User Panel
Posted: 11/14/2018 10:56:58 PM EDT
They aren't satisfied with the diverging timelines and minor demons that CERN is introducing, I guess.
Cthulhu 2032! MEGA! For about a decade, the biggest machine on the planet has been the Large Hadron Collider, situated on the border between Switzerland and France. The main body of the collider is a giant ring over 5 miles in diameter and the entire facility employs thousands of people. But according to a new announcement from China’s Institute of High Energy Physics, it might not be the world’s largest machine for long.
The Chinese institute announced plans to build its own particle accelerator over the next decade, and it’s designed to surpass the LHC in every way. According to the report authored by the institute, the upcoming collider will be over five times more powerful and over 20 miles in diameter. The proposed collider is called the Circular Electron Positron Collider, and was first proposed back in 2012. At the time, the specs for the collider were vague. Proposals ranged significantly in terms of size and power, so it wasn’t clear exactly how big or how much science would be done with it. That all changes with this latest announcement, which is accompanied by a 500-page detailed proposal for every last inch of the collider. Here’s how the plan is going to unfold: First, the CEPC will be built with its 20-mile diameter ring. If construction goes according to plan—which it very well may not, considering the scale of the endeavor—the collider should be finished by 2030. The CEPC will then go into full operation, where it will begin producing exotic particles like the Higgs boson. According to the plan, the CEPC should be able to make a million Higgs particles over a decade, along with millions of other rare particles like W and Z bosons. Currently, only handfuls of these particles are produced in the Large Hadron Collider, and their rarity makes them difficult study subjects. If scientists could drown themselves in these particles—metaphorically speaking, of course—they could learn so much more about them. These particles might also be key to unlocking new physics, such as discovering the identity of dark matter. View Quote |
|
The new physics it unlocks will be "what happens when the Three Gorges Dam fails?".
|
|
Guess it beats building cities that no one actually lives in.
|
|
I have faith in the ability of the Chinese to dig a twenty mile tunnel. The rest not so much.
|
|
|
Cool, I have full faith in Chinese engineering. They have such an outstanding record so far, especially when it comes to large scale projects.
|
|
Dolly will have Invisalign. Or maybe she already does. I just blew my own mind.
|
|
This is how the earth is going to be ripped in half.
Built by the Chinese.....What could possibly go wrong? |
|
|
True. They already have quantum stealth and quantum radar. How can America even compete?
|
|
I certainly wouldn't underestimate their propaganda.
|
|
Is it going to look all fucked up like their aircraft carriers?
|
|
These fuckers are going to oopen a porthole to anohter dimension that will bring a reign of fuck and hell upon us.
|
|
My dad installed some cranes at the Hedron Collider. Said it was pretty neat to wander around there. If the Chinese really build theirs he will probably be there as well.
|
|
|
I was at CERN when they first proposed this. They've been doing their best to steal people away from CERN, but only having luck with Chinese nationals as far as I can tell. The 2 biggest issues they are going to have is getting the people who are capable of designing and building a machine like this to leave CERN, and the fact that although they have money and desire right now, their demographics and thus their economics are not moving in the right direction for this kind of multi decade project.
|
|
Quoted:
Is he the particle collider crane guru? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
Quoted:
I was at CERN when they first proposed this. They've been doing their best to steal people away from CERN, but only having luck with Chinese nationals as far as I can tell. The 2 biggest issues they are going to have is getting the people who are capable of designing and building a machine like this to leave CERN, and the fact that although they have money and desire right now, their demographics and thus their economics are not moving in the right direction for this kind of multi decade project. View Quote |
|
It either will not work or will break shortly after first use.
|
|
Quoted:
Would not underestimate the Chinese. View Quote |
|
|
|
And as usual the media gets the details wrong, the LHC makes hundreds of thousands of Higgs per run cycle, the problem is distinguishing them from the QCD background. That's why an e-p collider is better for electroweak physics, much much lower QCD background so you can make precision EW measurements. For them it will also be easier to build before converting to p-p because it's so big they can probably have non-superconducting, or lightly superconducting magnets to start.
|
|
I hope they have a Chinese version of Gordon Freeman.
And crowbars...... |
|
Quoted:
And as usual the media gets the details wrong, the LHC makes hundreds of thousands of Higgs per run cycle, the problem is distinguishing them from the QCD background. That's why an e-p collider is better for electroweak physics, much much lower QCD background so you can make precision EW measurements. For them it will also be easier to build before converting to p-p because it's so big they can probably have non-superconducting, or lightly superconducting magnets to start. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Can they be trusted with that many magnets? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I was at CERN when they first proposed this. They've been doing their best to steal people away from CERN, but only having luck with Chinese nationals as far as I can tell. The 2 biggest issues they are going to have is getting the people who are capable of designing and building a machine like this to leave CERN, and the fact that although they have money and desire right now, their demographics and thus their economics are not moving in the right direction for this kind of multi decade project. |
|
Quoted:
And as usual the media gets the details wrong, the LHC makes hundreds of thousands of Higgs per run cycle, the problem is distinguishing them from the QCD background. That's why an e-p collider is better for electroweak physics, much much lower QCD background so you can make precision EW measurements. For them it will also be easier to build before converting to p-p because it's so big they can probably have non-superconducting, or lightly superconducting magnets to start. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Do the Chinese submit their work for western peer review? I honestly don't know. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
And as usual the media gets the details wrong, the LHC makes hundreds of thousands of Higgs per run cycle, the problem is distinguishing them from the QCD background. That's why an e-p collider is better for electroweak physics, much much lower QCD background so you can make precision EW measurements. For them it will also be easier to build before converting to p-p because it's so big they can probably have non-superconducting, or lightly superconducting magnets to start. |
|
They've done some amazing projects. You can get a lot done with slave labor.
Not that they work, but they are amazing... |
|
Doesn't the US have a particle collider that is half built, IIRC in texas.
|
|
Quoted:
Doesn't the US have a particle collider that is half built, IIRC in texas. View Quote eta Pic here On a related subject it took me changing my line of work to become friends with Roy Schwitters |
|
Quoted:
I'm going with this. Didn't understand about half of what was written, but with a username of MrHiggs, gotta go with it! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
And as usual the media gets the details wrong, the LHC makes hundreds of thousands of Higgs per run cycle, the problem is distinguishing them from the QCD background. That's why an e-p collider is better for electroweak physics, much much lower QCD background so you can make precision EW measurements. For them it will also be easier to build before converting to p-p because it's so big they can probably have non-superconducting, or lightly superconducting magnets to start. |
|
|
So what have we gained by having the LHC?
Did we find new technology or inventions from this giant machine? |
|
If the particles are so small, why does the tunnel need to be so big?
|
|
|
|
Can someone explain the purpose of this research?
I'm not sure why we need so much research on bosun-higgs particles or why they are important |
|
|
In the original timeline this collider created a singularity that ended up consuming the earth.
It will be interesting to see how it works out this time. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.