User Panel
Originally Posted By hardcorps1775: Or it's big brother, the trench club. https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91oVVklLK0L._SL1500_.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By hardcorps1775: Originally Posted By FlyLeaf: Ribbed dildo Or it's big brother, the trench club. https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91oVVklLK0L._SL1500_.jpg That’s a dildo. |
|
|
|
|
The longer the weapon in question, the slower you will be able to turn/use it. Hence, a higher chance it can be taken from you.
A club/blade under 30 inches is your best bet. A pair of 30 inch blades would be good. A 30 inch blade with a hand-held, actual warhammer (a real one, not something like Thor's hammer) would probably be best. |
|
|
Quoted: Beneath the secret compartment of my ring I fill with my UnderDog Super Energy Pill.https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/206146/1B0FEC21-1496-4FDD-933A-F05166FC522D_jpe-1410466.JPG View Quote I've seen every one! (Yeah, I'm old) |
|
|
Originally Posted By Palm: Yes, the sound of the spoon deploying on a grenade is an unmistakable sound. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Palm: Originally Posted By Rojoko: Grenade FTW. Yes, the sound of the spoon deploying on a grenade is an unmistakable sound. Yep, you wouldn't even have to throw it. The bad guys would just run away. Kind of like racking a round in on a pump action shotgun. |
|
Originally Posted By JLPettimoreIII: Originally Posted By steelycr: Spetsnaz shovel.... Go on... The Cold Steel one... You can sharpen that thing... use it as an impact weapon, slashing weapon... you can throw it at someone as you're doing a back flip... That thing is awesome!!!! |
|
Quoted: The longer the weapon in question, the slower you will be able to turn/use it. Hence, a higher chance it can be taken from you. A club/blade under 30 inches is your best. A pair of 30 inch blades would be good. A 30 inch blade with a hand-held, actual warhammer (a real one, not something like Thor's hammer) would probably be best. View Quote Two weapons is very hard to master. Your off hand is shit, you just don't know it. Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. |
|
|
Originally Posted By hawktheslayer: The longer the weapon in question, the slower you will be able to turn/use it. Hence, a higher chance it can be taken from you. A club/blade under 30 inches is your best. A pair of 30 inch blades would be good. A 30 inch blade with a hand-held, actual warhammer (a real one, not something like Thor's hammer) would probably be best. View Quote I always thought that my geologist's hammer could really fuck up someone's day. It is basically the size and shape of a medieval war hammer, is forged, and cost like $40. |
|
Pole axe, one side for cutting and one side blunt.
Attached File I'm convinced that this is one of the fastest ways to deal some serious damage at a distance |
|
collapsible baton. you take one wack to the head with one you are dead.
|
|
Originally Posted By BUCC_Guy: Two weapons Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BUCC_Guy: Two weapons Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. Polearms are NOT melee weapons. Read the OP's post. He said "hand-to-hand" weapons for multple threats. Ask anyone who has trained in silat or kali about fighting with two blades or a stick and a knife, sword and dagger (espada y daga). It can be done quite easily and even beginners can become extremely proficient in it if you train for it. The only REAL trouble you can have dual weilding is if your weapons are too long; like trying to use two long swords or broadswords. They'll inevitably get tangled up and get you killed. Very, very difficult to manage two long blades in hand-to-hand combat. Certainly a bladed spear like a partisan or a polearm like a ranseur or bec de corbin might be okay if you had your back covered and multiple dudes to form a line. However, we're talking melee weapons, bro. Multiple attackers. For multiple attackers, you need to be able to engage, disengage, vary your angle of attacks and quickly movie to crowd your attackers and act/react within fractions of a second. Even then, it's no guarantee. While spears have their place, in such close quarters, you're better off with short blades/hammer/shield combo. Originally Posted By clickclickBOOM: Originally Posted By maleante: Bow staff Exactly. My Bow staff and Liger combo will defeat multiple targets with ease. It's BO staff, not BOW staff. And bo staffs will get you fucking killed in a group with multiple attackers. The first person you poke might take a hit, but before you can withdraw and re-engage it's getting snatched up by one of your attackers. It's far too long to manage in close quarters with multiple attackers. Sure, you can spin it like a dumbass in a kung-fu movie, but the minute your hit somebody, it's speed and energy transfer takes place. You're vulnerable for LONG seconds with a long stick that's easy to take away from you. Especially with multiple attackers. OP was talking "hand-to-hand" range. Bo staffs are shit for that. |
|
|
