User Panel
Quoted:
Yes, but the V-2 they fielded was compromised by mild steel and other alloy restrictions. I don't see them getting the A-9 functional, and if they had the metal to do so, it would have went into making turbojets that last for more than 2 missions instead. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: Had they been able to develop the A-9 "Amerikarakete" they probably wouldn't have needed a plane to make it to NY course, someone like Eugen Sanger, with his Silbervogel project could have fixed that quick |
|
Quoted: LOL the B-36 top speed as the same as the Mustang. It might be slow by modern standards but in 1945 it wasn’t slow at al. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It wouldn’t have, we were still hung up on straight wings, the ME262 changed that, and the P1101 gave the world the bases for F-86 and Mig15 View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: XP-47H with Chrysler IV-2220 inverted V-16 engine, 490 MPH ... https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/Republic_XP-47H.jpg XP-47J with souped up R-2800 and lightened airframe - 505 MPH ... https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/Republic_XP-47J_three-quarter_front_view.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The ME262 would have been dead meat to the straight-winged P-80, and the Swallow's wings were swept, not for aerodynamics, but to move the center of gravity and center of lift, similar to the Sunderland flying boat. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It wouldn’t have, we were still hung up on straight wings, the ME262 changed that, and the P1101 gave the world the bases for F-86 and Mig15 |
|
Quoted:
That is a question that never has been answered, the ME262 was never tested against the P80, the engines simply were not reliable enough to do mock dogfights, or even push the ME262, so at best to say one would be dog meat is simply a unfounded statement. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
That is a question that never has been answered, the ME262 was never tested against the P80, the engines simply were not reliable enough to do mock dogfights, or even push the ME262, so at best to say one would be dog meat is simply a unfounded statement. "The Americans also tested a Me 262A-1a/U3 unarmed photo reconnaissance version, which was fitted with a fighter nose and a smooth finish. Between May and August 1946, the aircraft completed eight flights, lasting four hours and forty minutes. Testing was discontinued after four engine changes were required during the course of the tests, culminating in two single-engine landings.[94] These aircraft were extensively studied, ..." (Wikipedia) - sems to indicate some testing was indeed done. That having been said, lets look at stated specs: Me-262 General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 10.6 m (34 ft 9 in) Wingspan: 12.6 m (41 ft 4 in) Height: 3.5 m (11 ft 6 in) Wing area: 21.7 m2 (234 sq ft) Aspect ratio: 7.32 Empty weight: 3,795 kg (8,367 lb) [119] Gross weight: 6,473 kg (14,271 lb) [119] Max takeoff weight: 7,130 kg (15,719 lb) [119] Powerplant: 2 × Junkers Jumo 004B-1 turbojet Performance Maximum speed: 900 km/h (560 mph, 490 kn) Range: 1,050 km (650 mi, 570 nmi) Service ceiling: 11,450 m (37,570 ft) Rate of climb: 20 m/s (3,900 ft/min) at max weight of 7,130 kg (15,720 lb) Thrust/weight: 0.28 P-80: General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 34 ft 5 in (10.49 m) Wingspan: 38 ft 9 in (11.81 m) Height: 11 ft 3 in (3.43 m) Wing area: 237.6 sq ft (22.07 m2) Aspect ratio: 6.37 Airfoil: NACA 65-213[57] Empty weight: 8,420 lb (3,819 kg) Gross weight: 12,200 lb (5,534 kg) Max takeoff weight: 16,856 lb (7,646 kg) Zero-lift drag coefficient: 0.0134 Frontal area: 32 sq ft (3.0 m2) Powerplant: 1 × Allison J33-A-35 centrifugal compressor turbojet, 4,600 lbf (20 kN) thrust dry 5,400 lbf (24 kN) with water injection[58] Performance Maximum speed: 594 mph (956 km/h, 516 kn) at sea level Maximum speed: Mach 0.76 Cruise speed: 439 mph (707 km/h, 381 kn) Range: 825 mi (1,328 km, 717 nmi) Ferry range: 1,380 mi (2,220 km, 1,200 nmi) Service ceiling: 46,800 ft (14,300 m) Rate of climb: 6,870 ft/min (34.9 m/s) Time to altitude: 20,000 ft (6,100 m) in 5 minutes 30 seconds Lift-to-drag: 17.7 Wing loading: 51.3 lb/sq ft (250 kg/m2) Thrust/weight: 0.364 0.435 with water injection. Looks to me the P-80 is 34 MPH faster, has a better thrust-to-weight ratio, a 9000 foot higher service ceiling, and climbs 75% faster, at the expense of 200 miles range - IF you don't hang tip or drop tanks on it. With that said there is going to be a actual comparison done late 2020 or 2021. The world only ME262 with original Jumos will be taking to the skies in 2020. Your statement on the origins is correct, but it was discovered that swept wings brought other advantages as well, if there were not we’d still be flying straight winged aircraft, the Germans discovered this and swept wings were incorporated into the P1101, which didn’t have twin wing mounted engines like the 262. |
|
wouldn't we have been unable to nuke both Hiroshima and Nagasaki without the uranium recovered from Berlin after the Nazis surrendered?
