Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 25
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:06:38 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate.  2  new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative.
View Quote
I supported him and I still don't give a shit.

There is no excuse for this, if it comes to pass. Fucking none!
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:07:30 AM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Except that part in red isn't true.
View Quote
Exactly, the trigger still needs to contact the trigger finger for each separate ignition. Rate of fire is inconsequential, it is still semi-automatic fire.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:08:36 AM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I wonder if this will finally be the straw that breaks the camel's back?
View Quote
lol No. Last Man Standing is on.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:09:06 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate.  2  new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Make no mistake, that's what this is really all about -- doing something that FBHO couldn't / wouldn't / didn't do.

This is just another ego-boost for FDJT.  He doesn't give a single care about the 2A.  If anything, based on his previous comments as a Democrat, he's more anti-2A than he is pro-2A.

In fact, he's now done absolutely nothing pro-2A and more damage to the 2A than Bush Jr. and FBHO combined!   Someone explain that!
Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate.  2  new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative.
We get it.  He's better than Hillary.  No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:10:31 AM EST
[#5]
Phase 1
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:11:02 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I supported him and I still don't give a shit.

There is no excuse for this, if it comes to pass. Fucking none!
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate.  2  new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative.
I supported him and I still don't give a shit.

There is no excuse for this, if it comes to pass. Fucking none!
Same here.

Guy who made that comment (@ShadowAngel) is pathetic and just part of the larger problem.

Wanna talk about slow?  Let's talk...
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:11:10 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I wonder if this will finally be the straw that breaks the camel's back?
View Quote
Hopefully!
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:11:31 AM EST
[#8]
The lawsuit should be filed in the ninth circuit, let's see how they handle it for the laughs.  
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:12:38 AM EST
[#9]
LOL lets see how this works out for them.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:13:20 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So where do owners join the class action for a violation of their 5th and 14th amendment rights?

5th
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

14th
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.[1]
View Quote
When are people going to learn, the constitution means nothing anymore.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:13:53 AM EST
[#11]
Gun control by executive fiat! ...Awesome precedent to set.

So much winning. I can't wait to see how president Kamala Harris re-interprets our gun laws!

"President Kamala Harris has re-re-interpreted "Machine Gun" to include any gun with machined parts, you have 90 days to turn them in"
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:14:27 AM EST
[#12]
The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions without Congress. The irony is that Judge Tigar would undoubtedly support the EO, and bestow dictatorial powers to the President.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:15:47 AM EST
[#13]
We are promised easy access to suppressors.

We get a ban on bump stocks.

We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:17:03 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We get it.  He's better than Hillary.  No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We get it.  He's better than Hillary.  No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person.
Quoted:
We are promised easy access to suppressors.

We get a ban on bump stocks.

We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead.
lol it's like clockwork
you guys are too obvious
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:17:23 AM EST
[#15]
Hey, maybe the NRA will shop for a judge to stop Trump....Oh wait.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:18:02 AM EST
[#16]
LOL

Make new "law" by executive order.  I don't currently have a bump stock, but if I did I would not comply with this bullshit.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:18:38 AM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Amnesty is the answer and add them to the nfa register
View Quote
If an amnesty was ever announced
the closets and basements would empty with tons of NFA items
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:19:11 AM EST
[#18]
it is getting awfully fucking close to time.

I don't think the bump stock ban will do it, it's a small percentage of gun owners who have one.

But this is 100% going to embolden the piece of shit leftists and they will be pushing through more 2A violations and will eventually get their semi-automatic ban and try confiscation.

I think that is when mother fuckers start

Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:20:51 AM EST
[#19]
Let's just get an injunction against this in the 9th circuit.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:21:50 AM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Amnesty is the answer and add them to the nfa register
View Quote
Fuck amnesty.

The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions. He's not aGod Emperor, he's an elected official and he's constrained by the Constitution.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:22:25 AM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

If an amnesty was ever announced
the closets and basements would empty with tons of NFA items
View Quote
IF amnesty is announced......my ARs...PTR91....and my Glock 17 will be declared machine
guns ....then be converted later.... They want to play games....I will play them right back...fuck'em
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:22:54 AM EST
[#22]
This could literally cost Trump 2020.

His margin is razor thin and this will cause a lot of gun owners to sit it out
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:23:19 AM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

IF amnesty is announced......my ARs...PTR91....and my Glock 17 will be declared machine
guns ....then be converted later.... They want to play games....I will play them right back...fuck'em
View Quote
'Fo 'sho!

