User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 7:19:43 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Where did you find that pic and what package is that? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Exactly. I'm middle aged and remember all the awesome hotrods that I was too young to buy before they got ridiculously expensive. Late 60s to early 70s Broncos and Blazers have always talked to me in a way that I can't describe. So did the Plymouth Superbird but that ain't gonna happen in my life so when I saw Ford was bringing these back and I could reasonably afford a base model with a couple of options I FO'd. Hard. The wife now wants me to reserve one for her. No shit, she said "get both". Not sure I want to do that but at least I got prior permission  More like what I am going to order... page 2 pwn'd! https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/454103/Silkys_Bronco_jpg-1504333.JPG Where did you find that pic and what package is that? Scroll down to the "colorizer": https://www.ford.com/suvs/bronco/2021/ ETA: The package is the Badlands (see fender badge). |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 7:26:29 PM EDT
[#2]
Well now i'm questioning my Wildtrak decision vs Badlands. Hmm.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 7:29:05 PM EDT
[#3]
87% sure i want the Black Diamond with the 2.7,not sure on the other options yet
This is great timing as i plan on selling my 2011 Tacoma next spring and getting a new 4x4 Finally a new ride that has me excited to buy |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 7:32:42 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Scroll down to the "colorizer": https://www.ford.com/suvs/bronco/2021/ ETA: The package is the Badlands (see fender badge). Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Exactly. I'm middle aged and remember all the awesome hotrods that I was too young to buy before they got ridiculously expensive. Late 60s to early 70s Broncos and Blazers have always talked to me in a way that I can't describe. So did the Plymouth Superbird but that ain't gonna happen in my life so when I saw Ford was bringing these back and I could reasonably afford a base model with a couple of options I FO'd. Hard. The wife now wants me to reserve one for her. No shit, she said "get both". Not sure I want to do that but at least I got prior permission More like what I am going to order... page 2 pwn'd! https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/454103/Silkys_Bronco_jpg-1504333.JPG Where did you find that pic and what package is that? Scroll down to the "colorizer": https://www.ford.com/suvs/bronco/2021/ ETA: The package is the Badlands (see fender badge). Thank you sir much appreciated 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 8:12:57 PM EDT
[#5]
Looking around the web, Ford has an absolutely huge hit on their hands.
Hell, I’m interested and it is decidedly not my thing when it comes to vehicles. Might sound a bit crazy, but it reminds me of when the Miata debuted. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 8:18:20 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Looking around the web, Ford has an absolutely huge hit on their hands. Hell, I’m interested and it is decidedly not my thing when it comes to vehicles. Might sound a bit crazy, but it reminds me of when the Miata debuted. This These are gonna be hot for some time before you will get a great deal on one Saving my Ben Franklin's as we speak |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 8:31:54 PM EDT
[#7]
 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 8:45:14 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think that's a good assumption. Ford doesn't exactly have a reputation for sourcing the best manual transmissions, so this could be a blessing in disguise. ? What ford manuals were weak? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 10:27:29 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: ? What ford manuals were weak? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I think that's a good assumption. Ford doesn't exactly have a reputation for sourcing the best manual transmissions, so this could be a blessing in disguise. ? What ford manuals were weak? 2011+ Mustang manual transmissions have been reporting problems since Getrag shifted production of it to China. Outside of that, I don't know of any other common or widespread Ford manual trans issues. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 10:29:08 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Goddam it. 10 speed is a requirement with the sasquatch package as well. The package can't be paired with the manual. I want a 4 door, 2.7, manual trans sasquatch, but you can't get either the 2.7 or the sasquatch package with the manual trans. Is this for sure? I can't find anything on the website and that would suck if they force you into the auto just to get the samsquanch package. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/15/2020 11:48:55 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 2011+ Mustang manual transmissions have been reporting problems since Getrag shifted production of it to China. Outside of that, I don't know of any other common or widespread Ford manual trans issues. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think that's a good assumption. Ford doesn't exactly have a reputation for sourcing the best manual transmissions, so this could be a blessing in disguise. ? What ford manuals were weak? 2011+ Mustang manual transmissions have been reporting problems since Getrag shifted production of it to China. Outside of that, I don't know of any other common or widespread Ford manual trans issues. That's pretty much the entirety of Ford's manual transmission offerings for the past decade outside of the FoST and FiST. I think I remember hearing about some issue with manuals in OBS trucks, but I don't remember details there. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 1:51:18 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is this for sure? I can't find anything on the website and that would suck if they force you into the auto just to get the samsquanch package. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Goddam it. 10 speed is a requirement with the sasquatch package as well. The package can't be paired with the manual. I want a 4 door, 2.7, manual trans sasquatch, but you can't get either the 2.7 or the sasquatch package with the manual trans. Is this for sure? I can't find anything on the website and that would suck if they force you into the auto just to get the samsquanch package. Ford confirmed it on Twitter - Sasquatch requires the auto. They did indicate they were open to feedback on that though, so maybe it'll change. