User Panel
Posted: 7/22/2023 4:44:46 PM EDT
Currently in NKJV but cross referencing it with the Amplified bible. While I understand it is not the closest literally, it is very close. Part of my problem again due to age is being raised on KJV and memorizing KJV. There were not many options out there back in the 70-80's. So everything I learned was out of KJV and it is hard to undo that. If starting fresh, I would likely go with other versions.
Anyway, NKJV here for now with a side of Amplified. |
|
NLT, but use NIV and NKJV for reference and comparison as well as online references to get back to original language
|
|
I like the King James Version, but I in no way advocate the "King James Only" crowd.
|
|
When I do read it’s the NASB.
But I am also a flip flopper and vacillate between loving and hating God, so…. I’ll read, the stop, then read, stop, etc. But, each time it’s the NASB when I do go back. |
|
|
|
I like American King James but I also check out other versions to compare translations...
|
|
KJV, but if I had to switch I'd use NKJV. I'm not an "only" type about it though, and don't care what others use.
|
|
Quoted: Yep, I know "those types". I avoid "those types". View Quote I don't avoid "those types". 1 Corinthians 12:2 And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you. Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron, So a man sharpens the countenance of his friend. |
|
I can't comment on accuracy (WAAAAAAY outside of my wheelhouse), but I've always appreciated the KJV the most, for literary reasons.
It just feels more poetic. Probably has more to do with my upbringing than anything else, but...you asked. |
|
|
At present a Dixson Study bible, Thompson Study Bible, and a Scofield. Just kinda to see whut iz and aint.
|
|
Mostly King James but have also been reading now from the New American Standard,which is a little easier to read but does not change what is in the KJV.
|
|
I have an NLT but our church uses ESV (Jack Graham/southern baptist)
|
|
Quoted: I can't comment on accuracy (WAAAAAAY outside of my wheelhouse), but I've always appreciated the KJV the most, for literary reasons. It just feels more poetic. Probably has more to do with my upbringing than anything else, but...you asked. View Quote Yep, the "poetic" part you mention I have heard before. And...you are correct. |
|
Quoted: Original Language? Holy Spirit doesn't speak English? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: NLT, but use NIV and NKJV for reference and comparison as well as online references to get back to original language Original Language? Holy Spirit doesn't speak English? The Holy Spirit is in me. I speak english...so he kind of does with me... |
|
The Jerusalem Bible (a gift from a family friend in my early teens).
The Revised Standard Version and Apocrypha, was used in the Orthodox seminary from which I graduated. The Duoay Confraternity. The ESV. The Passion and Resurrection Gospels in the original Greek, again, from my seminary studies. Also other versions are in our house, but the above are what I usually read. |
|
|
Was raised King James Only and all that goes along with that.
No longer in that camp and read ESV, NLT, and NASB and a few others. Pat |
|
I go to a wonderful Independent Baptist Church and my Pastor is “King James Only” and I use that since I grew up with that also but I honestly like the ESV better since it’s written in the style of English we use today.
|
|
NASB for study. Pre-2011 NIV for light reading or teaching kids. ESV or HCSB somewhere in between.
KJV for poetry. YMMV, but I believe those are the best modern translations. If I had to pick one it would be NASB. NIV is a little *too* 'thought for thought' for me. I am more of a clunky, literal person, and NASB and its stiff word-for-word attitude suits that personality well. Things I would not do: -Amplified Bible. -TNIV -The Message -Any NIV printed after ~2011. There's an argument to be made that some of the 2011 updates improved it, but they also weakened it with some of their gender-word translations. |
|
KJV. Others change too many words. Don’t be confused or ill informed, the KJV is not hard to read. If you have eye’s to see, see.
|
|
|
I've always thought that this was a hard question to answer, when phrased in terms of accuracy.
Almost none of us speak the languages it was written in. And of the few of very learned folks among us that might, even fewer are capable of understanding the language it was written in at the time. I mean...not many native English speakers can actually read Beowulf, and comparatively...it wasn't written that that long ago in the grand scheme of things, know what I mean? Languages evolve over time. And then it gets stranger, when I think "Is the version that millions of Portuguese believers are reading actually all that accurate, in the finer details? And really...how would I even know? Not only do I not speak the languages it was translated from, I don't speak the version it was translated to". Lather, rinse, repeat for a ton of other translations. I guess that's why they call it "faith". I'm being a bit shitty there , but at some level, we all have to sort of accept a certain level of domain-specific expertise that none of us have, and just sort of go with it. It's either that, or devote large portions of our lives learning ancient (and then various modern) languages. It's a big ask. |
|
NASB, and ESV. Grew up on the NIV and KJV. NASB is my favorite and was my go to translation was I was taking some seminary courses and needed to get into the text.
|
|
Quoted: at some level, we all have to sort of accept a certain level of domain-specific expertise that none of us have, and just sort of go with it. It's either that, or devote large portions of our lives learning ancient (and then various modern) languages. It's a big ask. View Quote I think every Christian - or anyone else who wants to learn about the bible, or church history - ought to be exposed to textual criticism and its history. A little bit of knowledge of different manuscript families/lines, translation controversies, how those were sometimes wrapped up in political stuff, the difference between word for word versus thought for thought, and so on, can go a long way in helping people learn to trust the bible. Besides, it's a fascinating subject from a historical standpoint. |
|
Douay–Rheims and New Revised Standard Version, complete edition.
I have several of those heathen translations some of you folks like too, as a reference. I tend to quote KJV on arfcom unless the passage or book isn't available. |
|
I'm not even Christian, but I went on a long search for "truth." I read just about all of them, including the Gnostic chapters. King James is by far the worst IMO. Frankly all of the translations are pretty shit because Peter was a pedantic idiot who didn't understand a single word Christ said, and then who became focused on control and manipulation right from the beginning. Fight me, I don't care.
|
|
Quoted: Douay Rheims and New Revised Standard Version, complete edition. I have several of those heathen translations some of you folks like too, as a reference. I tend to quote KJV on arfcom unless the passage or book isn't available. View Quote Shows you how much I know. I've never heard of it. |
|
Quoted: Shows you how much I know. I've never heard of it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Douay Rheims and New Revised Standard Version, complete edition. I have several of those heathen translations some of you folks like too, as a reference. I tend to quote KJV on arfcom unless the passage or book isn't available. Shows you how much I know. I've never heard of it. My, you must have missed out on some epic religion forum threads over the years. Probably good for your sanity. But, https://www.drbo.org |
|
Quoted: I'm not even Christian, but I went on a long search for "truth." I read just about all of them, including the Gnostic chapters. King James is by far the worst IMO. Frankly all of the translations are pretty shit because Peter was a pedantic idiot who didn't understand a single word Christ said, and then who became focused on control and manipulation right from the beginning. Fight me, I don't care. View Quote Wut You clearly put your trust in the writings of somebody else or your personal feelings. |
|
|
I have an old heavily annotated NIV I tend to use most. I don't even know how many translations I have (plus the UBS Greek).
I have to confess to a bias against the KJV. A long time ago I was tutoring for Literacy Volunteers of America, and my student had one goal: He wanted to stand up and read a favorite passage on Sunday when the pastor asked for members to do so. A worthy goal (and against the rules of LVA, but whatever). His church used the KJV and he was adamant about staying with that translation. We worked for a long time on that goal. He got there. I came away pretty firmly convinced that understanding the Bible is hard enough without thrashing through archaic language and sentence construction that allow more errors of comprehension than modern translations. YMMV. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.