Originally Posted By BUCC_Guy: Two weapons is very hard to master. Your off hand is shit, you just don't know it. Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By BUCC_Guy: Originally Posted By hawktheslayer: The longer the weapon in question, the slower you will be able to turn/use it. Hence, a higher chance it can be taken from you. A club/blade under 30 inches is your best. A pair of 30 inch blades would be good. A 30 inch blade with a hand-held, actual warhammer (a real one, not something like Thor's hammer) would probably be best. Two weapons is very hard to master. Your off hand is shit, you just don't know it. Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. Spears are tremendous weapons. The sword has been heavily romanticized in media, but historically a lot of fighting and killing was done by spears. |
|
Originally Posted By 110: Gladius, Short sword, Katana, Bastard View Quote +1 I'd want shorter than longer. Many say that a 6" knife is perfect in a close-in situation. Short enough that it doesn't get entangled in people/clothing/objects, but long enough to reach deeply into organs (heart, lungs, spleen, liver, aorta). But in keeping with your theme, the Xiphos from the movie Troy: Troy (Achilles Vs Boagrius) 4K |
|
Originally Posted By Bale2011: War club https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/259519/DB56EC62-395D-444F-9814-75827D29D472_jpe-1410461.JPG View Quote Caption this pic: FORE!!!!! |
|
Quoted: Oh man, how about the Bat-chete? $104 on Amazon! All the impact force of a baseball bat with the cutting and slashing ability of a machete without the danger of overpenetration and loding in bone! https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91qkbdZu11L._SL1500_.jpg https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81-y7iJ5PpL._SL1500_.jpg View Quote |
|
Mace. Light, with a bunch of 2" spikes but the wide base kind that will penetrate but not get stuck.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By hawktheslayer: Polearms are NOT melee weapons. Read the OP's post. He said "hand-to-hand" weapons for multple threats. Ask anyone who has trained in silat or kali about fighting with two blades or a stick and a knife, sword and dagger (espada y daga). It can be done quite easily and even beginners can become extremely proficient in it if you train for it. The only REAL trouble you can have dual weilding is if your weapons are too long; like trying to use two long swords or broadswords. They'll inevitably get tangled up and get you killed. Very, very difficult to manage two long blades in hand-to-hand combat. Certainly a bladed spear like a partisan or a polearm like a ranseur or bec de corbin might be okay if you had your back covered and multiple dudes to form a line. However, we're talking melee weapons, bro. Multiple attackers. For multiple attackers, you need to be able to engage, disengage, vary your angle of attacks and quickly movie to crowd your attackers and act/react within fractions of a second. Even then, it's no guarantee. While spears have their place, in such close quarters, you're better off with short blades/hammer/shield combo. It's BO staff, not BOW staff. And bo staffs will get you fucking killed in a group with multiple attackers. The first person you poke might take a hit, but before you can withdraw and re-engage it's getting snatched up by one of your attackers. It's far too long to manage in close quarters with multiple attackers. Sure, you can spin it like a dumbass in a kung-fu movie, but the minute your hit somebody, it's speed and energy transfer takes place. You're vulnerable for LONG seconds with a long stick that's easy to take away from you. Especially with multiple attackers. OP was talking "hand-to-hand" range. Bo staffs are shit for that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By hawktheslayer: Originally Posted By BUCC_Guy: Two weapons Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. Polearms are NOT melee weapons. Read the OP's post. He said "hand-to-hand" weapons for multple threats. Ask anyone who has trained in silat or kali about fighting with two blades or a stick and a knife, sword and dagger (espada y daga). It can be done quite easily and even beginners can become extremely proficient in it if you train for it. The only REAL trouble you can have dual weilding is if your weapons are too long; like trying to use two long swords or broadswords. They'll inevitably get tangled up and get you killed. Very, very difficult to manage two long blades in hand-to-hand combat. Certainly a bladed spear like a partisan or a polearm like a ranseur or bec de corbin might be okay if you had your back covered and multiple dudes to form a line. However, we're talking melee weapons, bro. Multiple attackers. For multiple attackers, you need to be able to engage, disengage, vary your angle of attacks and quickly movie to crowd your attackers and act/react within fractions of a second. Even then, it's no guarantee. While spears have their place, in such close quarters, you're better off with short blades/hammer/shield combo. Originally Posted By clickclickBOOM: Originally Posted By maleante: Bow staff Exactly. My Bow staff and Liger combo will defeat multiple targets with ease. It's BO staff, not BOW staff. And bo staffs will get you fucking killed in a group with multiple attackers. The first person you poke might take a hit, but before you can withdraw and re-engage it's getting snatched up by one of your attackers. It's far too long to manage in close quarters with multiple attackers. Sure, you can spin it like a dumbass in a kung-fu movie, but the minute your hit somebody, it's speed and energy transfer takes place. You're vulnerable for LONG seconds with a long stick that's easy to take away from you. Especially with multiple attackers. OP was talking "hand-to-hand" range. Bo staffs are shit for that. You’re wrong that’s what the Liger is for. He’s trained to watch my back. Pedro has his nunchucks and will step in and help. |
