User Panel
Quoted: Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate. 2 new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative. View Quote There is no excuse for this, if it comes to pass. Fucking none! |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate. 2 new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Make no mistake, that's what this is really all about -- doing something that FBHO couldn't / wouldn't / didn't do. This is just another ego-boost for FDJT. He doesn't give a single care about the 2A. If anything, based on his previous comments as a Democrat, he's more anti-2A than he is pro-2A. In fact, he's now done absolutely nothing pro-2A and more damage to the 2A than Bush Jr. and FBHO combined! Someone explain that! |
|
Quoted:
I supported him and I still don't give a shit. There is no excuse for this, if it comes to pass. Fucking none! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Again for the slow. Imagine an america right now where trump had lost. Hillary making the calls. Democrat house. Possibly dem senate. 2 new liberal judges on the court. Trump isn't perfect, but he's a fuckload better than the alternative. There is no excuse for this, if it comes to pass. Fucking none! Guy who made that comment (@ShadowAngel) is pathetic and just part of the larger problem. Wanna talk about slow? Let's talk... |
|
|
The lawsuit should be filed in the ninth circuit, let's see how they handle it for the laughs.
|
|
Quoted:
So where do owners join the class action for a violation of their 5th and 14th amendment rights? 5th No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. 14th Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.[1] View Quote |
|
Gun control by executive fiat! ...Awesome precedent to set.
So much winning. I can't wait to see how president Kamala Harris re-interprets our gun laws! "President Kamala Harris has re-re-interpreted "Machine Gun" to include any gun with machined parts, you have 90 days to turn them in" |
|
The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions without Congress. The irony is that Judge Tigar would undoubtedly support the EO, and bestow dictatorial powers to the President.
|
|
We are promised easy access to suppressors.
We get a ban on bump stocks. We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead. |
|
Quoted:
We get it. He's better than Hillary. No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
We get it. He's better than Hillary. No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person. Quoted:
We are promised easy access to suppressors. We get a ban on bump stocks. We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead. you guys are too obvious |
|
Hey, maybe the NRA will shop for a judge to stop Trump....Oh wait.
|
|
LOL
Make new "law" by executive order. I don't currently have a bump stock, but if I did I would not comply with this bullshit. |
|
|
Let's just get an injunction against this in the 9th circuit.
|
|
|
Quoted: If an amnesty was ever announced the closets and basements would empty with tons of NFA items View Quote guns ....then be converted later.... They want to play games....I will play them right back...fuck'em |
|
This could literally cost Trump 2020.
His margin is razor thin and this will cause a lot of gun owners to sit it out |
|
|
|
Quoted:
This could literally cost Trump 2020. His margin is razor thin and this will cause a lot of gun owners to sit it out View Quote Look at what just happened in FL with the recounts and all that crap. You think it was that close "just because" or do you think Rick Scott doing the exact same thing to Floridians had any influence on things? I argue the latter to be the case. Now it's the same thing again with FDJT, except at the national level. People are pissed and they're gonna stay pissed. |
|
|
Quoted:
All you "don't comply" guys are totally full of shit. You'll comply, for the exact same reason you don't own other illegal weapons. Yes someone will sue, and lose... because the .gov's justification for banning bump stocks is identical to their regulating/outlawing full-auto. "Just compensation " may be a problem for their plan though. But easily fixed. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Fuck amnesty. The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions. He's not aGod Emperor, he's an elected official and he's constrained by the Constitution. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Amnesty is the answer and add them to the nfa register The President doesn't have the authority to change codified legal definitions. He's not aGod Emperor, he's an elected official and he's constrained by the Constitution. |
|
The definition of a firearm and its functions is codified into law, and is not subject to off-the-page arbitrary reinterpretation by ANYBODY or any agency.