|
|
Yes P-51s shot down 262s but the majority were while landing. The overall exchange vs allied fighters was very positively in the 262s favor.
Early P-80s were not without reliability issues,one bit Dick Bong for example. It was a better plane than the 262 certainly but we aren’t playing by the real world timeline and there is the question of where are these P-80s flying from and what is the Luftwaffe putting in the air? |
|
Quoted: wouldn't we have been unable to nuke both Hiroshima and Nagasaki without the uranium recovered from Berlin after the Nazis surrendered? View Quote https://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/31/us/captured-cargo-captivating-mystery.html |
|
Quoted: It just got added to the mix, and this was off the U-234 https://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/31/us/captured-cargo-captivating-mystery.html View Quote that is crazy ! . |
|
Quoted: WOW that is crazy ! . View Quote Nazi Uranium for the Manhattan Project The U Boat U 234 with U 235 Nuclear cargo Flanked by US escorts, surrendered German submarine U-234 arrives at dock in Port...HD Stock Footage ww2 U-boat U-234 |
|
Quoted: LOL the B-36 top speed as the same as the Mustang. It might be slow by modern standards but in 1945 it wasn’t slow at al. View Quote As has been mentioned most of the flight would have been around 200MPH - but the real advantage of the B-36 was altitude. Very few aircraft would have been able to get to it. The Ta152 is the only Axis aircraft that I think would have had a chance. |
|
Quoted:
What do you think about the JU-390 flight near NYC? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Germany didn't have a working bomb design nor the electrical capacity to run the number of centrifuges necessary to build even a single bomb. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Think about what you typed. When one aircraft is so unreliable that you can't even run it hard to compare it to another - that is a CLUE. Why do you think P-51s were shooting them down? "The Americans also tested a Me 262A-1a/U3 unarmed photo reconnaissance version, which was fitted with a fighter nose and a smooth finish. Between May and August 1946, the aircraft completed eight flights, lasting four hours and forty minutes. Testing was discontinued after four engine changes were required during the course of the tests, culminating in two single-engine landings.[94] These aircraft were extensively studied, ..." (Wikipedia) - sems to indicate some testing was indeed done. That having been said, lets look at stated specs: Me-262 General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 10.6 m (34 ft 9 in) Wingspan: 12.6 m (41 ft 4 in) Height: 3.5 m (11 ft 6 in) Wing area: 21.7 m2 (234 sq ft) Aspect ratio: 7.32 Empty weight: 3,795 kg (8,367 lb) [119] Gross weight: 6,473 kg (14,271 lb) [119] Max takeoff weight: 7,130 kg (15,719 lb) [119] Powerplant: 2 × Junkers Jumo 004B-1 turbojet Performance Maximum speed: 900 km/h (560 mph, 490 kn) Range: 1,050 km (650 mi, 570 nmi) Service ceiling: 11,450 m (37,570 ft) Rate of climb: 20 m/s (3,900 ft/min) at max weight of 7,130 kg (15,720 lb) Thrust/weight: 0.28 P-80: General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 34 ft 5 in (10.49 m) Wingspan: 38 ft 9 in (11.81 m) Height: 11 ft 3 in (3.43 m) Wing area: 237.6 sq ft (22.07 m2) Aspect ratio: 6.37 Airfoil: NACA 65-213[57] Empty weight: 8,420 lb (3,819 kg) Gross weight: 12,200 lb (5,534 kg) Max takeoff weight: 16,856 lb (7,646 kg) Zero-lift drag coefficient: 0.0134 Frontal area: 32 sq ft (3.0 m2) Powerplant: 1 × Allison J33-A-35 centrifugal compressor turbojet, 4,600 lbf (20 kN) thrust dry 5,400 lbf (24 kN) with water injection[58] Performance Maximum speed: 594 mph (956 km/h, 516 kn) at sea level Maximum speed: Mach 0.76 Cruise speed: 439 mph (707 km/h, 