User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 8:04:19 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ummmm yeah! We are living in a 1st world banana republic! I have no faith that justice will be served! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Attorney General Loretta Lynch will appear on Fox News Special Report with Brett Baier on Monday at 6:00 pm. Harris Faulkner of Fox News is reporting that Lynch will appear in an attempt to reassure the American people that the Justice Department is taking the investigation seriously. Ummmm yeah! We are living in a 1st world banana republic! I have no faith that justice will be served! I want to see as much of this info get out as possible. Let's see exactly how banana republic Obama and his supporters are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 8:58:05 PM EDT
[#2]
Final document dump of Clinton emails today.
Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:00:11 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:03:44 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. Uh oh. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:05:24 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. So they actually have the 18-1/2 minutes of Hillary tape? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:09:40 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. We can only hope. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:11:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. Interesting that we are hearing about this with the last document dump. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:12:43 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We can only hope. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. We can only hope. Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:13:35 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Interesting that we are hearing about this with the last document dump. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. Interesting that we are hearing about this with the last document dump. Yup. But that could be for reasons favoring either side if you think about it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:14:50 PM EDT
[#10]
Catherine Herridge also reported more. I was in the process of posting it here and my mind suddenly went blank and I was unable to remember what it was. Attempting to recover thought process....
That's it. She is reporting the FBI has recovered much of the deleted emails from Clinton's illegally erased server. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:14:51 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. We can only hope. Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? It would be prosecution. You don't want to publish the evidence you're going to use against someone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:15:01 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. We can only hope. Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? Sure would be interesting if it was an order from someone else. Just dreaming. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:17:20 PM EDT
[#13]
In the Loretta Lynch interview today it was eye opening when she responded to the question about Pratreus being prosecuted for much less than what Clinton has been proved to have done.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:25:57 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In the Loretta Lynch interview today it was eye opening when she responded to the question about Pratreus being prosecuted for much less than what Clinton has been proved to have done. What I found interesting is she kept repeating the "We will do what we always do" thing. All I could think of is to take her word for it: if a democrat they will always get a pass. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:27:38 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In the Loretta Lynch interview today it was eye opening when she responded to the question about Pratreus being prosecuted for much less than what Clinton has been proved to have done. Go on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:31:27 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The vast majority of contractors conduct their official business on servers provided by the hiring organization. If a contract company is operating their own systems, particularly in the case of Classified, those systems must meet the same configuration and physical security standards as the Government systems and are subject to inspection for compliance. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
FIY. Contractors most certainly can conduct"official" business with the gov using their contractor-owned servers. And I'm not entirely certainthe gov employee restriction is not just "policy" vice law. Now, in Clinton's case, she most certainly could have had a SCIF with JWICS and SIPR terminals installed in her house at taxpayer expense if she asked for it. I'd bet WHCA installed a STE as a matter of course for Cabinet members. She had to deliberately try to do what she did. ETA - and I heard GEN Hayden (former DIRNSA/DCI) on the radio this evening say that he would lose all respect for a lot of foreign intelligence agencies if they had not sucked her personal server dry. The vast majority of contractors conduct their official business on servers provided by the hiring organization. If a contract company is operating their own systems, particularly in the case of Classified, those systems must meet the same configuration and physical security standards as the Government systems and are subject to inspection for compliance. Indeed. We may be into semantics...Contractor = the company holding the contract. Contractor employees are not contractors, per se, although the terminology is generally blurred. I've been an AISSO for contractor-owned classified systems. It's a pain, but not much of a pain. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:31:41 PM EDT
[#17]
I have no faith that that lying bitch will get any punishment whatsoever.