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 1:57:25 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ford confirmed it on Twitter - Sasquatch requires the auto. They did indicate they were open to feedback on that though, so maybe it'll change. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Goddam it. 10 speed is a requirement with the sasquatch package as well. The package can't be paired with the manual. I want a 4 door, 2.7, manual trans sasquatch, but you can't get either the 2.7 or the sasquatch package with the manual trans. Is this for sure? I can't find anything on the website and that would suck if they force you into the auto just to get the samsquanch package. Ford confirmed it on Twitter - Sasquatch requires the auto. They did indicate they were open to feedback on that though, so maybe it'll change. Petition is available...  https://www.change.org/p/ford-offer-the-2021-ford-bronco-with-a-manual-transmission-for-all-packages?utm_content=cl_sharecopy_23494920_en-US%3A1&recruiter=1131797397&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 8:09:13 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ford confirmed it on Twitter - Sasquatch requires the auto. They did indicate they were open to feedback on that though, so maybe it'll change. Bummer. With the sasquatch gearing AND granny gear (C) the crawl ratio would be fucking insane |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 8:13:33 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistorySo in the 4x4 systems for standard it says "4x4 part time selectable engagement" Is that mechanical lever activated? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 8:16:49 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Looking around the web, Ford has an absolutely huge hit on their hands. Hell, I’m interested and it is decidedly not my thing when it comes to vehicles. Might sound a bit crazy, but it reminds me of when the Miata debuted. All the first year glitches won't be fun. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 10:19:25 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So in the 4x4 systems for standard it says "4x4 part time selectable engagement" Is that mechanical lever activated? Pictures also look electronic, not mechanical. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 10:44:25 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Goddam it. 10 speed is a requirement with the sasquatch package as well. The package can't be paired with the manual. I want a 4 door, 2.7, manual trans sasquatch, but you can't get either the 2.7 or the sasquatch package with the manual trans. Is this for sure? I can't find anything on the website and that would suck if they force you into the auto just to get the samsquanch package. Ford confirmed it on Twitter - Sasquatch requires the auto. They did indicate they were open to feedback on that though, so maybe it'll change. Petition is available... https://www.change.org/p/ford-offer-the-2021-ford-bronco-with-a-manual-transmission-for-all-packages?utm_content=cl_sharecopy_23494920_en-US%3A1&recruiter=1131797397&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition Hit. Need more signatures. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 1:33:52 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Goddam it. 10 speed is a requirement with the sasquatch package as well. The package can't be paired with the manual. I want a 4 door, 2.7, manual trans sasquatch, but you can't get either the 2.7 or the sasquatch package with the manual trans. Is this for sure? I can't find anything on the website and that would suck if they force you into the auto just to get the samsquanch package. Ford confirmed it on Twitter - Sasquatch requires the auto. They did indicate they were open to feedback on that though, so maybe it'll change. Petition is available... https://www.change.org/p/ford-offer-the-2021-ford-bronco-with-a-manual-transmission-for-all-packages?utm_content=cl_sharecopy_23494920_en-US%3A1&recruiter=1131797397&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition hit |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 1:38:00 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's pretty much the entirety of Ford's manual transmission offerings for the past decade outside of the FoST and FiST. I think I remember hearing about some issue with manuals in OBS trucks, but I don't remember details there. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I think that's a good assumption. Ford doesn't exactly have a reputation for sourcing the best manual transmissions, so this could be a blessing in disguise. ? What ford manuals were weak? 2011+ Mustang manual transmissions have been reporting problems since Getrag shifted production of it to China. Outside of that, I don't know of any other common or widespread Ford manual trans issues. That's pretty much the entirety of Ford's manual transmission offerings for the past decade outside of the FoST and FiST. I think I remember hearing about some issue with manuals in OBS trucks, but I don't remember details there. The 1/2 tons and Full Size Broncos used mazda 5spds in the 90s that were weak. Fox bodies had notoriously weak 5spds (T5). |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/16/2020 1:47:44 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryDamn... That kinda reminds me of my old Series III Rover. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2020 8:31:49 PM EDT
[#22]
Any time I watch YouTube now it's flooded with anti-Bronco Jeep ads. They know Ford nailed it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2020 8:02:01 AM EDT
[#23]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 12:07:06 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: All the first year glitches won't be fun. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Looking around the web, Ford has an absolutely huge hit on their hands. Hell, I’m interested and it is decidedly not my thing when it comes to vehicles. Might sound a bit crazy, but it reminds me of when the Miata debuted. All the first year glitches won't be fun. People say these things, and it makes sense on the surface, but I'm not sure how relevant the whole "first year" thing is for most models. A new engine, transmission, or other system? Sure. But a new model that mostly uses systems that have already been ironed out in other models? Not that big of a leap. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 12:35:19 PM EDT
[#25]
Final stage of testing/QA is always the end user, unfortunately.
