User Panel
Quoted:
The "record" for "bombshells" I remember seeing on Hannity (might be far more but I don't watch him that often) was 4 of them. You know how many resulted in ANYTHING prosecutorial or Grand Jury actions? NONE!!! View Quote And half the Republican party is on them. Guess who has a staffer who was on the payroll of a Ukrainian energy company? Mittens. This whole hullaballo is about the corruptocrats who have spent the last 50 years enriching themselves protecting their iron rice bowl. Trump, despite his many faults, is actually a significant threat to that. There haven't been criminal prosecutions because the corruptocrats have fully circled the wagons and are using every lever of power possible to insulate themselves from exposure and, most importantly, consequences. Rod Rosenstein is exemplar of how it has been done. |
|
Quoted: Hannity is a fucking idiot. But let's be abundantly clear that if the party affiliations were reversed, the shit that has come out about the muller probe, the spying on the Trump campaign, the stuff developing in the Ukraine...pretty much anything John Solomon has been reporting on in the last few years...then Washington DC would have ground to an absolute halt. There would have been indictments and arrests and jail sentences. There would have been wailing and gnashing of teeth that makes the current media bullshit look tame by comparison. That isn't happening because the abuses of power, the lawbreaking, the malfeasance, the grift is all going in the direction that the elitist cabal likes. So it's a non issue. What Solomon has been reporting over the last few years is legitimately bombshell material. But it isn't moving the needle because the media is pretending none of it exists. Including the latest revelations that John Solomon was being spied on by, at a minimum, Obama appointees in the State department. And that's not the first time he was being monitored, either. So all this stuff is legitimately huge news. It's simply apparent at this point that the democrats are 100% in for using every lever of power possible to get their preferred end result without any concern for how it is happening. Like this entire impeachment thing in the first place. They've been talking about impeachment since Trump was elected. You know, after they tried to get the electors to break with hundreds of years of established tradition and nullify the votes of millions because Their Girl had to win to keep all this deep state profiteering going. They were looking for the excuse and it never came. So they're done waiting for the right excuse. They'll just manufacture one real quick and proceed without any regard for past precedent. I mean, we learned pretty clearly that the concept of due process was of zero concern to democrats during the Kavenaugh debacle. Everyone remembers that, right? A completely specious allegation made by somebody who couldn't even get the details of her own story right got taken super, super serial by the democrats who all voted not to confirm him. After they promoted complete bullshit to be promoted that also turned out to completely crumble under any reasonable investigation because fuck due process. What matters is that he didn't get a seat on the court. Because that fucks up their plans. So they branded him a rapist on absolutely no evidence and they're still on the campaign trail talking about impeaching him. This is no different. The "whistleblower's" lawyers are now saying they want their client to submit testimony in writing and to never have to appear to testify. Which means he will not be cross examined. So they want to impeach over a phone call we already have the transcripts for, based on the word of a "whistleblower" who didn't actually meet the requirements of being a whistleblower in the first place, who submitted his complaint on a form that got backdated to make it look like it was kosher, and after having been in contact with the House Intel comittiee's chairman. Contact that the chairman lied about, and contact that the ICIG claims not to have been informed of. A "whistleblower" who we now know worked with Biden and it's possible even traveled with Biden to Ukraine for Biden's intimidation and graft tour. And now this "whistleblower" doesn't even want to appear under oath and answer any questions. He wants to phone in his "testimony" through his lawyers in a manner that will not allow ANY cross-examination or scrutiny. And we're supposed to impeach a president on that basis. It could not be any more evident what is really going on here. View Quote Hannity should spend as much time trashing Barr and other people in a position to DO SOMETHING because as of now they have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING meaningful. But I guess you and I just have to wait "another two weeks" for all of this to "come out". The "wait two weeks for all this to come out" RIVALS "bombshells" in the number of times I have heard that utter bullshit. And I am tired of it and have become massively jaded. We live in a Banana Republic. |
|
Quoted:
The "record" for "bombshells" I remember seeing on Hannity (might be far more but I don't watch him that often) was 4 of them. You know how many resulted in ANYTHING prosecutorial or Grand Jury actions? NONE!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Hannity is a low-IQ conservative grifter boomer with those stupid “tick tock” tweets that turn out to be nothing burgers. You know how many resulted in ANYTHING prosecutorial or Grand Jury actions? NONE!!! Hannity is the right’s version of Rachel Madcow. A late night host who reads a script to entertain an audience of mainly low-IQ boomers and retirement home residents. |
