I'm not even through page 3 yet and these comments have me dumbfounded that some of you guys go out in the real world

Ok so you make accusations without evidence.  Noted.  Goodbye.

That was awesome.  Complete and utter meltdown from a t-shirt.  

Jeezus.

Good thing he wasn't gay at a Christian bakery . . .

He won't understand.  Don't even bother trying to explain.  He's just confused.

Customer also asked to speak to a manager.

Not really an asshole when someone loses their mind over a t-shirt, screams at you, and calls you racist.   His response was pretty measured IMO.

@Rogueboss

Come on BOSS, you know I am normal

Let's not rush to judgement on this one, there are still 3 more days left.

Is the dash-- the new underscore?

Says the ginger soyboy got fired for being abusive to the customer. Good firing.

lol see ya!

What are you on about? The Christian baker won in the Supreme Court.

LMFAO

Attached File

Yup. My thoughts as well.

Disagree. GD is often hypocritical but I don't think so in this case. Maybe a few, but not the majority.

So what am I confused about?  You have said nothing I didn't already know. I have pretty much spelled out my position to you which mainly involved a hypothetical LE response and determining intent.  Your take was lazy, don't like it?  Then one shouldn't be a lazy cop....generally speaking of course.  Don't want you to get your panties in a twist again.

Typical #nevertumpeter.

Screen name?

Race, color, religious creed or national origin.

Maybe?

That's one ugly motherfucker

Good. Business is business plain and simple, and that employee’s behavior was simply embarrassing, not reflecting any sort of professionalism at all regardless of anything else.

The problem with that is Pro-Tump business person would never act like an insane antifa liberal.  The Trump person would allow the transaction to take
place and go on with their life.

Pro Trump business people typically like money.    They know better than to piss off half their potential customer base.

So far finished the replies on page one, but what the hell is up with the little girl scream.

I'm curious about the guys who are putting blame on the customer in this video. If you walked into a store, and were treated like that by an employee because they didn't like your shirt, are you really saying your response would be "Good day to you, sir!", and you'd leave? I'm not buying it, unless you really are the Right's soy-boy equivalent. I can't imagine letting someone shit on me like that and just walking out because "their rules". Fuck him, and fuck that.

Depends on the jurisdiction.  In DC and some other places political affiliation is a protected class under the local human rights act.  I prepared a CLE on the issue ages ago.

SO sorry your princess LOST>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAGA!

PING!!!!!!!!


And he might ought to be reported to the po po so he can't buy a gun.  Unstable....

The dash don't be silent...

No, he said if he sold him it, he wouldn't call his boss and get him fired. Seemed like a fair trade.

Please video it if you do!!!!!!

When did it become acceptable to give up all of your God given rights when you step into a buisness?

Please give an explanation using the Constitution and Bill of Rights as your source material (and you can use Supreme Court decisions if you like) to explain how a private business can force you to give up your "God given rights".

Which rights do you give up when entering a private business voluntarily?

Good for Trump shirt dude, the haters will cede the union waiting for the left to engage in Marquess of Queensberry rules.

Obviously.

Well, I have a cousin that had to fire his sister from the family business.  Hopefully he will soon be unemployed for not doing his job and selling a legal product to a customer.

Best line to me was right near the end.  "He's still your president."

Wow.  

Bake that cake! It goes both ways.

Bake. My. Fucking. Cake. 13'er.

and for GD, classically...

Click To View Spoiler

Bet the shop owner is pissed.  That’s what you get for hiring ginger cucks.

I guess you didn't get the news. Here it is.   June 2018 decision.  7-2.

"The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who declined to make a wedding cake for a same-sex ceremony.

The case – Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission – asked the high court to balance the religious rights of the baker against the couple’s right to equal treatment under the law. Similar disputes have popped up across the U.S."

https://www.foxnews.com/us/supreme-court-decides-colorado-gay-wedding-cake-case-a-timeline-of-events

That store was huge. Look at the back. It goes on into infinity.

In case you didn't know we are at war with the left.