381 kn) Range: 825 mi (1,328 km, 717 nmi) Ferry range: 1,380 mi (2,220 km, 1,200 nmi) Service ceiling: 46,800 ft (14,300 m) Rate of climb: 6,870 ft/min (34.9 m/s) Time to altitude: 20,000 ft (6,100 m) in 5 minutes 30 seconds Lift-to-drag: 17.7 Wing loading: 51.3 lb/sq ft (250 kg/m2) Thrust/weight: 0.364 0.435 with water injection. Looks to me the P-80 is 34 MPH faster, has a better thrust-to-weight ratio, a 9000 foot higher service ceiling, and climbs 75% faster, at the expense of 200 miles range - IF you don't hang tip or drop tanks on it. Swept wings also bring some disadvantages - see 'Dutch Roll", AKA "Sabre Dance". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That is a question that never has been answered, the ME262 was never tested against the P80, the engines simply were not reliable enough to do mock dogfights, or even push the ME262, so at best to say one would be dog meat is simply a unfounded statement. "The Americans also tested a Me 262A-1a/U3 unarmed photo reconnaissance version, which was fitted with a fighter nose and a smooth finish. Between May and August 1946, the aircraft completed eight flights, lasting four hours and forty minutes. Testing was discontinued after four engine changes were required during the course of the tests, culminating in two single-engine landings.[94] These aircraft were extensively studied, ..." (Wikipedia) - sems to indicate some testing was indeed done. That having been said, lets look at stated specs: Me-262 General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 10.6 m (34 ft 9 in) Wingspan: 12.6 m (41 ft 4 in) Height: 3.5 m (11 ft 6 in) Wing area: 21.7 m2 (234 sq ft) Aspect ratio: 7.32 Empty weight: 3,795 kg (8,367 lb) [119] Gross weight: 6,473 kg (14,271 lb) [119] Max takeoff weight: 7,130 kg (15,719 lb) [119] Powerplant: 2 × Junkers Jumo 004B-1 turbojet Performance Maximum speed: 900 km/h (560 mph, 490 kn) Range: 1,050 km (650 mi, 570 nmi) Service ceiling: 11,450 m (37,570 ft) Rate of climb: 20 m/s (3,900 ft/min) at max weight of 7,130 kg (15,720 lb) Thrust/weight: 0.28 P-80: General characteristics Crew: 1 Length: 34 ft 5 in (10.49 m) Wingspan: 38 ft 9 in (11.81 m) Height: 11 ft 3 in (3.43 m) Wing area: 237.6 sq ft (22.07 m2) Aspect ratio: 6.37 Airfoil: NACA 65-213[57] Empty weight: 8,420 lb (3,819 kg) Gross weight: 12,200 lb (5,534 kg) Max takeoff weight: 16,856 lb (7,646 kg) Zero-lift drag coefficient: 0.0134 Frontal area: 32 sq ft (3.0 m2) Powerplant: 1 × Allison J33-A-35 centrifugal compressor turbojet, 4,600 lbf (20 kN) thrust dry 5,400 lbf (24 kN) with water injection[58] Performance Maximum speed: 594 mph (956 km/h, 516 kn) at sea level Maximum speed: Mach 0.76 Cruise speed: 439 mph (707 km/h, 381 kn) Range: 825 mi (1,328 km, 717 nmi) Ferry range: 1,380 mi (2,220 km, 1,200 nmi) Service ceiling: 46,800 ft (14,300 m) Rate of climb: 6,870 ft/min (34.9 m/s) Time to altitude: 20,000 ft (6,100 m) in 5 minutes 30 seconds Lift-to-drag: 17.7 Wing loading: 51.3 lb/sq ft (250 kg/m2) Thrust/weight: 0.364 0.435 with water injection. Looks to me the P-80 is 34 MPH faster, has a better thrust-to-weight ratio, a 9000 foot higher service ceiling, and climbs 75% faster, at the expense of 200 miles range - IF you don't hang tip or drop tanks on it. With that said there is going to be a actual comparison done late 2020 or 2021. The world only ME262 with original Jumos will be taking to the skies in 2020. Your statement on the origins is correct, but it was discovered that swept wings brought other advantages as well, if there were not we’d still be flying straight winged aircraft, the Germans discovered this and swept wings were incorporated into the P1101, which didn’t have twin wing mounted engines like the 262. |
|
Germany had some futuristic designs but their economy and industrial ability was going down fast.