|
Quoted: Polearms are NOT melee weapons. Read the OP's post. He said "hand-to-hand" weapons for multple threats. Certainly a bladed spear like a partisan or a polearm like a ranseur or bec de corbine might be okay if you had your back covered and multiple dudes to form a line. However, we're talking melee weapons, bro. Multiple attackers. For multiple attackers, you need to be able to engage, disengage, vary your angle of attacks and quickly movie to crowd your attackers. While spears have their place, in such close quarters, you're better off with short blades/hammer/shield combo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Two weapons is very hard to master. Your off hand is shit, you just don't know it. Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. Polearms are NOT melee weapons. Read the OP's post. He said "hand-to-hand" weapons for multple threats. Certainly a bladed spear like a partisan or a polearm like a ranseur or bec de corbine might be okay if you had your back covered and multiple dudes to form a line. However, we're talking melee weapons, bro. Multiple attackers. For multiple attackers, you need to be able to engage, disengage, vary your angle of attacks and quickly movie to crowd your attackers. While spears have their place, in such close quarters, you're better off with short blades/hammer/shield combo. Ranseur wouldn't be the greatest option for formation or small group. Partisans, except for the early ones, are a bit clumsy compared to other options. Bec de corbin is an excellent choice for any scenario. They are only about six feet tall, at most, usually. Some are only four feet. There's one for auction in Germany later this month. I don't understand why you don't think Polearms qualify in this thread. I read this as basically non-projectile weapons. |
|
Originally Posted By blackghost: Bo staff for less-lethal option, short spear if lethal force authorized. Outside the box: chainsaw. Nobody is going to try and rush in on you while you have that thing powered up. View Quote Never thought of that but it makes a ton of sense. I'd rather take a sword through the stomach than get dismembered by a chainsaw |
|
Originally Posted By Swampgrass: Going to weigh to much. Will slow it down. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Swampgrass: Originally Posted By JLPettimoreIII: Aluminum bat shortened just a touch. Fill with concrete. Wrap with hockey tape. Bonjour! Going to weigh to much. Will slow it down. Exactly. Just save yourself the effort and go with a children's T-Ball Bat. They all hover around 2' long and they're ready to use right off the rack. I prefer aluminum ones for the really satisfying "ping!" they deliver on impact. Small, light, covert. You can really pepper a target as opposed to a Baseball Bat and you can just leave in your vehicle for when it's needed to defend yourself. FYI- If you modify a bat for fighting, you've weaponized it. That is commonly illegal. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Spears are tremendous weapons. The sword has been heavily romanticized in media, but historically a lot of fighting and killing was done by spears. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The longer the weapon in question, the slower you will be able to turn/use it. Hence, a higher chance it can be taken from you. A club/blade under 30 inches is your best. A pair of 30 inch blades would be good. A 30 inch blade with a hand-held, actual warhammer (a real one, not something like Thor's hammer) would probably be best. Two weapons is very hard to master. Your off hand is shit, you just don't know it. Polearms are surprisingly nimble. Informal testing shows spears beating one handers regularly, until shields get introduced, which evens things up a bit. Polearms were the primary weapons on foot for pretty much everyone for a long time. Spears are tremendous weapons. The sword has been heavily romanticized in media, but historically a lot of fighting and killing was done by spears. Spears: Why they defeat swords, optimum characteristics & perfect length |
|
claymore
CLACK CLACK BIOTCH INFANTRYMAN'S GUIDE: M18A1 CLAYMORE |
|
|
Ever see a Filipino looking guy, with a stick and a knife...run the other way as fast as you can. Escrima/Arnis/Kali extremely effective at close quarters combat.
|
|
Very close quarters? A trench knife. If you ever hold one and think about it for a bit, you'll understand.
But as someone else already said, trench knife and trench club is ideal. You can do absolutely insane damage if you're reasonably fit and quick. |
|
|
Ever see a Filipino looking guy, with a stick and a knife...run the other way as fast as you can. Escrima/Arnis/Kali extremely effective at close quarters combat.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.