|
Quoted: Hannity is a low-IQ conservative grifter boomer with those stupid "tick tock" tweets that turn out to be nothing burgers. View Quote |
|
Quoted: That’s my point. No matter what bull shit he spews nothing will happen. His show is a masterbatory jerk fest on republican red meat issues and NOTHIHG EVER HAPPENS despite supposedly Trump watching every night. View Quote My total and COMPLETE exasperation is with those in the Deep State like Bill Barr who everyone tells us are "on the up and up and are honest and totally above board, blah, blah...……..blah". Yet...…..NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. |
|
Quoted:
Not sure I'd quite frame it in those harsh of words but yeah I can't stand him either. I mean I generally agree with most of the things he says but he's just such a tool View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Hannity is a low-IQ conservative grifter boomer with those stupid "tick tock" tweets that turn out to be nothing burgers. |
|
Quoted:
Well like John_Wayne said......at least he is getting the info out there. My total and COMPLETE exasperation is with those in the Deep State like Bill Barr who everyone tells us are "on the up and up and are honest and totally above board, blah, blah...……..blah". Yet...…..NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: That’s my point. No matter what bull shit he spews nothing will happen. His show is a masterbatory jerk fest on republican red meat issues and NOTHIHG EVER HAPPENS despite supposedly Trump watching every night. My total and COMPLETE exasperation is with those in the Deep State like Bill Barr who everyone tells us are "on the up and up and are honest and totally above board, blah, blah...……..blah". Yet...…..NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. I’m fed up with the shit because, as you and others have pointed out, NOTHING WILL HAPPEN. Hillary Clinton Eric Holder John Brennan James Comey James Clapper Tony Podesta Peter Strozk NONE of them will ever see a prison cell much less a court room. |
|
Quoted:
I agree COMPLETELY but I am tired of these "bombshells" when they ALWAYS result in "duds" relative to the Deep State ever taking action. Hannity should spend as much time trashing Barr and other people in a position to DO SOMETHING because as of now they have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING meaningful. But I guess you and I just have to wait "another two weeks" for all of this to "come out". The "wait two weeks for all this to come out" RIVALS "bombshells" in the number of times I have heard that utter bullshit. And I am tired of it and have become massively jaded. We live in a Banana Republic. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Hannity is a fucking idiot. But let's be abundantly clear that if the party affiliations were reversed, the shit that has come out about the muller probe, the spying on the Trump campaign, the stuff developing in the Ukraine...pretty much anything John Solomon has been reporting on in the last few years...then Washington DC would have ground to an absolute halt. There would have been indictments and arrests and jail sentences. There would have been wailing and gnashing of teeth that makes the current media bullshit look tame by comparison. That isn't happening because the abuses of power, the lawbreaking, the malfeasance, the grift is all going in the direction that the elitist cabal likes. So it's a non issue. What Solomon has been reporting over the last few years is legitimately bombshell material. But it isn't moving the needle because the media is pretending none of it exists. Including the latest revelations that John Solomon was being spied on by, at a minimum, Obama appointees in the State department. And that's not the first time he was being monitored, either. So all this stuff is legitimately huge news. It's simply apparent at this point that the democrats are 100% in for using every lever of power possible to get their preferred end result without any concern for how it is happening. Like this entire impeachment thing in the first place. They've been talking about impeachment since Trump was elected. You know, after they tried to get the electors to break with hundreds of years of established tradition and nullify the votes of millions because Their Girl had to win to keep all this deep state profiteering going. They were looking for the excuse and it never came. So they're done waiting for the right excuse. They'll just manufacture one real quick and proceed without any regard for past precedent. I mean, we learned pretty clearly that the concept of due process was of zero concern to democrats during the Kavenaugh debacle. Everyone remembers that, right? A completely specious allegation made by somebody who couldn't even get the details of her own story right got taken super, super serial by the democrats who all voted not to confirm him. After they promoted complete bullshit to be promoted that also turned out to completely crumble under any reasonable investigation because fuck due process. What matters is that he didn't get a seat on the court. Because that