User Panel
Quoted:
How retarded are these people? I had never heard of buzfeed until today...Google/wiki tells me it's a pretty untrustworthy site. Are these leftists that stupid that they'd jump all over a report from a site that has a history of posting falsehoods and hoaxes? View Quote |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Sure seems to be a lot of wishcasting into what "not accurate" means. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Holy fuck, it's been a long time since I've watched CNN. Jesus Christ these people are some one sided,biased sons of bitch's.
|
|
lol you were a nevertrumper before the bumpstock thing. If I had to guess, you're the reason those tards are allowed to stink up the site.
|
|
CNN and MSNBC and elected Democrat officials with unbelievable egg on their face
Fake fucking news proven to exist again. |
|
|
|
The Buzzfeed hack reporter is still standing by his sources. Its time to find out who these sources are. There needs to be a journalist standard put in place now for news reporting.
|
|
|
|
Cohen follows the fate of Creepy Porn Lawyer.
Next he will be beating his girlfriend and evicted from his house, not necessarily in that order. |
|
Quoted:
He told Cohen to lie while he was president. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They're gleefully saying they have proof from Michael Cohen and other sources that Trump suborned perjury over the Trump Tower meetings in Moscow. It is impeachable and CNN firmly believes this is the moment. They are all in on this one. 'Rock solid" I'm guessing Trump will drop out any day now. |
|
AC 360 is some of the most fascinating TV I've seen in awhile....the f**kers are having such a come to Jesus moment. You can almost feel their embarrassment, and sadness coming through the TV.
Tubin the noobin just said this is a huge mistake by the media, and that they owe everybody a huge apology. This hurts them bigly in the long run. |
|
Quoted:
What does "not accurate " mean? What will Cohen's testimony be, please cite sources for the information that no one has yet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
CNN has lost whatever bit of credibility they had. But sadly like how 1st page news gets a 10th page correction. So the public at large gets the bullshit instead of the correction.
|
|
Quoted:
"Not accurate" does not automatically mean "fake news". Accuracy is not binary. If a minor detail is incorrect that doesn't invalidate everything else. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Sure seems to be a lot of wishcasting into what "not accurate" means. What will Cohen's testimony be, please cite sources for the information that no one has yet. |
|
This really really pisses me off. MSM will talk about this Mueller update for a couple of hours and they will move on to the next fake story. At best we will get a “oopsies, their bad”.
All the people that heard the original story will not hear that the story was a lie. People should be lynched. |
|
Ummmm, ummmm, they said it wasn't accurate. That means it isn't totally wrong! Trump will still be impeached and President Pelosi will happen!
(Moonbat mode off) Edit: Holy shit. I hadn't read the post from the underscore lefty. Here I was trying to be absurd and it turns out I read it's mind. |
|
|
Quoted:
Arfcom NeverTrumpers have been wrong about EVERYTHING for over three years now. That's not a sign of "retardation" but rather a sign of mental illness. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
Quoted:
"Not accurate" does not automatically mean "fake news". Accuracy is not binary. If a minor detail is incorrect that doesn't invalidate everything else. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Sure seems to be a lot of wishcasting into what "not accurate" means. What will Cohen's testimony be, please cite sources for the information that no one has yet. |
|
At this point, the left had better hope Trump declares a national emergency to get this fuckup out of the news.
|
|
CNN needs to be eliminated and all employees sent to re-education camps. Or prison as traitors and propagandists.
|
|
Demoncrats loved to be lied to or are just plain ignorant and as long as that continues, CNN and MSNBC, etc will keep shoveling that shit down their throat as they ask for more.
HEY LIBERALS...THERE IS NO DAMN SANTA CLAUS! |
|
|
Quoted: "Not accurate" does not automatically mean "fake news". Accuracy is not binary. If a minor detail is incorrect that doesn't invalidate everything else. View Quote Accuracy is certainly binary in this context. Remember, Blumenthal tried to lecture us all during the Kavanaugh proceedings: falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. |
|
Quoted: Looks like they issued a "no comment".
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
You seem pretty happy about being suckered. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
"Not accurate" does not automatically mean "fake news". Accuracy is not binary. If a minor detail is incorrect that doesn't invalidate everything else. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: Sure seems to be a lot of wishcasting into what "not accurate" means. What will Cohen's testimony be, please cite sources for the information that no one has yet. When the declassification comes, I will remind you of this. Attached File |
|
Quoted:
You lost me there. No way an investigation is legitimate with the kind of biased investigators and prosecutors Mueller has working for him. Not only that, the evidence they used to launch this is tainted with bias and is unverified. View Quote More to your point, if Mueller and team only wanted to get Trump and have such a strong political bias, then why did they issue a statement this evening throwing cold water on the Buzzfeed story? Now, it was a very parsed statement, and that could mean anything from the story got details wrong to the story being dead wrong, but they issued a statement to contradict it. Why do that if all you want to do is get Trump and you're totally biased? |
|
|
Quoted:
As I said throughout this thread, I was/is skeptical of the Buzzfeed story. Looks like I was right. More to your point, if Mueller and team only wanted to get Trump and have such a strong political bias, then why did they issue a statement this evening throwing cold water on the Buzzfeed story? Now, it was a very parsed statement, and that could mean anything from the story got details wrong to the story being dead wrong, but they issued a statement to contradict it. Why do that if all you want to do is get Trump and you're totally biased? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You lost me there. No way an investigation is legitimate with the kind of biased investigators and prosecutors Mueller has working for him. Not only that, the evidence they used to launch this is tainted with bias and is unverified. More to your point, if Mueller and team only wanted to get Trump and have such a strong political bias, then why did they issue a statement this evening throwing cold water on the Buzzfeed story? Now, it was a very parsed statement, and that could mean anything from the story got details wrong to the story being dead wrong, but they issued a statement to contradict it. Why do that if all you want to do is get Trump and you're totally biased? |
|
Quoted: "Not accurate" does not automatically mean "fake news". Accuracy is not binary. If a minor detail is incorrect that doesn't invalidate everything else. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
As I said throughout this thread, I was/is skeptical of the Buzzfeed story. Looks like I was right. More to your point, if Mueller and team only wanted to get Trump and have such a strong political bias, then why did they issue a statement this evening throwing cold water on the Buzzfeed story? Now, it was a very parsed statement, and that could mean anything from the story got details wrong to the story being dead wrong, but they issued a statement to contradict it. Why do that if all you want to do is get Trump and you're totally biased? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You lost me there. No way an investigation is legitimate with the kind of biased investigators and prosecutors Mueller has working for him. Not only that, the evidence they used to launch this is tainted with bias and is unverified. More to your point, if Mueller and team only wanted to get Trump and have such a strong political bias, then why did they issue a statement this evening throwing cold water on the Buzzfeed story? Now, it was a very parsed statement, and that could mean anything from the story got details wrong to the story being dead wrong, but they issued a statement to contradict it. Why do that if all you want to do is get Trump and you're totally biased? |
|
Quoted: "Not accurate" does not automatically mean "fake news". Accuracy is not binary. If a minor detail is incorrect that doesn't invalidate everything else. View Quote 'not accurate' pretty much describes the lies and mis-representations you do about Trump we just haven't established how 'not accurate' you are about your part in representing the nra |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.