Everything I have will be registered.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:23:56 AM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We are promised easy access to suppressors.

We get a ban on bump stocks.

We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead.
View Quote
LOL, no.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:25:26 AM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This could literally cost Trump 2020.

His margin is razor thin and this will cause a lot of gun owners to sit it out
View Quote
I've been saying that for months ever since this BS started.

Look at what just happened in FL with the recounts and all that crap.  You think it was that close "just because" or do you think Rick Scott doing the exact same thing to Floridians had any influence on things?  I argue the latter to be the case.

Now it's the same thing again with FDJT, except at the national level. People are pissed and they're gonna stay pissed.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:26:00 AM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

'Fo 'sho!

Everything I have will be registered.
View Quote
Yup, every single gun I own will be registered.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:26:29 AM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

"Sorry your gal lost."
View Quote
This
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:26:56 AM EST
[#28]
Sure am going to miss my dag
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:27:29 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
All you "don't comply" guys are totally full of shit.  You'll comply, for the exact same reason you don't own other illegal weapons.

Yes someone will sue, and lose... because the .gov's justification for banning bump stocks is identical to their regulating/outlawing full-auto.

"Just compensation " may be a problem for their plan though. But easily fixed.
View Quote
You should google the compliance rates for ny, mass and cali’s registrations.  I’ve never seen numbers higher than 10%
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:28:28 AM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Fuck amnesty.

The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions. He's not aGod Emperor, he's an elected official and he's constrained by the Constitution.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Amnesty is the answer and add them to the nfa register
Fuck amnesty.

The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions. He's not aGod Emperor, he's an elected official and he's constrained by the Constitution.
No.....but the ATF seems to be able to change codeifed legal definitions.....remember the shoestring incident......and the original bumpstock ruling....  I meant Sig Brace ruling
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:30:04 AM EST
[#31]
The definition of a firearm and its functions is codified into law, and is not subject to off-the-page arbitrary reinterpretation by ANYBODY or any agency.

Only Congress has the authority to change what the law says and means.

There's really no way that a bumpstock ban will withstand scrutiny under a competent legal challenge.  An item that can be attached to a firearm and does not even affect the operation of the trigger group in and of itself can't possibly be considered to be anything but what it is...a piece of plastic, a spring, and a few other parts attached to a firearm.

This ain't no selector switch.  We know that. But they need to be made aware of that.

That being said...gun grabbers are idiots.  Democrats are idiots.   And bumpstocks are stupid. Learn to do the bump without this gadget that does not make bumping possible, it just makes it easier to do if you're a bit of a klutz.

Bumping is itself stupid.  Trading accuracy for a higher rate of fire makes sense if you're trying to get your enemies to stay under cover on the battlefield,  but for the rest of us,  you're just wasting ammo and burning up barrels faster.

I certainly don't want to see anything banned.  In fact the very idea of banning or restricting any THING makes me very angry indeed.   But if they do try to ban bumpstocks, they'll lose in a court challenge against that ban, just be sure you don't file it in the 9th circuit.

Poke your thumb in their eye by learning to bump with a regular stock.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:30:10 AM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
No wonder this is being wrapped up after the ellection and long before 2020.

Trumps a politician now

View Quote
I won't forget it in 2020. I couldn't bring myself to vote for him in 2016, and if he does this, in spite of some other good things he has done, I will not vote for him in 2020.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:31:53 AM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This shit ends up going through it will be a slippery slope and it's all downhill
View Quote
Next Dem President:

“Well, if the “anti-establishment outsider” (lol) Trump banned firearm features arbitrarily and unilaterally via an EO, then so can I all you dumb hicks.”
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:32:56 AM EST
[#34]
can you be arrested for violating an executive order?
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:33:00 AM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I am sure they are enjoying those stocks at the public range with absolutely no fear of going to prison.

Even if they are not complying, they are.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Seriously. Bumpstocks have been banned in multiple states. Compliance has been next to nothing. Hate when people project.
I am sure they are enjoying those stocks at the public range with absolutely no fear of going to prison.

Even if they are not complying, they are.
My public range won't let you use them.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:33:02 AM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No.....but the ATF seems to be able to change codeifed legal definitions.....remember the shoestring incident......and the original bumpstock ruling.......
View Quote
This may never turn into a shooting war, but shit like this may change quite a few things that the BATF have gotten away with since 1934.  It could very well change a lot of things if enough of the right kind of legals get behind an illegal change in codified law.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:33:52 AM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
lol it's like clockwork
you guys are too obvious
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

We get it.  He's better than Hillary.  No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person.
Quoted:
We are promised easy access to suppressors.