Aircraft, cars, software, appliances...... |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 2:45:31 PM EDT
[#26]
 I sorta just like the looks of this one... I like the steel wheels... you guys think those are the 32's? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 3:05:22 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I finally realized what the Bronco Sport styling reminded me of... https://www.motortrend.com/uploads/sites/5/2020/07/2021-Ford-Bronco-Sport-exterior-4.jpg https://www.cstatic-images.com/car-pictures/xl/cab80fos332a0101.png Just with a more LR-ish front fascia. It reminds me of the previous version of the Escape  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 7:02:12 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It reminds me of the previous version of the Escape https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/332415/Screenshot_20200719-140451_Chrome_jpg-1510865.JPG Wife had one for a bit. I can see the resemblance but it's more "bubbly" or "roundish" IMO. It reminded me more of the flatter sides of the Taurus X. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 7:20:24 PM EDT
[#29]
Looks nice but I really wish they would offer a V8. Maybe down the road when sales start to slip. My friend had an early 302 Bronco with 4-on-the-floor and set of glasspacks. No frills, crappy brakes, handling, and ride, but it made massive torque that would crawl up a steep hill in the woods at idle rpms or burn all 4 tires on dry pavement.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 7:40:33 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Looks nice but I really wish they would offer a V8. Maybe down the road when sales start to slip. My friend had an early 302 Bronco with 4-on-the-floor and set of glasspacks. No frills, crappy brakes, handling, and ride, but it made massive torque that would crawl up a steep hill in the woods at idle rpms or burn all 4 tires on dry pavement. I had an 87 with a 302. Decent rig it lasted me for quite a while, solid motor. Go the ford website and look at the hp/torque specs for their V8 vs the 2.7L Those little motors are putting out some massive tq on par with the V8 |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 8:16:22 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I had an 87 with a 302. Decent rig it lasted me for quite a while, solid motor. Go the ford website and look at the hp/torque specs for their V8 vs the 2.7L Those little motors are putting out some massive tq on par with the V8 Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Looks nice but I really wish they would offer a V8. Maybe down the road when sales start to slip. My friend had an early 302 Bronco with 4-on-the-floor and set of glasspacks. No frills, crappy brakes, handling, and ride, but it made massive torque that would crawl up a steep hill in the woods at idle rpms or burn all 4 tires on dry pavement. I had an 87 with a 302. Decent rig it lasted me for quite a while, solid motor. Go the ford website and look at the hp/torque specs for their V8 vs the 2.7L Those little motors are putting out some massive tq on par with the V8 I had a '95 5.0/5spd. It was fine around town, but absolutely gutless at 70mph. Really comfortable seats and was fun as hell though. The 2.7EB will be a monster. BTW, fuck Jeep for talking about a Hemi Wrangler now. They've had decades to bring the V8 back, but just acted like cock teases with it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 8:50:09 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I had a '95 5.0/5spd. It was fine around town, but absolutely gutless at 70mph. Really comfortable seats and was fun as hell though. The 2.7EB will be a monster. BTW, fuck Jeep for talking about a Hemi Wrangler now. They've had decades to bring the V8 back, but just acted like cock teases with it. Capitalism in action. My friends Bronco was early 70's, very small and light compared to the later full size "OJ" Broncos. Like a tin box on wheels. The 302 was already overkill and he put a 4 barrel intake, cam, and other "Mustang" type mods to make it even more powerful. Later on he bought a Bronco II with a V6 (used the Ranger platform I believe?) that was slow and boring but he was a family man at that point so it served its purpose. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 9:31:17 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Capitalism in action. My friends Bronco was early 70's, very small and light compared to the later full size "OJ" Broncos. Like a tin box on wheels. The 302 was already overkill and he put a 4 barrel intake, cam, and other "Mustang" type mods to make it even more powerful. Later on he bought a Bronco II with a V6 (used the Ranger platform I believe?) that was slow and boring but he was a family man at that point so it served its purpose. I remember when you pretty much needed heads, intake, carb and exhaust to break 300hp. A performance rebuild on the transmission would soon follow. Modern V6s make that easily from the factory. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2020 9:54:11 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I remember when you pretty much needed heads, intake, carb and exhaust to break 300hp. A performance rebuild on the transmission would soon follow. Modern V6s make that easily from the factory. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Capitalism in action. My friends Bronco was early 70's, very small and light compared to the later full size "OJ" Broncos. Like a tin box on wheels. The 302 was already overkill and he put a 4 barrel intake, cam, and other "Mustang" type mods to make it even more powerful. Later on he bought a Bronco II with a V6 (used the Ranger platform I believe?) that was slow and boring but he was a family man at that point so it served its purpose. I remember when you pretty much needed heads, intake, carb and exhaust to break 300hp. A performance rebuild on the transmission would soon follow. Modern V6s make that easily from the factory. Yeah old engines sucked. As I've pointed out before the 2.3 in the current ranger makes double the horsepower and 70 more ft lbs of torque compared to a 77 Bronco which was the last of the originals. I've driven Ford Trucks my whole life. The new motors are awesome. 80 250 with the 300 was as gutless as they get. Yeah it had torque but couldn't even do highway speeds and if it could it would probably get 6mpg. 90 250 with the 460 made good power but was a beast on fuel. 95 250 with the 351 was gutless and bad on fuel. 00 350 with the V10 was pretty solid. Felt really close to my 460 but a little better all around. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 12:06:51 AM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yeah old engines sucked. As I've pointed out before the 2.3 in the current ranger makes double the horsepower and 70 more ft lbs of torque compared to a 77 Bronco which was the last of the originals. I've driven Ford Trucks my whole life. The new motors are awesome. 80 250 with the 300 was as gutless as they get. Yeah it had torque but couldn't even do highway speeds and if it could it would probably get 6mpg. 90 250 with the 460 made good power but was a beast on fuel. 95 250 with the 351 was gutless and bad on fuel. 00 350 with the V10 was pretty solid. Felt really close to my 460 but a little better all around. The little 3.5 five cylinder in my Colorado makes 20% more HP than my old 88 F150 that had a 5.0 in it. I also get 20 mpg in it versus the 8 mpg I got in that old truck. And to think the newer engines stomp that five cylinder just as much if not more. BTW, those V10's might be a PITA to work on but they're fun to drive. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 3:46:10 AM EDT
[#36]
I have a 2.7 ecoboost in my F150 with 35 inch tires. If I drive it like a boomer, I get 20mpg+. The new motors are great. I love the 2.7.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 3:47:24 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You're not going to get a locking differential in an IFS That's where you're wrong... 'cause you're getting lockers in an IFS, if you sasquatch. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 4:30:14 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's where you're wrong... 'cause you're getting lockers in an IFS, if you sasquatch. ...and the ZR2 offered one prior to the Bronco, and the H3 prior to that, etc. GD just being GD |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 7:33:12 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That's where you're wrong... 'cause you're getting lockers in an IFS, if you sasquatch. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: You're not going to get a locking differential in an IFS That's where you're wrong... 'cause you're getting lockers in an IFS, if you sasquatch. For the sake of accuracy, I admitted my shock/surprise somewhat later in the thread when it turned out that they are offering one. I originally thought it was highly unlikely. I am happy that they are, in fact, offering front and rear lockers, because they are nice to have and Jeep needs competition. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 3:17:56 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It reminds me of the previous version of the Escape https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/332415/Screenshot_20200719-140451_Chrome_jpg-1510865.JPG Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I finally realized what the Bronco Sport styling reminded me of... https://www.motortrend.com/uploads/sites/5/2020/07/2021-Ford-Bronco-Sport-exterior-4.jpg https://www.cstatic-images.com/car-pictures/xl/cab80fos332a0101.png Just with a more LR-ish front fascia. It reminds me of the previous version of the Escape https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/332415/Screenshot_20200719-140451_Chrome_jpg-1510865.JPG If you look at what the Escape started as and what it has become today, you can see how Ford could reach the conclusion that there's market space for a more outdoors focused CUV on the same platform. