Quoted:do you really think if she got out immediately when he said, he would have thrown her to the ground ?

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:


Really? What an impressive disconnect from reality.

We've seen, over the decades, that no matter how egregeious an offense is, if the offender wears a uniform, he is judged at ever level by a different standard. Time and time again. there is an "internal investigation" which clears things up. Worst case, a slap on the wrist and 99.87% not even that.
Throw an 18-year face down on the asphalt and it's perfectly fine. She is the poster child for a perfect citizen. Yeah, burned out headlight. What to do, set her in boiling oil?
 Even the slowest rat can see the maze has no exit.
What an insult to my intelligence.

You as a civilian, try 10% of the shyt they do and you will be found guilty. There are multiple levels of justice and double or triple standards. Unless there is race involved. But not here, she does not fit the profile where media could milk it for its political content. The only people who endorse/protect/stay silent about the above practice are the ones who have something to benefit from it, a vested interest, or total imbeciles.

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:

The slimy cowards have now taken their phones off the hook.  

WANE 15 has reached out to both the South Whitley Police Department and the South Whitley Town Council, but it appears the phones have been disconnected.

Quoted:
I see it the other way around. Why the need to get butthurt about people piling on a bad cop? If there's a thread somewhere on some shitbag lawyer, do I get butthurt that people don't like lawyers, and lecture everyone on the chaos that would ensue without lawyers around

Quoted:

Perhaps I'm misinterpreting him but I see nothing in his post that has any problem with piling on this bad cop. He simply recognizes that there's more than a few in this thread that are clearly lumping all law enforcement in with him. That's dumb. You don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Pile on this cop all you want but this type of shit is atomically retarded:

That number represents all law enforcement of all kinds in the whole nation. This is the comment of an anarchist.

Quoted:

You don't see it at all if you are ignoring the cop haters in this thread piling on ALL cops because one bad cop got caught on video.  You are part of the problem with LE recruitment.  I am not defending this guy but am pissed because people in here are piling on ALL cops, just like the left wingers want.  Follow the ones yanking on your leash then like a good dog.  And anyone in here stupid enough to think I defended the cop on the video: it would be a good thing if you learn to read and comprehend.  We don't need bad cops, but we sure as hell need cops.

Quoted:

Who are the rest of the more than a few that are "clearly lumping all law enforcement in with him"

Quoted:

No it wasn’t. He dragged her out and threw her on the ground. An apple is not an orange.

Quoted:

I am not in agreement that "more than a few in this thread that are clearly lumping all law enforcement in with him".  If you think that I am perhaps you should get out of the sun because you're having issues.

Quoted:
Gave it some more flair... FAFO, am I right?

https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/277223/SHE_SHOULD_ROLLED_THE_WINDOW_DOWN_ALL_TH-3194367.png

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:


Really? What an impressive disconnect from reality.

We've seen, over the decades, that no matter how egregeious an offense is, if the offender wears a uniform, he is judged at ever level by a different standard. Time and time again. there is an "internal investigation" which clears things up. Worst case, a slap on the wrist and 99.87% not even that.
Throw an 18-year face down on the asphalt and it's perfectly fine. She is the poster child for a perfect citizen. Yeah, burned out headlight. What to do, set her in boiling oil?
 Even the slowest rat can see the maze has no exit.
What an insult to my intelligence.

You as a civilian, try 10% of the shyt they do and you will be found guilty. There are multiple levels of justice and double or triple standards. Unless there is race involved. But not here, she does not fit the profile where media could milk it for its political content. The only people who endorse/protect/stay silent about the above practice are the ones who have something to benefit from it, a vested interest, or total imbeciles.

Quoted:
I see a lot of LE hating idiots and leftist shills in this thread.  Leftists (and authority hating right wingers?) who don't realize that without cops we would have even more chaos than the regressive progressives are fomenting now.  Is that the goal?  Chaos?  Support LE because they are the only ones between us and those who would go batshit crazy on everyone if we had no law enforcement.  Bad ones on on duty and have to go for sure but good, decent ones far outnumber them.

Quoted:
I love how the main counterargument seems to be here (not necessarily here, but everywhere that I've seen) "he's biased, he's biased!" Lol, yeah, well the name of the YouTube channel is "The Civil Rights Lawyer," meaning it's about the defense of civil rights within the available means via the judiciary. Defense against whom?? Walmart? Only the government, generally via LEO, can violate ones civil rights. Of course I'm biased you fucking dolt. It's not Fox News, it's a lawyer who sues cops/government for a living and makes videos about it. Nowhere have I claimed I'm not biased. I do not represent the government, nor advocate for the government, or its officials/employees. Exactly the opposite.

I think the word they're looking for is "fair." I don't purposefully edit videos to remove things that are exculpable to one side or the other. I work with the facts I'm given, but I advocate for the side I want to advocate for. As a lawyer, you don't get to make up your own facts - you work within them.

I go through a lot of these videos and post about 2 to 3 per week. So I've seen a bunch of them. What should cops avoid to avoid the public getting upset at them? It's all about the "he deserved it defense." It's real, both in the court of public opinion and the real courtroom. Why the outrage here? This girl didn't deserve this. She could be any of our daughters. Contrast that with the dude driving around in the white car w/ the ski mask who shot at the cops. Or the pedo who pulled the gun on the cops at the hotel sting a couple of days ago. That's what matters to people.

I think that's probably what the other cop here meant, or was trying to say to this tone-deaf cop who just took down a high school girl. This is a good family; people are gonna care about this, so you better be able to make the case that she deserved it. It really is that simple, even though I wish it wasn't. If you're gonna violate constitutional rights, you better not to do it to somebody the public will see as undeserving and sympathetic.

If the best defense to this body cam footage is to attack the messenger, that's a pretty weak defense. I left out nothing substantive. The only thing missing is the missing body cam footage from the initial conversation. And whose fault is that that it's missing? In court, we can generally get a jury instruction informing the jury that they can assume a negative inference where a LEO spoilated footage.

Quoted:

Good luck and Godspeed, sir. You're doing great work.

Quoted:


I don’t think anyone really believes we should be without police or want to be without police.  Same as the IRS, they are at minimum perceived as a necessary evil.  What some seem to view as LE hating is the absence of LE ball gargling.  There is absolutely NO requirement to like the police or the IRS. As a function of government the founders expected the people to have a at least a healthy skepticism, and an adversarial attitude when warranted.  Ball gargling is a bonus the government enjoys and cultivates, not a requirement.

I disagree that the police are the ONLY ones that stand between society and chaos.  History has shown that when they are not around or otherwise an encumbrance to the decent people, people will step up and maintain order and defend the vulnerable.  History has shown that the police will do exactly what they are told to do.  If we are lucky they are told to do things that are lawful while respecting citizens constitutional rights.  Even recent history has shown us that we are often not lucky that the police were ordered to be lawful and respectful of rights.  

And the incident that started this thread is a prime example.

Quoted:


He doesn't understand that if there was no pay and no power, pretty much every cop in the US would drop their issued toys and walk away. [no, I don't blame them, most jobs are like that] It's not done out of altruism but because it's an income. Past that, any other reasons can be good or bad. Some try to be the officer society expects them to be and others are in it simply because of the power it gives them and make no mistake, they have the power to absolutely rat fvck the typical person if they want to sans any other evidence to the contrary. And cell phones [and other cameras]  are proving that better then words ever could. On the good side, those same devices and cameras are making sure good officers aren't getting rat fvcked by a lying POS who claims something that never happened or has their ''own'' version that has no relation to the facts or truth.