Only Congress has the authority to change what the law says and means. There's really no way that a bumpstock ban will withstand scrutiny under a competent legal challenge. An item that can be attached to a firearm and does not even affect the operation of the trigger group in and of itself can't possibly be considered to be anything but what it is...a piece of plastic, a spring, and a few other parts attached to a firearm. This ain't no selector switch. We know that. But they need to be made aware of that. That being said...gun grabbers are idiots. Democrats are idiots. And bumpstocks are stupid. Learn to do the bump without this gadget that does not make bumping possible, it just makes it easier to do if you're a bit of a klutz. Bumping is itself stupid. Trading accuracy for a higher rate of fire makes sense if you're trying to get your enemies to stay under cover on the battlefield, but for the rest of us, you're just wasting ammo and burning up barrels faster. I certainly don't want to see anything banned. In fact the very idea of banning or restricting any THING makes me very angry indeed. But if they do try to ban bumpstocks, they'll lose in a court challenge against that ban, just be sure you don't file it in the 9th circuit. Poke your thumb in their eye by learning to bump with a regular stock. |
|
Quoted:
No wonder this is being wrapped up after the ellection and long before 2020. Trumps a politician now View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I am sure they are enjoying those stocks at the public range with absolutely no fear of going to prison. Even if they are not complying, they are. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
No.....but the ATF seems to be able to change codeifed legal definitions.....remember the shoestring incident......and the original bumpstock ruling....... View Quote |
|
Quoted:
lol it's like clockwork you guys are too obvious View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We get it. He's better than Hillary. No one here is arguing otherwise...literally not a single person. Quoted:
We are promised easy access to suppressors. We get a ban on bump stocks. We would have been better of with Hillary, at least the republicans and NRA would have fought, instead they just followed this morons lead. you guys are too obvious So one guy has that opinion....the other 99% of us fully realize that T$ is better than Hillary. That doesn't mean we shouldn't criticize him when it's blatantly warranted. You guys are like the Obama sycophants that cheered wildly no matter what he did. Suddenly, a GOP POTUS unilaterally implementing more gun control than the last D POTUS did in 8 years is really no big deal. If this was Obama, you would be crying like a little bitch. |
|
Quoted:
I won't forget it in 2020. I couldn't bring myself to vote for him in 2016, and if he does this, in spite of some other good things he has done, I will not vote for him in 2020. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No wonder this is being wrapped up after the ellection and long before 2020. Trumps a politician now |
|
Quoted:
Even the nut case gun grabbers have been quoted in various news interviews that this is going to be caught up in court before it would ever be implemented. Even if they have the companies list that showed who bought them, they would need to secure warrants to come get them if someone didn't turn it in. The compliance level if put into place is not going to be what they might think, just the attempt to try and do it this way has many ramifications on a lot of other things that any president now and in the future might think they could get away with. View Quote We have a an excuse to stand firm and refuse and have it be a meaningful and representative refutation that will show the power brokers that they overstepped their rule. The problem being, there are too many who forget that by choosing individual benefit, they doom everyone (themselves included) to a life of more govt power and control. |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
This could literally cost Trump 2020. His margin is razor thin and this will cause a lot of gun owners to sit it out View Quote |
|
Quoted:
All you "don't comply" guys are totally full of shit. You'll comply, for the exact same reason you don't own other illegal weapons. Yes someone will sue, and lose... because the .gov's justification for banning bump stocks is identical to their regulating/outlawing full-auto. "Just compensation " may be a problem for their plan though. But easily fixed. View Quote I'm not turning in shit. |
|
|
Good ole 1000yds John Burns gonna have a field day with bump stock owners.
|
|
I admit a part of me wants to get a dumb bump stock just so I can not turn it in.
|
|
Quoted:
So where do owners join the class action for a violation of their 5th and 14th amendment rights? 5th No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. 14th Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State. Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.[1] View Quote |
|
Quoted: This may never turn into a shooting war, but shit like this may change quite a few things that the BATF have gotten away with since 1934. It could very well change a lot of things if enough of the right kind of legals get behind an illegal change in codified law. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.