This is how you win the culture war.
This is what it looks like on the front lines of the culture war.

You can say he was trespassing all you want. Until he is charged with trespassing it legally doesn't matter.

People with your mind set is why we are losing. It's why in 25 years we want even recognize this country anymore unless we fight.

And on the other end of the vape shop employee spectrum LOL

https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Shopping-at-local-store-and-notice-manager-owner-wearing-this-Nazi-related-/5-2154634/

Unfortunately, I think this is what it would come down to in the State of GA.

Wonder if and when the pendulum will swing the other way though.

If the black dude pulled out his bunker buster and told the gay ginger guy to suck it.

You don't make things better by acting like a fool.  It just alienates people from your position.  Imagine if your hero in this case allowed the clerk to screech uncontrollably and then walked out as asked.  Then, contact the owner.....post the video if he wanted to.  The owner may be a good guy who just hired a dumbass.  Now the Trump shirt wearing tard made Trump supporters look like fools.  Stupid behavior on the part of so called conservatives won't win anyone over.  Stupid behavior on the part of liberals is the best chance for us to convince the majority of fence sitters to look away from liberals.  Behaving just as stupidly as the liberal side does us no favors.

Also, side note....there are lots of things that are crimes that ultimately can only be prosecuted if there is a willing victim in prosecution.  Doesn't mean a crime wasn't occurring and if LE has a reasonable belief that a crime was occurring, they can take enforcement action.  The Supreme Court has already weighed in on this.....recently.

Booze, drugs, strippers -- and trespassing, Supreme Court says

WASHINGTON – "Peaches" got creamed at the Supreme Court Monday.

The justices ruled unanimously that District of Columbia police were within their rights to arrest 21 partygoers for trespassing and disorderly conduct in 2008 at a boozy bachelor party hosted by a woman named Peaches.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that police made an "entirely reasonable inference" that those attending the party, which featured booze, drugs and strippers, knew they shouldn't be there because the home was vacant and in disarray.

"The living room had been converted into a makeshift strip club," he wrote. "Strippers in bras and thongs, with cash stuffed in their garter belts, were giving lap dances. Upstairs, the officers found a group of men with a single, naked woman on a bare mattress — the only bed in the house — along with multiple open condom wrappers and a used condom.

"Taken together, the condition of the house and the conduct of the party-goers allowed the officers to make several 'common-sense conclusions about human behavior.' "

Furthermore, Thomas said, there was the problem of "a bachelor party without a bachelor."

The case is important in setting a precedent for what police can and cannot do when confronted with similar situations. Here, a federal jury awarded $680,000 to the partygoers who sued the district after the arrests, and a federal appeals court upheld the verdict.

While the court's judgment was unanimous, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said it need not have backed the police department's version of events.

"The court’s jurisprudence, I am concerned, sets the balance too heavily in favor of police unaccountability to the detriment of Fourth Amendment protection," Ginsburg wrote.

When the case was heard during the first week of the court's 2017 term in October, several justices showed their age. Justice Stephen Breyer, 79, said it's no longer uncommon for young people to show up for a party without knowing all the details — as opposed to during "the Middle Ages, with which I am more familiar."

Justice Elena Kagan, 57, recalled parties she was invited to "long, long ago" where "marijuana was maybe present" and attendees didn't always know the host.

The details were so tantalizing that after nearly an hour's debate, Justice Samuel Alito, 67, asked an obvious question. "Just out of curiosity," he said, "who is the bachelor at this bachelor party?"

Even that was unclear to many celebrants, said their lawyer, Nathaniel Garrett.

"So Peaches is the host at a bachelor party," Justice Anthony Kennedy, 81, mused.

In his opinion for the court, Thomas cut into Peaches:

"When the officers spoke with Peaches, she was nervous, agitated, and evasive," he wrote. "After initially insisting that she had permission to use the house, she ultimately confessed that this was a lie — a fact that the owner confirmed. Peaches’ lying and evasive behavior gave the officers reason to discredit everything she had told them."