fucks up their plans. So they branded him a rapist on absolutely no evidence and they're still on the campaign trail talking about impeaching him. This is no different. The "whistleblower's" lawyers are now saying they want their client to submit testimony in writing and to never have to appear to testify. Which means he will not be cross examined. So they want to impeach over a phone call we already have the transcripts for, based on the word of a "whistleblower" who didn't actually meet the requirements of being a whistleblower in the first place, who submitted his complaint on a form that got backdated to make it look like it was kosher, and after having been in contact with the House Intel comittiee's chairman. Contact that the chairman lied about, and contact that the ICIG claims not to have been informed of. A "whistleblower" who we now know worked with Biden and it's possible even traveled with Biden to Ukraine for Biden's intimidation and graft tour. And now this "whistleblower" doesn't even want to appear under oath and answer any questions. He wants to phone in his "testimony" through his lawyers in a manner that will not allow ANY cross-examination or scrutiny. And we're supposed to impeach a president on that basis. It could not be any more evident what is really going on here. Hannity should spend as much time trashing Barr and other people in a position to DO SOMETHING because as of now they have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING meaningful. But I guess you and I just have to wait "another two weeks" for all of this to "come out". The "wait two weeks for all this to come out" RIVALS "bombshells" in the number of times I have heard that utter bullshit. And I am tired of it and have become massively jaded. We live in a Banana Republic. Neither of us know who they are or the deals they are trying to make to get themselves out of this bind. I assume Barr and his deputy have rejected quite a few of those shit deals since they've been there. |
|
Quoted: So is Carlson. Which do you think has done more to red pill normies who are simple pedestrian viewers of cable news? I’m fed up with the shit because, as you and others have pointed out, NOTHING WILL HAPPEN. Hillary Clinton Eric Holder John Brennan James Comey James Clapper Tony Podesta NONE of them will ever see a prison cell much less a court room. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It's not Barr mucking shit up.... it's the career entrenched bureaucrats and their politically connected lawyer friends in and around DC, most of which are representing the clowns we want to face a prison sentence or execution. Neither of us know who they are or the deals they are trying to make to get themselves out of this bind. I assume Barrand his deputy have rejected quite a few of those shit deals since they've been there. View Quote I don't give Barr a pass though. I hope I am wrong. |
|
Quoted:
So is Carlson. Which do you think has done more to red pill normies who are simple pedestrian viewers of cable news? I’m fed up with the shit because, as you and others have pointed out, NOTHING WILL HAPPEN. Hillary Clinton Eric Holder John Brennan James Comey James Clapper Tony Podesta Peter Strozk NONE of them will ever see a prison cell much less a court room. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: That’s my point. No matter what bull shit he spews nothing will happen. His show is a masterbatory jerk fest on republican red meat issues and NOTHIHG EVER HAPPENS despite supposedly Trump watching every night. My total and COMPLETE exasperation is with those in the Deep State like Bill Barr who everyone tells us are "on the up and up and are honest and totally above board, blah, blah...……..blah". Yet...…..NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. I’m fed up with the shit because, as you and others have pointed out, NOTHING WILL HAPPEN. Hillary Clinton Eric Holder John Brennan James Comey James Clapper Tony Podesta Peter Strozk NONE of them will ever see a prison cell much less a court room. Trump's fighting this in the only way it could possibly ever been fought - come in from outside and bring The People with you. He's opening eyes, but it's going to be up to us to enact any real change. As it should be. |
|
Quoted:
I am sure there is A LOT of that also. I don't give Barr a pass though. I hope I am wrong. View Quote Every one in the DOJ and the top echelon of the FBI has worked with Comey and McCabe directly or indirectly. Not only that, most of the law firms around DC(democrats) have worked with Comey and McCabe. Not only do they have an untold amount of cash to defend themselves but they also get free representation from all of these people plus *CNN and the other fake news corps who want to take Trump to the woodshed. This goes for Clapper and Brennan in the IC also. They all get to hide behind anti Trumpers in these agencies and get to spew bullshit in the news endlessly. The shenanigans Barr has to put up with has got to be insane. |
|
Rudy's biggest problem is Rudy talking on TV too much.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGn0PqHX0AAJ4f-?format=jpg&name=large View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Rudy's biggest problem is Rudy talking on TV too much. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Watters'' Words: A political atrocity |
|
lol, I think impeachment is pretty much dead at this point.
