User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:34:02 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Do you guys need a background check to buy ammunition yet? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:34:03 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hope the Never Trumpers are happy now that the adults are back in charge. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:34:30 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I hate that guy just as much as any MAGA chud and I'm not even a conservative. He's just trying to signal to his base of bland scared suburban liberals. No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. This is the type of ignorance that leads to abusive government, policies, regulations, laws, and even judgements built on fear, emotions, and disinformation. A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. Taxpayers are literally paying for a subversive office in government whose ideology is to literally eliminate their Constitutional rights. It’s not marketing, it’s openly attacking the Constitution, specifically the 2A. If someone can’t see that, they are likely very similar to FJB…low IQ and mentally impaired. ROCK6 |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:34:43 AM EDT
[#4]
damage control b/c of hunter biden
give it a year and they'll be grifting money off this sucker also Office of Race Relations next friday |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:42:20 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Joke is on him. I'm gonna take Arfcom's advise and move to a free state.   Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:44:45 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Liberals and Leftists support gun control for different reasons. Liberals support it due to political correctness. Leftists support it because they want control. The vast and overwhelming majority of the law abiding gun owners in America are white. The vast and overwhelming majority of the violent criminals in America are black or Hispanic. The Dems' solution to curbing the violence perpetrated overwhelmingly by black and Hispanic criminals, is to enact gun control measures that will make it more difficult for law-abiding white people to own guns. Makes no sense, right? Well... it makes no sense if the goal is to reduce violent crime. If you're a liberal, it makes sense, because it avoids addressing the politically incorrect realities of violence and crime in America. If you're a Leftist, it makes sense because it disarms the law-abiding, which is what you really want.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:49:52 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It’s almost as if they believe that I give a shit and follow the laws they put in place that violate the second amendment… lol I only follow the laws in the constitution. I really don't gaf any more. A country boy will survive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:51:11 AM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:51:50 AM EDT
[#10]
Hope its as much of a paper tiger as Trump's Second Amendment Coalition
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:53:03 AM EDT
[#11]
Citizens and elected servants of the people boldly working against the constitution in every way but the correct way.
Can someone explain why this isn't treasnous, or at a minimum against the law? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:53:12 AM EDT
[#12]
Can't congress defund that bs?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:53:37 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This is the type of ignorance that leads to abusive government, policies, regulations, laws, and even judgements built on fear, emotions, and disinformation. A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. Taxpayers are literally paying for a subversive office in government whose ideology is to literally eliminate their Constitutional rights. It’s not marketing, it’s openly attacking the Constitution, specifically the 2A. If someone can’t see that, they are likely very similar to FJB…low IQ and mentally impaired. ROCK6 This. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:55:46 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Don't fool yourself because they do not fucking care. Never Trumpers are pos Democratic Socialist voters who helped get that senile sorry sack shit elected  Tragically, this. They only thing they have is their stupid "but he banned muh bumpstocks!" idiocy. Traitors, every one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:57:53 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 11:59:22 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm surprised that hasn't been proposed, that and online ammo sales. I'm sure they're working on it. Wasn't a BC required for ammo purchases in CA (and then later got stomped)? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:02:30 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I hate giving Brownells money, but that note feature sure comes in handy Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I hate that guy just as much as any MAGA chud and I'm not even a conservative. He's just trying to signal to his base of bland scared suburban liberals. No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. I hate giving Brownells money, but that note feature sure comes in handy |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:03:45 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This is the type of ignorance that leads to abusive government, policies, regulations, laws, and even judgements built on fear, emotions, and disinformation. A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. Taxpayers are literally paying for a subversive office in government whose ideology is to literally eliminate their Constitutional rights. It’s not marketing, it’s openly attacking the Constitution, specifically the 2A. If someone can’t see that, they are likely very similar to FJB…low IQ and mentally impaired. ROCK6 It's a troll account man, he's literally parroting Obama's gaslighting. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:06:19 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:08:31 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We know the things that Trump said he’d like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren’t fanatics defending Biden’s gun control actions here. Quoted: Nothing got passed. An executive order got issued to change a rule. There wasn’t any change in any law and the rule change violated existing law. It’s just nobody has argued it correctly in court yet. The DOJ won’t even press charges relating to the rule because they know they’ll get their ass handed to them in court. Which President decided to end Run around Congress & do "Gun Control All By Myself Because I'm Not Afraid of the NRA"?  Which was actually a much worse of a back stab & betrayal. Mitch McConnell would never have let ANY gun control bill move forward in the Senate. But Trumpy Bear just had to show "He's the Star of the Show" and shove Gun Control by Executive Order (Giving BATFE free reign to change or interpret legal items to instantly become "naughty no-no's" & get "Insta-Felon" charges on their owners. Trump on his Bumpstock ban At 2:12 (but watch from the beginning to see Trump personally advocate his direct support for Red Flag Laws, Raising the Purchase Age & other 2nd Amendment Restrictions ... while sitting next to Diane F'ing Fiendswine...  Trump: ‘We’re getting rid’ of ‘bump stocks’ I'd rather face a known sworn enemy ahead of me, then be backstabbed by a traitor like Trump.  Fuck Joe Biden & Every Democrat - but the same to "Republicans" who support Gun Control too! Bigger_Hammer  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:10:15 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Which President decided to end Run around Congress & do "Gun Control All By Myself Because I'm Not Afraid of the NRA"? https://i.imgur.com/hhMKS0f.jpg Which was actually a much worse of a back stab & betrayal. Mitch McConnell would never have let ANY gun control bill move forward in the Senate. But Trumpy Bear just had to show "He's the Star of the Show" and shove Gun Control by Executive Order (Giving BATFE free reign to change or interpret legal items to instantly become "naughty no-no's" & get "Insta-Felon" charges on their owners. Trump on his Bumpstock ban At 2:12 (but watch from the beginning to see Trump personally advocate his direct support for Red Flag Laws, Raising the Purchase Age & other 2nd Amendment Restrictions ... while sitting next to Diane F'ing Fiendswine...  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eoCS-QxuCcI'd rather face a known sworn enemy ahead of me, then be backstabbed by a traitor like Trump. https://i.imgur.com/oTEshxc.jpg Fuck Joe Biden & Every Democrat - but the same to "Republicans" who support Gun Control too! Bigger_Hammer Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: We know the things that Trump said he’d like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren’t fanatics defending Biden’s gun control actions here. Quoted: Nothing got passed. An executive order got issued to change a rule. There wasn’t any change in any law and the rule change violated existing law. It’s just nobody has argued it correctly in court yet. The DOJ won’t even press charges relating to the rule because they know they’ll get their ass handed to them in court. Which President decided to end Run around Congress & do "Gun Control All By Myself Because I'm Not Afraid of the NRA"? https://i.imgur.com/hhMKS0f.jpg Which was actually a much worse of a back stab & betrayal. Mitch McConnell would never have let ANY gun control bill move forward in the Senate. But Trumpy Bear just had to show "He's the Star of the Show" and shove Gun Control by Executive Order (Giving BATFE free reign to change or interpret legal items to instantly become "naughty no-no's" & get "Insta-Felon" charges on their owners. Trump on his Bumpstock ban At 2:12 (but watch from the beginning to see Trump personally advocate his direct support for Red Flag Laws, Raising the Purchase Age & other 2nd Amendment Restrictions ... while sitting next to Diane F'ing Fiendswine... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eoCS-QxuCcI'd rather face a known sworn enemy ahead of me, then be backstabbed by a traitor like Trump. https://i.imgur.com/oTEshxc.jpg Fuck Joe Biden & Every Democrat - but the same to "Republicans" who support Gun Control too! Bigger_Hammer  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:15:29 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Citizens and elected servants of the people boldly working against the constitution in every way but the correct way. Can someone explain why this isn't treasnous, or at a minimum against the law? It's clearly both; the real question is why nothing is done about it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:15:56 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Wasn't a BC required for ammo purchases in CA (and then later got stomped)? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I'm surprised that hasn't been proposed, that and online ammo sales. I'm sure they're working on it. Wasn't a BC required for ammo purchases in CA (and then later got stomped)? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:16:54 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Tragically, this. They only thing they have is their stupid "but he banned muh bumpstocks!" idiocy. Traitors, every one. “We”(we being pro-2A) have a lot more than bump stocks to make our case. The real traitors are the ones who continue to support and vote for Trump despite his clear anti-2A inclinations. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:17:00 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We know the things that Trump said he'd like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren't fanatics defending Biden's gun control actions here. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Y'all can wave the "Trump bumpstock" banner all you want. Nobody can know what would have happened under a 2nd term, but you can SEE what's happening in Biden's first. I would have MUCH rather had a 2nd Trump term than all this bullshit. We know the things that Trump said he'd like to do, and none of them are 2A friendly. Difference between Trump and Biden are that Biden is less competent at getting gun control passed, and there aren't fanatics defending Biden's gun control actions here. Fuckin' ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:18:06 PM EDT
[#26]
Obama's stooge can fuck off along with his new office the Marxists are creating.
First of all, show me a violent gun, because as far as I know guns can't be violent but what the fuck do I know. If the purpose is to mitigate violent criminals and mental illness which is the actual issue, that would be worthwhile. But we all know that will never happen. FJB |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:18:17 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A taxpayer funded office meant to solely focus on and support anti-gun data and research that specifically designed to influence policies, regulations, and even laws, is nothing short of being completely antithetical to the 2A. This is no different than when this administration wanted to stand up a government “dis-mis-mal information” office, so the government could advise on what information they can promote or prohibit to other bureaucracies & agencies for policy and regulatory changes, influence public opinion, and push social media companies to implement illegal actions the government can’t (overtly) do. This office could also drive funding away from any gun-safety activities or anything that promote self-defense, shape data from gun-use, influence legislation, public opinion, even judicial opinions. On top of money laundering and grifting, here's the icing on the cake. Directly counter organizations that need funding, like FPC, GOA with an Executive level department with it's own money printer. But it's not like the .gov couldn't do that anyway. A streamlined way to direct funds and propaganda. Directly demonize firearms ownership and use. "Gun training? People stockpiling and making ammo? Threats to democracy. Shooting sports? Nutcases. Having kids involved with guns? Brainwashing indoctrination. Children need to be in their mandatory LGBTBBQWTF classes. If you know these people, contact the Office of |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:26:28 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The real traitors are the ones who continue to support and vote for Trump despite his clear anti-2A inclinations. I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning -- Trump, DeSantis, whoever is the R. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Who will you choose? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:27:10 PM EDT
[#29]
Moar unconstitutional acts by an illegitimate pretendent.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:28:48 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Trump isn’t a Republican. So, my assumption is that you’re gonna pick from two Democrats if he’s the nominee. Voting for a Dem while claiming to be conservative? Seems pretty traitor-ish to me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:29:54 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Trump isn’t a Republican. So, my assumption is that you’re gonna pick from two Democrats if he’s the nominee. Voting for a Dem while claiming to be conservative? Seems pretty traitor-ish to me. Wow. So the R next to Trump's name in 2020 was a misprint???  I've never voted for a Dem. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing the letters, not me. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:31:39 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I've never voted for a Dem. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing the parties, not me. If you voted for Trump, you did. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing between a Republican and a RINO, not me. (Nice edit, again learn what a RINO is) |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:32:35 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: If you voted for Trump, you did. You are the one who seems to be having a problem distinguishing between a Republican and a RINO, not me. Have fun voting for Biden again, and destroying our country. And yes, if you did anything except pull the R lever, you put Biden in power. Liberals... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:32:57 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I'm not even a conservative. . Pretty obvious with your statement. Which agency do you work for again? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:34:35 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:35:46 PM EDT
[#36]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:37:18 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. I complained about the bumpstock ban too, but I still voted R. Lesser of 2 evils and all... |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:38:09 PM EDT
[#38]
We already have one Brandon.
