for the .gov, though. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 3:38:15 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There was some internet research and it was determined that Chelsea Clinton was using am alias or 2 in email. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 4:13:44 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Google Search: "elizabeth carlisle" department of justice And just to prove my point about open source internet footprints: Google Search: "pgaplayerless" banned
Second of all, your jedi internet skills are epic failure. Online people searches reveal SEVERAL hits for "Elizabeth Carlisle" in the greater DC area mainly Alexandria, VA and Arlington, VA..... See real search providers dig through property records, utility records, and so on.....they don't just assume somebody doesn't exist because they dont have Facebook or Twitter because that's just plain idiotic conclusion
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 4:32:08 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ummm..... Force of Habit. Have you ever ended a phone call with someone not your wife or girlfriend and almost said "I love you, Bye". Or a waiter drops off your food and says " enjoy your meal" and you respond "Thanks! You too!". Or how about write a check with the previous year 2016 in January 2017 out of habit. She probably didn't realize she tagged it AG at the end. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 4:33:45 PM EST
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
never done any of that....ever. Also not only would Lynch have to forget that she's sending her reply from her "super secret" account, the initial sender would also have to "fogrget" that she's email Lynch on her super secret account while addressing her "AG Lynch" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Ummm..... Force of Habit. Have you ever ended a phone call with someone not your wife or girlfriend and almost said "I love you, Bye". Or a waiter drops off your food and says " enjoy your meal" and you respond "Thanks! You too!". Or how about write a check with the previous year 2016 in January 2017 out of habit. She probably didn't realize she tagged it AG at the end. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/5/2017 4:42:28 PM EST
[#50]
Most transparent administration ever.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