|
|
Quoted:
Wont happen. They aren't worried about being exposed. No one is ever going to do anything to them. They just dont want to lose the issue View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I WANT the House of Representatives to hold an impeachment vote so the issue can move to the senate where Trump will most certainly be able to both bring into focus the democratic mis-deeds, and the attempted coup, then the senate can reject the impeachment and we can move on. I have even thought that it would be smart for the Republicans in the house to ask for an impeachment vote, just to get the ball rolling into the senate and shortstop all the BS in the house. The House democrats will drag this out as long as possible, so having republicans ask for the vote would short stop their tactic. Much like when all the representatives were calling for the dissolution of I.C.E., then once a vote on the issue was requested they backed off. The great irony would be if republicans asked for an impeachment vote in the house of representatives, the democrats would be faced with voting in favor of something the republicans asked for (which they hate), or voting against impeachment... The irony of those two choices would be truly entertaining to watch. about being exposed. No one is ever going to do anything to them. They just dont want to lose the issue |
|
https://saraacarter.com/adam-schiff-we-dont-need-whistleblowers-testimony-anymore-this-is-to-protect-his-her-identity/
Adam Schiff: We don’t need whistleblower’s testimony anymore, this is to protect his/her identity |
|
|
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/schiff-there-doesnt-need-to-be-a-quid-pro-quo
Schiff: 'There doesn't need to be a quid pro quo'
|
|
Quoted:
All those people trying to get their kids jobs? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGn0PqHX0AAJ4f-?format=jpg&name=large |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGn0PqHX0AAJ4f-?format=jpg&name=large |
|
Quoted:
Oh hell nahhh. Wait until this week. Something new! Tick tock! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So is the peach mint over now? Tick tock! -Schiff is selling the we already have enough to go forward narrative -Recess is over so the local sell by Dems who are in Trump districts will be known and the count given to Nancy -Articles (yes plural) of impeachment are already drawn up by Lawfareblog and ready to be voted on in the appropriate committees so they can be sent to the House floor for a full vote. -It will all depend on how well the Dems did on selling this back home to their $$$$ people. -The Rs in the Senate are ready and willing to have a trial. None if this follows traditional rules or precedents but they don't care. |
|
Didn't McConnell say sham impeachment won't make it past him?
|
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Didn't McConnell say sham impeachment won't make it past him? View Quote I’m in the minority of thinking here but I am pretty sure the Senate will convict because the Republican never-Trump and Deep State R’s will see this as their chance. |
|
Quoted:
https://saraacarter.com/adam-schiff-we-dont-need-whistleblowers-testimony-anymore-this-is-to-protect-his-her-identity/ Adam Schiff: We don’t need whistleblower’s testimony anymore, this is to protect his/her identity View Quote Anything to avoid subjecting the supposed cause of this to any sort of cross examination or questioning. Especially about his contacts with the IC democrats. |
|
Quoted: Exactly. Anything to avoid subjecting the supposed cause of this to any sort of cross examination or questioning. Especially about his contacts with the IC democrats. View Quote If a President is tossed out on a case of lies, we only prove the republic is dead and it is time again for a revolution to restore liberty. |
|
Quoted: DON IS HERE TO TOSS SALAD AND BUILD WALLS AND HE'S ALL OUT OF STEEL AND STONE! /media/mediaFiles/sharedAlbum/128_zps8f345fb6_GIF-107.gif View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Nope. If impeached the Senate is constitutionally obligated to take them up IIRC. I’m in the minority of thinking here but I am pretty sure the Senate will convict because the Republican never-Trump and Deep State R’s will see this as their chance. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Didn't McConnell say sham impeachment won't make it past him? I’m in the minority of thinking here but I am pretty sure the Senate will convict because the Republican never-Trump and Deep State R’s will see this as their chance. Just like the in the house the constitution has almost no rules on what the Senate "has" to do. The Senate only has to accept the articles of impeachment from the house. Other then that there really aren't any rules in the constitution. The Senate has some self created rules/guidelines based on past impeachments. However as we have seen in the House they could be completely ignored just like Pelosi is doing in the House. Nothing in the constitution says the Senate has to vote on the articles of impeachment. |
|
Quoted: @mnvwguy02 The first is what the constitution says. Just like the in the house the constitution has almost no rules on what the Senate "has" to do. The Senate only has to accept the articles of impeachment from the house. Other then that there really aren't any rules in the constitution. The Senate has some self created rules/guidelines based on past impeachments. However as we have seen in the House they could be completely ignored just like Pelosi is doing in the House. Nothing in the constitution says the Senate has to vote on the articles of impeachment. View Quote Unfortunately: McConnell says ‘Senate would have to take up’: hopefully he’s just sending disinformation to see what happens. |