It’s called the 2nd Amendment! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:40:20 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. No, no I didn’t. Your baseless bitch-ass attempt to put words in my mouth is nothing but a weak-dick strawman smear because you have NOTHING. @Kent |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:40:28 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryNow that was funny, I don’t care who you are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:41:43 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Welcome aboard! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff. It's a marketing tactic. He doesn't believe anything. I hate that guy just as much as any MAGA chud and I'm not even a conservative. He's just trying to signal to his base of bland scared suburban liberals. No one is coming for your guns using federal powers. steerage or boiler gang ? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:42:51 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: At least you’ll resist Democrat gun control and we won’t have to endure years of “lol muh bumpstocks” posts from the MAGA boys. Some of us don’t like gun control of any flavor and had the audacity to get mad when our supposed “GEOTUS” voluntarily got us the bump stock ban and RFLs. Fine. Get mad. But you put a communist in power during your tantrum. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. There is no excuse. I would bet most of the people that were complaining about the bump stock ban still voted for Donald Trump in 2020. I did. I voted for Trump twice. And I don’t even have a single bumpstock. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:43:19 PM EDT
[#43]
I hope the Trump Cult is happy since he is expanding on the Bump Stock Ban which was also an EO.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:45:16 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Don't fool yourself because they do not fucking care. Never Trumpers are pos Democratic Socialist voters who helped get that senile sorry sack shit elected The cultists say I’m a never trumper because I stand with Ron this time. But I voted for Trump in 2020 and would vote Trump again if he wins the nomination. How does that make me responsible for Biden? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:46:09 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: We better hold onto the House or Senate. These guys are going to ban new production of AR15 lowers and uppers and magazines as soon as they get the votes This where all the energy needs to be focused. Because at the end of the day it won’t matter who is POTUS. All this arguing over Trump/DeSantis is meaningless. Less than meaningless really. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:47:48 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't get why some people are so scared about this kinda stuff.....No one is coming for your guns using federal powers.  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:47:55 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, no I didn’t. Your baseless bitch-ass attempt to put words in my mouth is nothing but a weak-dick strawman smear because you have NOTHING. @Kent  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:48:38 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, no I didn’t. Your baseless bitch-ass attempt to put words in my mouth is nothing but a weak-dick strawman smear because you have NOTHING. @Kent You mad, bro? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:49:06 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Hope its as much of a paper tiger as Trump's Second Amendment Coalition This might actually exist though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/20/2023 12:49:41 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning -- Trump, DeSantis, whoever is the R. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Who will you choose? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The real traitors are the ones who continue to support and vote for Trump despite his clear anti-2A inclinations. I'll assume you're real and not a DU plant, and talking about the national election. I'm voting for whomever is running against the communists and has a chance of winning -- Trump, DeSantis, whoever is the R. Who are you throwing your vote away on? Or are you voting Dem? Infighting and "sending a message" is for the primaries. Once we're in the actual election, you are getting either a communist or whoever is the R candidate. No exceptions. Who will you choose? It’s likely that the “Republican” candidate you support is a big fan of gun control, just like Brandon (this is thoroughly documented). He supports other “progressive” values… yet he’s being pushed by a weird cult that claims he’s our only chance. Note that that same person has spent most of his career fighting conservatives (liberals, not so much). They’ve burned the party that opposes the democrats to the ground and replaced it with nothing. You think I should support them? The sooner that cult dies, the better. Ask yourself this- what conservative’s fight is more successful as a result of Trump (hint- the answer is “none of them”). |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