We get a ban on bump stocks.

We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead.
lol it's like clockwork
you guys are too obvious
No one in this thread was arguing that until his comment.

So one guy has that opinion....the other 99% of us fully realize that T$ is better than Hillary.  That doesn't mean we shouldn't criticize him when it's blatantly warranted.

You guys are like the Obama sycophants that cheered wildly no matter what he did.

Suddenly, a GOP POTUS unilaterally implementing more gun control than the last D POTUS did in 8 years is really no big deal.  If this was Obama, you would be crying like a little bitch.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:34:14 AM EST
[#38]
Are we panicking yet?
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:34:49 AM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I won't forget it in 2020. I couldn't bring myself to vote for him in 2016, and if he does this, in spite of some other good things he has done, I will not vote for him in 2020.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
No wonder this is being wrapped up after the ellection and long before 2020.

Trumps a politician now

I won't forget it in 2020. I couldn't bring myself to vote for him in 2016, and if he does this, in spite of some other good things he has done, I will not vote for him in 2020.
President Kamala Harris thanks you for your support
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:35:27 AM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Even the nut case gun grabbers have been quoted in various news interviews that this is going to be caught up in court before it would ever be implemented.

Even if they have the companies list that showed who bought them, they would need to secure warrants to come get them if someone didn't turn it in.

The compliance level if put into place is not going to be what they might think, just the attempt to try and do it this way has many ramifications on a lot of other things that any president now and in the future might think they could get away with.
View Quote
This.  If we fold, we will see a new era of bullshit and regulation.

We have a an excuse to stand firm and refuse and have it be a meaningful and representative refutation that will show the power brokers that they overstepped their rule.

The problem being, there are too many who forget that by choosing individual benefit, they doom everyone (themselves included) to a life of more govt power and control.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:35:36 AM EST
[#41]
@swampfoxoutdoors I hate to say, "I told you so..."

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This is going to get destroyed in the courts before it ever goes into effect
View Quote
I wouldn't bet the farm on that.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:36:18 AM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Awe the beauty of it, I don't go to public ranges, ever, I honestly don't know anyone in my area that goes to public ranges either.
View Quote
Most gun owners have no other choice. Most

Typical gun owners talk, I got mine fuck everyone else attitude. The attitude that kills rights.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:36:58 AM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

curios, huh?

prove ownership of C&R license; i don't think you're really about that
View Quote
I don't understand what you mean.

This EO is fucked up, I agree with everybody here.

I want an answer why DIAS's, LL' s and those 10/22 accelerator stocks didn't get this same reaction.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:37:02 AM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
This could literally cost Trump 2020.

His margin is razor thin and this will cause a lot of gun owners to sit it out
View Quote
Never sit it out. Protest votes may not "count" but they are noticed. If we could get even 10% voting for alternative candidates, someone would be looking to scoop up those votes im the next round. They listen when they realize you aren't following them anymore. What really sucks is how many people don't vote at all. There's enough eligible non-voters to sway every election in the country.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:37:09 AM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
All you "don't comply" guys are totally full of shit.  You'll comply, for the exact same reason you don't own other illegal weapons.

Yes someone will sue, and lose... because the .gov's justification for banning bump stocks is identical to their regulating/outlawing full-auto.

"Just compensation " may be a problem for their plan though. But easily fixed.
View Quote
Huurrrrr Durrrr

I'm not turning in shit.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:37:12 AM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Damn. No compensation.

That's a lot of moola down the drain for some of those guys.
View Quote
That's a taking without compensation, not to mention the direct 2nd amendment violation.

What I don't understand is how Florida was able to pass it without getting sued...
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:37:13 AM EST
[#47]
Good ole 1000yds John Burns gonna have a field day with bump stock owners.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:38:03 AM EST
[#48]
I admit a part of me wants to get a dumb bump stock just so I can not turn it in.
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:38:19 AM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So where do owners join the class action for a violation of their 5th and 14th amendment rights?

5th
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

14th
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.[1]
View Quote
I don't see f how what you highlighted matters
Link Posted: 11/29/2018 10:38:30 AM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

This may never turn into a shooting war, but shit like this may change quite a few things that the BATF have gotten away with since 1934.  It could very well change a lot of things if enough of the right kind of legals get behind an illegal change in codified law.
View Quote
It could also make congress feel like they need to do something.  That could have any number of bad or good results.  Probably bad.
Page / 25
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top