|
Quoted:
True. Unfortunately: McConnell says ‘Senate would have to take up’: hopefully he’s just sending disinformation to see what happens. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: @mnvwguy02 The first is what the constitution says. Just like the in the house the constitution has almost no rules on what the Senate "has" to do. The Senate only has to accept the articles of impeachment from the house. Other then that there really aren't any rules in the constitution. The Senate has some self created rules/guidelines based on past impeachments. However as we have seen in the House they could be completely ignored just like Pelosi is doing in the House. Nothing in the constitution says the Senate has to vote on the articles of impeachment. Unfortunately: McConnell says ‘Senate would have to take up’: hopefully he’s just sending disinformation to see what happens. |
|
https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/14/democracy-dies-in-darkness-adam-schiff-just-banned-a-gop-lawmaker-from-attending-key-ukrainegate-deposition/
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., just banned a key Republican lawmaker from the deposition of a former anti-Trump national security official believed to be at the center of ongoing Ukraine proceedings, sources tell The Federalist. Schiff tossed Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., out of the deposition. |
|
Quoted:
True. Unfortunately: McConnell says ‘Senate would have to take up’: hopefully he’s just sending disinformation to see what happens. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: @mnvwguy02 The first is what the constitution says. Just like the in the house the constitution has almost no rules on what the Senate "has" to do. The Senate only has to accept the articles of impeachment from the house. Other then that there really aren't any rules in the constitution. The Senate has some self created rules/guidelines based on past impeachments. However as we have seen in the House they could be completely ignored just like Pelosi is doing in the House. Nothing in the constitution says the Senate has to vote on the articles of impeachment. Unfortunately: McConnell says ‘Senate would have to take up’: hopefully he’s just sending disinformation to see what happens. |
|
The leftist lynch mob in the house is just making up their own rules now. Trump will keep playing along and keep giving them rope as they hang themselves with their own lies.
Now, if Trump ever feels he's losing control, and things are going south, there will be a military preemptive counter-coup. That's because President Trump is also the "Commander in Chief," and has a constitutional duty to protect the nation from treasonists, terrorists, saboteurs, traitors, seditionists, subversives, conspirators, anarchists, etc. no matter who they are. Like most people here, I find this scenario frightful. But I also find an illegal coup that installs Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff as President and VP with their black hooded ANTIFA thugs as enforcers even more frightful. And even more frightening is an all out civil war. All empires end. And ours may be ending due to immense corruption. However, Trump won't let the socialists flush the USA down the toilet without a fight. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote
|
|
Pelosi gives update on whether the House will vote on impeachment inquiry
LIVE Pelosi, Schiff hold press conference on Trump impeachment inquiry |
|
Quoted:
That cuts both ways. Mitch is going to do what he thinks is best for the party and his majority. Got real quiet around here on this subject since Bolton's name came up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Underestimate teh Turtle at your own risk. Got real quiet around here on this subject since Bolton's name came up. And unless something quantifiably real turns up, the best thing for his remaining as MAJORITY leader is to take care of Trump's flanks. |
|
And another week has almost gone by with IG Horowitz's FISA report being unissued and AG Barr DOING NOTHING.
|
|
|
https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/18/adam-schiff-flip-flopped-on-whistleblower-testimony-after-reports-of-coordination/
House Democrats’ top impeachment inquisitor abruptly changed from repeatedly insisting on the testimony of a whistleblower against President Donald Trump to working to prevent it. The change occurred as soon as it was revealed the complainant had secretly worked with Rep. Adam Schiff’s Democratic staff prior to filing his formal complaint on Aug. 12. At first, Schiff insisted an anti-Trump bureaucrat sharing allegations against the president must share his story with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. But after news broke that Schiff’s staff had secretly worked with the whistleblower prior to the complaint being lodged, discussions that the whistleblower failed to mention when specifically asked about them as part of the official whistleblower process, Schiff moved to prevent the testimony. The move appears designed to prevent Republican lawmakers from asking the individual under oath about his discussions with House Democrats, media, and others involved in the impeachment effort. |
|
|
I'm watching Hoyer & Scalise go back and forth on the House floor from today.
Hoyer keeps saying the reasons the R's can't be in on the meeting ect. is because those are the rules from the R's. Scalise keeps asking if Hoyer will vote to change the rules. https://www.c-span.org/video/?465291-1/house-session |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.