The usa's economy was on fire and the industrial might was in high gear. Japan's warships and merchant ships were being sunk much faster than they could be built. Both Germany and japan were pretty much out of fuel. Besides fighting much fuel is needed for pilot training. Not sure about germany but japan had shot their wad and they were very short on experienced pilots. Two ocean war was pretty grim in 41-43 but as we built up our air power , sea power and merchant fleets at the same time we were taking apart the ability of Japan and Germany to fight in the air on the seas and under the seas with submarines the outcome was clear. Ultra high technology is cool but you have to be able to build real numbers to make any difference |
|
Quoted:
My point on the ME262 is that it was never compared and during testing it was never pushed very hard. The Specs on the ME262 are actually considered by many very conservative due to the inability to push the engines. Paul Allen’s ME262 is going to honestly see how well it would have been had germany had the proper materials to build the Jumos. The design of the engines were not at fault, the metallurgy was. I have actually been quite involved with the ME262 project here. I do know that there are many unknowns and down right false info as well, true it wasn’t a dog fighter compared to other piston designs, but the same can be said for the P80. The biggest reason ME262’s were shot down was it’s vulnerability during take off and landing, but then again that was also the same issue of the Gloster Meteor and the P80. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That is a question that never has been answered, the ME262 was never tested against the P80, the engines simply were not reliable enough to do mock dogfights, or even push the ME262, so at best to say one would be dog meat is simply a unfounded statement. With that said there is going to be a actual comparison done late 2020 or 2021. The world only ME262 with original Jumos will be taking to the skies in 2020. Your statement on the origins is correct, but it was discovered that swept wings brought other advantages as well, if there were not we’d still be flying straight winged aircraft, the Germans discovered this and swept wings were incorporated into the P1101, which didn’t have twin wing mounted engines like the 262. View Quote Mike |
|
Quoted:
Swept wings did bring benefits in the transonic regime, but the wings of the ME-262 did not. A German aeronautical engineer by the name of Adolph Buseman recommended a wing sweep of 35*, but the chosen sweep of 18.5* was done for center of gravity reasons rather than high speed aerodynamics, and had little impact on high speed operations for the aircraft. There were proposals for later high speed (HG) variants of the ME-262 which would have had 35 or 45* swept wings - the HG 2 and HG 3. These never advanced past paper, however. Mike View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
That is a question that never has been answered, the ME262 was never tested against the P80, the engines simply were not reliable enough to do mock dogfights, or even push the ME262, so at best to say one would be dog meat is simply a unfounded statement. With that said there is going to be a actual comparison done late 2020 or 2021. The world only ME262 with original Jumos will be taking to the skies in 2020. Your statement on the origins is correct, but it was discovered that swept wings brought other advantages as well, if there were not we’d still be flying straight winged aircraft, the Germans discovered this and swept wings were incorporated into the P1101, which didn’t have twin wing mounted engines like the 262. Mike |
|
Quoted:
Yes P-51s shot down 262s but the majority were while landing. The overall exchange vs allied fighters was very positively in the 262s favor. Early P-80s were not without reliability issues,one bit Dick Bong for example. It was a better plane than the 262 certainly but we aren’t playing by the real world timeline and there is the question of where are these P-80s flying from and what is the Luftwaffe putting in the air? View Quote Let's compare postwar production and service careers - ME-262 - a handful of Czech examples, out of service by 1950. P-80/T-33/F-94/SeaStar - in production until 1959, foriegn production in Canada and Japan, thousands built P-80 retired in 1973 T-33 retired in 2017 |
|
Quoted:
Quoted: It just got added to the mix, and this was off the U-234 https://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/31/us/captured-cargo-captivating-mystery.html that is crazy ! . |
|
Quoted:
Already beaten... Uranium was captured from a U boat View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
wouldn't we have been unable to nuke both Hiroshima and Nagasaki without the uranium recovered from Berlin after the Nazis surrendered? Originally, the U.S. thought they would never build any more weapons to the Little Boy design, but reactor problems led to a plutonium shortage. Unfortunately a lot of designs and drawings had been destroyed and had to be re-created. 6 additional Little Boy bombs were build, which were then followed by 25 more for the Navy for use on the Neptune patrol bomber, if it was launched from a Midway class aircraft carrier on a nuke strike. Doubtless in these bombs is where the German uranium ended up. |
|
Quoted:
