Quoted:
lol you quoted his post and said that is true and went on about white knighting.  Maybe you should take your own advice and take better care of what you're quoting.  As to trespassing, any cop who was worth a shit and not lazy would be able to solve this without citing the customer or putting him on trespass notice if the owner confirmed the clerk was not acting in good faith.  If you're citing the guy or giving notice without at least attempting to contact him or the manager, you're a shitty cop.  Let me guess, you're a nevertrumper?

Quoted:

Your analogy would be correct however, apples to apples would be your Gardner is mowing your lawn. You are out of town. A disgruntled ex employee of the Gardner comes on your property and argues with your Gardner.

Your Gardner tells his ex employee to get the fuck off his lawn, he’s working.

Neither parties own your property so can they kick one another off your land?

Quoted:
Most likely this whole display of human stupidity would be resolved by Trump shirt leaving.  Case closed.  On to more important things.  If they both wanted to pursue it (and both are clearly morons) then two citations resolves it for the time being.

Please post links to me being a nevertrumper.  Feel free to pull from any portion of this site.  You know that whole ASSuming thing?

Quoted:

Your analogy would be correct however, apples to apples would be your Gardner is mowing your lawn. You are out of town. A disgruntled ex employee of the Gardner comes on your property and argues with your Gardner.

Your Gardner tells his ex employee to get the fuck off his lawn, he’s working.

Neither parties own your property so can they kick one another off your land?

Quoted:
It was a question due to them outing themselves in every thread about anything involving Trump with intellectual dishonesty and cognitive dissonance. It would be much easier and better police work if the cop showed some initiative and solved it right there given time and opportunity.

Quoted:

He absolutely would not be trespassing in Texas. Do you know for a fact that he would be in Georgia?

Penal Code § 30.05. Criminal Trespass.

(a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains on or in property, including an aircraft or other vehicle, of another without effective consent or he enters or remains in a building of another without effective consent and he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.
(b) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Entry” means the intrusion of the entire body.
(2) “Notice” means:
(A) oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;
(B) fencing or other enclosure obviously designed to exclude intruders or to contain livestock;
(C) a sign or signs posted on the property or at the entrance to the building, reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders, indicating that entry is forbidden;
(D) the placement of identifying purple paint marks on trees or posts on the property, provided that the marks are:
(i) vertical lines of not less than eight inches in length and not less than one inch in width;
(ii) placed so that the bottom of the mark is not less than three feet from the ground or more than five feet from the ground; and
(iii) placed at locations that are readily visible to any person approaching the property and no more than:
(a) 100 feet apart on forest land; or
(b) 1,000 feet apart on land other than forest land; or
(E) the visible presence on the property of a crop grown for human consumption that is under cultivation, in the process of being harvested, or marketable if harvested at the time of entry.
(3) “Shelter center” has the meaning assigned by Section 51.002(1), Human Resources Code.
(4) “Forest land” means land on which the trees are potentially valuable for timber products.
(5) “Agricultural land” has the meaning assigned by Section 75.001, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
(6) “Superfund site” means a facility that:
(A) is on the National Priorities List established under Section 105 of the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. Section 9605); or
(B) is listed on the state registry established under Section 361.181, Health and Safety Code.
(c) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor at the time of the offense was a fire fighter or emergency medical services personnel, as that term is defined by Section 773.003, Health and Safety Code, acting in the lawful discharge of an official duty under exigent circumstances.
(d) An offense under Subsection (e) is a Class C misdemeanor unless it is committed in a habitation or unless the actor carries a deadly weapon on or about the actor’s person during the commission of the offense, in which event it is a Class A misdemeanor. An offense under Subsection (a) is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is a Class A misdemeanor if:
(1) the offense is committed:
(A) in a habitation or a shelter center; or
(B) on a Superfund site; or
(2) the actor carries a deadly weapon on or about his person during the commission of the offense.
(e) A person commits an offense if without express consent or if without authorization provided by any law, whether in writing or other form, the person:
(1)enters or remains on agricultural land of another;
(2) is on the agricultural land and within 100 feet of the boundary of the land when apprehended; and
(3) had notice that the entry was forbidden or received notice to depart but failed to do so.
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category the person was carrying.

Quoted:

Cashier cannot kick out customers, the manager/owner can.

Quoted:

Well gee, I guess he wasn't acting on the wishes of his employer after all.

Quoted:

How certain are you about that? Trespass laws are very different all over the country, and they're different for businesses than they are for residences in most of those places. May you should post the exact Georgia law that pertains if you want get all self-righteous, so we can see if you know what the hell you're talking about or not.

Quoted:
Trump shirt wearer is trespassing.

Entitled prick thinks he can force a private business to sell him things. lol.

Ginger boy is meltdown central.

Couple of real winners.

Quoted:
LMAO

You still don't get it.

He was the agent of the owner, the apparent only one at the time. He told the man to leave. Said man refused. Said man therefore was trespassing under the law. Period.

Does not matter what the owner stated later about how he wished HIS CHOSEN agent should have acted.