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 3:20:42 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I had a '95 5.0/5spd. It was fine around town, but absolutely gutless at 70mph. Really comfortable seats and was fun as hell though. The 2.7EB will be a monster. BTW, fuck Jeep for talking about a Hemi Wrangler now. They've had decades to bring the V8 back, but just acted like cock teases with it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Looks nice but I really wish they would offer a V8. Maybe down the road when sales start to slip. My friend had an early 302 Bronco with 4-on-the-floor and set of glasspacks. No frills, crappy brakes, handling, and ride, but it made massive torque that would crawl up a steep hill in the woods at idle rpms or burn all 4 tires on dry pavement. I had an 87 with a 302. Decent rig it lasted me for quite a while, solid motor. Go the ford website and look at the hp/torque specs for their V8 vs the 2.7L Those little motors are putting out some massive tq on par with the V8 I had a '95 5.0/5spd. It was fine around town, but absolutely gutless at 70mph. Really comfortable seats and was fun as hell though. The 2.7EB will be a monster. BTW, fuck Jeep for talking about a Hemi Wrangler now. They've had decades to bring the V8 back, but just acted like cock teases with it. They don't really have a choice. They woke up one day and found themselves in an arms race. The 2.7L EB is significantly better than anything currently under the hood of the JL/JT, and FCA has to respond to that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 4:59:06 PM EDT
[#42]
My wife likes her EcoBoost 2.0L Escape with the AWD, but an off road vehicle it is not. Surprisingly decent in light snow though.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 5:40:06 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My wife likes her EcoBoost 2.0L Escape with the AWD, but an off road vehicle it is not. Surprisingly decent in light snow though. In all honesty 90% of those lusting for the new Bronco will take it off road as often as your wife does with her Escape. As a parts supplier I'm sure not going to discourage any city dwelling office commuters or soccer moms from buying one just for shits and giggles though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 7:07:31 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They don't really have a choice. They woke up one day and found themselves in an arms race. The 2.7L EB is significantly better than anything currently under the hood of the JL/JT, and FCA has to respond to that. They could've set the bar when the JK was introduced. We'd be getting the 3.5 in the Bronco instead of the 2.7....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 7:08:58 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: My wife likes her EcoBoost 2.0L Escape with the AWD, but an off road vehicle it is not. Surprisingly decent in light snow though. That's a shame. My gen 1 was pretty impressive for what it was. Went through 12" of snow and drifts up to the headlights without a problem. Went down some pretty gnarly forest roads with ease also. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 7:29:37 PM EDT
[#46]
Pretty good look at a sasquatch 2 door up close video
More pics in link https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/video-3-broncos-at-different-heights-and-roof-rack-on-2-door-updated-with-more-photos-including-cactus-gray.2436/  Failed To Load Title |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 8:20:10 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Pretty good look at a sasquatch 2 door up close video More pics in link https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/video-3-broncos-at-different-heights-and-roof-rack-on-2-door-updated-with-more-photos-including-cactus-gray.2436/  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9fUtkvGgSYI wonder why he blurred the yellow paint on the diff? The 2 door looks great, I'm not as big a fan of the 4 door. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 8:31:25 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I wonder why he blurred the yellow paint on the diff? The 2 door looks great, I'm not as big a fan of the 4 door. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Pretty good look at a sasquatch 2 door up close video More pics in link https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/video-3-broncos-at-different-heights-and-roof-rack-on-2-door-updated-with-more-photos-including-cactus-gray.2436/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9fUtkvGgSYI wonder why he blurred the yellow paint on the diff? The 2 door looks great, I'm not as big a fan of the 4 door. Not sure. Yeah the 2 door is the one to get. Looks great with the wider fender flares and 35's Im stuck on which one to get.The online builder with prices on options etc is coming in August on fords website |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2020 10:48:49 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Not sure. Yeah the 2 door is the one to get. Looks great with the wider fender flares and 35's Im stuck on which one to get.The online builder with prices on options etc is coming in August on fords website I'm really conflicted on what package to get. I'm thinking 2dr wildtrak. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/21/2020 4:24:59 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They could've set the bar when the JK was introduced. We'd be getting the 3.5 in the Bronco instead of the 2.7.... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: They don't really have a choice. They woke up one day and found themselves in an arms race. The 2.7L EB is significantly better than anything currently under the hood of the JL/JT, and FCA has to respond to that. They could've set the bar when the JK was introduced. We'd be getting the 3.5 in the Bronco instead of the 2.7.... In the absence of competition, companies don't have much incentive to innovate, invest, or even try. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File