My point on the ME262 is that it was never compared and during testing it was never pushed very hard. The Specs on the ME262 are actually considered by many very conservative due to the inability to push the engines. Paul Allen’s ME262 is going to honestly see how well it would have been had germany had the proper materials to build the Jumos. The design of the engines were not at fault, the metallurgy was. I have actually been quite involved with the ME262 project here. I do know that there are many unknowns and down right false info as well, true it wasn’t a dog fighter compared to other piston designs, but the same can be said for the P80. The biggest reason ME262’s were shot down was it’s vulnerability during take off and landing, but then again that was also the same issue of the Gloster Meteor and the P80. View Quote Anyways, I'm a little jealous of you, that's a cool project to be involved with. Please let us know the results. |
|
|
Quoted:
Czechoslovakia had the ME-262 (locally produced as the Avia S-92) in front line service for a year, and tried to export it as well. Perhaps there might be some info on performance from their use of it? The issue with the Avia S-92 was again the same that plagued the ME262. There simply was not the correct metals available. Anyways, I'm a little jealous of you, that's a cool project to be involved with. Please let us know the results. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
My point on the ME262 is that it was never compared and during testing it was never pushed very hard. The Specs on the ME262 are actually considered by many very conservative due to the inability to push the engines. Paul Allen’s ME262 is going to honestly see how well it would have been had germany had the proper materials to build the Jumos. The design of the engines were not at fault, the metallurgy was. I have actually been quite involved with the ME262 project here. I do know that there are many unknowns and down right false info as well, true it wasn’t a dog fighter compared to other piston designs, but the same can be said for the P80. The biggest reason ME262’s were shot down was it’s vulnerability during take off and landing, but then again that was also the same issue of the Gloster Meteor and the P80. The issue with the Avia S-92 was again the same that plagued the ME262. There simply was not the correct metals available. Anyways, I'm a little jealous of you, that's a cool project to be involved with. Please let us know the results. |
|
Quoted:
Germany was already basically out of oil by the end of 1941. 42-45 was basically just delaying the inevitable. This whole thread is made on a false premise, it's not history. Its alt history, which is just a never ending discussion of what ifs. View Quote Germany's fate was sealed the same moment Japan's was, December 1941. Everything that happened afterwards was a prolonged and painful mop-up. There were so many cards dealt against Germany and Japan that there was little chance. It wasn't like WWI where Germany could win it right up until the end. WWII was decided at Stalingrad and Pearl Harbor. After that, Germany and Japan were outmanned, out produced, out teched, and out thought. The only thing Britain and Russia needed to accelerate the inevitable defeat of Germany was the US. Which Churchill knew after they won the battle of Britain. The only thing the US needed to beat Japan was resolve. Which Japan knew going in and their strategy was structured around the US running out of it. They made the mistake of giving us shitloads of it at Pearl. |
|
Quoted:
Yep. Germany's fate was sealed the same moment Japan's was, December 1941. Everything that happened afterwards was a prolonged and painful mop-up. There were so many cards dealt against Germany and Japan that there was little chance. It wasn't like WWI where Germany could win it right up until the end. WWII was decided at Stalingrad and Pearl Harbor. After that, Germany and Japan were outmanned, out produced, out teched, and out thought. The only thing Britain and Russia needed to accelerate the inevitable defeat of Germany was the US. Which Churchill knew after they won the battle of Britain. The only thing the US needed to beat Japan was resolve. Which Japan knew going in and their strategy was structured around the US running out of it. They made the mistake of giving us shitloads of it at Pearl. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Germany was already basically out of oil by the end of 1941. 42-45 was basically just delaying the inevitable. This whole thread is made on a false premise, it's not history. Its alt history, which is just a never ending discussion of what ifs. Germany's fate was sealed the same moment Japan's was, December 1941. Everything that happened afterwards was a prolonged and painful mop-up. There were so many cards dealt against Germany and Japan that there was little chance. It wasn't like WWI where Germany could win it right up until the end. WWII was decided at Stalingrad and Pearl Harbor. After that, Germany and Japan were outmanned, out produced, out teched, and out thought. The only thing Britain and Russia needed to accelerate the inevitable defeat of Germany was the US. Which Churchill knew after they won the battle of Britain. The only thing the US needed to beat Japan was resolve. Which Japan knew going in and their strategy was structured around the US running out of it. They made the mistake of giving us shitloads of it at Pearl. |
|
LUFTWAFEE 1946 (Would Have Happened if ...) |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.