(I would love to be wrong) |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:32:00 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Catherine Herridge also reported more. I was in the process of posting it here and my mind suddenly went blank and I was unable to remember what it was. Attempting to recover thought process.... That's it. She is reporting the FBI has recovered much of the deleted emails from Clinton's illegally erased server. That was originally reported a little while ago. There was a FOIA request for the recovered emails but it was turned down due to the FBI's investigation. ETA: A link to a story about the emails being recovered. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/22/fbi-reportedly-recovered-deleted-emails-from-clinton-server.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:33:50 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
They said six emails. Not much of a crime. I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:35:30 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Indeed. We may be into semantics...Contractor = the company holding the contract. Contractor employees are not contractors, per se, although the terminology is generally blurred. I've been an AISSO for contractor-owned classified systems. It's a pain, but not much of a pain. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
FIY. Contractors most certainly can conduct"official" business with the gov using their contractor-owned servers. And I'm not entirely certainthe gov employee restriction is not just "policy" vice law. Now, in Clinton's case, she most certainly could have had a SCIF with JWICS and SIPR terminals installed in her house at taxpayer expense if she asked for it. I'd bet WHCA installed a STE as a matter of course for Cabinet members. She had to deliberately try to do what she did. ETA - and I heard GEN Hayden (former DIRNSA/DCI) on the radio this evening say that he would lose all respect for a lot of foreign intelligence agencies if they had not sucked her personal server dry. The vast majority of contractors conduct their official business on servers provided by the hiring organization. If a contract company is operating their own systems, particularly in the case of Classified, those systems must meet the same configuration and physical security standards as the Government systems and are subject to inspection for compliance. Indeed. We may be into semantics...Contractor = the company holding the contract. Contractor employees are not contractors, per se, although the terminology is generally blurred. I've been an AISSO for contractor-owned classified systems. It's a pain, but not much of a pain. FWIW, that's why I've tried to stay out of the weeds. We're into territory that is difficult to keep at a layman level and a lot of folks get hung up on a picture of how they think things "should" work. In truth, it may not differ much from how it "does" work but there's usually a couple layers of "meaning of 'is'" to cut through if we're being accurate in our portrayals. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:37:24 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They said six emails. Not much of a crime. I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Maybe they are talking about the number of emails between Hillary and the WH. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:37:31 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They said six emails. Not much of a crime. I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. We were talking about emails to or from Obama. It was reported that none of them contained classified info. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:37:40 PM EDT
[#23]
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:42:29 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet? Biden hasn't announced yet. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:42:42 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet? No, but he doesn't want Hilldog. He won't let the Clintons drag his party back to the center. He loathes them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:44:36 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We were talking about emails to or from Obama. It was reported that none of them contained classified info. Yes, but State reported that. Who else vetted these? I actually doubt these were highly classified, but they may put the two of them in a very bad light. But State has tended to try to spin things to make Clinton look good, but that is hard to do when CIA (or whoever) is saying "no, that's born classified information". Emails between Clinton and Obama that State says are not classified and Obama doesn't want to release . . . yeah, I don't trust anyone involved. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:45:32 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, but he doesn't want Hilldog. He won't let the Clintons drag his party back to the center. He loathes them. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet? No, but he doesn't want Hilldog. He won't let the Clintons drag his party back to the center. He loathes them. I don't think she will drag anything back to the center. She may not want to defend Iran from Israel, if it comes to that . . . |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:45:42 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Biden hasn't announced yet. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet? Biden hasn't announced yet. Good thing they have super delegates. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:46:13 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It would be prosecution. You don't want to publish the evidence you're going to use against someone. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. We can only hope. Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? It would be prosecution. You don't want to publish the evidence you're going to use against someone. Wasn't there another email were she told them to send info unsecured? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:47:01 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FWIW, that's why I've tried to stay out of the weeds. We're into territory that is difficult to keep at a layman level and a lot of folks get hung up on a picture of how they think things "should" work. In truth, it may not differ much from how it "does" work but there's usually a couple layers of "meaning of 'is'" to cut through if we're being accurate in our portrayals. The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:48:36 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That was originally reported a little while ago. There was a FOIA request for the recovered emails but it was turned down due to the FBI's investigation. ETA: A link to a story about the emails being recovered. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/22/fbi-reportedly-recovered-deleted-emails-from-clinton-server.html Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Catherine Herridge also reported more. I was in the process of posting it here and my mind suddenly went blank and I was unable to remember what it was. Attempting to recover thought process.... That's it. She is reporting the FBI has recovered much of the deleted emails from Clinton's illegally erased server. That was originally reported a little while ago. There was a FOIA request for the recovered emails but it was turned down due to the FBI's investigation. ETA: A link to a story about the emails being recovered. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/22/fbi-reportedly-recovered-deleted-emails-from-clinton-server.html I hope they did recover the deleted emails. I would love to see her reaction when she is told. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:55:28 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They said six emails. Not much of a crime. I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Over 1,800 a week ago of total classified emails. 22 top secret or above. 8 emails to Obama a few weeks ago |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:56:06 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wasn't there another email were she told them to send info unsecured? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Final document dump of Clinton emails today. Catherine Herridge reporting that one email was held back at request from law enforcement. She is reporting that FBI sources say it is a smoking gun document that shows intent to bypass government security measures. We can only hope. Held back from the public in an attempt to do what and for what purpose? Prosecution? Obfuscation? It would be prosecution. You don't want to publish the evidence you're going to use against someone. Wasn't there another email were she told them to send info unsecured? Yes, but it was not a smoking gun. She claimed that there was confusion, and the info was not sent. It could be used against her, but it didn't prove anything. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 9:59:28 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, but it was not a smoking gun. She claimed that there was confusion, and the info was not sent. It could be used against her, but it didn't prove anything. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Wasn't there another email were she told them to send info unsecured? Yes, but it was not a smoking gun. She claimed that there was confusion, and the info was not sent. It could be used against her, but it didn't prove anything. The smoking gun email is a new one that is being held back completely. Could it be an email telling someone to wipe the server? You know, with like a cloth. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:00:50 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
FWIW, that's why I've tried to stay out of the weeds. We're into territory that is difficult to keep at a layman level and a lot of folks get hung up on a picture of how they think things "should" work. In truth, it may not differ much from how it "does" work but there's usually a couple layers of "meaning of 'is'" to cut through if we're being accurate in our portrayals. The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. That line is doing nothing but buying time with the polls. The people believe that it matters that they weren't classified when sent, but she absolutely knows better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:04:53 PM EDT
[#36]
Might be time to petition Zhukov to fire up the "Official" Biden and Warren threads.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:06:26 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That line is doing nothing but buying time with the polls. The people believe that it matters that they weren't classified when sent, but she absolutely knows better. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. That line is doing nothing but buying time with the polls. The people believe that it matters that they weren't classified when sent, but she absolutely knows better. Sure. The intelligence agencies are saying the info was classified at the time. One of Clinton's henchmen lifted the info directly from the properly marked classified document and put it, sans markings, into her server. She knows full well what she was doing. She also knows most of her supporters are too stupid to figure it out or too corrupt to care. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:09:09 PM EDT
[#38]
face it, this administration will attempt to obfuscate, stall, hinder, assemble roadblocks, stonewall this thing as long as possible. They were complicit and they planned on taking advantage of the gambit she was inflicting on the administration and the American people. But, it backfired on them.......what possibly started out as ploy by Valerie and her minions to control the Clintons soon devolved into a federal investigation that took on a life of it's own.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:09:53 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, but it was not a smoking gun. She claimed that there was confusion, and the info was not sent. It could be used against her, but it didn't prove anything. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Wasn't there another email were she told them to send info unsecured? Yes, but it was not a smoking gun. She claimed that there was confusion, and the info was not sent. It could be used against her, but it didn't prove anything. It was a State memo, and if the info was only classified by State she as OCA could send it. If the info in the memo was classified by another OCA it is another matter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:12:29 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Over 1,800 a week ago of total classified emails. 22 top secret or above. 8 emails to Obama a few weeks ago Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They said six emails. Not much of a crime. I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Over 1,800 a week ago of total classified emails. 22 top secret or above. 8 emails to Obama a few weeks ago Jesus....Anyone else would be facing a long career in Federal PMITA prison. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:13:46 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good thing they have super delegates. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet? Biden hasn't announced yet. Good thing they have super delegates. further proof that the dems have their primary system criminally fixed, nothing like a bunch of apparatchiks to make sure the establishment's guy wins. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:13:57 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sure. The intelligence agencies are saying the info was classified at the time. One of Clinton's henchmen lifted the info directly from the properly marked classified document and put it, sans markings, into her server. She knows full well what she was doing. She also knows most of her supporters are too stupid to figure it out or too corrupt to care. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. That line is doing nothing but buying time with the polls. The people believe that it matters that they weren't classified when sent, but she absolutely knows better. Sure. The intelligence agencies are saying the info was classified at the time. One of Clinton's henchmen lifted the info directly from the properly marked classified document and put it, sans markings, into her server. She knows full well what she was doing. She also knows most of her supporters are too stupid to figure it out or too corrupt to care. The next step will be to blame it all on her staff. They are in deep shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:15:25 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Jesus....Anyone else would be facing a long career in Federal PMITA prison. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They said six emails. Not much of a crime. I heard "fewer than 2 dozen" However, the quantity of emails isn't the crime. The content is key, and the administration wants to keep them under wraps. Edited to add: few emails between SoS and POTUS would suggest a rather dysfunctional administration, unless they typically communicated in other ways. But Clinton used lots of emails. You guys aren't keeping up. Last I heard the count was over 1300 classified e-mails. Over 1,800 a week ago of total classified emails. 22 top secret or above. 8 emails to Obama a few weeks ago Jesus....Anyone else would be facing a long career in Federal PMITA prison. our Republic is effectively dead. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:15:26 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The next step will be to blame it all on her staff. They are in deep shit. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. That line is doing nothing but buying time with the polls. The people believe that it matters that they weren't classified when sent, but she absolutely knows better. Sure. The intelligence agencies are saying the info was classified at the time. One of Clinton's henchmen lifted the info directly from the properly marked classified document and put it, sans markings, into her server. She knows full well what she was doing. She also knows most of her supporters are too stupid to figure it out or too corrupt to care. The next step will be to blame it all on her staff. They are in deep shit. As they should be. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:16:16 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The next step will be to blame it all on her staff. They are in deep shit. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Clinton/State narrative "they were not marked classified at the time" is clear meaning of "is" spin. That line is doing nothing but buying time with the polls. The people believe that it matters that they weren't classified when sent, but she absolutely knows better. Sure. The intelligence agencies are saying the info was classified at the time. One of Clinton's henchmen lifted the info directly from the properly marked classified document and put it, sans markings, into her server. She knows full well what she was doing. She also knows most of her supporters are too stupid to figure it out or too corrupt to care. The next step will be to blame it all on her staff. They are in deep shit. all it takes, is one, to roll |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:16:42 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
face it, this administration will attempt to obfuscate, stall, hinder, assemble roadblocks, stonewall this thing as long as possible. They were complicit and they planned on taking advantage of the gambit she was inflicting on the administration and the American people. But, it backfired on them.......what possibly started out as ploy by Valerie and her minions to control the Clintons soon devolved into a federal investigation that took on a life of it's own. That's pretty much my ttake on it all as well. Especially the investigation taking on a life of its own. There is no telling how this will shake out. But I wouldn't rule out some sort of Black Swan where she gets thrown under the bus because it's all too big and out of control to cover up. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:17:53 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
further proof that the dems have their primary system criminally fixed, nothing like a bunch of apparatchiks to make sure the establishment's guy wins. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Has Obama endorsed anyone for President yet? Biden hasn't announced yet. Good thing they have super delegates. further proof that the dems have their primary system criminally fixed, nothing like a bunch of apparatchiks to make sure the establishment's guy wins. Comes in handy when your main go to candidate is under indictment and the average guy in the middle says fuck it, not voting this time. Now they can just dust off an acceptable alternative to Bernie and that person can still be nominated. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:23:21 PM EDT
[#48]
Any day now.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:27:05 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As they should be. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The next step will be to blame it all on her staff. They are in deep shit. As they should be. Absolutely. They get a full share. But the way I see it, the only way she gets away with this is to dump it all on them. Hopefully, the "smoking gun" pins her with the brunt of it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/29/2016 10:33:39 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
all it takes, is one, to roll Would that take a prosecutor offering immunity in return for information? That's exactly what Lynch / Obama seem to be avoiding. FBI isn't the one who can cut a deal. They just investigate. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
